View: https://youtu.be/qhPGbr51jfc
And slowly, you come to realise
It's all as it should be
You can only do so much
Blackpill Masculinity is an actual social construct and More - Studies
View: https://youtu.be/qhPGbr51jfc
And slowly, you come to realise
It's all as it should be
You can only do so much
Cucked retard. You missed the whole (correct and high iq) point and are probably it infiltrator
i literally linked a study about what I said in the OP which specifically mentions it.
It's the first fucking link, quote:
As always, the person critiquing me reduces the blackpill to a personal issue, like my only argument is some internalized bitterness about the opposite sex. This is not about me, I only care about whats true or not, and not my personal preference. As the study states, manhood can be revoked or diminished, unlike womanhood, which is rooted in being a biological woman. My point stands, no counter was provided, case closed.
The fucktard is probably a foid IT infiltrator. That’s why he/she cannot grasp the idea of abstract thought detached from personal interest.
Holy shit this idiot really compared women having muscles (which btw has entire porn sections dedicated to) to men being non masculine hence not desired by fucking anyone
Litterally ANYTHING you mentioned makes the woman still appreciated or sexually desired. Sometimes even MORE. There are millions of men into girls with hairs, muscles (are you even kidding me, giga tard?) while there are no girls into broke, short ugly men. Also the lack of nurturing qualities (at least write decently) never made women lose a single fucking point in the SMV if anything they are praised for that by femishit soyciety or by cucks using them as moneymistresses or shit like that.
Your whole point is stupid, invalid and lacks awareness to a embarassing level. Foids problems, especially what you cited, are litterally nothing compared to their equivalent male problems.
Go back to it, fucktard
You normies really struggle to understand the ideas of attacking someone for abstract reasons not becayse ME ME ME personally i have something to gain from that (ME MEME MEEE). It’s litterally like you are retarded.
What part of men defend women while women do not defend men and this creates a strong imbalance don’t you understand?
Even if i had or when i had some kind of success with women i still didn’t change my mind about them a single fucking bit. I loathe women because they would love to see me dominate other men or insult inferior men, not for my lack of capability to do so.
Abstract morality. Want me to draw for you? Is it too difficult?
even on this forum we literally have a micro-cult dedicated to muscular "amazonian" women.
Just ask @wereq and look into his server.
And I am not saying that to shit on him, because I am one of them actually. I love big women, I love fat women, I love tall women with a big frame.
Men have zero standards, honestly. And this too has been proven over and over again - look at these studies here for example:
[MULTIPLE STUDIES] Juggernaut law confirmed. Ugly women are more likely to be married and have more sex partners.
A study here shows that very unattractive women are more likely to be married by age 29 than unattractive or average women. Also, another study shows unattractive men were less likely to find a marriage partner than other men whereas this wasn't the case for unattractive women. In the study...
incels.is
Unattractive women more likely to be married
The existence of femcels once again debunked (water wet) The analysis of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) shows that very unattractive women were significantly more likely to be married at Age 29 than unattractive or average-looking women, and their spouses or...
incels.is
These quotes from the second thread in particular:
- For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level.
- For women, physical attractiveness does not affect the likelihood of any of those events occurring.
- Among women, physical attractiveness did not matter when it came to mating. The results for women indicate that attractiveness did not matter.
I kinda expect you to be some kind of shit testing/bullyinng apologist fucktard.
Normie boomer gonna boom
Attachments
I really do not know where that retard even came from with such a pathetic stupid ass comparison.even on this forum we literally have a micro-cult dedicated to muscular "amazonian" women.
Just ask @wereq and look into his server.
And I am not saying that to shit on him, because I am one of them actually. I love big women, I love fat women, I love tall women with a big frame.
Men have zero standards, honestly. And this too has been proven over and over again - look at these studies here for example:
[MULTIPLE STUDIES] Juggernaut law confirmed. Ugly women are more likely to be married and have more sex partners.
A study here shows that very unattractive women are more likely to be married by age 29 than unattractive or average women. Also, another study shows unattractive men were less likely to find a marriage partner than other men whereas this wasn't the case for unattractive women. In the study...
