Deleted member 101
I just wanna be loved, but don’t think I’m worthy
-
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2017
- Posts
- 4,228
Hating women or not life will never get better
Indeed but u need the looks too and doneHating wome will get you laid.
No it won’t, not when you’re ugly, short, possibly autisticHating wome will get you laid.
I said it before. I dont hate whamen. I hate blue pill cucks and simps. With a passion. Its them that enable foids worst behavior.
Probably some fat femcel whore who got tired of her echo chamber discussions with other femcels and soys, came here for a "challenge" and finally broke in this thread after getting mocked in every single thread she's ever made.At this point I'm pretty sure @K9Otaku is a woman, they literally can't resist making these kinds of insults, and they don't understand that insults like this "come out of nowhere" so its a dead giveaway
No man speaking about a topic like this just randomly decides - "You know what, I'll insult his dick size and try and emasculate him"
That is completely random
Knowing this forum it'll take like half a year for her to be banned though JFL
She deleted the comment, she let it slip @MasterAt this point I'm pretty sure @K9Otaku is a woman, they literally can't resist making these kinds of insults, and they don't understand that insults like this "come out of nowhere" so its a dead giveaway
No man speaking about a topic like this just randomly decides - "You know what, I'll insult his dick size and try and emasculate him"
That is completely random
Knowing this forum it'll take like half a year for her to be banned though JFL
Sorry about that. I guess I went too far.Everything you said in this thread I disagree with but I had no problem with it
But when you start throwing around normie tier insults like this you start to look really suspicious and like someone that should be banned
How the hell does anything he just said indicate having a "micropenis", you are sounding a lot like a woman right now, because that's the kind of insults women use, we could be arguing about something in physics and women will immediately go to insulting your masculinity with relation to sex
"You can't get laid"
"Your dick must be small"
Etc
You need to ease up there or your ban will be soon to come, don't let the larp mask fall off so easily
Here, I think you are stretching the meaning of "hate" beyond its generally accepted scope. Normally, "hate" means "wishing harm and intending to do harm if possible"Lastly, when it comes to hating women, there really isn't any reason to stop hating women, of course it depends on what hate means to someone, to me every person that I have truly hated I became INDIFFERENT to their existence, as in I don't care what does or doesn't happen to them so long as it doesn't impact my life
Like Christians (I am not one), I am saying "hate the sin, not the sinner"That is how my hatred is for women, so I don't see any reason to not hate them
There is such a thing as "irrational hate"
For example there are incels here who will refuse to pay for sex because they "hate" women whilst ironically making the contradictory complaint of not being able to have sex, that's irrational hate, that's hate which is making you think in an illogical way, the kind of hate that makes you "cut your nose off to spite your face"
My hatred is rational, I know how I have been treated by most women, and I know how most women view me
To me it makes perfect sense to pay a woman for sex, because that is the truest form of objectification, and based on where you are paying for sex you are pretty much robbing these women because its dirt cheap (e.g. SEA or EE)
You'll notice that a lot of incels that CLAIM they "hate" women ironically say they couldn't enjoy paid for sex especially if they see a look of disgust on the woman's face
For me its the opposite, I'm indifferent to women and their plight, I only care about my own pleasure, and based on how I've been treated by them, a look of disgust from a whore would be more gratifying to me, so I'd enjoy the sex more
When you think about it, their hate doesn't make sense, because if they actually hated women, wouldn't a look of disgust feel like some kind of "revenge", wouldn't you enjoy it more?
It stands to reason that these men are lying to themselves and they actually care deeply about women, and their claim of hatred is just a coping mechanism. Men like this likely haven't had many negative experiences with women, they are they guys who "had a oneitis" and approached like 3 to 5 women and then stopped.
