Hindus! GTFIH!

[DenHaag]

Mostly true. Though, I think if taken with suppliment texts outside of direct religions texts, certain things become a clearer study.

Like Rene Girard's work in "Deceit Desire and the Novel" along with the New Testament and other works written by early and middle ages Christians, and then soke things examined by more recent Philosophy like that of Ludwig Wittgenstein.

All of a piece. While there is something to be said for an integrated comprehensive learning in one tradition and body of literature, our world today would not permit it, and our world is full of doubts and vexations of all kinds that seek to slot in what is "x" there into "y" elsewhere, and so on. In the postmodern journey it's all hands on deck. Whatever works. Anyway, that seems to be the syncretism of Hinduism throughout the ages, no? (And someday future ecumenists and mystics may arrive at similar conclusions in and for the Abrahamic bubble, who knows.) All rivers to one ocean.

But I'll have to leave that here, because it gets too heavy to explain. It would take a lot of reading and a lot of years.

That it would.

"This tale grew in the telling . . . "

 

[Indracel]

The by-product of people like Dawkins is that every confuses SCIENTIST with Scientific Talk show hosts. Every child says "I want to be a Scientist" not because they are actually invested in being a researcher in a small lab, but because they want to be Talk-Show faggot like Dawkins. A YouTube sensation and a "Science presenter etc etc. This has led to less than 5% science innovation and 95% bullshit talk-show host behaviors. Its unsustainable.

Because you're only looking at the most public aspect of his career which is his science communication. There's isn't some mutually exclusive choice scientists have to make where they choose to either pursue research in complete isolation or do nothing but talk to the public. Have you looked at his academic contributions to evolutionary biology? What are your criticisms of them?

 

[Ricordanza]

I have graduate degrees in the relevant languages, and have contributed to peer-reviewed published academic work on the subject.

I explained a few examples and the relevant principles. The responses showed that what I tried to keep brief was itself not even being read.

You can go to a decent university library and find journals and books for more. There is more in there than on the Internet. You'll find my work there.

And no I won't dox myself.

It's all good man. Fight on.

You addressed none of my points and provided no arguments

 

[Ricordanza]

then what about Christianity being superior to Islam? Do you agree?

I already said that christianity is also full of contradictions when it comes to the trinity

Same for A LOT of Hinduism buddy. Why do you forget to mention this? Brahmin scholars and Sanskrit scholars do the interpretations

Theres no one stopping you from publishing your own interpretation of hindu texts and a large number of people following them. There is no verse in hinduism that states that you must only follow one interpretation. The same cannot be said for islam

Yes but, scriptures gets reinterpreted with the newer times. The practices and rituals matter also. Hinduism is stuck in the past, which is why India is also stuck, which is ALSO what makes it better for LDAR'ing Incels

If anything its the exact opposite. Hinduism and other religions are open to reinterpretation. There is a verse in the Quran (5:3) which explicitly states that it has been perfected for mankind until the last day

 

[JayGoptri]

All of a piece. While there is something to be said for an integrated comprehensive learning in one tradition and body of literature, our world today would not permit it, and our world is full of doubts and vexations of all kinds that seek to slot in what is "x" there into "y" elsewhere, and so on. In the postmodern journey it's all hands on deck. Whatever works. Anyway, that seems to be the syncretism of Hinduism throughout the ages, no?

In a way, yes. But Hinduism as a result ran the risk of becoming a garbage collection of way too much for it's own good. Its resilience to certain negative aspects of Western culture not withstanding. Otherwise you are absolutely correct. Well said!

(And someday future ecumenists and mystics may arrive at similar conclusions in and for the Abrahamic bubble, who knows.) All rivers to one ocean.

Well, one thing that Christianity would have benefited from would be adapting its language to the newer world of disguised Sins, yes. I believe its a bit too late. But parts of it can still be used to build anew.

That it would.

"This tale grew in the telling . . . "

Precisely brocel, Precisely!

 

[currycel⁰]

Allah was too busy perfecting chad while making us as a warm up exercise

 

[JayGoptri]

Because you're only looking at the most public aspect of his career which is his science communication. There's isn't some mutually exclusive choice scientists have to make where they choose to either pursue research in complete isolation or do nothing but talk to the public.

