Serious Circumcision (MGM) is performed out of malice towards boys and men:

[Morro]

Circumcision is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in males. Approximately 13.3 million men worldwide are circumcised each year.
https://www.noharmm.org/bju.htm
Circumcision is performed primarily for three different indications:

1. For medical reasons in the presence of pathological phimosis.
2. For religious or socio-cultural reasons.
3. Finally, in Anglo-Saxon countries, circumcision in newborns was practiced as so-called routine circumcision. While this practice has been completely abandoned in Great Britain and New Zealand, and has declined sharply in Canada and Australia, 55% of all male newborns are still routinely circumcised in the USA.

In Europe, Australia, North America, South America, and South Korea, circumcision is often performed without a religious or cultural background and without strict examination of the indication. This is partly because circumcision is considered a minor surgical procedure that, according to widespread opinion, has no consequences (especially negative ones) for the patient. Second, the alleged medical benefits of routine circumcision in terms of prophylaxis favor a generous indication.
After critical examination, however, one must now conclude that circumcision cannot be attributed any medical benefit in improving genital hygiene, reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases, or cancer prevention. Circumcision is medically indicated only in cases of pathologically acquired phimosis, after all available conservative treatment options have failed. However, there is a not insignificant rate of perioperative and postoperative complications, ranging between 2% and 10%.
https://www.cirp.org/library/complications/williams-kapila/
Circumcision is also associated with long-term anatomical, sexual, and psychological consequences. Although the latter are difficult to investigate, circumcision certainly cannot be dismissed as a harmless and inconsequential procedure. There are numerous reports of the negative consequences of circumcision for both the patient and their sexual partners, and scientific evidence is accumulating regarding the negative impact of circumcision on the sexuality of men and their partners.

 

[sub5ricemale]

only allowed because kikes do it

 

[Nicusor_delaBraila]

Circumcision is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in males. Approximately 13.3 million men worldwide are circumcised each year.
https://www.noharmm.org/bju.htm
Circumcision is performed primarily for three different indications:

1. For medical reasons in the presence of pathological phimosis.
2. For religious or socio-cultural reasons.
3. Finally, in Anglo-Saxon countries, circumcision in newborns was practiced as so-called routine circumcision. While this practice has been completely abandoned in Great Britain and New Zealand, and has declined sharply in Canada and Australia, 55% of all male newborns are still routinely circumcised in the USA.

In Europe, Australia, North America, South America, and South Korea, circumcision is often performed without a religious or cultural background and without strict examination of the indication. This is partly because circumcision is considered a minor surgical procedure that, according to widespread opinion, has no consequences (especially negative ones) for the patient. Second, the alleged medical benefits of routine circumcision in terms of prophylaxis favor a generous indication.
After critical examination, however, one must now conclude that circumcision cannot be attributed any medical benefit in improving genital hygiene, reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases, or cancer prevention. Circumcision is medically indicated only in cases of pathologically acquired phimosis, after all available conservative treatment options have failed. However, there is a not insignificant rate of perioperative and postoperative complications, ranging between 2% and 10%.
https://www.cirp.org/library/complications/williams-kapila/
Circumcision is also associated with long-term anatomical, sexual, and psychological consequences. Although the latter are difficult to investigate, circumcision certainly cannot be dismissed as a harmless and inconsequential procedure. There are numerous reports of the negative consequences of circumcision for both the patient and their sexual partners, and scientific evidence is accumulating regarding the negative impact of circumcision on the sexuality of men and their partners.

imagine getting circumsised while being a cold climate people
over for protestantcels

 

[GmeOvr]

I want to go ER on the American Academy of Pediatrics.
They are one of the biggest circumcision promoters and thus deserve annihilation.

 

[NormieCelll]

For medical reasons in the presence of pathological phimosis.

Circumcisions should only be done for that reason imo

The rest of the times it should only be done to legal of age males and with their permission

 

[turbocuckcel_7000]

yes, it may have been that superstition and ritual was more influential in creating the practice in ancient times, but since superstition and ritual has faded (even among the putatively religious) it's pretty safe to say that malice is doing some very heavy lifting in keeping the practice alive all the way to the present day.

 

[Morro]

only allowed because kikes do it

Cirumcision is allowed because "everyone" benefit from it.
-Traditionnal conservatives: old religious/cultural practice
-Feminism: they enjoy seign members of the male sex suffer
-Capitalists: the foreskin contains stem cells that can be harvested to create cosmetic products, particularly for women.
And, of course, since men's oppression and exploitation are deeply rooted in human society and were actually built upon it. The idea of routinely mutilating men does not trigger anybody, not even men themselves...

