20%
I lied, i coomed todayFirst off, thank you to the mod who pinned this.
I was reading some of your responses and so was not able to respond myself.
"It's ok if you wear female clothes, bro! Just don't be like a toilet and don't let feelings or senses cloud your judgement!"
Simply put: Chad avis are banned. And I guess it's strange, but a lot of people might choose avis of saints and truecels that are certainly very unattractive, so that tells us that maybe those types of people are more true to themselves or relate more to those people's struggles rather than "aspiring" to be something more, like an attractive male, hence why they don't use "Chad" avis or at least MALE ANIME avis, which could serve a similar purpose.
Damn.
You're essentially enshrining them in a flawless state (illustrations and drawings are the closest you can get to showing what the "perfect" facial appearance looks like). It's like a slave (virgin man) not only loving his abusive master (females), but also taking beatings, whippings, and lashings happily like some sort of masochist, teetering on the edge of insanity after years of suffering and torment under his rule, being shackled like some sort of wild animal in a zoo and left to work in the hot sun for hours without provisions, and then being emancipated and immediately building a fucking statue of his master in his backyard, worshiping it like some voodoo statue or fetish, and making it his temple, prostrating daily infront of this "shrine" of his. It's a small look into the Stockholm syndrome many forum members are afflicted with, unfortunately, and the people who consciously support them are no better; they're folie a deux, stuck in this shared delusion that glorifying females in the form of drawings is not only acceptable, but good and healthy!
They probably won't be at this rate.
Mods decide, not me.
In theory, subconsciously, yes.
Yes, according to @subhuman's study.
Doesn't make it any better. I think this decision is very important and requires a lot of thought into it than just dismissing it with this permissive attitude of "Oh, let's just allow it! What's the harm in it?"
Then you support pseudo-transvestism, my friend!
Elab.
BASED.
Least expected from you. I am very disappointed in you, child.
Agreed.
I would also recommend the 1997 North Hollywood bank robbers (Larry Phillips Jr. and Emil Matasareanu) in the movie/docudrama 44 Minutes: The North Hollywood Shoot-Out:
View attachment 1164757
He's saying "fuck you" to the cops.
So it's ok if someone uses an avi of some fag if they explicitly state that's not how they are irl? A lot of our behaviors irl are translated into how we act online. You can't just say what you do online and what you do irl are two completely separate, unrelated things that have no effect on eachother. They certainly do, and to a great extent, which is why if you were to find someone with, say, a mass shooter avi, they're more likely to be more unhinged than your average person. And I'm talking in the realm of normies, although it can apply to this place to a smaller extent (considering a lot of us are unhinged already).
Slowpoke isn't a trait. Maybe if it was associated with being an actual "slowpoke"...
Then maybe not, but you're at least conscious of the fact that you might be perceived as such, so you don't have an excuse to saying "Oh, I used this avi, but it's not like I want to be perceived in this way!" Anyone with reasonable intelligence, vision, and a functional visual cortex can analyze pictures and find the connotations associated with them. No offense—and this isn't directed at you or anyone in particular—but if you claim to be unable to do that, either you're lying, are mentally disabled, or have zero self-awareness (same as being disabled).
Female anime avis are literally just females with little to no imperfections. They're drawings, man. They can be anything!
- Slippery slope fallacy
- Encouraging apathy (a bit oxymoronic)
I don't see how that's possible if you've seen the mountains of evidence pointing to female being evil and the root of everything evil in society today. You should reread the blackpill, man.
I guess your way of thinking is more reminiscent of late-'90s Yahoo shyness forums and early-'00s Love-shy.com. I don't think Love-shy and incel spaces in general became "hate-filled" and "misogynistic" up until the 2010s, because that's when the Shys Boys (2011) documentary was released and you can see quite a lot of resentment. The only non-misogynist "nice guy" was the ginger guy with glasses, Michael.
Maybe @ElTruecel knows more.
How about you make your own thread supporting female anime avis? After all, I don't think mods can pin a pro-FAA (female anime avi) thread if it simple doesn't exist. And it should be with a bit of thought too so that it's not just simple low-effort stuff.
That's the point. You subconsciously do this. You subconsciously like to click on threads made by users with female avis since that's what your male brain tells you to do. If people were conscious of this sort of thing, @subhuman wouldn't have had to make a thread.
It affects social interaction on this site. I'd bet not only do people with FAA get more attention, but they also get more POSITIVE attention. This is just simple lookism, man. As easy as predicting nine-o'clock at 8:30.
You're just making bullshit up at this point. Heterosexual men all like females, right? So it's natural they'll ALL be more likely to click on threads by FAA users, even if they're this or that or religious or not. It's simply human biology.
Yes, I am preventing worship since it's literally proven that FAA increases thread engagement. @subhuman proved it!!! He's the prophet of this movement, man.
They literally are, bro.
Wtf do you think they are?
"You don't try to make people believe that you're actually a female by using a female anime character" is true, sure, but people subconsciously associate you with feminine traits. Key word: SUBCONSCIOUSLY.
Ad hominem.
And you sure like calling for people to be banned. You sure that isn't a projection of your fears?
The same philosophy applies to this forum. People use avis for self-representation.
A lot of people associate certain avis solely to solely one person.
@shii410 will always be that recessed dude.
@FrothySolutions will always be that buff gymlet.
And you will always be that cloud with a rainbow.
Point is, it is quite important for self-identification. @Saysitsover won't be who he is without his MOGGER lobster avi.
In some cases.
Yes, Type III transvestism (True TV), to be precise:
View attachment 1164819
View attachment 1164820
Notice:
- Masculine
- "Dresses" constantly or as often as possible. May live and be accepted as woman. May "dress" underneath male clothes, if no other chance. = uses FAA indefinitely, resistant to idea of change, and finds changing the FAA repulsive
- Heterosexual. Rarely bisexual. Masturbation with fetish. Guilt feelings. "Purges" and relapses. = similar to how a user here liked others jacking off over his FAA, i.e. autogynephilic tendencies
- 0-2 = i.e. mostly heterosexual
- CONVERSION OPERATION: Actually rejected, but idea can be attractive. = reason for infamous "incel-to-tranny pipeline" (ITTP) explained
- ESTROGEN MEDICATION: Attractive as an experiment. Can be helpful emotionally. = ditto
- May assume double personality. Trend toward transsexualism = ITTP source confirmed
Many many parallels can be drawn here.
True.
He should just use "R."
Much like I don't find a man wearing female clothing "cute to look at" in the slightest, I don't find the idea of incels doing the same thing "cute."
Reasonable point.
I disagree.
You should go on a coom strike until the 2DPDhavers concede.
BAN JAHYSAMA!!!!!!!
I'm honored.
You're contributing to the ITTP.
