Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Based Intelligence Don't Attract Foids

yez

yez

cursed with inceldom
-
Joined
Aug 8, 2021
Posts
7,992
[UWSL]Many studies show consistent associations between higher intelligence and lower rates of sexual activity. Intelligent people, especially in universities, tend to have less sex. One of the strongest studies to find a negative relationship between sexual success and IQ found that young men with a verbal IQ of two standard deviations at or above the median (130 IQ) were two-thirds less likely to lose their virginity. The association between higher IQ and less likelihood of losing their virginity was linear for both boys and girls with a perfect average IQ above 100, but was stronger for girls with a four-fifths lower IQ of 130 or higher.[/UWSL]

A German study suggested that academics encourage academics at least twice as much as others. Among women, one standard deviation increase in childhood general intelligence (15 IQ points) reduces their odds of becoming parents by 21-25%. [Among college-age individuals, an informal study conducted by MIT-Wellesley students suggested that they differed significantly between different fields of study, with rates highest for biology and physical sciences and lowest for humanities. It is important to note that the hard sciences often have individuals with higher average IQs than those in the humanities (other than philosophy), and the higher the average IQ of a major, the fewer women will enroll in this major lesson. This coincides with the fact that women's IQs have a lower variability than men, and women have slightly lower overall intelligence than men. The skewed gender ratio in favor of males in these highly intellectual fields may partly explain the higher proportion of males enrolled in such courses; Men are unlikely to explain much of sexual success and therefore much.

Studies found a weak but significant association between IQ and height (around r = 0.2-0.3, depending on age and type of ability measured when tested). [ This correlation has different explanations from superior childhood nutrition that increases both height and IQ, from classification-based matching that causes height and IQ to be genetically linked, and even from the fact that taller people have greater cortical volume. In the brain, on average, it leads to greater intelligence. This can be explained by a general congruence factor linking intelligence and stature with other traits due to the classificatory mating associated with incentive traits.

Low IQ actually attracts women: Men with low IQ have more sex. Halpern et al. al (2000) found that the most sexually active individuals are in the 75-90 IQ range for men, and these men are the least likely to be virgins during puberty. An IQ below 70 is generally considered an intellectual disability. While 46.7% of low-IQ men were sexually active, only 18.4% of low-IQ women were sexually active. Therefore, low-IQ men were 2.5 times more likely to be sexually successful than low-IQ women.


Conclusion: Foids do not care about intelligence, go for low iq dark triad chads instead of supreme high iq gentlemen incels like us.
 
Many studies show consistent associations between higher intelligence and lower rates of sexual activity
this is why I'm an incel @BlackPilledNeet
 
[UWSL]Many studies show consistent associations between higher intelligence and lower rates of sexual activity. Intelligent people, especially in universities, tend to have less sex. One of the strongest studies to find a negative relationship between sexual success and IQ found that young men with a verbal IQ of two standard deviations at or above the median (130 IQ) were two-thirds less likely to lose their virginity. The association between higher IQ and less likelihood of losing their virginity was linear for both boys and girls with a perfect average IQ above 100, but was stronger for girls with a four-fifths lower IQ of 130 or higher.[/UWSL]

A German study suggested that academics encourage academics at least twice as much as others. Among women, one standard deviation increase in childhood general intelligence (15 IQ points) reduces their odds of becoming parents by 21-25%. [Among college-age individuals, an informal study conducted by MIT-Wellesley students suggested that they differed significantly between different fields of study, with rates highest for biology and physical sciences and lowest for humanities. It is important to note that the hard sciences often have individuals with higher average IQs than those in the humanities (other than philosophy), and the higher the average IQ of a major, the fewer women will enroll in this major lesson. This coincides with the fact that women's IQs have a lower variability than men, and women have slightly lower overall intelligence than men. The skewed gender ratio in favor of males in these highly intellectual fields may partly explain the higher proportion of males enrolled in such courses; Men are unlikely to explain much of sexual success and therefore much.

Studies found a weak but significant association between IQ and height (around r = 0.2-0.3, depending on age and type of ability measured when tested). [ This correlation has different explanations from superior childhood nutrition that increases both height and IQ, from classification-based matching that causes height and IQ to be genetically linked, and even from the fact that taller people have greater cortical volume. In the brain, on average, it leads to greater intelligence. This can be explained by a general congruence factor linking intelligence and stature with other traits due to the classificatory mating associated with incentive traits.

