Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Incels write letter to the U.S. Attorney General regarding Serge, Master, and Sanctioned Suicide

PPEcel

PPEcel

cope and seethe
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Posts
29,095
On December 21st, 2021, seven members of the U.S. House of Representatives wrote to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland asking if the U.S. Department of Justice can investigate and prosecute our former administrators for their involvement in another website, Sanctioned Suicide. This followed the New York Times article regarding that website earlier this month.

Several members of various incel communities were aware of the situation but decided against writing a post on the issue at the time while we decided on the stance we take on the issue. Now, here is our current stance:

1. We currently do not believe there is any genuine threat to incels.is' current operations, or to the safety of our former administrators. Having discussed the matter, our analysis is that this is entirely political theater with little or no legal substance. The closest comparison I can make to this situation is when Ted Cruz and other members of Congress wrote letters to the DOJ asking then-AG Barr to prosecute Netflix on child pornography charges. Yes, that happened. Lawmakers pull stunts like this because they can virtue-signal to white mom lobby groups that they did something whilst punting the issue and deflecting blame for any inaction to the DOJ.

2. We have reliable information that since the publication of the New York Times article, a few U.S.-based individuals who we know of are actively lobbying members of Congress to censor incels.is, amongst other communities. Additionally, we know that these individuals seek to sow disinformation in these communities out of spite. However, their financial backing is pretty much zero relative to their aims, so we will not elaborate as not to give the crazies any legitimacy or publicity.

3. We note that one or more advocacy groups have also submitted their own comments on the issue of Sanctioned Suicide to the DOJ. We strongly and unreservedly support the right to freedom of speech, and the right to petition the government, as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. To that effect, we have decided to add our perspective to the conversation.

We have submitted the following correspondence to Attorney General Garland. Copies of this letter were also sent to the seven members of Congress, and two reporters at the New York Times. We encourage every incel to read this letter in its entirety.



Thank you.

@Infinity @AmIjustDreaming @Fat Link @Robtical @MarquisDeSade @Lv99_BixNood @IncelCream @Wellington @Hell @TheProphetMuscle @suigin @Vrthraghna @Angry_runt @JoeBruhcel @Arabcel9 @Transcended Trucel @Rhaast @PoodankMcGee @fast_curry @IncelHQ @wgm24 @Oroborus @erenyeager @TheNEET @MARTYRDOM GOD X @faded @nystagmuscel @solblue @Mecoja @Escthectrler @Restart80 @Speed @incelerated @Ghostbuster15k @Blackpillapologist @OscarAllius @kampman @Mentally lost cel @Lycan @THE TRUE HONKLER @Honeypot @Zer0/∞ @Saudade @ThoughtfulCel @Loner94 @Steiner Ex Machina @Misanthropy1 @Incellectual @Meus @SlayerSlayer @KingChemist @proudweeb @FrothySolutions @Words2_live_bye @22yearoldcel @SoloAlex @Arthas93 @ordinaryotaku @Hapacalyptist @Immolator @M12Comic @-BrettyBoy- @BlkPillPres
 
Damn. Shit isn’t looking up for Master and Serge
 
I made it boys :feelsautistic::feelsautistic::feelsautistic: (btw my bets are on both of them being fine, but the future of this forum...probably not)
 
Uhhhhh... on the one hand I don't want Sarge and Master to go jail or anything, and they likely won't.

On the other hand, I have long been adamantly opposed to the idea of Sanctioned Suicide, both the forum and the concept itself. So I'm pretty secure in my conscience in not signing this letter. Is that what we're doing? Signing this letter?

Whatever we're doing, Sarge and Master will likely not be convicted of anything.
 
Damn. Shit isn’t looking up for Master and Serge
I wouldn't worry about it too much, they're just asking for information, even if something does happen it'll probably happen in a few years from now.
 
What about the Admin in uruguay? Any update?
 
ITcels are gonna bring out the champagne and buttplugs in celebration at this act of desperation
 
Holy shit its on :feelzez:
 
Whatever we're doing, Sarge and Master will likely not be convicted of anything.
The fact that these seven members of Congress purportedly want to change the law is already a tell-tale sign that current U.S. law simply does not hold either of them criminally liable.

This is just a reminder to everyone that the First Amendment frowns very heavily on laws that engage in content-based regulation of speech.
 
The fact that these seven members of Congress purportedly want to change the law is already a tell-tale sign that current U.S. law simply does not hold either of them criminally liable.

This is just a reminder to everyone that the First Amendment frowns very heavily on laws that engage in content-based regulation of speech.

Well there are (probably) limits to freedom of speech as far as what you can post on the Internet. For instance, I... probably couldn't publish instructions on how to bomb a school.
 
