I lean towards the idea that IQ is not a good measurement of general intelligence.
I prefer not to say.
Serious @Logic55 Is An Example Of Why California Is The Way It Is.
So more of the one that people can be "intelligent" or better in certain metrics, or have certain traits which can be heritable?
I just think is not good enough to defend your theory
You might as well have just told. Now people can narrow it down to you either being curry or black
Of course this shit hits 3 pages 
.
.
He believes in JBW, could be chink too
They don't hide their race or LARP much. That's mainly a curry thing, and, to a lesser extent, a black thing (particularly in these spaces)
B
Steven Pinker is a neoliberal technocrat and academia mouthpiece who publicly tows the party line.
And this Craig Venter?
Why Science Turned on Craig Venter For Championing Genetic Privacy
“You cannot just give them some fake science."
How quickly they turn on their own and come to a different consensus when they disagree with him.
Just so it's abundantly clear, consensus is not a valid metric for evidence. The fact that you appeal to it shows how weak your thinking is.
What did they write exactly? Let's see something.
For the record, I don't care about Richard Lyn. What I care about in this instance is whether or not the criticisms against him are legitimate.
Last edited:
Yeah like Caesercel denying he's curry even when his 4chan timezone was in India or Pakistan
Why are curries like this bruh?
Look who's cherrypicking now
And I was just thinking my thoughts out loud, you pretentious shit. Incase you didn't pick up, that's literally what I do on this site. I just type out what my thoughts are.
And I've explained my reasoning, which I backed up, many times.
That is literally what anyone who has a theory does, they "think" about stuff
Jesus Christ, God help this country and website.
How North Korea’s education fever has driven a boom in private tutoring | NK News
Across East Asia, school exams are seen as a life-or-death matter. Children in China, Vietnam and South Korea spend their formative years preparing and sitting for an unending cycle of tests on everything from algebra to history. North Korea is increasingly like this too. Many kids from...
www.nknews.org
Professor Andrei Lankov is one of the world's foremost North Korea experts
Last edited:
I have to pay to see this article. To my knowledge, only the affluent North Koreans have access to high quality education.How North Korea’s education fever has driven a boom in private tutoring | NK News
Across East Asia, school exams are seen as a life-or-death matter. Children in China, Vietnam and South Korea spend their formative years preparing and sitting for an unending cycle of tests on everything from algebra to history. North Korea is increasingly like this too. Many kids from...
Professor Andrei Lankov is one of the world's foremost North Korea experts
inb4 6 million page race war thread
Economic prosperity has risen somewhat with the advent of economic reforms under Kim Jong Un
More and more North Koreans are secretly hiring private tutors for their children, similar to South Korea
more than what could be said for others...
I see you are discrediting them for being liberal. Richard Lyn is associated with the American Renaissance, it is a white supremacist organization that promotes far right beliefs. How ironic
@WorthlessSlavicShit what do you think of all this?
Did you know that East Asians are not inherently more intelligent than every other race? People in Japan and South Korea have higher iqs because in their countries, young people are encouraged to excel in their academics. It has nothing to do with race.
Last edited:
Why would such a culture arise in the first place then?
B
Not discrediting anything just yet, because I haven't seen the criticisms you're referring to. I am, however, noting upfront the ideological contrast and taking into account how this could influence any of said criticism.
B
Yeah, I'm extra critical of all "public intellectuals," especially when they make political or social commentary.
Finally somebody agrees with me on Steven fucking Pinker
B
Of course, he does. He's Ashkenazi. All Ashkenazi's think they have superior IQ, even though the best evidence shows that they're no more smarter than European ethnicities, with whom they're mixed. JFL
Top fucking KEK.
I doubt that Richard Lyn, a white supremacist who associates himself with far right organizations, is being objective in his research.
B
But you think scientists on the left are completely honest and objective their research. JFL
We aren't going to get anywhere if we continue to waste time arguing about the political beliefs of these scientists that we are relying on for our information
*271k
B
The point here is that you appeal to consensus, which in and of itself is laughably poor reasoning. Not only that, but it's the consensus of scientists who are predominantly on one ideological isle, while actively disregarding results that you claim are coming from a different ideological isle. The paper I linked before didn't have this ideological split, by the way. You didn't find that it did, so you defaulted to consensus as your justification to dismiss it instead of dealing with it.
You keep claiming that you're being objective, but that's clearly false. You're disingenuous and put your beliefs before facts, especially when it's expedient or convenient.
In this case, the consensus has stronger evidence than those who don't agree with the majority. Can you show me the link to that paper again? I'm going to skim through it one more time
B
You are missing the point, the evidence that is provided by the majority is stronger and more convincing
Consensus is not evidence, mfer.
B
No. The strength of evidence is evaluated on its own merit, not the size of the group presenting it and how they feel about it.
Retards.is. Fucking hell.
RaceCopers.is
Even if these scientists were in the minority I would still side with them because their evidence is stronger
Says the one who believes that eating a tasty treat is a coping mechanism, lmfao.
B
Stop lying. You've been harping on about consensus this whole time. Consensus is the majority, not the minority. What you just said contradicted yourself.
@DarkStar I'm done dealing with this idiot. You can pick up the slack.
B
I don't know WTF you're even on about, but whatever it is, it's irrelevant to the thread anyway.
I remember you telling me that eating a piece of cake is an escape from inceldom. I said that it's not a cope you disagreed with me. This is why I can't take you seriously
I did not contradict myself, I explained why I agree with the consensus.
B
Post the comment so we can see the context, or don't bring it up.
And I've been explaining to you (to no effect) that consensus is not evidence nor is it a standard of evidence.
You can't seem to understand that and appear to have hit a hard ceiling. That's why I'm just fucking done. There's literally no point with discussing this any further with you.
His facts? Checked!
His bugs? Eaten!
His fluoride water? Drank!
His soy? Consoomed!
His cities? Walkable!
I see nothing wrong with his takes! When will @DarkStar learn to be a decent human being?
His bugs? Eaten!
His fluoride water? Drank!
His soy? Consoomed!
His cities? Walkable!
I see nothing wrong with his takes! When will @DarkStar learn to be a decent human being?
I agree with you. The consensus is not evidence. I looked at arguments from both sides. My point is that I agree with the scientists who dont believe that race determines IQ because when I read their findings, I can see that their evidence is more detailed. Don't be gullible like those racial realists, they are spewing false information to their uneducated followers
B
You know what's really funny? The cherry-looking turd on this shitcake? The fact that you're blatantly lying when anyone can just scroll through and see that what you just said is pure, fertilizer-grade bullshit.
You've been saying this whole time that you don't accept the genetic component of IQ in racial differences, because that's not what the scientific consensus says. Now you're backpedalling, trying to convince us that you've "just been looking at the evidence bro."
I should have clarified. The majority is not always right. In this case, the majority is right. I can prove they are right by citing their studies.
Shitnics "Race & IQ is not real" Also shitnics "JBW proves muh White supremacy"
I am not denying the fact that genetics play a role in your IQ. Like I said many times before, the genes that contribute to intelligence are not more common in one race than another. These smart genes present in all races.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