Though quantity is not required but also "quality", if a boy was embarrassed by a stacey who was "pretending to like him" and then outed him publicly for "thinking he had a chance", he would definitely hate and distrust women from now on, and I wouldn't blame him. Luckily I've never had anything like that happen to me, my "persecution" by the female collective was more "quantity" than "quality"
Hatred can be rational, and your entire argument is pretty much irrational because its like you are saying - "there's no reason one should keep hating women"
I do not think that is the case. Hatred (in the usual sense of the word) leads either to crime, which is not beneficial obviously, or to depression if it is impotent hatred (which it is 99.99% of the time). Depression leads to suicide, also not beneficial unless you have a warped "I am better off dead" mentality.What if that hatred benefits your existence?, isn't that an objective reason to keep hating women?
I think you have evolved since the thread I quoted at the beginning of the OP, probably because you got older and more successful in the world.The hatred I have for women comes from experiences, and we all learn from our experiences, they form our world view, and that's a good thing, one should learn from their mistakes, and if your experiences have shown you that it is a mistake to see women as individuals that "care about you" then one should operate based on those experiences, there's no reason for someone to artificially force themselves to "one day" stop hating women when that hatred has led to rational life choices that have benefited their existence
The black pill and my "hatred" (indifference) of women has led me on a path that so far has been very productive
I went from being a jobless, virgin with crappy social skills and no wealth building knowledge and skills, to a guy who has been promoted and given raises, lost his virginity by paying for sex (stopped thinking of women "as people" but instead as "an outlet"), has decent social skills from all the jobs he's worked and women he's interacted with and is probably on their path to becoming wealthy
All of that was because of the black pill and hatred, it was only when I discovered the black pill and accepted how women and society saw me, that I started making objective, "cold" and calculated life decisions. Before that I was just some hopeless blue pilled idiot who was "trying to be nice", the kind of guy who would tell himself "not to hate"
So your entire thread just sounds ridiculous to me, if you have a strategy that is working you should never abandon it unless it stops, and my strategy and mindset for life is definitely working right now, there's no reason to change, there's no reason to "stop hating"
When the world changes I will, because that's what I did the first time around. My world/reality changed when the black pill was revealed to me, when the truth was revealed to me, and it hasn't been disproved yet, so when the world changes again and the black pill is proven false, I'll change my perspective again (but we both know that change is never going to happen lol, the black pill is an unchanging fact of reality that is hidden from all men because it would cause widespread anarchy)
What you need to do is differentiate between the incels that hate irrationally and those that don't, there's a huge difference in life choices and perspective between these two groups
Most that I've spoken to with "irrational hate" are the LDAR type, all they plan to do is come online everyday and rage at the existence of women and attractive men, they have no path in life, they have no goal other than to just keep existing (and many of them are just lying to themselves about their hatred for women)
The incels who I have spoken to with "rational hate" treat their hatred of more of "an understanding of women", its really more like distrust and indifference than just "pure hatred", and these men all have goals, are wealthmaxxing or wealthy already, etc. They see women as an outlet for sexual urges, not an enemy to obsess over and complain about for years online
TO ME WOMEN ARE LIKE FIRE
FIRE "WANTS" TO BURN ME, BUT FIRE IS USEFUL FOR THINGS I WOULD LIKE TO DO (LIKE COOKING)
SO I MERELY NEED TO FIND A MEANS TO CONTROL THE FIRE SO THAT I CAN GET THE USE I WANT OUT OF ITS EXISTENCE
THERE'S NO REASON FOR ME TO LIKE FIRE BECAUSE I USE IT TO DO SOMETHING I LIKE
ESPECIALLY BECAUSE I KNOW IT "WANTS" TO BURN ME
TO TRY AND FORGET OR IGNORE MY DISTRUST AND NEGATIVE FEELINGS TOWARDS FIRE, THAT ONLY EXIST BASED ON FIRE'S INCLINATION TO BURN ME, WOULD BE LIKE ME DELUDING MYSELF INTO THINKING I'M "SAFE"
FIRE "WANTS" TO BURN ME, BUT FIRE IS USEFUL FOR THINGS I WOULD LIKE TO DO (LIKE COOKING)
SO I MERELY NEED TO FIND A MEANS TO CONTROL THE FIRE SO THAT I CAN GET THE USE I WANT OUT OF ITS EXISTENCE
CorrectI said it before. I dont hate whamen. I hate blue pill cucks and simps. With a passion. Its them that enable foids worst behavior.
