R
RollD20
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2019
- Posts
- 17,229
Might be true but most of the forum is normie.There is no brotherhood in real life except the brotherhood among incels. trying to find brotherhood among normies is suicide.
Might be true but most of the forum is normie.There is no brotherhood in real life except the brotherhood among incels. trying to find brotherhood among normies is suicide.
All I'm saying is that the Hindus are going to gang up against incel and treat them like shitMight be true but most of the forum is normie.
If he stands out yeah. But I doubt anyone is going to careless. Normies don’t give af anywhere typically. He might get heckled if he looks too foreign maybe.All I'm saying is that the Hindus are going to gang up against incel and treat them like shit
In Holy rituals performed by Brahmin priests in Brahman castes this doesn't happen. And I promise you that I have seen and even been apart of far more than you have in my 40 years.They sprinkle it and drink it
Its not man. Its a country-wide lower and middle caste Hindu ritual. But like I said, much less common today especially in upper castes.No, I have never seen any North Indian doing such filthy stuff. Drinking and eating cow waste is only gangetic and South Indian thing.
Dude this is either high-level autist crap or you can't read. I said, "IN TODAY'S TIMES". Ashvamedha he says."Kings" he says LMAO. Where the fuck do you see Kings today? You original post that goes this started was you declaring they are all doing it right now. To which I replied: that many low caste are, the rest are not !Yeah except the ashvamedha ritual has been carried out for hundreds of years by kings and it’s the one that involves animal sacrifice and dead horse beastiality.
I'm saying there ARE NO Kings you dense AllahuAkbar !Unless you’re saying that kings are low caste then idk what to tell you.
Oh my fucking god. These are GOD MYTHS- you know?..like the Greeks, and Romans? You ignoramus !What about the texts that mention how brahma married and raped his own daughter, brahma Vishnu and shiva gangraped anusuya a Hindu sages wife, Sages turned themselves into deers and engaged in beastiality.
It definitely has some. I never disagrees with that. As a Westerner who is not religious, I rejected Hinduism when I was maybe 12? Shortly before being forced to do a thread-ceremony. I am not religious but you could call me a post-Christian. Protestant Christianity WAS the only semi-decent and worthwhile religion in my opinion.Hinduism is full of filthy degenerate rituals.
Lol. People rape because they want to feel power like animals do. Of course religion plays a role but, its true all over the world.No wonder curries rape so much, they look up to their (false) gods
You are a high-level autist who has no real world experience !cope harder, you don't get more brahaminical than the manusmriti:.
You are a high-level autist who has no real world experienceManu's Code Of Law A Critical Edition And Translation Of The Manava Dharmasastra : Patrick Olivelle : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Manu's Code of Law is one of the most important texts in the Sanskrit canon, indeed one of the most important surviving texts from any classical civilization....archive.org
you even get punished for stealing cow dung jfl.
You are a high-level autist who has no real world experiencealso some stuff from the vedas on horse sex
The problem is, that Muslims (most Muslims in both the Middle East and ESPECIALLY India) are unable to do anything their Islamic religion tells them to. Their women, underneath the vail are behaving almost as badly as Western sluts and pretend Hindu upper caste whores.None of those things are found in islamic scripture. People who do these things will be answerable to God. All the things I mentioned about Hinduism however are found in their so called 'holy' scriptures
Indracel is an American Hindudindoo. Aka, an "Atheist"No point in arguing with hindpoo dindpoo pajeets, man, they're high off of cow piss
damn didn't know some of the weird rituals came from those respected books. I thought they were just some local cultural inventions of a few select curries. Indeed glad I Buddha maxxed .cope harder, you don't get more brahaminical than the manusmriti:
Manu's Code Of Law A Critical Edition And Translation Of The Manava Dharmasastra : Patrick Olivelle : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Manu's Code of Law is one of the most important texts in the Sanskrit canon, indeed one of the most important surviving texts from any classical civilization....archive.org
you even get punished for stealing cow dung jfl
also some stuff from the vedas on horse sex
No, but if you want to mostly LDAR then its the best. Of course, you have to have worked for a number of years prior to that, but I did just that. I'm a child of the 80's teenager of the 90's.India is not incel friendly. They are absurdly blue pilled and treat black pilled incels like shit.
This is correct and people should stop trying to pretend otherwise BUT... we might have some hope if people are willing to follow a new method and model for behavior and are interested in purely intellectual conversation with serious conviction.All these religious people will be biased against incels. In the military and religious communities brotherhood only exists for normies while the incels are just the punching bag. There is no brotherhood in real life except the brotherhood among incels. trying to find brotherhood among normies is suicide.