@Rhaast the whole discussion is talking about the US law, still doesn't indicate that the uruguay guy can't be legally persecuted
 
Well there are (probably) limits to freedom of speech as far as what you can post on the Internet. For instance, I... probably couldn't publish instructions on how to bomb a school.
1. Make a bomb
2. Place it in a school

Take me to prison glowniggers. :feelsLSD:
 
What brought NYT's attention to SS in the first place again? Wasn't it because some femoid took sodium nitrate after breaking up with her boyfriend? lol
 
they can't do shit to them, they didn't commit any crime.
 
ITcels are gonna bring out the champagne and buttplugs in celebration at this act of desperation
We disagree.

We are confident that, for the next several years at least, Congress will not have the political will necessary to amend Section 230, protecting site operators of controversial communities from most forms of liability.

We have simply decided that instead of letting other advocacy groups (i.e. the authoritarian feminist crowd) suck all the oxygen out of the political conversation, we should use our own speech rights effectively and eloquently and respond to those who do not seem to understand the First Amendment.
 
thanks for tagging, this is interesting
 
Hitler was right.
 
Based and lawpilled. Good job :panties:
 
they can't do shit to them, they didn't commit any crime.
The crime of letting people speak their mind in America. This "nation" is a joke now
 
We disagree.

We are confident that, for the next several years at least, Congress will not have the political will necessary to amend Section 230, protecting site operators of controversial communities from most forms of liability.

We have simply decided that instead of letting other advocacy groups (i.e. the authoritarian feminist crowd) suck all the oxygen out of the political conversation, we should use our own speech rights effectively and eloquently and respond to those who do not seem to understand the First Amendment.
no I mean that's how the cucks are gonna see this letter. This is an obvious sign of defensive weakness
 
1. Make a bomb
2. Place it in a school

Take me to prison glowniggers. :feelsLSD:

But you didn't tell me how to make the bomb. How I, an ordinary citizen, might get my hands on inexpensive materials to make my own homemade bomb that would do enough damage to hurt people.
 
What brought NYT's attention to SS in the first place again? Wasn't it because some femoid took sodium nitrate after breaking up with her boyfriend? lol
Ye
 
1. Make a bomb
2. Place it in a school

Take me to prison glowniggers. :feelsLSD:
But you didn't tell me how to make the bomb. How I, an ordinary citizen, might get my hands on inexpensive materials to make my own homemade bomb that would do enough damage to hurt people.

In 1996, Congress passed a law that criminalized the distribution of certain information relating to explosives. See 18 U.S.C. § 842 (p).

First Amendment concerns were raised during the drafting of the bill. Therefore, federal law criminalizes the publishing of bomb-making instructions only if the information was a) distributed with the intent to further a "federal crime of violence", or b) knowingly distributed to a person who intended to use the information to further a "federal crime of violence". In practice, that is a very high bar for the government to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, so convictions under this statute have been extremely rare.
 
In 1996, Congress passed a law that criminalized the distribution of certain information relating to explosives. See 18 U.S.C. § 842 (p).

First Amendment concerns were raised during the drafting of the bill. Therefore, federal law criminalizes the publishing of bomb-making instructions only if the information was a) distributed with the intent to further a "federal crime of violence", or b) knowingly distributed to a person who intended to use the information to further a "federal crime of violence". In practice, that is a very high bar for the government to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, so convictions under this statute have been extremely rare.

I'm pretty sure that's because people aren't trying it. "Intent to further a federal crime of violence," all that means is "Did the person hope someone would actually make a bomb or were they trolling?" If "proof" is simply what the jury thinks, I'm thinking most juries will err on the side that if you're posting bomb making instructions online, you know someone's gonna use it, and that's why you posted it.
 
can anyone confirm that serge is even alive still?
What brought NYT's attention to SS in the first place again? Wasn't it because some femoid took sodium nitrate after breaking up with her boyfriend? lol
based. all used h*les should rope :feelsaww: it's only right :feelsaww:
 
Last edited:
What brought NYT's attention to SS in the first place again? Wasn't it because some femoid took sodium nitrate after breaking up with her boyfriend? lol

We have that information.
 
Never knew that there was a forum called sanctioned suicide until now:waitwhat:
 
Tbh you have to be a complete sociopath to be okay with running a website were young teenage kids go there and some kill themselves
 
Tbh you have to be a complete sociopath to be okay with running a website were young teenage kids go there and some kill themselves
who made you god?
 
Tbh you have to be a complete sociopath to be okay with running a website were young teenage kids go there and some kill themselves
Eh, it's the unfortunate choice of an individual.
 
prosecute our former administrators
So who are the main mods of here now?
Also that other site has nothing to do with us other than serge being the same operator of it.
 
