Serious Circumcision (MGM) is performed out of malice towards boys and men

[Morro]

Circumcision is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in males. Approximately 13.3 million men worldwide are circumcised each year.
https://www.noharmm.org/bju.htm
Circumcision is performed primarily for three different indications:

1. For medical reasons in the presence of pathological phimosis.
2. For religious or socio-cultural reasons.
3. Finally, in Anglo-Saxon countries, circumcision in newborns was practiced as so-called routine circumcision. While this practice has been completely abandoned in Great Britain and New Zealand, and has declined sharply in Canada and Australia, 55% of all male newborns are still routinely circumcised in the USA.

In Europe, Australia, North America, South America, and South Korea, circumcision is often performed without a religious or cultural background and without strict examination of the indication. This is partly because circumcision is considered a minor surgical procedure that, according to widespread opinion, has no consequences (especially negative ones) for the patient. Second, the alleged medical benefits of routine circumcision in terms of prophylaxis favor a generous indication.
After critical examination, however, one must now conclude that circumcision cannot be attributed any medical benefit in improving genital hygiene, reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases, or cancer prevention. Circumcision is medically indicated only in cases of pathologically acquired phimosis, after all available conservative treatment options have failed. However, there is a not insignificant rate of perioperative and postoperative complications, ranging between 2% and 10%.
https://www.cirp.org/library/complications/williams-kapila/
Circumcision is also associated with long-term anatomical, sexual, and psychological consequences. Although the latter are difficult to investigate, circumcision certainly cannot be dismissed as a harmless and inconsequential procedure. There are numerous reports of the negative consequences of circumcision for both the patient and their sexual partners, and scientific evidence is accumulating regarding the negative impact of circumcision on the sexuality of men and their partners.

 

[Grodd]

It's the Jews again.

 

[Morro]

It's the Jews again.

No, it's females.
Females are to blame for these systemic and routine atrocities inflicted on defenceless baby boys (alongside capitalists and traditionnal conservatives).

Females: they enjoy inflicting abuse and torture on men, even when they are at their most innocent and harmless stage of life. Attacking men's genitals is an attack on their existence itself, which explains their obsession with perpetuating male genital mutilation alongside how painful and destructive it is. It is purely for hateful and sadistic purposes. Nothing more, nothing less.

Capitalists: male genital mutilation allows stem cells to be harvested and used in beauty products for females to enjoy.

Traditional conservatives: for cultural and religious reasons. The Universal and widespread lack of empathy towards men, coupled with their disposable role in society, further facilitates their support of this barbaric practice without remorse.

 

[turbocuckcel_7000]

yes

 

[Cloudrak]

jews jews jews

 

[Excalibur]

No, it's females.
Females are to blame for these systemic and routine atrocities inflicted on defenceless baby boys (alongside capitalists and traditionnal conservatives).

Females: they enjoy inflicting abuse and torture on men, even when they are at their most innocent and harmless stage of life. Attacking men's genitals is an attack on their existence itself, which explains their obsession with perpetuating male genital mutilation alongside how painful and destructive it is. It is purely for hateful and sadistic purposes. Nothing more, nothing less.

Capitalists: male genital mutilation allows stem cells to be harvested and used in beauty products for females to enjoy.

Traditional conservatives: for cultural and religious reasons. The Universal and widespread lack of empathy towards men, coupled with their disposable role in society, further facilitates their support of this barbaric practice without remorse.

View attachment 1642977

Nah, it’s just a ritual by kikes to mark and humiliate their cattle.

Among medieval Europeans circumcision was non-existent and was even banned by the Catholic Church. It was seen as a foreign Jewish practice, which it is.

 

[turbocuckcel_7000]

a barrage of total kike death by 2030 at the latest​

 

[Morro]

Nah, it’s just a ritual by kikes to mark and humiliate their cattle.

Among medieval Europeans circumcision was non-existent and was even banned by the Catholic Church. It was seen as a foreign Jewish practice, which it is.

 

[Excalibur]

View attachment 1642990

Are you retarded? The practice was started by Jews and other semites and was popularized among gentiles by philosemitic physicians in the late nineteenth century.

Before then, no one in the West, besides Jews and other foreigners, was circumcised and the practice itself was considered to be barbaric.

 

[Lonly ghost]

Circumcision is male genital mutilation.

Circumcision is rape of little boys . Circumcision is sexual abuse .

People hate anyone born male so much that they even harm baby boys .

People just like to use religion and non existent " health benefits" as an excuse to rape little boys .