No, this is always how I have hated women, I can't trust them, I know they don't like me, and I would like to deal with them on a strictly transactional basisI think you have evolved since the thread I quoted at the beginning of the OP, probably because you got older and more successful in the world.
In order to hide the fact that you have changed (to yourself, maybe), you have stretched the meaning of "hatred" to include your present attitude towards women.
You do not "hate" women now. An honest assessment of your attitude is that you have a negative opinion of women (also my opinion) based on experience and as a result do not fall for their manipulative tactics.
This is clearly expressed here and I agree with it:
No wrong, women aren't animals, if they are they shouldn't have rights, to strip women of any autonomy and blame is ironically enabling them in another way, that's the irony of your mindset, like I told @Cope or dieCorrect
Yeah that's retard logic, one should always blame the attacker not the person who "enables" them, seriously think about what that even means, its really presumptuous, because what you are actually say is X group is SUPPOSED TO force Y group to "behave", when Y group should have to choose to "behave" on their own
The great irony is guys like you don't realize that you are fundamentally NO DIFFERENT than the "blue pill cucks and simps" you claim to hate, all you guys do is infantalize women and strip any blame from their actions, that is 100% a blue pilled simp mindset
There is no such thing as "enabling" when it comes to women, in a world where women have rights and privileges, their actions are 100% their own and they are 100% accountable
That is not the definition of "hatred"No, this is always how I have hated women, I can't trust them, I know they don't like me, and I would like to deal with them on a strictly transactional basis
I would do the same.If I heard a woman screaming in an alleyway at nigh I would not rush to save her, is this more in line with your idea of being "less evolved"
Can you be more precise? What kind of opportunity exactly?You seem to be misunderstanding, I could be just as brutal and spiteful to women as any of the guys who you think "hate" women, I just don't see a point in "going out of my way" to do so, if an opportunity arises I would gladly take the "less evolved" option in that case
Yes. Hatred is an inverted version of worship. In that sense, it is still worshipA lot of these guys seem like they are "raging" against women because they still have delusions in the back of their mind of one day "ascending", they still believe that "love" is an actual thing, so they see women as their enemies,
Again, what circumstances exactly?I have no such delusions so my hatred isn't as "pronounced", but under the right circumstances I would act out physically in the same way they would
The drug dealer who gives a gun to an 8 year old to commit murder is more guilty than the kid.No wrong, women aren't animals, if they are they shouldn't have rights, to strip women of any autonomy and blame is ironically enabling them in another way, that's the irony of your mindset, like I told @Cope or die
So like I said in the quote you should have just read:The drug dealer who gives a gun to an 8 year old to commit murder is more guilty than the kid.
The irony of you using a "women are children" analogy when I literally just said that you guys infantalize themThe great irony is guys like you don't realize that you are fundamentally NO DIFFERENT than the "blue pill cucks and simps" you claim to hate, all you guys do is INFANTALIZE women and strip any blame from their actions, that is 100% a blue pilled simp mindset
To go back to my fire analogy, removing the safe guards from my stove which leads to me getting burned doesn't have anything to do with the fact that fire fucking burns period, your entire argument is basically an "appeal to nature" fallacy, I don't care if its natural that fire burns, there's no reason for me to "excuse" fire (especially because in the case of this analogy fire could actually choose not to burn me lol)What I am saying is that the people who purposefully destroyed all the safeguards against female misbehavior that existed in our culture are even more guilty than women are.