In today's dangerous world of sexual authority, YES IT MUST BE kept mutually exclusive !

Have you looked at his academic contributions to evolutionary biology?

Hahahahaha. Richard Dawkins made no contribution to any active field of science. Again, you are a nitwit who has been seduced and thinks he is smart and savoy, but you are not. Dawkins merely popularised the already existing and known facts regarding how replicating genes are important force behind evolution. No shit, really?!! LoL. That by itself doesn't make him evil or even a bad guy, its all well and good, but the talk-show masturbation style gave an entire generation the wrong about Science !

And yes buddyboyo, again and for the 10th time, I read "The Selfish Gene" before you mums let your dads put his pee inside her Lmao.

What are your criticisms of them?

AGAIN - I reject the claim that he has any contributions to speak of.

He battled religious cucks as a science talk-show cuck. Thats all.

 

[JayGoptri]

I already said that christianity is also full of contradictions when it comes to the trinity.

If misunderstood yes, and I believe Christianity is infact the MOST misunderstood religion for its useable parts.

Theres no one stopping you from publishing your own interpretation of hindu texts and a large number of people following them. There is no verse in hinduism that states that you must only follow one interpretation. The same cannot be said for islam.

Fair but....Oh yes it can be said..

If anything its the exact opposite. Hinduism and other religions are open to reinterpretation. There is a verse in the Quran (5:3) which explicitly states that it has been perfected for mankind until the last day

Yet Islam has been reinterpreted, social customs AND practices changed from various Sunni to Wahabbism and then again into whatever new age iterations that Muslim scholars in the West and even Middle East reiter it as today.

 

[JayGoptri]

In today's dangerous world of sexual authority, YES IT MUST BE kept mutually exclusive !

Hahahahaha. Richard Dawkins made no contribution to any active field of science. Again, you are a nitwit who has been seduced and thinks he is smart and savoy, but you are not. Dawkins merely popularised the already existing and known facts regarding how replicating genes are important force behind evolution. No shit, really?!! LoL. That by itself doesn't make him evil or even a bad guy, its all well and good, but the talk-show masturbation style gave an entire generation the wrong about Science !

And yes buddyboyo, again and for the 10th time, I read "The Selfish Gene" before you mums let your dads put his pee inside her Lmao.

AGAIN - I reject the claim that he has any contributions to speak of.

He battled religious cucks as a science talk-show cuck. Thats all.

@Indracel

Most British scientists cited in study feel Richard Dawkins’ work misrepresents science

Controversial British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins is well-known for his criticism of religion, but a new Rice University study of British scientists reveals that a majority who mentioned Dawkins’ work during research interviews reject his approach to public engagement

news.rice.edu

 

[JayGoptri]

@Indracel

Here is yet another set of major critique on Dawkins. In the piece, the author even admits his fans see him as a "superhero" LOL. Sound familiar? And what is a superhero but the reflection of a god? And you of course feel resentment about your subhuman Hindu/Indian family background and since Dawkins attacks religion, hes your Superhero. Admit it, its really the only reason you champion this scruffy talking head in "Science Public Relations" lol.

The Dangerous Delusions of Richard Dawkins

Richard Dawkins is seen as a superhero by thinkers seeking to overturn the delusions of monotheistic thought which have wreaked havoc on billions of people

www.resilience.org

 

[Ricordanza]

Yet Islam has been reinterpreted, social customs AND practices changed from various Sunni to Wahabbism and then again into whatever new age iterations that Muslim scholars in the West and even Middle East reiter it as today.

Wahhabism literally calls for Muslims to return to the Quran and the tradition of the first three generations of muslims and to stop believing in religious innovation

 

[Caesercel]

@Indracel @JayGoptri @wereq advice for OP?

the sad truth. regardless of what religion you choose, you can't get laid unless rich or good looking. I think your best option is to Afghanistan Maxx and learn farsi. Pakistan itself has many Pathans who would marry their daughters off for the dutch green card equivalent alone. I knew a gyro cart guy who had a daughter in Pakistan and then ditched his wife behind there. He was only 4/10 5'8 stats wise and fucking gyro seller yet still got a decent foid just due to USA halo. Dutch cels like you can do same

Jfl @ assuming op doesn't have a paki wife already

 

[JayGoptri]

Wahhabism literally calls for Muslims to return to the Quran and the tradition of the first three generations of muslims and to stop believing in religious innovation

Whatever. Then Wahhabism - Sunni. Point is under the veil, most Muslim women behave like criminal foids also

 

[JayGoptri]

Jfl @ assuming op doesn't have a paki wife already

Great observation there champ !