Low IQ actually attracts women: Men with low IQ have more sex. Halpern et al. al (2000) found that the most sexually active individuals are in the 75-90 IQ range for men, and these men are the least likely to be virgins during puberty. An IQ below 70 is generally considered an intellectual disability. While 46.7% of low-IQ men were sexually active, only 18.4% of low-IQ women were sexually active. Therefore, low-IQ men were 2.5 times more likely to be sexually successful than low-IQ women.


Conclusion: Foids do not care about intelligence, go for low iq dark triad chads instead of supreme high iq gentlemen incels like us.
Link to iq height study
 
A tall white guy with a learning disability at my school slayed more than me because he's giga low inhib.
 
Doesn't this prove dysgenics is real? Here we have real world observation that low IQ is being sexually selected for.
 
Iq detracts from a lot of people if you are very intelligent.Not everyone likes being around IQ moggers.
 
A tall white guy with a learning disability at my school slayed more than me because he's giga low inhib.
"A tall white guy". That's why he slayed :lul: This also proves that chads are low iq
 
It's unbearable how commonplace the false notions on this topic are. I bet people arrive at the conclusion by working off mental images

stupid person -> *thinks of an ugly retad*
intelligent person -> *thinks of chad with glasses*
-> "intelligence is attractive!"
 
it repels them. they only want meathead jocks
 
When you are not attractive in the first place, intelligence has no effect.
 
Doesn't this prove dysgenics is real? Here we have real world observation that low IQ is being sexually selected for.
Intelligent people tend to think more about the past,present and future while low IQ ones are living only in the present.
 
@Mentally lost cel thots ?
 
Doesn’t matter. Retard chad will slay just like phd chad will slay.
 
If you're a sub 8 male then nothing matters, traits like intelligence only register when you're above 8
 
If you're a sub 8 male then nothing matters, traits like intelligence only register when you're above 8
Actually to add to this, even if you're a retard and hot if you just make something sound smart they'll go "hahaha wow you're so smart"
 
I'm retarded and no girls are attracted to me.
 
Foids are narcissistic and yet incredibly insecure.

Which means they want a tallfag boyfriend because they are insecure about their fat ass weight and they want to show him off to other foids, yet are insecure about being dumber and poorer than he is. So they want a low iq retard tallfag that obsesses with fashion, drugs, tattoos, music, travelling, photography, brunch, and skating. Instead of a nerdy intellectual tallfag.
 
Last edited:
You don't need a paragraph to confirm that honestly the school is just there to prove it for example. :feelsaww:
 
bbc niggers who plays sport and goes broke in 5 years slay the most prime pussy in college

while rice and currycel with high iq rots
 
That’s odd, I always thought all the near genius Curries and Asians in college were slaying mad pussy.
 
Link to iq height study

Intelligence has been associated with many socio-economic and health-related outcomes. We used whole-genome LD Score Regression12 to calculate the genetic correlation with 32 traits from these domains for which GWAS summary statistics were available for download. Significant genetic correlations were observed with 14 traits. The strongest, positive genetic correlation was with Educational attainment (rg=0.70, SE=0.02, P=2.5×10−287). Moderate, positive genetic correlations were observed with smoking cessation, intracranial volume, head circumference in infancy, Autism spectrum disorder and height


it repels them. they only want meathead jocks

Ironically, the "meathead jock" was the male who learned to play several instruments. She rejected him and continuously chose White males.
 
its always the worst people in the world that feel the need to produce more children
 
yes it does, high IQfags have greater mogging capabilities and overall more dark triad traits, sure if you live in a poor rundown shithole then a low iq will make you seem more animalistic and therefore desirable, but many of us wouldn't be posting here if they lived in such a place. The whole "dumb jock" trope is complete bullshit, the highiq "cels" here misinterpret the bullying they received as teenagers as low IQ because "dumb jocks" don't go to the absolutely fucking obsessive lengths retarded spergs like kiwifags go through to bully people. Looks triumph over all obviously when it comes to foids, but intelligence is BY FAR the most important thing to living a happy and fulfilled life. If you are reading this here and have high iq, then you are closer to a normie than a trucel, congrats
 
Last edited:
this dysgenic trend has been ha;ppening since the industrial revolution. in hyper egalitarian societies like the modern west low iq niggers are encouraged to reproduce but not the more intelligent upper classes. they do this becauuse they want to exterminate all higher life
 
The only thing that attracts women is chad, chad could be the stupidest person alive and foids would still flock to him.
 
idiocy doesnt attract either. Mediocrity does. Not so called jock brain morons. Theyre not morons, theyre midwits.
 
