Not a "true" scientist?
en.wikipedia.org
Nope. Hes a bullshitter like you.
The fact you abruptly brought up "leftists" and "Democrats" confirms to me that you have a political agenda and are not dispassionately interested in the science of COVID-19 vacines.
I don't have a political agenda, its Covid policy and vaccines that had a social leftist political agenda. Otherwise Covid by itself should have been treated most of the other viruses I've lived through (which are a lot more than you). From N1H1, Swine Flu, to other mundane ones that do not prompt a shut down the economy as was hastily for almost 2 years (depending on region) for Covid. The type of belief that sort of overreacting requires is a Religious belief actually. And since you really advocate for such nonsense as "Science" I would say you are far more "religious" than I am in that sort of bad way.
Sure, you shouldn't always blindly accept conventional wisdom,
..Yet you do on a great many things I've observed..
but you aren't right just because you doubt it either.
This is simp normie assumption. The type cucked normies make, why would you think I'm simply basing it on a few frivolously facts, as opposed to 30 years of observation and the last 3.5 years od disaster and complete opposite reality from the information being put out by tue CDC, FDA, Biden WH, CNN & Co, MSM etc, and left-leaning Scientific consensus?
People who think they're enlightened because they're going against the consensus are every bit as much of being NPCs as those who don't.
Dude. Simp. This is NOT what I'm doing little boy. You are just using this very surface level talking point to describe what I am saying about Covid reactionary phenomenon because its convenient for you.
Oh boy, yet another COVID-19 vaccine doubter, color me surprised.
Actually, most people are like you. Not doubters.
You've been linking these cronies to me for a while now while showing not much understanding about the actual science behind it.
Cronies? Are you fucking kidding me? It means the leftist have really done a good job discrediting them if you think Roger Malone, Bret Weinstein and Assem Malhotra (along with many many others) are "cronies" LMAO. I know whats happening to you. You are able to recognise ugliness discrimination and lookism even though a critic of it would say the same thing to me which you are saying, using the same type of bullshit arguments, (because they are invested in Foid, in Women, they are CUCKS) AND NOW - because you invested so much into think Covid warranted these measures, and you want to be accepted by Doctor community of California normies, YOU are having trouble see whys right in front of you.
I mean seriously, mRNA "fucking up" someones genetic code? How is that even supposed to work?
Sweet lord. You don't read anything do you?
Ironically, he as a biochemist probably doesn't qualify as a scientist under your narrow definition of science either. I mean can he predict cardiac complications from COVID-19 mRNA vaccine usage with an accuracy of 99.9% or something?
It's impossible to do that for a field that literally tries to relate chemical reactions at a molecular level to the functioning of entire entire organ systems that contain upwards of trillions of cells each performing millions of reactions.
Its interesting you can recognise the difficulty Malhotra might have in "predicting" cardiac complications (so he simply says be warned of these signals and evidence of wrong doing from pharma companies), and yet you aren't able to apply the same logic when someone says "
Covid is so so so dangerous, lets shut down the world for 2 years and hurry out vaccines, and oh btw this is all based on SCIENCE"
How is that an issue? You just said science communication to the public has to be kept separate from contributing actual scientific work. Now you're telling me that its Dawkins' fault he chose to do just that.
No, he didn't choose to do that persay. I don't believe he made thay choice consciously. He just got enamoured with the glamour quotient that would come from dogging on Religion using the "Science yard stick" to beat peoplw with. Useless.
None of these are arguments. Just admit you're wrong
No I didn't. If you search "Dawkins" on the discord you invited me to and our DMs it returns zero results. The only time Dawkins was ever brought up was when you asked me if I was familiar with him on our voice conversation and I said yes.
Voice and discord and PM and here. Infact, you are still advocating for him RIGHT NOW. For some reason.
"metaphysical desire", "internal mediation"
I'm supposed to believe this over Richard Dawkins?
I mean, for a theory of behavior and Psychology, yes. Dawkins just repeats known facts. Hes not wrong in his facts, hes just worthless beyond a very simple task or need.
You were literally saying that I was "touting spineless worms like Richard Dawkins and Fauci" and now you're telling me that you think that I don't agree with them?
You still are. Faucci and Dawkins are some examples of the reasons for why you misunderstand what role Science has.
Agnosticism is an epistemological position. You can believe a god doesn't exist (atheism) while believing it's impossible to disprove the existence of a God (agnosticism).
Not necessary and Atheism is used for purposes it shouldn't be used for.
If your entire summary of the book is "genes replicate" then I don't think you actually read it.
Before you were born. Long tome ago. Its not a terrible read, but nothing can be done with it.
If you explicitly refuse to look at his actual scientific work.
He has very little.
and only watch him speak about atheism and humanities.
Thats all he truly did for 45 years.
then how are you in a position to claim he made no scientific contributions and that the latter was the only thing he did with his career?
It is and, I am. He wrote a few decent books, made a few good points the began jizzing all over people faces about Science vs. God. You like to drink his jizz.