You are coping hardcore and sound like one of those tradcons that speak of feminism like it "poisoned" women and they were these perfect little daises before big old bad feminism stepped into the picture lol. Reality is they were miserable, they were only "good" because we FORCED THEM TO BE, the women we see today IS WHAT WOMEN REALLY ARE IN THEIR NATURAL STATE WITHOUT ANY PHYSICAL OR SOCIAL BARRINGS TO HOLD THEM BACK.
I always use this analogy when I'm arguing against this bullshit, which I have argued against many times.
Imagine you and you wife are home, I walk into the living room after you leave to get something to eat, I walk up to her, I place a loaded gun next to her on the table and tell her "you know you can shoot him with this right, I mean if you want to and it benefits you", if when I leave and you come back she shoots and kills you, who is to blame?
A. Me
B. Your wife
The next answer will determine if you are coping buffoon.
The answer is obvious though, feminism is the gun, I am <insert X group that made the offer e.g. Jews, illuminati, etc>
I merely presented the gun as an option, its your wife that wanted to use it to begin with. She probably wanted to kill you anyways, she just lacked the tools to do so in a manner that suited her.
@JayGoptri claims to have talked to OP over the phone tho. I'll just assume they're both from IT until proven otherwise
If I heard a woman screaming in an alleyway at nigh I would not rush to save her, is this more in line with your idea of being "less evolved"
No, this is always how I have hated women, I can't trust them, I know they don't like me, and I would like to deal with them on a strictly transactional bas
If I heard a woman screaming in an alleyway at nigh I would not rush to save her, is this more in line with your idea of being "less evolved"
First off, Sherlock Holmes - why anyone needs to prove anything to you personally is beyond me. You self-righteous prick! [UWSL]And if you followed the last group convo you'd know that the author of the online novel lives somewhere here (India) also. Therefore we talked and K9 brokered it. K9 himself is actually a quieter chap and prefers typing. [/UWSL]
[UWSL]Paranoid people have a hard time making sound judgements, and I'm sure you would admit that you are a paranoid chap to the fullest. Many of us are, some for justifiable reasons and others for self serving and baseless reasons, paranoid. [/UWSL]
[UWSL]No women from IT would ever write what we are writing and what we are saying. Most of them can't even construct coherent sentences let alone debate/discuss finer points. [/UWSL]
No that is not less evolved considering what times we live in and what we males have been through! Trust me, many of us would do that in most situations because it's just not worth the trouble that will come with it, it's stupid hero syndrome, and who knows what has actually happened between the two. E.g. What the women has done.
I'd happily keep walking in this day and age.
don't worry he still doesn't get it.. you have more chances trying to agree with a wallTHEY
SIMPLY
DO
NOT
CARE
And then they have the audacity to still complain. How can you not hate them?I hate the pedestal they’ve been put on. They’re airheads strutting around like hot shit. Fucking annoying.
I hate the instincts of women.Instincts are not "good" or "bad" per se, they are just the result of natural evolution to a set of living conditions that we have moved past millennia ago.
That's what I thought you'd say. Dito.
Too many words, lost reading interestHow don't you realize that IT LOVES the kind of cucked "hatred of women" idiotic outbursts that are so common on this forum?
Each time someone does something like that on here, it makes their day. They can securely think they are on the right side ...
Exposing foids' misbehavior is another matter. That is something they generally hate and keep quiet about.
But idiotic rants about how women are genetically inferior and their nature is bad; that they love.
I didn't say anything thoThat's what I thought you'd say. Dito.
Oh but you did, you said: "I threw up". Comes with the territory of being an asshole.I didn't say anything tho
is that supposed to be witty?Oh but you did, you said: "I threw up". Comes with the territory of being an asshole.
Yep. Another thread from K9IncelTears. The bluepill infiltrator just can't stop posting garbage. Great job, mods.Tldr fakecel.
