The act of a grown man penetrating a small defenseless girl is kind of fucked up she can bleed and all that she basically has to be ready and 16 is the age they are apparently. With boys is different a grown foid can give a little boy head and show him what tittys are and what pussy feels like preparing him for his time when he's man no harm in that as long it's consensual
If bitches did this as at a young age maybe so many young boys wouldn't be so confused about their sexually
Not saying she is necessarily naive, but I still think a guy pursuing her could likely think that. Of course it's not necessarily true - maybe this 40 year old is seeking a completely equal partner and thinks one particular 14 year old is that - then I wouldn't see a reason to hate them - I just think it's unlikely.
True
Meanwhile she's getting fucked by those her own age
It’s all ageism when you think about it objectively.
Didn't claim that. I did claim that I think many older men try to sleep with them because they think they are easy to manipulate, and that's an evil trait. Of course I could be wrong, but well, it's what I think.
I would argue that you could not know whether a 13-16 year old virgin would become a slut (and then e.g. cheat on you later). But a woman who is able-bodied, not horrendously ugly and still a virgin at 20 most certainly is NOT a slut.
13 year olds aren't innocent children, pathetic agecuck. I knew multiple 13 year old foids in my high school slutting around, would you call them innocent children? I knew a sheboon who got pregnant when she was 11 by some drug dealer a few years older than her. Also, you're enabling foids to do anything without consequences, while it has no way the other way around. The absolute state of this forum. Defending muh 'innocent princesses' who are getting passed around and becoming the town bicycle in middle school/high school
What is 'little girl' in your definition? You're a hypocrite. Women develop earlier for a reason. Nature prioritises physical development for them. A 14 year old male is equivalent to a 11.5-12 year old female, since males develop 2 years later on average. So you're saying you have no problem if a female teacher forces herself onto a 14 year old male, yet it's wrong when her cucked husband takes vengeance and forces himself onto a 14 year old girl, who's already had sex more than him?
So, if she was 17 years old 364 days old, you would not 'touch her' because of some laws that are different based on manmade borders? It's completely normal for a man to be sexually attracted to a pubescent female who is giving off mating signals and can birth a child, she is no longer considered a child since this developmental milestone is not present anywhere. If the concept of time being measured wasn't invented, how would you discern a sexually developed female under the age of 18 from one that is over '18'?
Real paedophilia= attraction to prepubescent females, not attraction to pre-teenage women, which is a social construct on it's own, since the term 'teenagers' mainly came about in the 1950s, before that, they were considered adults, and still should be considered adults from the day they hit puberty.
It's relevant to the inceldom problem, idiot. This anti-paedophilia problem was started by Christian puritan feminists, and also a retarded Christian priest who wrote the 'Maiden Tribute of Babylon' in 1885. That's when the age of consent laws got moved from 10 or 12 in the US states, or 13 in the UK to 16 or 18 to push foids to education and to punish men escortmaxxing with recently pubescent women. What even is a minor in the first place if it can't be determined at all? Why do so many countries have age of consent laws that differ from each other? Why has the age of consent gotten higher if sexual maturity is being reached at a lower age. It has nothing to do with protecting 'innocent children'. Rather, it serves as a basis for 'minor' foids to fuck around in their teenage years, sometimes even with men in their 20s behind closed doors, while using it as an advantage to emotionally manipulate normie men and get them arrested, by lying about their age, whilst allowing it for Chad, teehee.. It's all lookism related, and if you're not able to understand that, you're braindead.
Strawman argument. Also, so, you think a woman under the age of majority/consent, or whatever the fuck it is, who willingly has sex with a man one day over the age of consent is suddenly 'traumatized', and still an 'innocent angel'? But, it's not the same way for a pre-pubescent boy? That does not make sense at all. Also, 'girls' are women as soon as they hit puberty, and they should suffer the consequences of their sexual choices, not the other way around.. Wouldn't cucks like you also say that women mature earlier? Ever heard about female hypoagency? Are you even blackpilled? Women are clearly more violent than men, they just act less on it to pretend not being a threat, when they are literal narcissist sociopaths. Also, How will this solve the even solve the inceldom problem? They will have sex with chadlets and normies when those chadlets aren't around, not you.
