Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

TeeHee Do you think good looking ppl (7+) are smarter lower or about the same IQ

?

  • Higher

    Votes: 26 48.1%
  • Lower

    Votes: 8 14.8%
  • Similar

    Votes: 20 37.0%

  • Total voters
    54
Pinpoint

Pinpoint

Banned
-
Joined
Jan 2, 2018
Posts
6,718
I'd say it's about even-ish. But in many cases I think they can actually be higher due to higher motivation/ getting more attention and thus more opportunities to have a life and enjoy the fun of existence.
The trope that they just drink and party all the time is not really always the case. Good looking people have lives but not always degeneracy. That's what try hards for attention do who try to NTmaxx to get through the loops of rejection.

I'd also say that genetics ocme in sets and because of that there is a fair chance that they could be higher IQ. but low IQ people can enhance IQ through OCDing and compensating.
 
statistically higher, although what causes this discrepancy of IQ might be the subject of another debate
 
At the same time many go to the "tanning" and end up leaving aside the intellectual side, many do not even need it.
 
not gonna bother digging them up as they're only one google search away and I'm drunk rn
what do you make of the fact they're higher IQ statistically?
do you think the party junkie trope detracting from their intellect is cope?
why do you think ugly ppl are lower iq.
 
I'd say it's about even-ish. But in many cases I think they can actually be higher due to higher motivation/ getting more attention and thus more opportunities to have a life and enjoy the fun of existence.
The trope that they just drink and party all the time is not really always the case. Good looking people have lives but not always degeneracy. That's what try hards for attention do who try to NTmaxx to get through the loops of rejection.

I'd also say that genetics ocme in sets and because of that there is a fair chance that they could be higher IQ. but low IQ people can enhance IQ through OCDing and compensating.
higher on average because people with syndromes are both ugly and low iq, and ed up loweting the iq average of the ugly people group
 
higher on average because people with syndromes are both ugly and low iq, and ed up loweting the iq average of the ugly people group
you think all forms of ugliness or averageness result from some form of syndrome. I suppose syndrome is a subjective labelization. You can even deem asians as a race as a syndrome. As james langdon downs did when he said that ppl with downs syndrome suffered mongolism.
 
what do you make of the fact they're higher IQ statistically?
do you think the party junkie trope detracting from their intellect is cope?
why do you think ugly ppl are lower iq.
one possible explanation is that high IQ men in prerecorded history secured all the good looking females for themselves, increasing the IQ of good looking people today. Another theory is that good looking people get treated better from childhood and onwards and are therefore encouraged to pursue higher quality interests (i.e. intellectual interests) than their nonintelligent counterpart and develop their higher IQ thereby. I'm personally open to both theories although my instinct tells me the prior has more validity to it than the former. Perhaps it is a mixture of both
 
Higher. lol@ the copers who think chad is a dumb meathead.
 
you think all forms of ugliness or averageness result from some form of syndrome. I suppose syndrome is a subjective labelization. You can even deem asians as a race as a syndrome. As james langdon downs did when he said that ppl with downs syndrome suffered mongolism.
i'm really talking about the few syndromes lowering the average
 
Higher. lol@ the copers who think chad is a dumb meathead.

Lower. lol@ the cucks that think chads are smart
one possible explanation is that high IQ men in prerecorded history secured all the good looking females for themselves, increasing the IQ of good looking people today. Another theory is that good looking people get treated better from childhood and onwards and are therefore encouraged to pursue higher quality interests (i.e. intellectual interests) than their nonintelligent counterpart and develop their higher IQ thereby. I'm personally open to both theories although my instinct tells me the prior has more validity to it than the former. Perhaps it is a mixture of both

ROFL @ the idea of "developing a higher IQ". If OP was strictly talking about IQ as something separate from intelligence then yes, attractive people have higher IQs. But that's because 21st century society is built around training Chads and Chadlites over thousands of hours to be better at the types of things that give incremental boosts to IQ.

But I took the question to be more in the spirit of, "are attractive people naturally more intelligent?" In which case my answer is a definite "no, they're way dumber than ugly people."

It's like asking, "are men with higher testosterone more athletic than men with lower testosterone" and then having the low-T men lift weights for decades while the high-T men are inactive and then seeing who can lift heavier weights to determine who's more athletic; it's misleading.

but low IQ people can enhance IQ through OCDing and compensating.

Exactly, which is precisely what attractive people do. I wouldn't say they're "smarter" than ugly people that don't mentally train and work their brains hard on a regular basis though, just like I wouldn't say low-T gymcels are "more athletic" than high-T couch potatoes just because they can lift a lot more weight at the gym.
 
Last edited:
Lower. lol@ the cucks that think chads are smart


ROFL @ the idea of "developing a higher IQ". If OP was strictly talking about IQ as something separate from intelligence then yes, attractive people have higher IQs. But that's because 21st century society is built around training Chads and Chadlites over thousands of hours to be better at the types of things that give incremental boosts to IQ.