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Hinduism spiritually mogs Islam.

For now, since I have no Hindu waifu; I say NO! Cope more.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

JFL, Hindus believe in cosmic purple 4-legged cows, JFL

I will too, if they get me a waifu.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Jfl @ assuming op doesn't have a paki wife already

I don’t, faggot. (I called you a bad name because you are lying about me).

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

I thought niggas were turning to islam to get a submissive loyal wife unicorn?

What happened to that cope?

If nothing else, you can go Jihad for that 72 virgin pussy reward?

Lmfao if you think they exist. They’re degenerate; these “Muslim” women (and men, btw).

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

@Indracel @JayGoptri @wereq advice for OP?

the sad truth. regardless of what religion you choose, you can't get laid unless rich or good looking. I think your best option is to Afghanistan Maxx and learn farsi. Pakistan itself has many Pathans who would marry their daughters off for the dutch green card equivalent alone. I knew a gyro cart guy who had a daughter in Pakistan and then ditched his wife behind there. He was only 4/10 5'8 stats wise and fucking gyro seller yet still got a decent foid just due to USA halo. Dutch cels like you can do same

Actually, Pathans hate non-Pathan people of Pakistan like me, they have a superiority complex. As for Afghanistan; they are also Pathans but they specifically hate Pakistanis like me. I was there in Pakistan and got no difference in treatment because I’m subhuman.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Come to India. But leave your pride and all of your delusions behind. If you try any of the shit you mentioned, nobody will accept you and nothing except your body hanging from a tree as an example (by extremist) will occur, and meanwhile the woke and often schizophrenic India media will tarnish you by calling you out on the News. And still, no girl will come.

This world doesn't work that way. And you are not a real gangster, like most of us you are, you aren't going to join some Hindutva hardliners and be accepted as a rando-without-a-family caste guy. You would need ENORMOUS support to live a life like this, which don't now, nor will you ever have.

If you come to India, come as a spiritual begger looking for a humble life and follow the advice and suggestions of people like me. Wiser and older more experienced than you...

Otherwise stfu and stay where you are.

I will only come to India if I can get a waifu, then I’ll Hindumaxx and be a loyal servant to my new community.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

His approach is delusional. Talking like this is a sign someone is in the grips of the worst type of dissassociative mental health crisis. Its typical when desperate to think that if you just SAY something that one group seems to be partial to, that they will accept you and you can start some new life in a nice Monastery filled with foids.

BUT, everyone knows life doesn't work that way, whether you believe yourself or not is irrelevant. In 1650, maybe, in 2023, he'll just be rejected at every level of society. Shit, people who type like OP aren't even able to gather the right documents to be able to leave the airport, let aline live in a drastically new environment !

I already know OP's tendencies. Hes an unstable obnoxious fella. And if we are to take, even remotely seriously, what he has written as his "plan", I will guarantee he'll be detained or in the hospital shortly after he arrives wherever the fuck hes going. Full stop!

I will go for Dalits then, would that help?

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

And please, don't make me laugh by tagging @Indracel, he can't give "advice" HAHA! Top Kek. He's an unaccomplished 19 year old asking his mommy for permission to have forks while in India and sitting in a California Ivory tower collegiate setting rest of the time. He also is convinced that "living in India" is no way to live and he will be living on Sunset Boulevard with an awesome California snow bunny as some sort of rich "Computer Science + Health Care professional".

Just like @RREEEEEEEEE and quite a few others, he will be coming back to me a few years down the line in PMs and asking me how to re-envision his behavior so that he can survive. And a large number of low smv Western curries who rejected the idea living like a Monk in India (or somewhere comparable) will realize that they are lucky to just be alive and healthy, forget "ascending with foid blaa blaa" thats all Top Kek - delusional. They are lucky if they are even able to move to India (or anywhere) by the time they realize they need it badly enough.