I dont think they have any firm evidence that Serge or Master actually persuade or encouraged someone to kill himself, people who are on the edge have more understanding to each other than some sos phone that say "dont" and lock you up in a madhouse.
 
@PPEcel is this just class project at public defender academy?
 
I am against suicide, but I understand that they had the right to talk about it.
Encouraging it on the other hand seems wrong to me now.

I hope Serge and Master get some good male lawyers to guide them.
I don't think they will be criminally charged but they might get civil charges.
Section 230
 
warn the owners of a public easy to find site for '''''ilegal activities''''' early? nah, let's wait for some retards to kill themselves for years and then doxx the owners and arrest them :soy::soy::soy::soy:
 
warn the owners of a public easy to find site for '''''ilegal activities''''' early? nah, let's wait for some retards to kill themselves for years and then doxx the owners and arrest them :soy::soy::soy::soy:
Nobody's getting convicted of anything here
 
On December 21st, 2021, seven members of the U.S. House of Representatives wrote to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland asking if the U.S. Department of Justice can investigate and prosecute our former administrators for their involvement in another website, Sanctioned Suicide. This followed the New York Times article regarding that website earlier this month.

Several members of various incel communities were aware of the situation but decided against writing a post on the issue at the time while we decided on the stance we take on the issue. Now, here is our current stance:

1. We currently do not believe there is any genuine threat to incels.is' current operations, or to the safety of our former administrators. Having discussed the matter, our analysis is that this is entirely political theater with little or no legal substance. The closest comparison I can make to this situation is when Ted Cruz and other members of Congress wrote letters to the DOJ asking then-AG Barr to prosecute Netflix on child pornography charges. Yes, that happened. Lawmakers pull stunts like this because they can virtue-signal to white mom lobby groups that they did something whilst punting the issue and deflecting blame for any inaction to the DOJ.

2. We have reliable information that since the publication of the New York Times article, a few U.S.-based individuals who we know of are actively lobbying members of Congress to censor incels.is, amongst other communities. Additionally, we know that these individuals seek to sow disinformation in these communities out of spite. However, their financial backing is pretty much zero relative to their aims, so we will not elaborate as not to give the crazies any legitimacy or publicity.

3. We note that one or more advocacy groups have also submitted their own comments on the issue of Sanctioned Suicide to the DOJ. We strongly and unreservedly support the right to freedom of speech, and the right to petition the government, as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. To that effect, we have decided to add our perspective to the conversation.

We have submitted the following correspondence to Attorney General Garland. Copies of this letter were also sent to the seven members of Congress, and two reporters at the New York Times. We encourage every incel to read this letter in its entirety.



Thank you.

@Infinity @AmIjustDreaming @Fat Link @Robtical @MarquisDeSade @Lv99_BixNood @IncelCream @Wellington @Hell @TheProphetMuscle @suigin @Vrthraghna @Angry_runt @JoeBruhcel @Arabcel9 @Transcended Trucel @Rhaast @PoodankMcGee @fast_curry @IncelHQ @wgm24 @Oroborus @erenyeager @TheNEET @MARTYRDOM GOD X @faded @nystagmuscel @solblue @Mecoja @Escthectrler @Restart80 @Speed @incelerated @Ghostbuster15k @Blackpillapologist @OscarAllius @kampman @Mentally lost cel @Lycan @THE TRUE HONKLER @Honeypot @Zer0/∞ @Saudade @ThoughtfulCel @Loner94 @Steiner Ex Machina @Misanthropy1 @Incellectual @Meus @SlayerSlayer @KingChemist @proudweeb @FrothySolutions @Words2_live_bye @22yearoldcel @SoloAlex @Arthas93 @ordinaryotaku @Hapacalyptist @Immolator @M12Comic @-BrettyBoy- @BlkPillPres

While I understand the legality of the issue in that it should be illegal of a media institution of the United States to doxx individuals who clearly aren't doing anything wrong, understand that currently, the United States along with much of the west is now lawless. Recall that with the mandate hundreds of thousands if not more have lost their jobs, incomes, and livelihoods because they refuse to take a vaccine, if they can get away with doing that they can get away with anything which is just one example of lawlessness here. The rule of law now is effectively dead. :feelsjuice: :yes:
 
While I understand the legality of the issue in that it should be illegal of a media institution of the United States to doxx individuals who clearly aren't doing anything wrong, understand that currently, the United States along with much of the west is now lawless. Recall that with the mandate hundreds of thousands if not more have lost their jobs, incomes, and livelihoods because they refuse to take a vaccine, if they can get away with doing that they can get away with anything which is just one example of lawlessness here. :feelsjuice: :yes:
:feelsokman:
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top