Agecucks think a toddler and a 16 year old are the same thing.
High IQ response. Great to read this.
Thank you for agreeing with me, brocel
. Anyone that supports agecuckery supports unrestricted female sexual selection, basically allowing women to pick and choose whoever they want in the sexual market, whilst men are punished for the actions that they women have perpetrated themselves (which is teenage women willingly having sex with older men and then emotionally manipulating them solely for resource and attention gain depending on their looks, no wonder how you always see average looking men get in trouble for statutory rape, never chads). It goes hand in hand with diluting the sexual market, that along with promoting women riding the cock carousel at an early age and losing their pair bonding abilities, instead of being forced (for their own benefit and for the benefit of the nuclear household) to contribute to society and civilization by doing what they're meant to (get married at an early age and start a family). Well, what d'yknow, ER would probably agree with me if he were still alive, because his programmed soul surely does.
I literally just said it shouldn’t be based on age. It should be based on horomones and if the girl is menstruating. You realize a lot of girls begin menstruating at 12-13? Fuckin idiot
I wasn’t disagreeing with you, pal but I was making a point.
apparently?
thelarche tends to occur earlier than thirteen
they really don't, they just parrot the line because they're too cowardly to stand up to feminist propaganda
damn the way this forum's been headed I didn't expect to get historymogged on this issue
I’m not implying that @coping_manlet said this, I was just trying to tell him how fucked up agecucks are but I’m sorry if I caused any confusion.
Oh boo hoo, soyim. Do you think those 12 year old foids give a shit about you protecting them? There's a lot of them becoming sexually active at that age, yet you're not holding them accountable at all, which promotes female supremacy and the gynocentric values we have today. It's ironic how you used the word 'chomo' in such an illogical
manner, 12 year old females can't be molested unless by a sexually unattractive male, (they would not report it as a molestation if they were NOT repulsed by the man who 'groped them') that they consider unattractive since they are not children and are old enough or for their parents to pick someone. If you are saying otherwise, this makes you a 'chomo' yourself, and your hypocritical counter-argument afterwards will probably be 0% logic 100% emotion. Why would they be children if you thought they were old enough to date and have sex with, as long as it's 'somehow' within their own age group. The age of consent protects no one, it only demonizes age gap relationships, and females are never punished. Those females will have sex with a 40 year old man if he's considered sexually attractive enough, their parents can't stop them, especially in societies where moral debauchery is sexual degeneracy is present, where the father is too cucked to control his own daughter. Literal paedophiles can't be stopped by a bunch of retarded laws that pay more attention to protecting so called 'minors' instead of children.And that makes you a 'genuine paedophile' too, if you think they magically turn into sexually developed women as soon as they hit some random age, then you're wrong. You're only talking about the average female who hits thelarche at 9-10 and has completed full sexual development by their early teenage years, as if they all do that, when there are plenty of exceptions, like the bottom 50% of women who hit puberty later than average statistically, thus it makes you a 'paedophile' by your own logic. Are you really going to call 80% of your male ancestors paedophile, curry (I am also one)? Are you going to call Srinivasa Ramanujan, one of the greatest curry mathematicians, a paedophile (Look up his wiki page)? A 16 year old women back in the late 1800s was equivalent to an 11 year old female today, since the vestiges of industrialization was in its infancy. You would be a 'genuine paedophile' even if you applied your logic to the time back then. It's all arbitrary and only involves subjective morality.
