it sounds like you found a little safe space of normies, and called them all "leftists" because the overton window shifting means that just about everyone says some lefty platitude now and again.
if you can't see leftists tearing each other apart then i don't know what to tell you.
you have TERFS vs. troons, feminists vs. muslims, whites vs. blacks calling everyone a racist, you have wider phenomena like universities blocking the admission of asians and whites even if they are leftist, and BLM setting shit on fire even if it belongs to leftists, and more.
please do read this to the end, it is important (at least to me, maybe it will be to you too)
they are infighting over differences in specific group interests, but the whole remains united behind the central purpose and values.
feminists used to hail islamists as "more respectful" because women weren't so sexualised over there. many still do when it suits them. the islamist groups on campuses coexist with the feminist ones. in the end, the larger group will assign one of the minor groups a higher value, the lesser group will submit, the members that won't go along with this will be exiled.
unity remains intact.
whites and blacks are united in calling whites racists. it's more of a competition in who can do it better. havard got sued for discriminating against asians and whites. what do the leftists on campus and the former members
do ?
"Groups representing Asian-American, Black, Hispanic, Native American and white Harvard students and alumni voiced fear to the appeals court about what would result if Harvard lost."
All races, even those being discriminated against, stand united behind their shared values. Can you imagine the races constantly bickering on here do that, under similar circumstances?
TERFs are not inside the leftist tent, they have been excluded for being uncooperative too often. Some of the feminsts experience the same, either those that are too sex realist to go along with trans, especially with trans interests being above their own, a very small amount for calling women out on some of their bullshit.
What you describe is not 'leftists tearing' themselfs apart, it's a functional ideology enforcing loyality to the central, higher cause by kicking those not willing to make the necessary sacrifices out.
If we did that here, no matter who decides what the central cause is defined as, there will be almost no one left. Most people will be gone, because there is no cause most of the members can unite behind in a meaningful way.
This is true even if the central cause was "hating women"!
Some people think women shouldn't be blamed for their nature. Or that there is no reason to expect them to care about ugly men that don't make them feel anything but disgust. Why should they have to like them? What do they offer?
Some want specific rights taken away from women, like excluding them from the workforce, or politics or academia.
Some would like to take all their rights away and enslave them.
Some just want women to suffer in any way possible, the more the better, legal or not who cares?
Some don't really want to change much, they just want a women to love them in particular, then the rest can stay as is.
I think on one of the main Incel Forums people are less united behind anything, even how they feel about women, than the left is on any of their main agenda points.
That is why we are irrelevant, powerless, abuseable. That is why I welcome the influx of failed normies and low status men of any kind, because these more normal people will be able to unite behind their interests as a sex. Once they realize how screwed men are on the sex market, that is.
For all of you, your special niche subinterests aren't strenghts. They are weaknesses, preventing you from cooperating with other people in your position. Nazi, ethnic, islamist, communists, fascist.
Any values beside "more for men, better for men" makes it harder for you to cooperate with others.
'No god beside me', and all that. Ultimately, you can't maxximize for two values at the same time, one can always be exchanged for some amount of the other value. And we are not in agreement what should be sacrificed for what.