TldrThis is in part a response to this old thread:
[Hard To Swallow Edition] You Didn't "Move Past" Your Hatred Or "Transcend" The Black Pill And Sexual Urges (Your Will Broke And/Or Libido Waned/Died)
I all too often see this argument from coping incels saying that they "moved past" their hatred and treat their lack of hate like its an achievement or something, or they speak about their lack of yearning for sex as though they've attained some new "level of existence" JFL ITS NOT A...incels.is
Nobody hates women as such. We all want the intimacy and the tenderness. And of course we want to ascend. Any guy here who would get the chance to fuck a girl would, despite anything they might have said in the past.
It is ok, of course to hate how women behave nowadays. No question about that. Women today, especially young ones, are hypocritical, without morals, deceitful, manipulative, back stabbers, etc, etc. The list is endless.
But saying "Muh, women's nature is bad, always been bad; their genes are evil" is a ridiculous cope.
And in fact it is hypocritical. People who say this sort of thing are generally young idiots who want to act tough. More often than not, this kind of statement is part of an Ersatz Chad routine. It is the most retarded kindergarten-level reaction to feminism. Feminists say "Women good, Women fantastic, Women always right" (which is of course dumb as shit) and then our own little micropenis virtual chadlets reply "Women bad, Women bad, Women bad' just to piss them off, like 5 year-olds annoying girls at recess. Dumber than shit.
Women's behavior, like our own is a composite of instincts and upbringing. Instincts are not "good" or "bad" per se, they are just the result of natural evolution to a set of living conditions that we have moved past millennia ago. So of course, instincts generally need to be reined in to make civilization possible. The biggest single problem is the alpha male instinct and the attraction females have for the alpha. That problem is dealt with by most cultures through rather strict sexuality control rule and enforced monogamy. In our culture, boomers came up with the genius idea that "liberating" sexuality would be great. Sure! It just made us revert to cavemen behavior. Women today are simultaneously trying to be cavewomen (fuck the alpha) while pretending to be supremely sophisticated. Naturally, the result is repulsive hypocrisy.
But that is a cultural problem. It has nothing to do with women's nature (instincts). Men's nature is just as "bad". When men regress to cavemen level, like Ghetto blacks have, it is not pretty either. And when men pretended to be unfettered alphas while pretending to be supremely sophisticated (Nazis, SS), it was even worse.
Human life is about figuring out how to deal with our instincts. Some cultures do (or did) it reasonably well and others (like our present one) do a piss poor job of it.
Hate our culture, not women. Do something real; stop coping.
Now, my reply to the above thread:
Having no desire for sex and moving past hatred are 2 completely different things.
I, for one, still fap often and enjoy the occasional escort. But I have indeed moved past my hatred of women
Yes. They are more mature.
So ? A good thing that happens without effort is still a good thing.
Of course, those who pretend they are heroes because they have become "impervious" to hatred or sexual urges are hypocrite copers. But genuinely not hating women is good. Forever impotent hatred is a sure recipe for deepening depression.
Cope. Hypocrisy. Effort? Yielding to your impotent craving for fake toughness is an effort? Okay ...
Fantasizing about vengeance is lame cope. No wonder societies who practice honor killings and vendettas are the most primitive.
No shit.
Yes, and that is good. Often, our will is wrong. We desire things that are not good for us. The sooner that kind of "will" is broken, the better.
Mine did not, so far. Again, nothing to do with moving past hatred.
Frightened of getting older? This has a name. It is called "Peter Pan syndrome"
We say everything we want on this forum and that is what makes it great. You don't get banned here for being unorthodox.
As an aside, I think that thiis is at least in part due to this place being run by the FBI. They want to know what Incels think (to monitor us) and so are unlikely to want anybody banned for what they say. An ironic avatar of "Free Speech", to be sure.
Nope. I am usually a straightforward chap. No need for virtue signaling my wit to everyone here like some of you do.is that supposed to be witty?
