Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Female hypocrisy as an example of marxist Base/Superstructure dialectic

Macrocephalus

Macrocephalus

Neoliberalism is why I don‘t have a gf
★★★
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Posts
1,790
In Marxist theory, society consists of two parts: Base and Superstructure. The relationship between the two is dialectical, meaning that each influences the other.

Base refers to the means of production (factories, land, machines, raw materials etc.) and the relations of production (as that between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie). Its purpose is to generate the goods society needs.

Superstructure consists of the culture, ideology and norms that people adopt, spacing from arts and media to political structure. Marx argued that the superstructure grows out of the base and reflects the ruling class' interests. Thus, its purpose is NOT the produce, but rather to JUSTIFY and LEGITIMIZE how the base works (namely, how good are produced) and defend the power of the elite.

alsauksupa111.jpg


This same pattern regulating socio-economic dynamics also applies to sexual dynamics.
In Sex, w*men happen to own the means of reproduction (id est, the vagina), which gives them the strong hand in the relations of reproduction. Thus, in a unrestrained sexual market as today's, w*men are the ruling class, and act accordingly.
As a consequence, just like economical elites (and with (((their))) support), w*men's main concern is to JUSTIFY and MAINTAIN their privilege, and the best way to do that is simply by denying it in the first place.

This is what sexual superstructure stands for: creating, with the key support of the (((media))), a false narrative in which males are privileged, looks don't matter, only sexually disadvantaged are to blame for their own shortcomings...and of course Personality, this almighty deity whose female ministers are the only ones capable of understanding, reigns above all. Much like only a selected number of Christian devouts could be blessed by an apparition of the Virgin Mary.

This serves the double purpose of legitimazing the inequal dynamics behind the creation and distribution of goods ( sex, in our allegory), as well as tricking the proletariat (men) into keeping faith in the guidelines of a rigged system. Get them to put effort into dating, improve their game, looks, clothes, status with the remote prospect of a future reward (again, sex)...lest they might focus on overthrowing the system itself.

1280px-Anti-capitalism_color%E2%80%94_Restored.png


KV4OQ1w.png
 
@mental_out @cocksucker @i_am_i put this thread in must-read section
 
@Macrocephalus
No 19th Century socialist/communist could predict socialism would have turned rich economies into weak economies that suffer the burden of welfare and public debt

1592232670010


This is italian public debt. Socialism turned us into third world
 
This sounds more like a fascist structure with unequal distribution (of sex and relationship) which only benefits the ruling class. How is this Marxist?
The dynamics behind said unequal distribution of sex are typical of Marx's theory, not the outcome itself
 
@Macrocephalus
No 19th Century socialist/communist could predict socialism would have turned rich economies into weak economies that suffer the burden of welfare and public debt

View attachment 277754

This is italian public debt. Socialism turned us into third world
I genuinely don't get what you're talking about tbhngl.
Btw the Italian debt went off the charts in two distinct moments: early 80s (separation between treasury and Central Bank, interests skyrocketing) and post-2008 recession (austerity policies, GDP plummeting). Both of those are textbook monetarism, nothing to do with socialism
 
This sounds more like a fascist structure with unequal distribution (of sex and relationship) which only benefits the ruling class. How is this Marxist?
This would be socialist in the Soviet style late 70's, 80's. By this time, the wealth (including sexual 'wealth') was firmly entrenched in the elite tier (the bureaucracy), with the peasants left toiling in the sterile factories. Most likely, the bigwigs in that society tended to bag the better looking women.
 

Similar threads

Tunadiver
Replies
59
Views
2K
WomenAreImpossible
W
lonelysince2006
Replies
126
Views
3K
caineturbat2003
caineturbat2003
AsiaCel
Replies
21
Views
332
Pajeetsingh
Pajeetsingh
N
Replies
18
Views
551
lifesucksandyoudie
lifesucksandyoudie

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top