Links to stories of western curries who went to India to ascend? I thought I was the only one.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

bro you're just ugly. simple as. many of my female relatives got married with no trouble

I never said I wasn’t ugly, JFL. I obviously am.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Yes drinking cow piss, bathing in cow dung, marrying dogs, letting your wife have sex with dead horses is very spiritual

I would do all this except for the last part for an Indian waifu.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Lmao imagine seeing a Pakistani muzzie stoning mosques and dancing to Jay shree Ram songs

Of course if I were to do that I wouldn’t be a “muzzie.” But if I can get an Indian waifu this will become reality.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

before: retarded
after: retarded

Kanker.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

All these religious people will be biased against incels. In the military and religious communities brotherhood only exists for normies while the incels are just the punching bag. There is no brotherhood in real life except the brotherhood among incels. trying to find brotherhood among normies is suicide. But at the same time if you're able to get a cute girl maybe someone very poor then you'd ascend and become a little more accepted by the normies just because you have a girl.
Then again you'll never really be a normie they will still bias against you for ugliness but just a step improvement from no girl.

Are you in India bhai? Tbh I’m obviously incel by looks so if they don’t accept incels then I can’t cope with this anymore.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

If he stands out yeah. But I doubt anyone is going to careless. Normies don’t give af anywhere typically. He might get heckled if he looks too foreign maybe.
Though even if he goes there, going there expecting a girl is dumb. If OP is looking for a golddigger country he should look elsewhere.

Why is it dumb? We used to be one country. I’m like a familiar foreigner; a distant family member, really. I speak the language and all and I’m familiar with the culture. I probably will stand out due my Jew nose though.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Isn´t a crime to leave islam ? If people find it out may they try to kill you ?

I would be living in India. And it’s more of a moral crime rather than a real crime, you know? It’s just low IQcels who think they can kill me for it.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

@Broly The muzzie is trying to steal your women

He’s from Nepal. Not India.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Pretty sure u won’t get shit if u throw stones at Muslims or mosques unless u get anti Islam wife who hates muslims

That’s basically… Hindus.

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

OP is too dense and mental health'd up to even reply to his own moronic question in his OP.

You are too negative. I think it will work.

 

[PLA1092]

You are too negative. I think it will work.

curryification of .is theory was right

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

curryification of .is theory was right

Curries are the incel race.

 

[PLA1092]

Curries are the incel race.

join pakistani equivalent of intelligence agency and ascend with cia stacy after looksmaxxing

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

join pakistani equivalent of intelligence agency and ascend with cia stacy after looksmaxxing

Looksmaxxing for me means hardmaxxing. Softmaxxing doesn’t do shit when there’s something smack-dab in the middle of your face. But I don’t want plastic surgery so my only option is Hindumaxxing and getting a waifu in India (not in that order). Since I’m too subhuman for my own community.

 

[PLA1092]

Looksmaxxing for me means hardmaxxing. Softmaxxing doesn’t do shit when there’s something smack-dab in the middle of your face. But I don’t want plastic surgery so my only option is Hindumaxxing and getting a waifu in India (not in that order). Since I’m too subhuman for my own community.

travel to Afghanistan and steal a foid

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

travel to Afghanistan and steal a foid

Dude, they fkn hate Pakistanis. They would murder me instantly. Someone else suggested Afghan Pakistanis but they’re the same as Afghans; they HATE Indic peoples of Pakistan. They got a superiority complex. Won’t work.

 

[RollD20]

Why is it dumb? We used to be one country. I’m like a familiar foreigner; a distant family member, really. I speak the language and all and I’m familiar with the culture. I probably will stand out due my Jew nose though.

I am pretty sure most of india is very communal, as a foreigner, or outside of the community it’s pretty hard to fit in. Unless you have relatives already there. Not sure about major cities but it’s probably filled with the same problem as western cities and tinderlites.

 

[kek1]

You can try visiting it to judge for yourself, in India the concept is that if an incel ever stood up for themself the horde of mentally disabled blue pilled curries would beat him to death, curries are extreme hateful and violent towards black pilled incels that is basically why they are absurdly blue pilled, personally i think going to India to escape incel discrimination is stupid, but going to India can make sense for other reasons

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

But what about allah?

Does he have psychokinetic abilities?