Nope. Not true. It goes back to being even worse, thats when the trouble will start. A lot of Incels really have a major dysfunction realizing this. They have a blind spot and are not able to understand that securing a gf doesn't mean you "through it", it means you will suffer even more and more and more.But at the same time if you're able to get a cute girl maybe someone very poor then you'd ascend and become a little more accepted by the normies just because you have a girl.
Yes exactly!Then again you'll never really be a normie they will still bias against you for ugliness but just a step improvement from no girl.
wtf is with this "gangetic" shit? kek. Yeah Ganges River is in the North EastNo, I have never seen any North Indian doing such filthy stuff. Drinking and eating cow waste is only gangetic and South Indian thing.
COPE@Broly The muzzie is trying to steal your women
I'm not sure that I agree that they are all in canonical Sanskrit texts in quite the way you mean -- and I don't want to get into it with you -- the same cherrypicking can be done with what is in the Koran too -- I am not sure that what is written down matters, as to my point.None of those things are found in islamic scripture. People who do these things will be answerable to God. All the things I mentioned about Hinduism however are found in their so called 'holy' scriptures
Devi Bhagwatam Book 5 Ch 2 ]I'm not sure that I agree that they are all in canonical Sanskrit texts in quite the way you mean -- and I don't want to get into it with you
No it cannotthe same cherrypicking can be done with what is in the Koran too
Some are clearly better than others. Child sacrifice and banning of music are both jacked up but one is clearly worseall religions have some jacked up elements that are easy to cherry pick and fixate on.
What is written down is what matters the most. If you don't follow the beliefs of your religion then you aren't really a follower. You cannot judge a religion by the actions of it's followers but by judging it's scripturesI am not sure that what is written down matters, as to my point
Wait.. Are you kidding me? I bet any whitecel here over the age of 30 can answer this question.. Are you seriously asking me about what real world experience has to do with knowing the difference between practice and orthodoxy, manuels and whats written in text? Lol. Yeah you are 19 and a Paycheck-Virgin !Real world experience? What does that have to do with cow urine being an agent of purification in Brahminical Hinduism?
Yes. Good. So you are able to see how @Misogynist Curry 卐 is a coping guru and wrong, but not able to understand that about yourself when touting spineless worms like Richard Dawkins, Anthony Faucci or pro-Covid-vacvine fags? Or Democrats in the U.S.? This is top kek.Some division curries online (especially pakistanis) made to try and separate themselves from people who come from the BIMARU states.
Again, orthodoxy and orthopraxy. Its not practiced.Devi Bhagwatam Book 5 Ch 2 ]
[31] O highly fortunate Rambha! With any female of whichever species, you will co-habit, you will get a son, more powerful than you; there is no doubt in this.
[32-] Vyâsa said :-- O king! Hearing thus the.
Oh yes it can. Not as easily, but trust me, it can be done. The Quran is overall, written much better than the ratchet conglomeration of texts Hindus have thrown together, but it still leads to Pride-Overload.No it cannot.
All of the low IQ posters need to wither ask questions or fuck off. OP is too dense and mental health'd up to even reply to his own moronic question in his OP.Pretty sure u won’t get shit if u throw stones at Muslims or mosques unless u get anti Islam wife who hates muslims
Some are clearly better than others. Child sacrifice and banning of music are both jacked up but one is clearly worse.
That’s literally what I’m sayingBut you are missing my more significant point, which is that Hinduism is a weak and fuzzy collection of garbage. You can always find a few gem stones in the trash but, not many. It has its strong points and a lot of weak points.
Do it thenOh yes it can. Not as easily, but trust me, it can be done. The Quran is overall, written much better than the ratchet conglomeration of texts Hindus have thrown together, but it still leads to Pride-Overload.
Yes I did, I said it to OP. Btw my "anecdotes" are far superior to the lack of information you hace gathered in the last 19 years. What? You are the only who believes he "researches people" and understands concepts? This is at the heart of whats wrong with you..I'll demonstrate further below.You never actually specified that you were only talking about Hinduism in practice and not just Hinduism in theory. You just said it was not Brahminical Hinduism which is demonstrably false. I don't know how frequently its practiced but that's a question that's going to be answered by a country-wide survey and not a single man's anecdotes.