Yea that's the law at least in usa
Whoever says this unironically are the biggest soy chugging fags
The west draws the line poorly in two apparent ways.
uhhuh
Actual admitted pedophiles always get banned from here though. I can cite many from memory, Nathan Larson, Deepsea (not even an admitted pedophile, just argued against the notion that sex between adults and children is intrinsically harmful), Napoleon De Geso, etc.
High IQ post.The west draws the line poorly in two apparent ways.
1) Double standard where older men banging young women is viewed with contempt but older women with young men, frankly nobody cares and in far more cases charges won’t be filed since, say, a young male student fucking his teacher will be seen by that student and his friends as a positive fortunate encounter.
At the very least we should get some consistency one way or the other though my view is that broadly speaking this isn’t a big deal so long as nobody was forced into anything and the younger party is like ~14. Which brings me to the second point:
2) Age of Consent is stupidly high in some countries and again only really applies if it’s an older man with a younger woman.
Once your 14 you’re basically good to go seems to me. And being attracted to a 14 year doesn’t make anyone a pedo either, this is a misconception that is repeated all the time but it simply isn’t true.
People grow basically like this:
1) baby
2) toddler
3) child
4) preteen / puberty starts
5) teen
6) puberty ends
7) young adult
8) adult
9) middle aged
10) old
11) decrepit
12) dead
More or less.
If you’re attracted to children that haven’t even begun puberty then sure that’s pedo. But for a lot of women by the time they’re 14 they’ve basically finished puberty and are young women. Historically people were getting married when they were like 13 ffs. Modern society has just pushed things later and later and the social norms have changed.
There’s some argument to be made the a large portion of men are hebephiles though but thats different to pedophilia despite what woke Redditors and women will insist. Most men are smart enough not to ever admit this in the current social climate. For example on surveys you see men basically say whatever the lowest age for post puberty women they’re “allowed” to socially without consequences.
Guy at my last job showed me some pictures of his gf once and he had one where she was 14 before she moved here. Let me tell you she looked way way better when she was 14 than she did in the current pictures. And she had fully developed sex characteristics at 14 (breasts, baby birthing hips, etc).
The other thing is as a man it’s far far more desirable to get a woman when they’re young because:
1) lower body count, only window where you can get a virgin that still has a chance of pair bonding with you
2) they still have optimism and aren’t ruined from cynicism after being pumped and dumped by Chad roulette.
3) less likely their brains have been rotted from their skull by feminist propaganda. Seriously there was a girl I used to crush on who lost her mind after going to college. Many such cases.
Goes without saying women get enraged by this topic because they hate the idea that they age out of their prime and have to compete with younger women so they use shaming tactics or even force of law to make men do what they want. But when those same women are 14 or 15 banging 25 year old Chad I guarantee you they don’t give a fuck and just enjoy the ride. Then later they act like they were used and abused
What do you mean by ‘pedos’?
Time to Mengelemaxx and torture some millions of kids in the name of "science" then. Also, I think you meant "prepubescent" there.
You genuinely believe that AoC laws are the reason you're incel?
Why?
Thanks Fren
I expect to see you protesting outside your local synagogue since you feel so strongly about that, since it's the only form of institutionalized baby fellatio defended in the entire world.
I don't recognize Deepsea or DeGeso, guess I can go see if any old threads talk about them.
Incel forums are basically the only place on the open net that barely tolerate them (as long as they don't do illegal shit obv), so they congregate and flock to places like here like shit on flies and scream louder than anyone. It doesn't help when feds piggy back off of this and try to larp for some bait.
no it won't
Good gravy, you’re a fucking cuck.
You want 14 year olds to be reserved only for other 14 year olds? This is exactly why we call people like you agecucks.
Because he’s an agecuck.
You're very ignorant about the definition of pedophilia.
I didn't ask you.
AoC laws in many countries (especially in the west) are lower than the age of marriage laws. Why else would they raise the AoC if not to destroy the structure that we had where a woman was married off as soon as she reached maturity (usually as soon as when she was considered able to create a child)?