Even if there was no religion , culture or " health benefits" , people would still mutilate little boys just because they hate anyone male .

Child abuse is the result of female supremacy and misandry.

 

[Glassness]

I think it should be a choice of a male to get circumcised not the parents unless the child has a condition

 

[TBIcel]

No, it's females.
Females are to blame for these systemic and routine atrocities inflicted on defenceless baby boys (alongside capitalists and traditionnal conservatives).

Females: they enjoy inflicting abuse and torture on men, even when they are at their most innocent and harmless stage of life. Attacking men's genitals is an attack on their existence itself, which explains their obsession with perpetuating male genital mutilation alongside how painful and destructive it is. It is purely for hateful and sadistic purposes. Nothing more, nothing less.

Capitalists: male genital mutilation allows stem cells to be harvested and used in beauty products for females to enjoy.

Traditional conservatives: for cultural and religious reasons. The Universal and widespread lack of empathy towards men, coupled with their disposable role in society, further facilitates their support of this barbaric practice without remorse.

View attachment 1642977

bullshit it is due to traditional conservatives there's nothing traditional or conservative about Jedeau Christianity that's just some retarded boomer drivel.

 

[Excalibur]

Even if there was no religion , culture or " health benefits" , people would still mutilate little boys just because they hate anyone male .

Circumcision is a Jewish import. For most of history circumcision was non-existent among European men, and even today it’s rare in continental Europe. It’s only common in the anglosphere today thanks to philosemitic doctors who believed that circumcision could prevent the spread of syphilis and other STDs, and discourage masturbation.

 

[Morro]

Are you retarded? The practice was started by Jews and other semites and was popularized among gentiles by philosemitic physicians in the late nineteenth century.

Before then, no one in the West, besides Jews and other foreigners, was circumcised and the practice itself was considered to be barbaric.

It doesn't matter.

What matters is that it is females who support and perpetuate male genital mutilation.

Females are the ones who come to the doctor and ask for their sons to be mutilated.

Females are the ones who advice each others to mutilate their sons.

Females are the ones who base their entire career path on being able to routinely mutilate babyboys.

Females also the ones who constantly downplay male genital mutilation and make it all about themselves.

Females are the ones who create content celebrating the fact that they have mutilated their sons and pressure other men to do the same.

Females even made the UN to create propaganda justifying male genital mutilation, which they then used to spread this barbaric practice across Sub-Saharan Africa.

While females do everything in their power to ban female circumcision, they ruthlessly take advantage of the most vulnerable stage in a man's life to mutilate him, laughing at his torture and humiliation while baking cakes in the shape of his severed penis.

Any attempt to divert attention towards "da joos" is an attempt to make people forget female responsibility in men's worldwide child knife-rape torture, and is therefore an attempt to pacify intactivism from within by distracting them with this never-ending conspiracy theory about Jews, which has never led to any real, practical change for men.

FEMALES ARE THE PROBLEM.

 

[Morro]

bullshit it is due to traditional conservatives there's nothing traditional or conservative about Jedeau Christianity that's just some retarded boomer drivel.

 

[Excalibur]

It doesn't matter.

What matters is that it is females who support and perpetuate male genital mutilation.

Females are the ones who come to the doctor and ask for their sons to be mutilated.

Females are the ones who advice each others to mutilate their sons.

Females are the ones who base their entire career path on being able to routinely mutilate babyboys.

Females also the ones who constantly downplay male genital mutilation and make it all about themselves.

Females are the ones who create content celebrating the fact that they have mutilated their sons and pressure other men to do the same.

Females even made the UN to create propaganda justifying male genital mutilation, which they then used to spread this barbaric practice across Sub-Saharan Africa.

While females do everything in their power to ban female circumcision, they ruthlessly take advantage of the most vulnerable stage in a man's life to mutilate him, laughing at his torture and humiliation while baking cakes in the shape of his severed penis.

Any attempt to divert attention towards "da joos" is an attempt to make people forget female responsibility in men's worldwide child knife-rape torture, and is therefore an attempt to pacify intactivism from within by distracting them with this never-ending conspiracy theory about Jews, which has never led to any real, practical change for men.

FEMALES ARE THE PROBLEM.