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

Coverage? You mean like insurance?

Don't worry about it.

Re: why do people just walk out of your life for no reason UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563 #182178881Friday, January 22, 2016 2:55 PM CST It is quite simple: They do not have any obligation to remain pleasing towards you.

Documentary Cure for Leftistic/ Ideologies UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563 #182179096Friday, January 22, 2016 2:58 PM CST Yes, here you go. This will reveal the truthful aspects of leftism to you. Systematic ideologies of Islam shown below: View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjVJjBiHzOA

Re: Documentary Cure for Leftistic/ Ideologies UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563 #182179308Friday, January 22, 2016 3:02 PM CST Barack "Imam" Obama is gladly embracing the Saudi princes as I-SIL is given greater access to oil reserves throughout the Middle-East. It is truly a blissful event for leftists/Islam sympathizers.

Re: how many of yall been to jail UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563 #182179491Friday, January 22, 2016 3:05 PM CST Yes. I was incarcerated for five years for forging large quantities of crucial documents involving federal services over a span of months. I have now reformed and become a servant of our Lord, Jesus Christ.

Re: Documentary Cure for Leftistic/ Ideologies UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563 #182179678Friday, January 22, 2016 3:08 PM CST Well Liberals, have you begun to banish your oblivion now that you recognize that the power-vacuum created by Bush was merely an opportunity for Sovereign Imam to dominate the Middle-East and America upon gaining entry into a position of power?

Re: What's your least trusted news source?

UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563

#181986928Tuesday, January 19, 2016 2:17 AM CST Any resource intoxicated by the influence of 'radical' leftists such as Barack "Imam" Obama/Hillary "Da'wah" Clinton.

Re: Half of OT is LGBT and yet we have the acceptance issue

UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563

#194146988Wednesday, July 20, 2016 4:44 PM CDT "ROBLOX needs to bring back the Global Chat subforum so we can contain political/religious discussion there again" This will never occur. ROBLOX is a liberal company controlled by leftists in liberal America. Only more censorship will be added when possible.

Re: lol im scared help me

UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563

#185677479Saturday, March 19, 2016 7:51 PM CDT Yes, you likely will. Barack "Imam" Obama regularly advocates his support for Islamic terrorism. Ensure that you are not riding an airplane with leftist Arabs.

Re: roblox has something against a certain kind of people?! UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563 #182213839Saturday, January 23, 2016 12:03 AM CST Quite pitiful. ROBLOX greatly endorses and advocates leftistic ideologies. As a direct result, Arabic use is silently-encouraged by the moderators. Your decal was rejected because you were perceived as being an "Islamophobic" rightist.

Re: Why Is Chimmihc A Scripting Deity? UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563 #182215978Saturday, January 23, 2016 12:56 AM CST " but he sounds awesome" Indeed he is. When I last spoke with Chimmihc earlier today, he hinted towards me that he is also developing a mechanism to efficiently implement client-sided physics over an Internet connection in C++. I am hoping that he will give us public access to his newly-created private Github repository.

Re: [ Content Deleted ] UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563 #182216035Saturday, January 23, 2016 12:58 AM CST Individuals with vulvas are known for psychologically-punishing vulnerable male individuals.

 

[JayGoptri]

I will only come to India if I can get a waifu, then I’ll Hindumaxx and be a loyal servant to my new community.

None of this will work for you, you are a mental cripple! Do I need to quote you back all the shit you said to me, and about Indian culture and how superior you are? I still have it in the chat. So do you now admit you are a piece of shit in character also?

I will go for Dalits then, would that help?

No, absolutely zero chance. I just know how screwed up you are, and you will not be tolerated by anyone whom you could have a hope of communicating with, or even begin forging a relationship with. Not even men for simple food service, let alone trying to get a foid. Just the way you wrote your OP shows how delusional and out of touch with reality you are!

Links to stories of western curries who went to India to ascend? I thought I was the only one.

The fuck? What are you even talking about. Proof read your sentences! You ascended? Are you brain damaged dude? You fought with me left and right when I tried to teach you about yourself (wrote me all sorts of nasty messages on PM) and now, you are back asking for my help and advice on ascending ? LOL.

You wouldn't survive a single week here or anywhere. Thats the truth !