 

[Morro]

Circumcisions should only be done for that reason imo

The rest of the times it should only be done to legal of age males and with their permission

Even during pathological phimosis, circumcision is only used as a last resort, and only the overextended foreskin is removed.

 

[MajorThomas666]

Circumcision is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in males. Approximately 13.3 million men worldwide are circumcised each year.
https://www.noharmm.org/bju.htm
Circumcision is performed primarily for three different indications:

1. For medical reasons in the presence of pathological phimosis.
2. For religious or socio-cultural reasons.
3. Finally, in Anglo-Saxon countries, circumcision in newborns was practiced as so-called routine circumcision. While this practice has been completely abandoned in Great Britain and New Zealand, and has declined sharply in Canada and Australia, 55% of all male newborns are still routinely circumcised in the USA.

In Europe, Australia, North America, South America, and South Korea, circumcision is often performed without a religious or cultural background and without strict examination of the indication. This is partly because circumcision is considered a minor surgical procedure that, according to widespread opinion, has no consequences (especially negative ones) for the patient. Second, the alleged medical benefits of routine circumcision in terms of prophylaxis favor a generous indication.
After critical examination, however, one must now conclude that circumcision cannot be attributed any medical benefit in improving genital hygiene, reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases, or cancer prevention. Circumcision is medically indicated only in cases of pathologically acquired phimosis, after all available conservative treatment options have failed. However, there is a not insignificant rate of perioperative and postoperative complications, ranging between 2% and 10%.
https://www.cirp.org/library/complications/williams-kapila/
Circumcision is also associated with long-term anatomical, sexual, and psychological consequences. Although the latter are difficult to investigate, circumcision certainly cannot be dismissed as a harmless and inconsequential procedure. There are numerous reports of the negative consequences of circumcision for both the patient and their sexual partners, and scientific evidence is accumulating regarding the negative impact of circumcision on the sexuality of men and their partners.

I wrote a 99pg thesis on genital mutilation of men and received a C-, not because it wasn't good, it was, but because the teacher was a circumcised Jew. In one section I made the case that Jews were the greatest propagandists for genital mutilation of non-Jews, and that rabbis employed the rite of circumcision to induce obedience and servility. The teacher was fuming.

 

[Jestermaxxest]

Again, it is the juice

 

[sub5ricemale]

Cirumcision is allowed because "everyone" benefit from it.
-Traditionnal conservatives: old religious/cultural practice
-Feminism: they enjoy seign members of the male sex suffer
-Capitalists: the foreskin contains stem cells that can be harvested to create cosmetic products, particularly for women.
And, of course, since men's oppression and exploitation are deeply rooted in human society and were actually built upon it. The idea of routinely mutilating men does not trigger anybody, not even men themselves...

we need a beta uprising

 

[ItsOverMan]

There are anti-circumcision subreddits. Although since it's Reddit, it's probably kink fetish for some people there.

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

Reddit - Please wait for verification

www.reddit.com

 

[ItsOverMan]

The only good thing about circumcision is you don't have to worry about phimosis. I'm intact but have phimosis. I think I've had it as long as I can remember (adolescence? I'm over 35 now).

 

[Homegrownman326]

Cirumcision is allowed because "everyone" benefit from it.
-Traditionnal conservatives: old religious/cultural practice
-Feminism: they enjoy seign members of the male sex suffer
-Capitalists: the foreskin contains stem cells that can be harvested to create cosmetic products, particularly for women.
And, of course, since men's oppression and exploitation are deeply rooted in human society and were actually built upon it. The idea of routinely mutilating men does not trigger anybody, not even men themselves...

This is the conclusion I've come to as well. Women subconsciously support circumcision because it's an attack on men, specifically the phallus, which is an effigy of a man's masculinity. Feminism is merely another term for "penis envy". Circumcision is an act of taming and controlling men's sexuality. It's so appalling that it makes me want to throw up. Only Jews could ever come up with a ritual as disgusting as circumcision.

 

[Morro]

The only good thing about circumcision is you don't have to worry about phimosis. I'm intact but have phimosis. I think I've had it as long as I can remember (adolescence? I'm over 35 now).

Phimosis >>>> Male genital mutilation

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

Finally, in Anglo-Saxon countries, circumcision in newborns was practiced as so-called routine circumcision. While this practice has been completely abandoned in Great Britain and New Zealand, and has declined sharply in Canada and Australia, 55% of all male newborns are still routinely circumcised in the USA.

For some reason anglos have to be the most cucked cucks in the world