Intelligent people tend to think more about the past,present and future while low IQ ones are living only in the present.
It's probably why black guys are so low inhib. Live only in the present
 
Brutal but does that really translate to real life? Stephen hawking and einstein were both around 5'6

Yes, though those are outliers.

I am 5'3, yet my IQ is above average.
 
Exactly foids cant understand the value of intellegence they are too primial
 
idiocy doesnt attract either. Mediocrity does. Not so called jock brain morons. Theyre not morons, theyre midwits.
Seems about right. Especially because the really stupid ones are liable to award themselves with the Darwin Award, either before they can reproduce, or after they reproduce which would be a liability to the female who would no longer have his resources in pre-Modern age.
 
I have a pet theory around the idea that intelligence is an eusocial trait.


Intelligence is one of the most important traits of our species, so how can it not correlate with reproductive success? Well, eusociality implies that some traits can be exhibited by a non-reproductive fraction of the population, and persist because they benefit the group.

In that sense a tiny part of the offspring is not meant as a vessel to transmit genes, but rather as a tool used to accomplish a specific task. Basically, smart humans are to the rest of humans what soldier ants are to other ants.

When you think about it, it's not hard to see how intelligence benefits the group arguably more than the individual. Intelligent people create culture, but one of the characteristics of culture is that it is easily transmitted. It probably took a lot of imagination and creativity to make the first bow and arrows, but then anyone seeing a bow and arrows in action could easily copy it and make an other one. A paradox of clever people is that they're able to understand first what seems obvious once shown or explained.
 
I have a pet theory around the idea that intelligence is an eusocial trait.


Intelligence is one of the most important traits of our species, so how can it not correlate with reproductive success? Well, eusociality implies that some traits can be exhibited by a non-reproductive fraction of the population, and persist because they benefit the group.

In that sense a tiny part of the offspring is not meant as a vessel to transmit genes, but rather as a tool used to accomplish a specific task. Basically, smart humans are to the rest of humans what soldier ants are to other ants.

When you think about it, it's not hard to see how intelligence benefits the group arguably more than the individual. Intelligent people create culture, but one of the characteristics of culture is that it is easily transmitted. It probably took a lot of imagination and creativity to make the first bow and arrows, but then anyone seeing a bow and arrows in action could easily copy it and make an other one. A paradox of clever people is that they're able to understand first what seems obvious once shown or explained.
If any type of intelligence is attractive to women, it's likely social intelligence. You can be dumb as a bag of rocks, but have high social intelligence. And by having high social intelligence, you will be perceived as smart by others.

Foids don't care if you can solve differential equations, but they do care if you are popular, have street smarts, charming etc because those require social intelligence.
 
If any type of intelligence is attractive to women, it's likely social intelligence. You can be dumb as a bag of rocks, but have high social intelligence. And by having high social intelligence, you will be perceived as smart by others.

Foids don't care if you can solve differential equations, but they do care if you are popular, have street smarts, charming etc because those require social intelligence.

"social intelligence" is quite an abstract concept, I think it's more accurate to talk about verbal intelligence, or basically mastery of language, and you're right it matters a lot for attraction with females.

It's still intelligence though (I've heard that stand-up comedians, who are at the peak of language mastery through humor, usually have a very high IQ), and the fact remains that it is negatively correlated with reproductive success.
 