Let me hear you say it, because even non-intellectual low iqs on this sitw know it.... Are you ACTUALLY telling me that people like Dawkins, (for Science) Faucci (for medicine) and Pro-Vaccine Covid cucks are the Saints & Gurus from which your superior non-anecdotal knowledge hails? LOL.They aren't wrong
But you're not able yo formulate it as well as I did. The issue is, you are too agressive about it Hinduism is a failure. But so is Islam when compared to Protestant Christianity. Do you agree?That’s literally what I’m saying.
I'm not a Quran specialist. I'm a generalist and, I believe my theory about Islam's Muslims as mostly problematic is correct. Same with my comparison regarding Islam vs Christianity.Do it then
Christianity in general is full of contradictions and the truth cannot be contradictoryBut so is Islam when compared to Protestant Christianity. Do you agree
So you talk about Islam like you possess authority on the subject despite not having studied it in depthI'm not a Quran specialist. I'm a generalist and, I believe my theory about Islam's Muslims as mostly problematic is correct. Same with my comparison regarding Islam vs Christianity
1=3now you’re coping mang
Christianity mogs Islam front and back
Fair question. But....Just curious.. in our convo you suggested that no one in America is Christian despite containing the largest number of self identified Christians in the word, and you said that Jordan Peterson is actually on track to become an atheist. So if we can look at neither the holy texts themselves nor what the self-identified followers are practicing to define what a religion is in practice, what, if anything, do you use to define “Christianity”, “Hinduism” etc?
Devi Bhagwatam Book 5 Ch 2 ] . . .
Maybe the following words are what move you:What is written down is what matters the most. If you don't follow the beliefs of your religion then you aren't really a follower. You cannot judge a religion by the actions of it's followers but by judging it's scriptures
Agreed. I was just trying to illustrate how silly it is to do that with any religion's texts. Ricordanza did it with the Bhagavatam etc. We could do the same bullshit with the Bible: "burn the witches" etc.Surah 9:5 or the "sword verse" is the part of the Qur'an that's taken the most out of context. Just look at the surrounding verses to see what the passage actually means:
And there are even more verses than the ones you quoted that really clarify the message of peace -- that one should not let Allah get in the way of making peace among men, etc.Surah 9:5 or the "sword verse" is the part of the Qur'an that's taken the most out of context. Just look at the surrounding verses to see what the passage actually means:
One other thing re: Richard Dawkins types:Just curious.. in our convo you suggested that no one in America is Christian despite containing the largest number of self identified Christians in the word, and you said that Jordan Peterson is actually on track to become an atheist. So if we can look at neither the holy texts themselves nor what the self-identified followers are practicing to define what a religion is in practice, what, if anything, do you use to define “Christianity”, “Hinduism” etc?
I can understand and fluently speak 3 Indian languages. I know more about Hinduism than you do. If you think this is cherry-picking then why don’t you quote counter examples from scholars of hinduism along with their sources?I think you missed the point, and it is clear you have no idea what you are talking about. I know you haven't read these books or even the entire chapters, in Sanskrit. Relevant words, e.g., prajanam, cognate with the word "progeny," can more properly and commonly be translated as "the people" -- not "organ of generation," i.e., the sex organ, as was often mistranslated by 19th-century Orientalists. The list of such examples is very long and extends to nearly every line of the relevant passages.
If you think it is indeed cherry-picking then prove me wrong. The mere fact that several contradictory statements about the same topic exist in hinduism prove that it is a false religionAgreed. I was just trying to illustrate how silly it is to do that with any religion's texts. Ricordanza did it with the Bhagavatam etc. We could do the same bullshit with the Bible: "burn the witches" etc.
My point is not to attack the Koran, at all. It is to point out how dumb cherrypicking polemics are -- how foid-level superficial such reading and writing is at the end of the day.
Strawman. I said scripture matters more than actions of the believers which every single scholar of abrahamism would agree with me onWords may matter to you more than actions.
I think the Abrahamists of all three stripes would strongly agree that this notion, that words matter more than actions, is a pernicious one, positively Satanic.
I have graduate degrees in the relevant languages, and have contributed to peer-reviewed published academic work on the subject.I can understand and fluently speak 3 Indian languages. I know more about Hinduism than you do. If you think this is cherry-picking then why don’t you quote counter examples from scholars of hinduism along with their sources?
Agreed. Also, his main point confuses doctrine and practice. Hindu doctrine comes in a lot of confused little spurts. Its almost impossible to reconcile it with what is practically done by Brahmins. For that you nees to look at the rituals of smaller sects of Brahmins and how they operate. There are Madhwa Brahmins and Smarta Brahmins and so many other in the Varna caste system. Very few if any drink cow urine or roll in dung. @Ricordanza is trying to simo his way into making a bigger point about his cherished Islam. Again, I have no quarrel with his preoccupation with the Quran, but his desire to claim superiority over Hinduism requires more back and forth. Much of what he said was just general blanket statement crap.Agreed. I was just trying to illustrate how silly it is to do that with any religion's texts. Ricordanza did it with the Bhagavatam etc. We could do the same bullshit with the Bible: "burn the witches" etc.
