Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

It's Over Gentleman it's beyond over, Tinder data trend shows 80/20 and even 90/10 rule is wrong

Baal Zebulde

Baal Zebulde

Banned
-
Joined
Jul 21, 2021
Posts
143
Online
1d 11h 43m
There is a trend of people posting their data results from tinder on reddit and instagram...the results? As we can imagine when talking about blackpills, nothing is so bad that it can't get worse

In this example this girl swiped 93.294 times and it gave a like in 5.950 guys, wich means only the 6,3% top percenters were good enough for her.
As a bonus she got 5 boyfriends from those top percenters and had sex with 37 different guys (32 hookups + 5 boyfriends)



In this other example this 22 years old girl swiped 103.846 times, she gave a like in only 625 guys, this is not even close to 1% (0,6%) can you fucking imagine having so many options that the top 1% is not good enough for you?




Now for the last one I bring here is the comparison of a female and a male in all the guy swips he gave a like to 32% of all the females, in comparison the female gave a like in 4,8% of all her swipes, plus the guy had sex 1 time and the female had sex 50 times!!!

 
Divergent_Integral

Divergent_Integral

Spastic ricecel, heightmogged by 99.74% of men
★★★★
Joined
Jul 3, 2020
Posts
828
Online
17d 2h 24m
Definitely over for 0th-percentile-cels.
 
Broly

Broly

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Posts
14,689
Online
67d 9h 2m
Never began:feelsrope:
 
Zer0/∞

Zer0/∞

Chudur-Budur Jr
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 23, 2021
Posts
3,486
Online
41d 12h 38m
Baal Zebulde said:
In this other example this 22 years old girl swiped 103.846 times, she gave a like in only 625 guys, this is not even close to 1% (0,6%) can you fucking imagine having so many options that the top 1% is not good enough for you?
So are chadcels real: Gigachad or rope 2021?:chad:
 
Fancy Alcoholic

Fancy Alcoholic

Living by the name
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Posts
6,393
Online
35d 6h 51m
Read everything. Regreted every single word.
 
kekfuel

kekfuel

ah
Joined
Jul 18, 2019
Posts
5,068
Online
96d 3h 43m
this is not how statistics work retard
the 80/20 rule refers to the average whore not some fucking cherrypicks u picked out
 
Fancy Alcoholic

Fancy Alcoholic

Living by the name
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Posts
6,393
Online
35d 6h 51m
kekfuel said:
this is not how statistics work retard
the 80/20 rule refers to the average whore not some fucking cherrypicks u picked out
Statistics is fake news.
 
AlexanderTheGreat11

AlexanderTheGreat11

生徒会長
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 13, 2019
Posts
33,543
Online
235d 19h 19m
<human

<human

Ich bin ein Terminator
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Posts
2,539
Online
105d 18h 3m
"nah bro it's sub 5 rule"
"tinder isn't real life"
 
trying to ascend

trying to ascend

Youngcel KHHV
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 30, 2020
Posts
6,688
Online
202d 2h 48m
Chances of having sex with the first = 0,0004%

JFL.

Just be one in 2500 bro
 
Baal Zebulde

Baal Zebulde

Banned
-
Joined
Jul 21, 2021
Posts
143
Online
1d 11h 43m
kekfuel said:
this is not how statistics work retard
the 80/20 rule refers to the average whore not some fucking cherrypicks u picked out


  1. Go in r/Tinder
  2. Type "Insights"
  3. Search the females
  4. Discover almost all of them don't follow the 80/20 rule
  5. Kys faggot




 
Saint Cho

Saint Cho

Everything is predetermined.
Joined
Aug 20, 2021
Posts
504
Online
16d 5h 52m
Baal Zebulde said:
There is a trend of people posting their data results from tinder on reddit and instagram...the results? As we can imagine when talking about blackpills, nothing is so bad that it can't get worse

In this example this girl swiped 93.294 times and it gave a like in 5.950 guys, wich means only the 6,3% top percenters were good enough for her.
As a bonus she got 5 boyfriends from those top percenters and had sex with 37 different guys (32 hookups + 5 boyfriends)

View attachment 506149

In this other example this 22 years old girl swiped 103.846 times, she gave a like in only 625 guys, this is not even close to 1% (0,6%) can you fucking imagine having so many options that the top 1% is not good enough for you?