 

[JayGoptri]

You are too negative. I think it will work.

Absolutely positively ZERO chance. Mark my words right here and let the whole forum see how right I am about these things! Ready?

curryification of .is theory was right

Nah man, its not just that. Some of these kids ask for my advice, flip out when I give them the Hardknocks real blackpilled truth based on my assessment of their behaviors, then they spaz out all over PM cause their ego grips them, call me all sorts of names and then..guess what.. in a few months time, they are back asking me "Hey man, I'm so sorry can you help me move to India and find a girl I'll be a good boy" LMAO. They are the worst that the inpatient Psych-ward at a hospital has to offer. Its like "Shutter Island" with these GenZ curries, have you seen that movie? In fact dude didn't even say "sorry" he just starts asking for advice like nothing happened. Shit is hilarious.

I mean you should have seen the type of shit this moron was writing few months back. Shit is top Kek.

 

[Ricordanza]

I would do all this except for the last part for an Indian waifu.

You really think hindus will be happy about you going after their sisters? Only yts aren't protective of their female relatives

 

[Indracel]

In today's dangerous world of sexual authority, YES IT MUST BE kept mutually exclusive !

Why? Who is supposed to educate the public about science besides scientists themselves?

Hahahahaha. Richard Dawkins made no contribution to any active field of science.

You just said science communication and doing scientific work HAD to be kept separate. Then what's your issue with Dawkins not doing scientific work? According to you both HAVE to be kept separate. Nevertheless:

Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1979). Arms races between and within species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 205(1161), 489-511.

Dawkins, R., & Carlisle, T. R. (1976). Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy. Nature, 262(5564), 131-133.

Dawkins, R. (1979). Twelve misunderstandings of kin selection. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 51(2), 184-200.

Dawkins, R. (1978). Replicator selection and the extended phenotype 3. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 47(1), 61-76.

Dawkins, R. (1982). Replicators and vehicles. Current problems in sociobiology, 45, 64.

Dawkins, R. (2019). The evolution of evolvability. In Artificial life (pp. 201-220). Routledge.

Dawkins, R. (1981). In defence of selfish genes. Philosophy, 56(218), 556-573.

Brockmann, H. J., Grafen, A., & Dawkins, R. (1979). Evolutionarily stable nesting strategy in a digger wasp. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 77(4), 473-496.

Dawkins, R., & Brockmann, H. J. (1980). Do digger wasps commit the Concorde fallacy?. Animal Behaviour, 28(3), 892-896.

Dawkins, R. (1990). Parasites, desiderata lists and the paradox of the organism. Parasitology, 100(S1), S63-S73.

Brockmann, H. J., & Dawkins, R. (1979). Joint nesting in a digger wasp as an evolutionarily stable preadaptation to social life. Behaviour, 71(3-4), 203-244.

Smith, J. N., & Dawkins, R. (1971). The hunting behaviour of individual great tits in relation to spatial variations in their food density. Animal Behaviour, 19(4), 695-706.

Krebs, John R. & Dawkins, Richard (1984). Animal Signals: Mind-Reading and Manipulation. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (eds.), Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell Scientific. pp. 380–402.

Mind you, all these publications have anywhere from a few hundred to two thousand citations, for a combined total of 113464 citations. Since he's jut a "science presenter" with "no real contributions to science" while you're a scholar with wisdom that none of those aforementioned individuals have, how do your citation metrics compare?

Again, you are a nitwit who has been seduced and thinks he is smart and savoy, but you are not.

Actually, I don't care about Richard Dawkins in particular. The fact you assume for no reason that I was some disciple of his (along with repeatedly bringing up irrelevant facts and people like Fauci and the COVID-19 vaccines into debates that have nothing to do whatsoever with them) shows a) how in the dark you are about understanding people despite claiming to be able to do so on a general level b) that you have some sort of agenda against the people who you are keen on attacking.

My preferred critic of Christianity from a historical perspective is Bart Ehrman.

Dawkins merely popularised the already existing and known facts regarding how replicating genes are important force behind evolution. No shit, really?!! LoL. That by itself doesn't make him evil or even a bad guy, its all well and good, but the talk-show masturbation style gave an entire generation the wrong about Science !