Unattractive women more likely to be married
The existence of femcels once again debunked (water wet) The analysis of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) shows that very unattractive women were significantly more likely to be married at Age 29 than unattractive or average-looking women, and their spouses or...
These quotes from the second thread in particular:
- For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level.
- For women, physical attractiveness does not affect the likelihood of any of those events occurring.
- Among women, physical attractiveness did not matter when it came to mating. The results for women indicate that attractiveness did not matter.
Muh women have problem too! Rich people cannot go out safely at night that means you starving bastard are suffering just like da poor rich people! You should acknowledge their problems te heeee
I love waiting for end of the world. I send my intentions it will come soon
Don’t even waste time with this tard. He litterally compared foids with muscles (loved litterally by anyone and with entire fetishes dedicated) to short, weak, broke incel men. IT tier faggot
Just recently I have read in local news about some politician saying about another that he doesn't have a spine and doesn't deserve to bear a name 'man'.
Masculinity don't mean fighting other men
this whole post is water but at least the r/inceltears retards can see that hatred towards women stems from deep inequality from the beginning and is rational. You'd have to be a complete brainlet to lose as a woman, with all the advantages they have for simply existing is insane."You're not a real woman!"
Said no one ever.
Why?
Why does that only work on men?
The answer is two-fold
1. women have inherent value, you can't loose your woman card because being a woman is synonymous with having female flesh.
2. masculinity as its propagated by women and society largely harms men and benefits women.
According to this study, you actually need to work constantly to maintain your status as a "real man" - Sisyphus anyone?
I will now explain point 1 and 2 a bit more in detail:
1. Why do Women have more value
a) TL;DR Water Wet, the only thing that makes a woman a woman is her looks
I don't believe in evo-psych sorry. I think it's even completely unnecessary to recount elaborate fables for certain human behaviors, when the same behaviors could simply be explained by narcissism.
Besides, the entire discussion usually slips into female-worship when you bring up evolution, because the implication that for instance "men are disposable" implies that all women are somehow 10/10 genetically perfect and healthy creatures, since the majority of them reproduce. So all women have perfect genes, and if we just let women reproduce with chads, everyone would be 10/10?
This is retarded and foid worship. Especially given that the fetus spends 9 months inside the foid growing, yet somehow only the males sperm is responsible for ALL the traits the child has? Again, foid worship because it leaves the females responsibility out of the equation. If anything the health and nutritional profile of the mother is WAY more important than DNA. Look into nutrition please, "Nutrition and Physical Degeneration" by Weston A. Price is a good starting point. Your looks are mostly shaped by factors such as maternal nutrition, breastfeeding, correct chewing, swallowing and breathing patterns etc.
Good article on the suppression of medical data showing that animal fats are good for you:
The sugar conspiracy | Ian Leslie
The Long Read: In 1972, a British scientist sounded the alarm that sugar – and not fat – was the greatest danger to our health. But his findings were ridiculed and his reputation ruined. How did the world’s top nutrition scientists get it so wrong for so long?www.theguardian.com
Neoteny in women is also often not the result of sexual dimorphism but simply nutritional degeneration. It is just not as apparent in women because women, unlike men, profit from looking neotenous. If the genders were healthy and fully developed after being raised on the correct diet, sexual dimorphism would be reduced greatly.
"Sorry sweaty its just natural selection" - so why does the majority of women reproduce? This is a simple logical fallacy, which, if brought to its conclusion, implies women somehow are more healthy, genetically superior and smarter than men. This is foid-worship, without a doubt.
So, I propose an alternative theory for why women are more valued, with a different starting presupposition:
1. Men respond to neoteny in any form, puppies, children, women with parental instinct (origin of instinct is debatable)
2. Women do everything in their power to exaggerate sexual dimorphism and increase neoteny (Esther Vilar wrote about this in her 1971 book "The Manipulated Man")
3. The mechanism (for lack of a better word) that makes men forgive women, is the same mechanism that makes men forgive a dog for shitting on the rug.
Dogs, btw, are nutritionally deficient mutants bred to look retarded and neotenous. It's literally like having a down syndrome child in your home, but on purpose. Women anyone?
3 million dog bites that need medical attention in US every year, yet nobody cares. Why? Neoteny, the dog is never blamed. If it was a hyena people would put it through meat grinder and applaud the person doing it.