What's there to moderate? They have brains so I think they can read and see it's High IQ shyt. Not whatever paranoid fantasy you want everyone to always entertain.Yep. Another thread from K9IncelTears. The bluepill infiltrator just can't stop posting garbage. Great job, mods.
Your loss I think.Tldr
dude, stop the cringeNope. I am usually a straightforward chap. No need for virtue signaling my wit to every here like some of you do
Nope. I am usually a straightforward chap. No need for virtue signaling my wit to every here like some of you do
What's there to moderate?
Your loss I think.
Read and reply properly.dude, stop the cringe
"If you want to know the truth about yourself, ask you enemy", Chinese ProverbThe main issue with this thread is the idea that incels can be self-defeating at all. That's basically IT-speak.
There is. What I am saying here is basically, "when you are in a hole, stop digging"Incels are already defeated. There is nothing any incel can do to further defeat themselves.
It does. Women's behavior and the soyciety around us will not change in the near future, and probably throughout our lifetime.An incel can delude themselves to reality sure, but the quality of life remains the same regardless.
Venting a little at the beginning is ok.Hating women is a good thing.
I would rather say, "The angry mind exists against itself""The angry mind exists for itself." - H. Harrison (in one of the books of the "stainless steel rat" series)
Of course they don'tWomen aren't that dumb. They know that unattractive men are suffering. They just don't care.
Boyo the whole cause of the contention is us speaking truth and being attacked by people spreading lies. There is no knowledge to be derived from the other party in that scenario."If you want to know the truth about yourself, ask you enemy", Chinese Proverb
The only behaviors that can related to Chad are those that punch down at the less fortunate, such as the mockery of manlets/autists/etc. by cels who lack those traits. Criticizing the privileged however is based.My argument here is that if you stop "hating foids" and playing the Ersatz Chad,
One's well-being is promoted by not stressing one's self suppressing natural inclinations. A major aspect of the black pill is coming to terms with nature, which includes one's own nature. If a person's psyche has determined that foids provoke a hateful response then trying to fight that is a fruitless effort.But again, that is not the only thing that determines your well-being.
Your worst enemy will always hit on your weakest point. As a result he is almost always right about what your weakest point is.Boyo the whole cause of the contention is us speaking truth and being attacked by people spreading lies. There is no knowledge to be derived from the other party in that scenario.
Marxist-inspired delusion. "Criticizing the privileged" is the very basis of bluepilled cucked cultureThe only behaviors that can related to Chad are those that punch down at the less fortunate, such as the mockery of manlets/autists/etc. by cels who lack those traits. Criticizing the privileged however is based.
I do not deflect anything. I am just pointing at an unchanging element that there is no point in criticizing because it is a givenYou deflect blame from foids
That is definitely not what I am doing. I do not deny that women have hypergamous instincts. No feminist would accept that.but advancing blue pill feminist shenanigans
Yes, of course. But if your response makes you weaker and more miserable, should you continue doing it?They can't change how they feel and think. They have full control over how they act, and people will respond as warranted.
That is an enormous Western-style cope: "don't suppress your instincts"One's well-being is promoted by not stressing one's self suppressing natural inclinations.
That is exactly what I am saying. But "coming to terms with our nature" does not consist in simply following our most immediate impulses. When we do that we almost always end up banging our heads against some wall.A major aspect of the black pill is coming to terms with nature, which includes one's own nature.
This is giga-cope. The life of a human being who lives within a complex society primarily consists of fighting his own instincts. That is the "curse" of being civilized. We do it because the curse of being uncivilized is even worse.If a person's psyche has determined that foids provoke a hateful response then trying to fight that is a fruitless effort.
I hate everything in existence.no problem i hate everyone
Ted Bundy. Murdered Whores and guess what? He had sex too.Indeed but u need the looks too and done
Doesn't apply when they're transparently simply picking low-hanging fruit. We are acceptable targets with no social capital from which to fight back. They're just lazily punching down; they have no actual point.Your worst enemy will always hit on your weakest point. As a result he is almost always right about what your weakest point is.