View attachment 506150


Now for the last one I bring here is the comparison of a female and a male in all the guy swips he gave a like to 32% of all the females, in comparison the female gave a like in 4,8% of all her swipes, plus the guy had sex 1 time and the female had sex 50 times!!!

View attachment 506154
:lul:Women:lul:
 
Last edited:
GustavWagner

GustavWagner

Greycel
Joined
Sep 26, 2021
Posts
22
Online
1d 4h 6m
Wow, this is very unsettling, I left Tinder in 2017, but wow, what a dump it has become.
"Tinder isn't real life bro"
"being an incel isn't a real life bro"
 
Baal Zebulde

Baal Zebulde

Banned
-
Joined
Jul 21, 2021
Posts
143
Online
1d 11h 43m
kekfuel said:
still cherry picking u fucking peanutbrain
not gonna bother
If it is just cherry picking, why the ones that are avaliable using the same method of research and are from male users folow the same patern that we expect? That is the guy likes much more than the girls and the numbers from theirs profiles are actually close to reality?
 
Fancy Alcoholic

Fancy Alcoholic

Living by the name
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Posts
6,393
Online
35d 6h 51m
GustavWagner said:
"being an incel isn't a real life bro"
Normie NPC punchline number 4523.
 
Saint Cho

Saint Cho

Everything is predetermined.
Joined
Aug 20, 2021
Posts
504
Online
16d 5h 52m

And you guys didn't believe me:feelskek:
 
Baal Zebulde

Baal Zebulde

Banned
-
Joined
Jul 21, 2021
Posts
143
Online
1d 11h 43m
Saint Cho said:

And you guys didn't believe me:feelskek:
People here focus too much in saying if anyone is a little better than them in anything, like height, face, money or status than he is a fakecel even tho the guy never had anyone.
 
Edmund_Kemper

Edmund_Kemper

Suicide is self-expression
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Posts
22,974
Online
237d 17h 35m
<human said:
"nah bro it's sub 5 rule"
"tinder isn't real life"
it's sub5 irl
 
Laskah

Laskah

Puru puru pururin
Joined
Apr 18, 2021
Posts
500
Online
8d 11h 38m
We are just products in the eyes of foids. ''Maybe I'll take this out today or this one, ew get out of my way etc."
 
Transcended Trucel

Transcended Trucel

Scholar of Conciousness
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 16, 2019
Posts
26,737
Online
259d 18h 35m
Fancy Alcoholic said:
Read everything. Regreted every single word.
:feelsree::feelsrope:
 
RollD20

RollD20

I just want handholding
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Posts
14,011
Online
103d 15h 26m
I think it’s more like 95/5 somehow COVID even made it worse
 
Baal Zebulde

Baal Zebulde

Banned
-
Joined
Jul 21, 2021
Posts
143
Online
1d 11h 43m
RollD20 said:
I think it’s more like 95/5 somehow COVID even made it worse
Agree, based on what I saw of this data being shared, some go a little higher with 8% of the top percenters and some like in my post go even less than 1%

If we keep a realistic view 95/5 seems to be the new rule. But then again this was based on what is available on r/Tinder.
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Supreme Incel Commander in Chief
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
19,706
Online
75d 14h 6m
Edmund_Kemper said:
it's sub5 irl
Sub5 to make a girl want to give you chance even if she isn’t sexually attracted, but rather doesn’t want to be alone. For sexual attraction, it’s chad or death.
 
RollD20

RollD20

I just want handholding
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Posts
14,011
Online
103d 15h 26m
Baal Zebulde said:
Agree, based on what I saw of this data being shared, some go a little higher with 8% of the top percenters and some like in my post go even less than 1%

If we keep a realistic view 95/5 seems to be the new rule. But then again this was based on what is available on r/Tinder.
Tinder is pretty accurate, and I do see more and more people even on Reddit agreeing with some blackpilled points.

the fact of the matter is most men just aren’t desirable to women, only reason women even consider an undesirable man is for money. Even oldcels are agreeing now.
Copexodius Maximus said:
Sub5 to make a girl want to give you chance even if she isn’t sexually attracted, but rather doesn’t want to be alone. For sexual attraction, it’s chad or death.
I would even go as far as to say most men are sub3 for women. We tend to rate ourselves higher than what women think of us, but honestly only the women rating matters.
 