[UWSL]Many studies show consistent associations between higher intelligence and lower rates of sexual activity. Intelligent people, especially in universities, tend to have less sex. One of the strongest studies to find a negative relationship between sexual success and IQ found that young men with a verbal IQ of two standard deviations at or above the median (130 IQ) were two-thirds less likely to lose their virginity. The association between higher IQ and less likelihood of losing their virginity was linear for both boys and girls with a perfect average IQ above 100, but was stronger for girls with a four-fifths lower IQ of 130 or higher.[/UWSL]

A German study suggested that academics encourage academics at least twice as much as others. Among women, one standard deviation increase in childhood general intelligence (15 IQ points) reduces their odds of becoming parents by 21-25%. [Among college-age individuals, an informal study conducted by MIT-Wellesley students suggested that they differed significantly between different fields of study, with rates highest for biology and physical sciences and lowest for humanities. It is important to note that the hard sciences often have individuals with higher average IQs than those in the humanities (other than philosophy), and the higher the average IQ of a major, the fewer women will enroll in this major lesson. This coincides with the fact that women's IQs have a lower variability than men, and women have slightly lower overall intelligence than men. The skewed gender ratio in favor of males in these highly intellectual fields may partly explain the higher proportion of males enrolled in such courses; Men are unlikely to explain much of sexual success and therefore much.

Studies found a weak but significant association between IQ and height (around r = 0.2-0.3, depending on age and type of ability measured when tested). [ This correlation has different explanations from superior childhood nutrition that increases both height and IQ, from classification-based matching that causes height and IQ to be genetically linked, and even from the fact that taller people have greater cortical volume. In the brain, on average, it leads to greater intelligence. This can be explained by a general congruence factor linking intelligence and stature with other traits due to the classificatory mating associated with incentive traits.

Low IQ actually attracts women: Men with low IQ have more sex. Halpern et al. al (2000) found that the most sexually active individuals are in the 75-90 IQ range for men, and these men are the least likely to be virgins during puberty. An IQ below 70 is generally considered an intellectual disability. While 46.7% of low-IQ men were sexually active, only 18.4% of low-IQ women were sexually active. Therefore, low-IQ men were 2.5 times more likely to be sexually successful than low-IQ women.


Conclusion: Foids do not care about intelligence, go for low iq dark triad chads instead of supreme high iq gentlemen incels like us.
It's 30 point communication gap. Anyone with an iq of +30 or -30 from 100 will percieved a freak.
 
Low IQ actually attracts women: Men with low IQ have more sex. Halpern et al. al (2000) found that the most sexually active individuals are in the 75-90 IQ range for men, and these men are the least likely to be virgins during puberty. An IQ below 70 is generally considered an intellectual disability. While 46.7% of low-IQ men were sexually active, only 18.4% of low-IQ women were sexually active. Therefore, low-IQ men were 2.5 times more likely to be sexually successful than low-IQ women.
So much for the whole "natural selection" argument. Foids are dysgenic cattle.
 
Water is consumed by humans
 

I've lost my Brio, so I'll use the C922:

Neet


Neet1


 
I have a pet theory around the idea that intelligence is an eusocial trait.


Intelligence is one of the most important traits of our species, so how can it not correlate with reproductive success? Well, eusociality implies that some traits can be exhibited by a non-reproductive fraction of the population, and persist because they benefit the group.

In that sense a tiny part of the offspring is not meant as a vessel to transmit genes, but rather as a tool used to accomplish a specific task. Basically, smart humans are to the rest of humans what soldier ants are to other ants.

When you think about it, it's not hard to see how intelligence benefits the group arguably more than the individual. Intelligent people create culture, but one of the characteristics of culture is that it is easily transmitted. It probably took a lot of imagination and creativity to make the first bow and arrows, but then anyone seeing a bow and arrows in action could easily copy it and make an other one. A paradox of clever people is that they're able to understand first what seems obvious once shown or explained.
In a fairer world, the use of each and every one is recognized, and they are awarded a life partner for it.
In clown world, the useful but not pretty are milked dry and discarded.

That's why I refuse to be useful apart from the minimum effort needed to keep my job. Fuck the clown world, I want it to burn, and I want all those happy on other's expense to suffer a million times what I've endured :reeeeee:
 

Similar threads

ethniccel1
Replies
8
Views
167
NoIdeaWhatToDo
NoIdeaWhatToDo
Mortis
Replies
53
Views
1K
DarkStarDown
DarkStarDown
Mortis
Replies
47
Views
1K
CountBleck
CountBleck
RealSchizo
Replies
33
Views
522
MrZez
MrZez
ne4rthend
Replies
27
Views
541
Misogynist Vegeta
Misogynist Vegeta

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top