female actually belives that standing outside with a sign and having a mental breakdown is fighting for somehting

[zionpill]

honestly it just shows u how stupid they are. they believe that whining outside holding up a bunch of signs is "FiGhTiNg" for something

 

[Sexless incel]

If only our human-ancestors knew the true nature of woMen, they would not have given them any rights

 

[zionpill]

Who gonna tell them that gays, lesbians and feminists would be hanged in the past

lol thats exactly what i thought

 

[ChrolloLucilfer04]

Jfl at them for hating on eren

 

[living]

holding up signs and protesting is the weakest behavior i can think of bunch of dumb animals think they are gonna leave a mark or make a change violence is the only thing that changes things

 

[nystagmuscel]

violence is the only thing that changes things

 

[turbosperg]

honestly it just shows u how stupid they are. they believe that whining outside holding up a bunch of signs is "FiGhTiNg" for something

Foids are pets.

If only our human-ancestors knew the true nature of woMen, they would not have given them any rights

Wise men always knew.

The problem is that beta males are over 90% of the male population, and they have this unstoppable simping instinct ("muh qween!").

In recent times in the west, it was the empowerment of beta males, through the "enlightenment" of the protestant revolutions (french revolution etc.) that resulted in beta males having a voice in soyciety. Since beta males can't help their instinct to give everything they can (and then some more) to foids, these beta males then fought for the empowerment and "emancipation" of women, and they did it fiercely in a competition against other beta males to display themselves as the biggest cuck of all in the hopes of acquiring a crumb of pussy and feminine attention. (any similarities with soys who "respect wahman" nowadays is not coincidence).

The foids, once they acquire resources and privileges, become free from their direct dependence on beta males. Foids can't help their instinct to give everything they can to Chads -- the only humans foids acknowledge other than themselves and their kids (if any).

These Chads, as they hoard resources and power, enter competition with other Chads. To keep ahead of their game, they need to acquire loyalty of as many beta males as possible in order to compete with other Chads, so they start redistributing privileges and resources to beta males, and the cycle begins anew...

This is so obvious and predictable. Has been like this for millenia.

I had written about this (here) and I quote:

These 3 eras are cyclical and non-transitive, like a rock-paper-scissors game (there is no ultimate stable strategy). The reason for that is thus: foids are biologically wired (hypergamy) to give themselves and their resources (see Tinder Swindler) to chads/bolgads/alpha males; alphas give women and resources to beta males, to keep them productive, loyal and obedient and thus help him outcompete other alphas; beta males give their resources to women in order to score some pussy. Thus the cycle is complete.

Feminism is just the phase of foid supremacy, in which foids accumulated so many resources, privileges, etc. that they don't need beta males anymore, so they incelize them. These foids will throw themselves and all their resources at Tinder Swinders, chads, and consumption of corporate products to enrich chads and jews.

Since foids are feeble, irresponsible, and desire nothing more than to be taken care of by chad (put in a harem), they can't maintain civilization, so the collapse is inevitable. After the collapse, chads will own all the foids and resources, the only competition they'll have is a game of one-upmanship with other chads . In order to succeed these alphas will need to recruit talent (from incel betas) in exchange for pussy and money (or a promise thereof). This is unrestrained patriarchy.

These incel betas will de-incelize, form families, and compete with other betas for pussy. In order to out-bid the next beta they will offer ever increasing amounts of resources and privileges to foids until society becomes foid-supremacist (feminist) once again. This is restrained patriarchy.

The only way out of this 3-stage cycle is if we breed a race in which the foids don't display hypergamy, the alphas don't display competitiveness, and betas don't display simping. These behaviors are innate to humans, so there is no way out of it without serious selective breeding (eugenics), transhumanism, etc.

 

[zionpill]

Foids are pets.


Wise men always knew.

The problem is that beta males are over 90% of the male population, and they have this unstoppable simping instinct ("muh qween!").

In recent times in the west, it was the empowerment of beta males, through the "enlightenment" of the protestant revolutions (french revolution etc.) that resulted in beta males having a voice in soyciety. Since beta males can't help their instinct to give everything they can (and then some more) to foids, these beta males then fought for the empowerment and "emancipation" of women, and they did it fiercely in a competition against other beta males to display themselves as the biggest cuck of all in the hopes of acquiring a crumb of pussy and feminine attention. (any similarities with soys who "respect wahman" nowadays is not coincidence).

The foids, once they acquire resources and privileges, become free from their direct dependence on beta males. Foids can't help their instinct to give everything they can to Chads -- the only humans foids acknowledge other than themselves and their kids (if any).

These Chads, as they hoard resources and power, enter competition with other Chads. To keep ahead of their game, they need to acquire loyalty of as many beta males as possible in order to compete with other Chads, so they start redistributing privileges and resources to beta males, and the cycle begins anew...

This is so obvious and predictable. Has been like this for millenia.

I had written about this (here) and I quote:

If you think your "want for validation" is biological rather than socialized, you aren't blackpilled.

1. Validation isn't real The males of nearly every species employ the use of force (rape) in order to pass on their genes, because what the female thinks of them (validation) is irrelevant to them, their primary goal is to reproduce (desire for sex is biological). In fact, in the animal world...

incels.is

 

[turbosperg]

If you think your "want for validation" is biological rather than socialized, you aren't blackpilled.

1. Validation isn't real The males of nearly every species employ the use of force (rape) in order to pass on their genes, because what the female thinks of them (validation) is irrelevant to them, their primary goal is to reproduce (desire for sex is biological). In fact, in the animal world...

incels.is

Interesting take.

Is this based on the just-lock-yourself-in-a-room-forever-and-be-mentally-healthy theory,
or the
just-be-bullied-and-treated-as-subhuman-your-whole-life-and-be-mentally-healthy theory?

___________

On a more serious note: dude, wake up.

Humans are social creatures. Humans need social validation and acknowledgement from others in order to be mentally healthy. The quality of one's relationships with other people (be it friendships, sexual, familial, etc.) are the number one predictor of mental health or illness.

 

[basementLDARcel]

Foids wouldn't have rights if there were no men who fought for them by their side.

 

[zionpill]

Interesting take.

Is this based on the just-lock-yourself-in-a-room-forever-and-be-mentally-healthy theory,
or the
just-be-bullied-and-treated-as-subhuman-your-whole-life-and-be-mentally-healthy theory?

___________

On a more serious note: dude, wake up.

Humans are social creatures. Humans need social validation and acknowledgement from others in order to be mentally healthy. The quality of one's relationships with other people (be it friendships, sexual, familial, etc.) are the number one predictor of mental health or illness.

ye i agree. but we dont care for validation from females only from other males

 

[Zhou Chang-Xing]

It's literally just virtue signaling, obviously they're going to participate in it. To toilets you don't actually have to change anything, you should just virtue signal that you do. This luxury doesn't exist for men, toilets are hyper critical of any man, but they always accept another toilet at face value.

 

[Zhou Chang-Xing]

If only our human-ancestors knew the true nature of woMen, they would not have given them any rights

Take the Votepill.

A toilet friend actually told me that she always votes for the most handsome man in an election and if there are no handsome men she'll vote for another toilet, if there are no Chang's and no toilets then she just refuses to vote.

I wouldn't be surprised if this is the rule, ever notice how ugly politicians are in countries where toilets can't vote?