My point is not to attack the Koran, at all. It is to point out how dumb cherrypicking polemics are -- how foid-level superficial such reading and writing is at the end of the day.
Indeed even the notion of "doctrine" is almost trying to square a circle.Agreed. Also, his main point confuses doctrine and practice. Hindu doctrine comes in a lot of confused little spurts. Its almost impossible to reconcile it with what is practically done by Brahmins. For that you nees to look at the rituals of smaller sects of Brahmins and how they operate. There are Madhwa Brahmins and Smarta Brahmins and so many other in the Varna caste system. Very few if any drink cow urine or roll in dung. @Ricordanza is trying to simo his way into making a bigger point about his cherished Islam. Again, I have no quarrel with his preoccupation with the Quran, but his desire to claim superiority over Hinduism requires more back and forth. Much of what he said was just general blanket statement crap.
You are cherry picking a litte bit and glossing over more practical points. Btw what 3 "Indian"languages do you speak?I can understand and fluently speak 3 Indian languages. I know more about Hinduism than you do. If you think this is cherry-picking then why don’t you quote counter examples from scholars of hinduism along with their sources?
I already granted you this. Its a loose fuzzy set of ism's thrown together. If Islam is superior to Hinduism (Islam, not Muslims superior to Hindus) then what about Christianity being superior to Islam? Do you agree?If you think it is indeed cherry-picking then prove me wrong. The mere fact that several contradictory statements about the same topic exist in hinduism prove that it is a false religion.
Same for A LOT of Hinduism buddy. Why do you forget to mention this? Brahmin scholars and Sanskrit scholars do the interpretations.Also islam is not not open to interpretation from lay muslims, you are supposed to accept the way it is interpretated by the ulama which itself is based upon the explanation and sunnah of the prophet and the sahaba.
Yes but, scriptures gets reinterpreted with the newer times. The practices and rituals matter also. Hinduism is stuck in the past, which is why India is also stuck, which is ALSO what makes it better for LDAR'ing Incels.Strawman. I said scripture matters more than actions of the believers which every single scholar of abrahamism would agree with me on
Mostly true. Though, I think if taken with suppliment texts outside of direct religions texts, certain things become a clearer study.Indeed even the notion of "doctrine" is almost trying to square a circle.
I respectfully submit that "confused little spurts" is a pretty good description of just about every religion's foundational texts, especially vis-a-vis the practices, traditions, lunatic fringes, etc.
The texts of Hinduism aren't bound up in one neat little book. There are a lot of them, over millennia upon millennia. Just about every intellectual revolution conceivable has happened ten times over throughout the history of these texts.
But having a neat little book doesn't mean its contents are neat or little. The Bible and Koran have their own vastness, enigmas, and complexities.
Mostly true. Though, I think if taken with suppliment texts outside of direct religions texts, certain things become a clearer study.
Like Rene Girard's work in "Deceit Desire and the Novel" along with the New Testament and other works written by early and middle ages Christians, and then soke things examined by more recent Philosophy like that of Ludwig Wittgenstein.
That it would.But I'll have to leave that here, because it gets too heavy to explain. It would take a lot of reading and a lot of years.
You addressed none of my points and provided no argumentsI have graduate degrees in the relevant languages, and have contributed to peer-reviewed published academic work on the subject.
I explained a few examples and the relevant principles. The responses showed that what I tried to keep brief was itself not even being read.
You can go to a decent university library and find journals and books for more. There is more in there than on the Internet. You'll find my work there.
And no I won't dox myself.
It's all good man. Fight on.
I already said that christianity is also full of contradictions when it comes to the trinitythen what about Christianity being superior to Islam? Do you agree?
