K9Otaku
Wizard
★★★★
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2019
- Posts
- 4,383
Being a thief or a communist results from a mental choice; a choice that can be made or not made. Being a woman does not result from a choice. Does it?I can hate both. I hate women for the same reason I hate thieves and communists.
At the moment all this is true. But this is a result of culture, not of what women are at the biological level.They are mostly leaches on male capital and productive output, contribute very little to society beyond their wombs, and make society worse that it needs to be.
Women are actually good at doing boring jobs that men don't enjoy, like being a secretary, or a bank back-office employee doing the same paperwork all day over and over again. Women like those jobs because they are 9 to 5 types, don't require a lot of mental investment and are very safe. In the 50s, it was considered ok for men to be construction workers and for women to be bank back-office employees. Both jobs need to be done and contribute to the economy. If we could go back to a situation like that, wouldn't it be all right?
What I mean is that women's nature is not bad in essence. If it is properly employed, it can be useful.
Again, all this is due to culture, not female biological nature. It could be otherwise.I hate that the majority of my tax money goes to subsidizing their shitty choices in reproduction (single mother welfare and public schools), I hate that they vote more and more to take more from me (they vote in leftists) and other wagecels to pay for their stupid shit, and I hate the fact that they ruin my copes.
It is obviously not possible.I see them as a nuisance at best, or an outright enemy at worse. I don't benefit from living in the same society as them and would much rather live in a place free of females if that is possible.
Desiring something that is impossible is the surest way to be continuously depressed. That is what I mean when I say that "hating foids" is self-defeating.