1. This is incorrect, strict Darwinism has been rejected by some biologists, including the likes of Stephen Jay Gould.
2. Since you're claiming he just "popularized" existing facts, who theorized the selfish gene framework then, and mind linking me their publications?

And yes buddyboyo, again and for the 10th time, I read "The Selfish Gene" before you mums let your dads put his pee inside her Lmao.

You could be a Nobel Prize winner for all I care. Arguments stand for themselves regardless of who says them.

AGAIN - I reject the claim that he has any contributions to speak of.

He battled religious cucks as a science talk-show cuck. Thats all.

Then I'm sure you have a response to all those publications.

 

[Indracel]

Nah man, its not just that. Some of these kids ask for my advice, flip out when I give them the Hardknocks real blackpilled truth based on my assessment of their behaviors, then they spaz out all over PM cause their ego grips them, call me all sorts of names and then..guess what.. in a few months time, they are back asking me "Hey man, I'm so sorry can you help me move to India and find a girl I'll be a good boy" LMAO. They are the worst that the inpatient Psych-ward at a hospital has to offer. Its like "Shutter Island" with these GenZ curries, have you seen that movie? In fact dude didn't even say "sorry" he just starts asking for advice like nothing happened. Shit is hilarious.

I mean you should have seen the type of shit this moron was writing few months back. Shit is top Kek.

Probably because they don't care about "Wittgenstein" or any of those other dry philosophers you keep lecturing about, but want practical advice like on how to integrate into Indian culture (but have to soothe your ego first before you'll provide it)

 

[Indracel]

@Indracel

Most British scientists cited in study feel Richard Dawkins’ work misrepresents science

Controversial British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins is well-known for his criticism of religion, but a new Rice University study of British scientists reveals that a majority who mentioned Dawkins’ work during research interviews reject his approach to public engagement

news.rice.edu

What they mean by "misrepresenting science" is that they disagree with his position that can you use natural sciences to "debunk" religion and that faith is necessarily contradictory to the scientific process. I of course agree with that. I'm unsurprised that many don't, given how much they don't want to antagonize religious belief.

 

[JayGoptri]

You really think hindus will be happy about you going after their sisters? Only yts aren't protective of their female relatives

This guy is just a mental patient in the middle of psychosis. I mean an out of touch, Paki-Westerner Muslim background Incel who trashed talked Indian Hindus his whole life says hes going to now move to India (general) and somehow be happy scoring a foid who will not even speak any language he knows and then sex her up and live a happy life?!? Is he going to communicate with her using sign language? LMAO. That too he was smashing me left and right for suggesting he move to India for a more peaceful monk life just a few months back..

You know the problem with these types of morons is they have absolutely no real life experience. They just don't understand that because THEY finally realized something it doesn't mean people will also agree with them and make it work LOL.

 

[JayGoptri]

Why? Who is supposed to educate the public about science besides scientists themselves?

Again, time number 55. He was not truly a producing scientist. You also have a lot of admiration for this word, you think it means something totally different than what it should mean.

Here is an example of a Scientist. He was working in the area of mRNA long before anything Covid. Most of his publications were done about SARS virus types BEFORE Covid. And yet, leftist and establishment Democrats have colludes with Wiki and Google to display the fact he spoke critical thought to the handling of vaccines, instead of any of his previous work.

Robert W. Malone - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

You just said science communication and doing scientific work HAD to be kept separate. Then what's your issue with Dawkins not doing scientific work? According to you both HAVE to be kept separate.

Today they should be, otherwise assholes like you get the idea they are intelligent LoL.

My issue is, the fact you are unable to see that Dawkins chose to abandon any real traction he may have had (which was very little to begin with) to contributing to the field of biology in a material way, and instead wages a war of the Humanities fields and Religion.

Nevertheless:

Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1979). Arms races between and within species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 205(1161), 489-511.

Science glamour.

Dawkins, R., & Carlisle, T. R. (1976). Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy. Nature, 262(5564), 131-133.

Okay. Fine. Science reporter. Educator.

Dawkins, R. (1979). Twelve misunderstandings of kin selection. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 51(2), 184-200.

Same as Above ^

Dawkins, R. (1978). Replicator selection and the extended phenotype 3. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 47(1), 61-76.