Antisocialloner

Antisocialloner

TRUECEL MENTALCEL HYBRID
★★
Joined
Oct 26, 2019
Posts
1,604
Online
26d 19h 20m
highinhibition

highinhibition

Banned
-
Joined
Jul 2, 2021
Posts
5,273
Online
36d 7h 0m
Zer0/∞ said:
So are chadcels real: Gigachad or rope 2021?:chad:
hahaha we are bangladeshi cels
thinking about tinder is ridiculous
 
BPJ

BPJ

Officer
★★
Joined
Jan 30, 2021
Posts
619
Online
11d 14h 23m
god tier post. good work sensei. beyond over ngl, unless u wanna go for older fat women. but even those are picky as fuck (coming from an oldcel)
 
Baal Zebulde

Baal Zebulde

Banned
-
Joined
Jul 21, 2021
Posts
143
Online
1d 11h 43m
BPJ said:
god tier post. good work sensei. beyond over ngl, unless u wanna go for older fat women. but even those are picky as fuck (coming from an oldcel)
Thank you BlackPill Jesus senpai!

:feelsaww:
 
curryboy420

curryboy420

Admiral
★★
Joined
Jul 11, 2020
Posts
2,625
Online
32d 19h 19m
The brutality of this truth was refreshing from all the bullshit. Good contribution
 
Arch Anemone

Arch Anemone

Arch Anomie - Older and wiser than you.
★★★★★
Joined
May 5, 2018
Posts
952
Online
33d 13h 4m
Blackpillapologist

Blackpillapologist

Recruit
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 22, 2021
Posts
407
Online
6d 22h 9m
Not surprised :feelsrope:
 
Rotter

Rotter

LDARcel
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Posts
1,511
Online
8d 17h 14m
I hate foids
 
Notorious Inkler

Notorious Inkler

proud volcel
★★★★
Joined
Jun 22, 2021
Posts
4,808
Online
51d 13m
Saint Cho said:

And you guys didn't believe me:feelskek:
I did



Whoremaxx or rope
 
Pancakecel

Pancakecel

You get what you fucking deserve
Joined
Jan 16, 2021
Posts
2,583
Online
64d 21h 53m
Schizoidcel

Schizoidcel

     
Joined
Feb 11, 2018
Posts
4,055
Online
8d 20m
Low IQ if you were using dating apps in any period of history as a sub-8 faced male anyway. Stop using them and giving them money, you're feeding gynocentrism.
 
Last edited:
Sennacherib

Sennacherib

Did I ever tell you the definition of insanity?
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 12, 2020
Posts
1,937
Online
46d 18h 4m
Don't give 2 shits since idgaff about what worthless roast beef wants.
 
C

countersemite

Banned
-
Joined
Aug 27, 2021
Posts
39
Online
15h 56m
dating apps are for garbage humans
there are no top 5% males or whatever on tinder
literally everyone on tinder will end up in the human equivalent of a landfill, the NPC hivemind
 
Overdosed

Overdosed

Glowcel with oneitis for Stacie coworker
Joined
May 24, 2021
Posts
542
Online
6d 6m
What's the point anymore if you're sub9 male?

The economical situation and civil unrest are going to hit hard in the next generation. I hope I'm there to rub it in normies faces. It'll be glorious!
 
Baldingethnicover

Baldingethnicover

Failure
Joined
Oct 7, 2021
Posts
18
Online
20h 57m
Its beyond over. Weve said this from time to time, tinder is real life. There was studies done on the correlation of tinder swipes/ matches to real life dating it was a brutal study.


"Couples who met via a dating app were more interested in living together compared with those who met offline, and women who found their partner through a dating app were more apt to want kids than those who found their partner in other ways. What's more, couples who met on dating apps were just as happy in their relationship as pairs who met elsewhere"
This is where the 90/ 10 rule plays
"According to a study entitled Tinder Experiments II: Guys, unless you are really hot you are probably better off not wasting your time on Tinder — a quantitative socio-economic study, “the bottom 80% of men (in terms of attractiveness) are competing for the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are competing for the top 20% of men.” This data almost precisely matches the Pareto distribution. The study elaborates to point out the fact that this means that “the Tinder economy has more inequality than 95.1% of all the world’s national economies.” As illustrated by these two studies, if you’re a guy on Tinder, the odds are not on your side"

Its abosulutely over for the average man in todays world. Landwhales are being put on magazines covers like its nothing. This is what I see when I go to target


In todays world your competing with this guy

Looks like a whole entire diffrent species. Its over.
 