It's the same mechanism that shields women from blame. It's just their looks. Stupid example to make a point: If a woman looked like a man, but acted the same, would her behavior be remotely acceptable? No, of course not -> ALWAYS genderswap in your head. Use faceapp on bitches to see what they would look like as men, then you can tell their actual nature. Some bitches look like thugs when genderswapped and their behavior always matches the looks.
So, the only thing that keeps women from getting their register pounded six days from tomorrow is their looks. Obviously.
b) INSANE female in-group bias (4.5 times the one men have, men have ZERO - study below)
Now, this one is less discussed and may come as a surprise to some here.
1. women are the only group in society that has innate in-group preference for their own gender
2. this means women naturally form a "herd" or "hive"
3. women trust women; men trust women; men fight men; ->society
That means, society is only women. Men fighting to get female validation is an attempt to get BACK into society.
ALL men are viewed as and out-group by both men and women. Every man is a stranger effectively.
The only way to get away from this, is by being accepted by women. If one woman accepts you, all do and thus, you are part of society (which is only women).
That's why people always act suspicious around single males, but not around men with women.
What that means for us is that the female in-group dictates which traits men need to display to get access to their in-group. Aka, women define what masculinity is.
As always, everything women say is projection.
Femininity is a social construct, designed to encourage certain behaviors in men by negation. These behaviors are then called "Masculinity."
Example:
Women act weak and helpless, there for its Masculine to be strong and help women (Female hypoagency).
This is also a classic manipulation tactic. The easiest way to manipulate people is by giving them what they want, because people don't question compliments (Just world fallacy + Fundamental Attribution Error).
What they do is basically pretend to be weak so the man feels empowered in his pseudo "masculinity" (which is only contingent on women liking him). That makes the man feel powerful and in charge, while she is actually in power and retains plausible deniability.
In reality, women are extremely powerful. This can not be stated enough. Women are infinitely more powerful than men. Their in-group preference alone makes them unstoppable. Imagine having 50% of society unconditionally supporting you + simps worshipping you and ready to kill another man at your order.
The reason why women project that there has to be a patriarchy is because it matches their IRL experience of life.
They constantly cheat the system by getting support from other women. They are like the mafia, but its half of society + simps as their cronies.
Additionally, women control 80% of customer spending or more, depending on sector:
The Purchasing Power of Women: Statistics | Girlpower Marketing
Women control over $20 trillion in world-wide spending. Learn more about the purchasing power of women, from Millennials to Baby Boomers, in various marketsgirlpowermarketing.com
View attachment 744382
This statistic alone should send shivers down your spine.
The implication here is that 40% of the money women spend comes from men, AT THE VERY LEAST.
Furthermore, women hold most of the wealth.
More studies here:
An additional study where they made men and women play an online RPG together. After some time, the women held the majority of the resources and power, while engaging in less risk taking behavior (fighting, dying, competing) -> men gave them all their resources. Even in a video game.
This means exactly what it sounds like.
4.5 in-group preference = women form a large, coherent hive-body with no individualism. This also makes them lesbian.
Men fuck each other. Up.
TL;DR of study:
1. women have much higher in-group bias for other women, communicate much more, have stronger networks to support each other - sisterhood mafia, women are jews
2. men kill each other but paradoxically trust women instantly and surrender all their resources to them
3. as result women are extremely empowered with both males serving them and providing them with resources while women take zero risks of their own
4. society. study link below.
How women organize social networks different from men - Scientific Reports
Superpositions of social networks, such as communication, friendship, or trade networks, are called multiplex networks, forming the structural backbone of human societies. Novel datasets now allow quantification and exploration of multiplex networks. Here we study gender-specific differences of...www.nature.com
That means, women are in total control of society on any level. They dictate beliefs, thoughts, how men view themselves, who gets big on social media, they dictate the entire market through their spending etc...
I want you to pay attention on livestreams, where the money comes from when they do superchats and shit.
I think even Karl Marx wrote that you can't start a revolution with men. You kickstart the foids first and the men follow.