Theres no one stopping you from publishing your own interpretation of hindu texts and a large number of people following them. There is no verse in hinduism that states that you must only follow one interpretation. The same cannot be said for islamSame for A LOT of Hinduism buddy. Why do you forget to mention this? Brahmin scholars and Sanskrit scholars do the interpretations
If anything its the exact opposite. Hinduism and other religions are open to reinterpretation. There is a verse in the Quran (5:3) which explicitly states that it has been perfected for mankind until the last dayYes but, scriptures gets reinterpreted with the newer times. The practices and rituals matter also. Hinduism is stuck in the past, which is why India is also stuck, which is ALSO what makes it better for LDAR'ing Incels
In a way, yes. But Hinduism as a result ran the risk of becoming a garbage collection of way too much for it's own good. Its resilience to certain negative aspects of Western culture not withstanding. Otherwise you are absolutely correct. Well said!All of a piece. While there is something to be said for an integrated comprehensive learning in one tradition and body of literature, our world today would not permit it, and our world is full of doubts and vexations of all kinds that seek to slot in what is "x" there into "y" elsewhere, and so on. In the postmodern journey it's all hands on deck. Whatever works. Anyway, that seems to be the syncretism of Hinduism throughout the ages, no?
Well, one thing that Christianity would have benefited from would be adapting its language to the newer world of disguised Sins, yes. I believe its a bit too late. But parts of it can still be used to build anew.(And someday future ecumenists and mystics may arrive at similar conclusions in and for the Abrahamic bubble, who knows.) All rivers to one ocean.
Precisely brocel, Precisely!That it would.
"This tale grew in the telling . . . "
Allah was too busy perfecting chad while making us as a warm up exercise
In today's dangerous world of sexual authority, YES IT MUST BE kept mutually exclusive !Because you're only looking at the most public aspect of his career which is his science communication. There's isn't some mutually exclusive choice scientists have to make where they choose to either pursue research in complete isolation or do nothing but talk to the public.
Hahahahaha. Richard Dawkins made no contribution to any active field of science. Again, you are a nitwit who has been seduced and thinks he is smart and savoy, but you are not. Dawkins merely popularised the already existing and known facts regarding how replicating genes are important force behind evolution. No shit, really?!! LoL. That by itself doesn't make him evil or even a bad guy, its all well and good, but the talk-show masturbation style gave an entire generation the wrong about Science !Have you looked at his academic contributions to evolutionary biology?
AGAIN - I reject the claim that he has any contributions to speak of.What are your criticisms of them?
If misunderstood yes, and I believe Christianity is infact the MOST misunderstood religion for its useable parts.I already said that christianity is also full of contradictions when it comes to the trinity.
Fair but....Oh yes it can be said..Theres no one stopping you from publishing your own interpretation of hindu texts and a large number of people following them. There is no verse in hinduism that states that you must only follow one interpretation. The same cannot be said for islam.
Yet Islam has been reinterpreted, social customs AND practices changed from various Sunni to Wahabbism and then again into whatever new age iterations that Muslim scholars in the West and even Middle East reiter it as today.If anything its the exact opposite. Hinduism and other religions are open to reinterpretation. There is a verse in the Quran (5:3) which explicitly states that it has been perfected for mankind until the last day
@IndracelIn today's dangerous world of sexual authority, YES IT MUST BE kept mutually exclusive !
Hahahahaha. Richard Dawkins made no contribution to any active field of science. Again, you are a nitwit who has been seduced and thinks he is smart and savoy, but you are not. Dawkins merely popularised the already existing and known facts regarding how replicating genes are important force behind evolution. No shit, really?!! LoL. That by itself doesn't make him evil or even a bad guy, its all well and good, but the talk-show masturbation style gave an entire generation the wrong about Science !
And yes buddyboyo, again and for the 10th time, I read "The Selfish Gene" before you mums let your dads put his pee inside her Lmao.
AGAIN - I reject the claim that he has any contributions to speak of.
He battled religious cucks as a science talk-show cuck. Thats all.
Wahhabism literally calls for Muslims to return to the Quran and the tradition of the first three generations of muslims and to stop believing in religious innovationYet Islam has been reinterpreted, social customs AND practices changed from various Sunni to Wahabbism and then again into whatever new age iterations that Muslim scholars in the West and even Middle East reiter it as today.
Jfl @ assuming op doesn't have a paki wife already@Indracel @JayGoptri @wereq advice for OP?
the sad truth. regardless of what religion you choose, you can't get laid unless rich or good looking. I think your best option is to Afghanistan Maxx and learn farsi. Pakistan itself has many Pathans who would marry their daughters off for the dutch green card equivalent alone. I knew a gyro cart guy who had a daughter in Pakistan and then ditched his wife behind there. He was only 4/10 5'8 stats wise and fucking gyro seller yet still got a decent foid just due to USA halo. Dutch cels like you can do same
Whatever. Then Wahhabism - Sunni. Point is under the veil, most Muslim women behave like criminal foids alsoWahhabism literally calls for Muslims to return to the Quran and the tradition of the first three generations of muslims and to stop believing in religious innovation