It becomes cucked when people confuse being rewarded for being privileged. A bulk of the "privileges" libs complain about are statuses conferred based on some merit the alleged "privileged" individual or group achieved.Marxist-inspired delusion. "Criticizing the privileged" is the very basis of bluepilled cucked culture
There is no "weaker". This is it. It's already over. All this mindset wank is cope. 100% of the suffering is derived from being incel; people just react to the scenario differently. The depression levels here on .co and the depression levels on some subreddit that doesn't hate women like IncelsWithoutHate or foreveralone are roughly the same.But if your response makes you weaker and more miserable, should you continue doing it?
To the extent of how you behave. Not within your own mind.The life of a human being who lives within a complex society primarily consists of fighting his own instincts.
I'd rather die.My argument here is that if you stop "hating foids" and playing the Ersatz Chad, you can make your life tolerable.
Who said anything about changing their minds? Do you think Chad gives a shit about changing a Figrews mind when she wants sex? The Beta does not care about her mind either. If they are indebted to Men and rewarded for their efforts in raising the Nuclear Family their minds will quickly change. It's like when they are raped they cling to their attacker.. not because of Mental Illness but of Mental Wellness. This is what their mind tells them to do and is a carry over from the Stone Age. Their minds must not be that developed.. a cost of producing offspring I would have thought. Added vulnerability for the amount of stress and strain on the body.Of course they don't
I never said we could change their minds.
That is not the point.
Our self-defeating mental routines are a very low hanging fruitDoesn't apply when they're transparently simply picking low-hanging fruit.
Absolutely. This is why you should not use the word "privilege" because if you do, it confuses the issue.It becomes cucked when people confuse being rewarded for being privileged. A bulk of the "privileges" libs complain about are statuses conferred based on some merit the alleged "privileged" individual or group achieved.
Meanwhile foids do nothing of note to earn white knight pampering and chivalry. They're just expected to receive it because they're precious women. Chad did nothing to grow to 6'4 with the right millimeters of bone. He's just worshipped for it. None of these birthrights improve society in any way, yet society still rolls over for them. That's real privilege.
Physically, yes, we are at the weakest level a human can be. But not mentally. You can build your mental strength when you are defeated. Constantly expressing impotent rage will prevent you from doing that.There is no "weaker".
Materialistic illusion. Your mindset is the biggest contributor to your level of suffering.This is it. It's already over. All this mindset wank is cope.
Nope. You can worsen your suffering or mitigate it. Doing the latter makes a lot of difference. Again, what you are expressing here is your materialistic Western-culture conditioning. In theory, Western culture is the one that believes the least in mental exercises. Yet it is the one that has invented the biggest array of crap mental copes ever. Why is that? Simple. If you neglect high-quality mental copes, you will also be bad at identifying and combating the spread of low-quality ones. As a result, you will be swamped by an ocean of the latter.100% of the suffering is derived from being incel;
How do you know ? Did you measure it ?People just react to the scenario differently. The depression levels here on .co and the depression levels on some subreddit that doesn't hate women like IncelsWithoutHate or foreveralone are roughly the same.
How you behave affects your mind. Constantly complaining about something is a self conditioning behavior. A bad one.To the extent of how you behave. Not within your own mind.
I can hate both. I hate women for the same reason I hate thieves and communists. They are mostly leaches on male capital and productive output, contribute very little to society beyond their wombs, and make society worse that it needs to be. I hate that the majority of my tax money goes to subsidizing their shitty choices in reproduction (single mother welfare and public schools), I hate that they vote more and more to take more from me (they vote in leftists) and other wagecels to pay for their stupid shit, and I hate the fact that they ruin my copes.Hate our culture, not women. Do something real; stop coping.