How Marx and Engels fought for women’s liberation
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels were champions of women’s liberation, both in theory and in practice, in public and in private.1 Important work has already been published exploring both Marx’s and Engels’s writings about women and the family, and developing… Continue Reading →isj.org.uk
It all comes down to something we all are familar with: Briffaults law
Briffault's law states:
Now, in the light of all of the above, consider the insane power women hold in society. It's truly staggering how powerless men are.
Please think about this:
How pathetic, I can't stress this enough, HOW PATHETIC is it to tell young men to "just go to the gym" in the light of this?
How absolutely comical is it to make young men participate in a race this rigged?
The biggest pill is the genderpill: IF YOU ARE BORN MALE ITS OVER
That's why "masculinity" doesn't exist outside the context of what women want, that's why you can loose it. It's a passport to society that can be revoked by women at any time. It's a conditional surrender of your individuality and dignity in favor of women.
LASTLY: IF YOU CHASE MONEY, YOU ALSO SERVE WOMEN
If it isn't obvious at this point:
1. women control all the wealth, directly and indirectly
2. if you want to be successful in any way financially, you have to cater to women
3. by chasing money you indirectly support women by providing them services and further exploiting men
4. to chase money means to compete with other men for female validation, women don't compete like that, they support each other (4.5 in-group pref)
5. women act just like jewsh with their retarded-tier high in-group preference and nepotism. If you go along with this, you're a jew. A female with a male body would just be jew tbh.
Chasing money is a feminine trait. It's female centered, it serves females, it gets you female attention -> its feminine
There's a reason why it says in the Gospels, you can either serve God or Mammon, not both. A man can only have one master.
- Matthew 6:24, KJV
Tags:
@lifefuel @MortonZnk @M.Yass @Med Amine @Tarquinius
Ok absolute women's rights
It does a lot
Masculinity is a toxic word created by privileged men and often now used by women to blackmail their male victims.
Meanwhile, bitches fuck with pretty boys all day long(they can't even lift 20kg or 44lbs) and the masculine one goes to the gym fucking up their ankles and watching Zyzz videos on JewTube for inspirational purposes. Jfl.
Masculinity... What a toxic word.
Meanwhile, bitches fuck with pretty boys all day long(they can't even lift 20kg or 44lbs) and the masculine one goes to the gym fucking up their ankles and watching Zyzz videos on JewTube for inspirational purposes. Jfl.
Masculinity... What a toxic word.
on looksmax I once read this guy who said he knew this prettyboy chad who had the lowest fucking t-levels, like clinically low
and he said despite this, this guy would get tons of pussy
ive seen similar things in irl.
Dudes working out and destroying their body
and then tall lanklet with v-neck shirt shows up and just gets pussy
These memes capture it perfectly:
1. only gay guys hit on you (if you even get big - you need insertions, frame, metabolism etc)
2. nothing changes even if you get big
3. lanklet DYEL chads get all the pussy (the guy in the meme with the white shirt, I literally met a dude in the mental hospital who looked 1:1 like that, same hair, face, shirt, height. Suffice to say he was a slayer)
Besides thats, there may be health risks to going to the gym that people dont talk about. Here is something I PMed someone:
That gym part seems to be a cope. Gym is useless for attracting others but necessary for yourself.
Being 5'4 manlet it is essential you have a good physique and learn some martial arts to defend yourself
Fat isn't bad for you, saturated fat is. It will increase LDL cholesterol and clog up your arteries.
A balanced diet with required amounts of carbs, protein and fat is ideal.
Last edited:
Other factors such as cigarettes, alcohol and drugs effect your health, sleep and well being as well.
Reminds me, in my home country (Poland) I often get shit for looking young/having "young" face, I guess cool/masculine thing to do is to look like you're destroyed by alcohol and manual labour at the ripe age of 20, JFL
Really high effort post here. Reminds me of the many conversations I've heard when I was eavesdropping on boomer dads drinking. All of them know these truths and they are contempt with it. Sexhavers are ALL SIMPS, well everyone that isn't Chad.
Oh, so basically what women say is honorable. Got it!
Similar threads
Toxic Femininity
''In times of war, women are not killed because of bullets or bombs. They are killed by having less access to basic social needs''
- NeverEvenBegan
- The Lounge
MoggedByALoli
Izayacel
Users who are viewing this thread