Pixycel

Pixycel

Fiat justitia ruat caelum
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 21, 2020
Posts
5,462
Online
123d 3h 38m
kekfuel said:
this is not how statistics work retard
the 80/20 rule refers to the average whore not some fucking cherrypicks u picked out
tbf no dating app releases their full data anymore so these anecdote are all we really have to go off of.
 
Last edited:
genma

genma

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Sep 27, 2020
Posts
339
Online
9d 12h 58m
kekfuel said:
this is not how statistics work retard
the 80/20 rule refers to the average whore not some fucking cherrypicks u picked out
It's only cherrypicking if there's a tree, and he's picking the cherries and discarding the rest.

It's not cherrypicking to look at the only data we have available. If you'd like to do a study, then you are welcome to propose some systematic process for obtaining non-biased data.

Oh wait, you can't! Because very likely, the full body of data is even worse than this! There used to be a dating site called "ok cupid" and the guys who started it were data nerds and they freely published data and results they compiled from that data. OK Cupid was bought out and the new owners shut that shit right down.

...nobody wants average men to have data about how completely over it is for them.

...so no dating site is going to give you raw numbers.

...so the only reports we can possibly get are those posted by users.

that's not cherrypicking.

-------------------------------

As to the general topic: Does anyone have any theories to explain how these foids in OPs pics got boyfriends?

If these are top 5% chads, why the fuck would they commit to any girl? Maybe a clue is in short timeframe of each relationship. The first one has 5 boyfriends over 6 years. Those are vanishingly short relationships. I wonder if this indicates that chads are keeping multiple women are "girlfriends" just to have easier booty calls.
 
Last edited:
F

Fedsmoker

Keep On Feather'n
-
Joined
Oct 10, 2021
Posts
31
Online
6h 32m
Imagine not rising up against a system that commits sexual genocide against you while humiliating you and backing you into a corner your whole life? Westerners are domesticated soy chattel. Soyim.
 
Baal Zebulde

Baal Zebulde

Banned
-
Joined
Jul 21, 2021
Posts
143
Online
1d 11h 43m
genma said:
If these are top 5% chads, why the fuck would they commit to any girl? Maybe a clue is in short timeframe of each relationship. The first one has 5 boyfriends over 6 years. Those are vanishingly short relationships. I wonder if this indicates that chads are keeping multiple women are "girlfriends" just to have easier booty calls.
Your line of thought is exactly what I was thinking as well, I would even say the "boyfriend" was probably on her mind, what I mean is those guys would call her to eat and do something couples do and them they would fuck her, 2 weeks later those chads would call her again and she doesn't even suspect they are doing the same thing with other 4 girls. For the chads they aren't girlfriend and boyfriend, but for her she is living the dream, she finally has the chad "boyfriend" a lie she believes even now, after they ended the "relationship".
 
C

cancerousgreed

Doomer
★★
Joined
Jun 19, 2019
Posts
2,693
Online
20d 23h 46m
fuck wagecucking for this rigged society
 
Insanitycel

Insanitycel

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Nov 30, 2020
Posts
285
Online
7d 2h 39m
over for 99.4% of men
 
kekfuel

kekfuel

ah
Joined
Jul 18, 2019
Posts
5,068
Online
96d 3h 43m
genma said:
It's not cherrypicking to look at the only data we have available. If you'd like to do a study, then you are welcome to propose some systematic process for obtaining non-biased data.
looking at individual cases wont fucking give you the average
what about the majority, aka the ones that dont post their results? Are you just going to disregard them?
genma said:
Oh wait, you can't! Because very likely, the full body of data is even worse than this! There used to be a dating site called "ok cupid" and the guys who started it were data nerds and they freely published data and results they compiled from that data. OK Cupid was bought out and the new owners shut that shit right down.
pure speculation and pointless to address
of course they shut it down, why wouldnt they? Revealing data would eventually get them cancelled
genma said:
...so no dating site is going to give you raw numbers.

...so the only reports we can possibly get are those posted by users.
Hence why this shit is pointless and click bait
'' look guys only x% amount of guys get swiped on based on this single example ive found'' its dishonest and not how it works
i myself believe the 80/20 rule is even worse now but im not going to draw any fucking conclusion until i see the data
 

Similar threads

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape7
shape8
Top