But I took the question to be more in the spirit of, "are attractive people naturally more intelligent?" In which case my answer is a definite "no, they're way dumber than ugly people."

It's like asking, "are men with higher testosterone more athletic than men with lower testosterone" and then having the low-T men lift weights for decades while the high-T men are inactive and then seeing who can lift heavier weights to determine who's more athletic; it's misleading.



Exactly, which is precisely what attractive people do. I wouldn't say they're "smarter" than ugly people that don't mentally train and work their brains hard on a regular basis though, just like I wouldn't say low-T gymcels are "more athletic" than high-T couch potatoes just because they can lift a lot more weight at the gym.

T-levels are genetic

IQ is genetic and is immutable

saying you can work on them is like saying you can work out and get taller


"but people increased t-levels by..."
yeah, they were unhealthy and got healthy. assuming you're healthy and no being hindered by starvation or something, IQ, t-levels, height, etc. are genetic
 
IQ is genetic and is immutable
IQ is both genetic and environmental. Curries in their own country are low IQ but they are pretty high IQ in america. Why is this?
 
IQ is both genetic and environmental. Curries in their own country are low IQ but they are pretty high IQ in america. Why is this?

because companies sponsor the h1b visa and they're not going to use one of the limit h1b slots they have for someone who is dumb and sucks at his job?

companies have h1b quotes.
 
because companies sponsor the h1b visa and they're not going to use one of the limit h1b slots they have for someone who is dumb and sucks at his job?

companies have h1b quotes.
True, But i dont think its 100% genetics. It is mostly though (like 75%)
 
T-levels are genetic

IQ is genetic and is immutable

IQ is genetic but IQ is not the same as intelligence. IQ is just a measure of something that many people associate with or outright call "intelligence".

And every so-called "intelligent" Chad that I've come across has struck me as not actually being what I consider to be intelligent, but rather having several characteristics that people [wrongly, in my view] tend to associate with intelligence (talk fast, quick-witted, gets good grades, able to focus on a task very intensively, hard-working, etc.)

Real intelligence in my view requires logic and rationality of course, but it also requires creativity, open-mindedness, and imagination. In my experience, attractive people are reliably deficient in two or more of those attributes and/or are entirely missing at least one of them.
 
Last edited:
Most scientists are ugly so I say lower
 
Attractive people are naturally smarter, but ugly ones are IQmaxxing hard because that's the only way for them to compensate for their face to some degree. In the meantime, attractive people become lazy since they realize that they don't need to be smart to have a great life.

In the end, it's about the same I think.
 
Better looking people have higher IQ’s eventually
Ugly peoples ideas, thoughts etc are often surpressed, at least that’s my experience
 
Higher. Everything comes down to genetics.
 
A lot of the highest iQ people are pretty close to incel tier.
 
I would assume the IQ beetween ugly and good looking people is about the same under the presumption that the environment they grow up in is the same and there is no psychological trauma. I dont see a direct corralation beetween phenotyical Genes and IQ except on a racial scale.
 
Similar tbh. Looks alone don’t play a role
 
The halo effect presumes that they're smarter. They're not since no objective study & test has been done on them.

Also they are free to pursue studying since they know they can get a physiological need met at any time unless they're ugly like us in which they can't do.

Intelligence I would say similar. Robustness I would say alot weaker since they can't stand the hell hole we face day in day out.
I would assume the IQ beetween ugly and good looking people is about the same under the presumption that the environment they grow up in is the same and there is no psychological trauma. I dont see a direct corralation beetween phenotyical Genes and IQ except on a racial scale.

Similar tbh. Looks alone don’t play a role
 
Extremely good looking people are just much less likely to suffer from learning disabilities and or mental retardation. Although, I have noticed that tall and facially attractive women tend to have better problem solving skills then shorter women.
 
Very GL people are a bit less likely to be very stupid
Very ugly people are a bit less likely to be very smart
But overall it’s not a big difference
 
Yes.
Good looking ppl on average also come from richer families (better quality of food and environment).
 
Looks and IQ are correlated and the correlation is actually fairly strong. Ethnics and other uglies succeed in academia because they work hard. Good looking people have better things to do than study.
 
Einstein and Newton were truecels tbh
 
I think the key here is inbreeding - inbreeding leads to subhumanism and loss of attractiveness, along with decreased IQ. There is probably not much correlation when inbreeding / outbreeding is taken into account, but some areas you really see people haven't bred with anyone more than 7 miles for generations.

I see a lot of low IQ goblin types where I live, all the same genetic dross matching over and over for generations.
 
Higher. lol@ the copers who think chad is a dumb meathead.

Moreover, the chad meathead will have street smarts, emotional intelligence, and real-life smarts way higher than your average incel.

It is truly over.
 
IQ is trick by gay jews
 
I'd have to go with higher.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top