The fact that foids have a preference for circumcision is mostly irrelevant, given that circumcision has been commonplace in the U.S. for generations. Believe me, if circumcision hadn't been presented as the ideal surgical procedure that all male newborns need by Jewish or Jewish-controlled doctors for over a century, no froid would ever think of circumcising his son. Look at continental Europe, for example, where circumcision has always been considered a taboo and circumcision rates are very low despite the existence of females.
The fact is, women are not the primary cause, nor are they the reason why circumcision is so widespread in the USA. The reason is the Jewish-owned medical establishment that, since the 19th century, has been spreading propaganda encouraging all parents to circumcise their boys for health and moral reasons. Over time, as circumcised penises became the norm among American men, they naturally became the preference of some American women. You have to understand that women are merely pawns in the great Jewish game to subvert and destroy Western civilization and that they have used women, mainly in the form of feminism, to destabilize and undermine Western society. Women can be brought under control, to be sure, but only once the subverters who put these ideas in their head have been dealt with.

 

[Morro]

The fact that foids have a preference for circumcision is mostly irrelevant, given that circumcision has been commonplace in the U.S. for generations. Believe me, if circumcision hadn't been presented as the ideal surgical procedure that all male newborns need by Jewish or Jewish-controlled doctors for over a century, no froid would ever think of circumcising his son. Look at continental Europe, for example, where circumcision has always been considered a taboo and circumcision rates are very low despite the existence of females.
The fact is, women are not the primary cause, nor are they the reason why circumcision is so widespread in the USA. The reason is the Jewish-owned medical establishment that, since the 19th century, has been spreading propaganda encouraging all parents to circumcise their boys for health and moral reasons. Over time, as circumcised penises became the norm among American men, they naturally became the preference of some American women. You have to understand that women are merely pawns in the great Jewish game to subvert and destroy Western civilization and that they have used women, mainly in the form of feminism, to destabilize and undermine Western society. Women can be brought under control, to be sure, but only once the subverters who put these ideas in their head have been dealt with.

The obsession of men to defend their genital mutilators and blame "da joos" for everything needs to be seriously studied.

In my entire life and in my decade of academic research, I have never seen a group more cucked than men themselves.

 

[Excalibur]

View attachment 1643043
The obsession of men to defend their genital mutilators and blame "da joos" for everything needs to be seriously studied.

In my entire life and in my decade of academic research, I have never seen a group more cucked than men themselves.

I’m not defending foids jfl. I hate them, but I recognize that they’re just tools in the grander scheme of things. Do you seriously believe that the rise of feminism among other things was organic and not astroturfed at all?

 

[Morro]

I’m not defending foids jfl. I hate them, but I recognize that they’re just tools in the grander scheme of things. Do you seriously believe that the rise of feminism among other things was organic and not astroturfed at all?

Calling females tools is just a way of downplaying their role in male oppression and absolving them of responsibility for their actions.
Feminism is the political manifestation of female nature. The political vector used by females to promote, perpetuate, and accentuate female supremacy.

 

[Excalibur]

Calling females tools is just a way of downplaying their role in male oppression and absolving them of responsibility for their actions.
Feminism is the political manifestation of female nature. The political vector used by females to promote, perpetuate, and accentuate female supremacy.

You're being terribly obtuse by missing my point.

Foids are beings that must naturally be placed under the control of men. There is no other solution. Women will always exist, which is why we must accept that the only way to prevent them from ever undermining the will of men is to permanently subjugate them. This, however, will only be possible when all subversive influences, mainly that of Jews, which incite women to resist men and fight against all that is natural, as well as men to embrace weakness and allow females to trample on them, have been definitively stifled.

 

[Morro]

You're being terribly obtuse by missing my point.

Foids are beings that must naturally be placed under the control of men. There is no other solution. Women will always exist, which is why we must accept that the only way to prevent them from ever undermining the will of men is to permanently subjugate them. This, however, will only be possible when all subversive influences, mainly that of Jews, which incite women to resist men and fight against all that is natural, as well as men to embrace weakness and allow females to trample on them, have been definitively stifled.

All I see are excuses for not fighting against female supremacy through shifting the blaming toward 'da joos'. You want us to waste our whole lives barking about that invisible enemy and that never-ending conspiracy theory that leads nowhere, rather than providing real solution and making effective change by holding females accountable.
You're also completely deluded if you think it's "natural" for men to dominate females. Because if that was true, we would not be in this such situation. You should stop coping and strong-man posturing. We are the oppressed gender for a reason.
Either fight for your rights and stay a miserable slave for females.

 

[Excalibur]

All I see are excuses for not fighting against female supremacy through shifting the blaming toward 'da joos'. You want us to waste our whole lives barking about that invisible enemy and that never-ending conspiracy theory that leads nowhere, rather than providing real solution and making effective change by holding females accountable.