Dawkins, R. (1982). Replicators and vehicles. Current problems in sociobiology, 45, 64.

Dawkins, R. (2019). The evolution of evolvability. In Artificial life (pp. 201-220). Routledge.

Dawkins, R. (1981). In defence of selfish genes. Philosophy, 56(218), 556-573.

Brockmann, H. J., Grafen, A., & Dawkins, R. (1979). Evolutionarily stable nesting strategy in a digger wasp. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 77(4), 473-496.

Dawkins, R., & Brockmann, H. J. (1980). Do digger wasps commit the Concorde fallacy?. Animal Behaviour, 28(3), 892-896.

Dawkins, R. (1990). Parasites, desiderata lists and the paradox of the organism. Parasitology, 100(S1), S63-S73.

Brockmann, H. J., & Dawkins, R. (1979). Joint nesting in a digger wasp as an evolutionarily stable preadaptation to social life. Behaviour, 71(3-4), 203-244.

Smith, J. N., & Dawkins, R. (1971). The hunting behaviour of individual great tits in relation to spatial variations in their food density. Animal Behaviour, 19(4), 695-706.

Krebs, John R. & Dawkins, Richard (1984). Animal Signals: Mind-Reading and Manipulation. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (eds.), Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell Scientific. pp. 380–402.

Mind you, all these publications have anywhere from a few hundred to two thousand citations, for a combined total of 113464 citations. Since he's jut a "science presenter" with "no real contributions to science" while you're a scholar with wisdom that none of those aforementioned individuals have, how do your citation metrics compare?

Means little to negate my point about him and many others' point about the same. In most of these publications he is waging a war on religion Lol.

Actually, I don't care about Richard Dawkins in particular.

Yes you do. I asked you specifically when we had the "sex is not a biological need" discussion and on discord several times, "who do you consider to be a scientist then" after a piece I posted about Bret Weinstein, your reply was "Richard Dawkins" so yeah... you do.

The fact you assume for no reason that I was some disciple of his (along with repeatedly bringing up irrelevant facts and people like Fauci and the COVID-19 vaccines into debates that have nothing to do whatsoever with them).

It had everything to do with them. The government and political response to Covid scamdemic is almost an exact measure of how they are in the grips of metaphysical desire and internal mediation. When I tried to teach you that vocabulary so that you could understand what I was saying, you behaved ridiculously by declaring "this bullshit has nothing to do with Psychology and Behavior of people I take my information from Psychology and Psychiatry" then you quoted some wikipedia page about brain scans. I replied with what Thomas Szasz, a psychiatrist says about his own field's short comings, to which you couldn't even (and still haven't) been able to reply at all. You forget the sequence of invents on here and discord that led you to think you understand what I (or anyone else you keep citing too for that matter) am saying or how those fields connect.

shows a) how in the dark you are about understanding people despite claiming to be able to do so on a general level.

It doesn't, and I have given you the chronology of events above.

b) that you have some sort of agenda against the people who you are keen on attacking.

I generally don't like seduction artists and bullshitters. We have all done it. It makes a person real sick in the head. Its time to call a spade a spade. Dawkins, Faucci, whomever. I don't particularly think you agree with them, I think you don't know any more than the fact other people think they are pioneers etc.

My preferred critic of Christianity from a historical perspective is Bart Ehrman.

Great. A man who even in his Atheism adits being an agnostic is best, after struggling with the philosophical problems of evil and suffering ! Wow.

1. This is incorrect, strict Darwinism has been rejected by some biologists, including the likes of Stephen Jay Gould.
2. Since you're claiming he just "popularized" existing facts, who theorized the selfish gene framework then, and mind linking me their publications?.

Re-read what I wrote and don't use the book title. I said Dawkins POPULARIZED the theories involving the fact that genes replicate. This was a known discovery already. So I'm not sure what you are whinning about.

You could be a Nobel Prize winner for all I care. Arguments stand for themselves regardless of who says them.

Nope, I just know motivations of people when I aee them. I used to think Dawkins was just swell until I realized how poisonous his type of thinking and way of explaining is to the new generation of potential thinkers.

Then I'm sure you have a response to all those publications.

Will not look at any of the crap beyond self-ish gene. Ive seen dawkins speak a hundred times, I know what hes about.