The only solution is to purge Jewry and its ideological poisons once and for all.

. Because if that was true, we would not be in this such situation. You should stop coping and strong-man posturing. We are the oppressed gender for a reason.

We’re in this situation thanks to slave morality started by Jews in the form of Christianity which inverted our morals from valuing strength and dominance to valuing weakness and submission, as Nietzsche pointed out. There’s a very clear reason why the first Christians in the Roman Empire were slaves and literal prostitutes. Christianity was a total rejection of pagan values which worshipped the the former values and was used to subvert Europeans and turn them into servile weaklings. From there Christian universalism and egalitarianism would eventually spiral into the Enlightenment which would give birth to subversive ideologies such as feminism, liberalism, communism ect.

You're also completely deluded if you think it's "natural" for men to dominate females.

It is natural. We're stronger and smarter than foids, so we have the right to subdue them. Hell, I've had the urge to dominate foids since I hit puberty, maybe even before. If it weren’t for gynocentric, cucked laws I’d have gotten myself a foid fuck slave by now.

Either fight for your rights and stay a miserable slave for females

How do you expect men to do this without being strong? Or do you expect us to just whine and protest like a bunch of effeminate hippies, is that it? The truth is, the only way to bring about change in this world is through sheer force, and men need to wake up and realize that women are not untouchable and must be dominated for sake of our civilization.

 

[yakubhitler]

It's the Jews again.

They literally make skin creams out of our foreskin without consent

 

[Extern]

You're also completely deluded if you think it's "natural" for men to dominate females.

 

[Morro]

The only solution is to purge Jewry and its ideological poisons once and for all.

You're trying to protect females by scapegoating another group of people and leading us down a never-ending conspiracy theory and a dead end.

We’re in this situation thanks to slave morality started by Jews in the form of Christianity which inverted our morals from valuing strength and dominance to valuing weakness and submission, as Nietzsche pointed out. There’s a very clear reason why the first Christians in the Roman Empire were slaves and literal prostitutes. Christianity was a total rejection of pagan values which worshipped the the former values and was used to subvert Europeans and turn them into servile weaklings. From there Christian universalism and egalitarianism would eventually spiral into the Enlightenment which would give birth to subversive ideologies such as feminism, liberalism, communism ect.

Same thing, but this time you are also scapegoating communism and liberalism.
The male-female situation is not confined to the Western world; it concerns every society that has ever existed in recorded human history, as well as those that still exist today. Therefore, your yapping about history is meaningless. Your bullshit do not and cannot explain male oppression in 90% of the world, past and present

It is natural. We're stronger and smarter than foids, so we have the right to subdue them. Hell, I've had the urge to dominate foids since I hit puberty, maybe even before. If it weren’t for gynocentric, cucked laws I’d have gotten myself a foid fuck slave by now.

Pure cope and strong-man posturing because you are too insecure to accept the grim reality of your situation. Nature isn't about having the right to do something or not, quite the opposite. What is natural is what exist, regardless of what is right or fair. Men are the dominated and oppressed gender, which makes your mumbling about men being superior miserable and pathetic.
If you truly want to dominate females, the first thing you should do is stop trying to exonerate them from their actions and scapegoat Jews. Secondly, you need to have the strength to admit that you are being dominated so that you can fight back more effectively.
A man who thinks he is invincible will never defend himself and will eventually be killed. This is why it is so difficult for men to fight against female supremacy; they don't even realise that they are under attack by females.

How do you expect men to do this without being strong? Or do you expect us to just whine and protest like a bunch of effeminate hippies, is that it? The truth is, the only way to bring about change in this world is through sheer force, and men need to wake up and realize that women are not untouchable and must be dominated for sake of our civilization.

True strength lies in "whining" and protesting. Doing nothing is the ultimate sign of weakness. The fact that you try to cope by calling your miserable passivity 'strength' only serves to prove your weakness further. Since you are insecure about your situation, you try to appear to be someone you are not. A man who recognizes his weaknesses will always be stronger than a man who pretend he has none.
Females dominate the world because they never shut up. They constantly whine, scream and protest, which eventually leads to shifts in opinion and changes to the world in their favour. In contrast, men are always silent, like good, submissive slaves.
Just look how completely upside down your reasoning is : Would you call a man who wields a sword in self-defence an effeminate hippie?
Only suicidal idiots or men who are too weak to defend themselves wouldn't do anything in the face of aggression.