D
Deleted member 23682
mentally crippled by lonely teen years
-
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2019
- Posts
- 38,936
@Thebiggestloser
Brutally over for @needsolution. I really thought he would surpass Cuyen someday. RIP nigga.
He stopped postmaxxing when he reached 20,000.Brutally over for @needsolution. I really thought he would surpass Cuyen someday. RIP nigga.
Yup, and no chance to appeal again.is he perma banned ?
The Slavpill was too much for some to handle nglAnd i thought mods were harsh with me lmao
(and @speedtypingincel) permanent.Mods,
permanent.@Thebiggestloser
temporary.@BummerDrummer dead serious you jews ban him again!?
requested.@Sadness? im not even allowed to pm or follow him
This is the price to pay for a strict mod team. If the mods werent so brutal, this place would turn into a shithole like /r9k/.Don't understand how so many users get banned for dumb shit tbh. I've been here since 2018 and I've never been banned. Some bans are over the top but lots are just users being retarded.
it says temp if I hover over his name@Reddit_is_for_cucks temp or perm?
Temp.@Reddit_is_for_cucks temp or perm?
sent to gulag@Barnacle what happened? why was he banned?
They’reI was saying most of these bans are deserved. The people are being retarded. Some of the bans are unjustified, but mostly I'm sitting here as an early2018cel wondering how all these late2018cels and 2019cels are getting banned.
Temp.@Eugenicist Temp/Perm/Requested?
@Barnacle what happened? why was he banned?
basedThe biggest threat to Incels on this forum at the moment seems to be getting banned for reasons unrelated to a users Inceldom, and that's a problem in my eye. If someone makes a bad argument by for example "cherrypicking" let people point it out instead of giving them a warning/ban.
We all know which types of Incels gets targeted the most because of that rule the most, and then of course there's the low effort rule. It'd be one thing if it was just mass spam or random gibberish cluttering up the forum, that is worthy of a ban, if not a permanent one, but that's not what most people get warned/banned for in regards to low effort.
And then of course there's shitposting/jokes taken the wrong way, and trolling. Is this really such a big deal? This stuff is male humor at its peak, and we're supposed to be a male community, we should embrace these things, not shun them. These things make communities stronger, not weaker.
I don't think anyone here truly wants this place to be lawless, but shouldn't the rules be used to target non Incels/people who actually genuinely hate us/are trying to hurt Incels, rather than our own whether we agree with or disagree with them?
did you quote me before? I got a notification here.The biggest threat to Incels on this forum at the moment seems to be getting banned for reasons unrelated to a users Inceldom, and that's a problem in my eye. If someone makes a bad argument by for example "cherrypicking" let people point it out instead of giving them a warning/ban.
We all know which types of Incels gets targeted the most because of that rule the most, and then of course there's the low effort rule. It'd be one thing if it was just mass spam or random gibberish cluttering up the forum, that is worthy of a ban, if not a permanent one, but that's not what most people get warned/banned for in regards to low effort.
And then of course there's shitposting/jokes taken the wrong way, and trolling. Is this really such a big deal? This stuff is male humor at its peak, and we're supposed to be a male community, we should embrace these things, not shun them. These things make communities stronger, not weaker.
I don't think anyone here truly wants this place to be lawless, but shouldn't the rules be used to target non Incels/people who actually genuinely hate us/are trying to hurt Incels, rather than our own whether we agree with or disagree with them?
What do you mean by cherry-picking?Perm. He got up to 100 percent after his 6th warning specifically for cherrypicking. Another moderator had a discussion with him via PM specifically for cherrypicking, but he did it 2 more times after that anyway.
What type of cherrypicking? For bluepill?Perm. He got up to 100 percent after his 6th warning specifically for cherrypicking. Another moderator had a discussion with him via PM specifically for cherrypicking, but he did it 2 more times after that anyway.
Nah, we have enough trolling and shitposting. Keep that shit in offtopic. No need to turn a serious cause into a low IQ meme.The biggest threat to Incels on this forum at the moment seems to be getting banned for reasons unrelated to a users Inceldom, and that's a problem in my eye. If someone makes a bad argument by for example "cherrypicking" let people point it out instead of giving them a warning/ban.
We all know which types of Incels gets targeted the most because of that rule the most, and then of course there's the low effort rule. It'd be one thing if it was just mass spam or random gibberish cluttering up the forum, that is worthy of a ban, if not a permanent one, but that's not what most people get warned/banned for in regards to low effort.
And then of course there's shitposting/jokes taken the wrong way, and trolling. Is this really such a big deal? This stuff is male humor at its peak, and we're supposed to be a male community, we should embrace these things, not shun them. These things make communities stronger, not weaker.
I don't think anyone here truly wants this place to be lawless, but shouldn't the rules be used to target non Incels/people who actually genuinely hate us/are trying to hurt Incels, rather than our own whether we agree with or disagree with them?
Temp.@Colvin76
Agreed.This is the price to pay for a strict mod team. If the mods werent so brutal, this place would turn into a shithole like /r9k/.
I know, mods can seem strict at times, but its only for the greater good of the forum.
Lol brutal, what for?Temp.
@Edmund_Kemper i mean btwWhat happened with him?
The funny side is how we win. Comedy shapes society. If we can make people laugh we win.Nah, we have enough trolling and shitposting. Keep that shit in offtopic. No need to turn a serious cause into a low IQ meme.
The funny side is how we win. Comedy shapes society. If we can make people laugh we win.
This is the price to pay for a strict mod team. If the mods werent so brutal, this place would turn into a shithole like /r9k/.
I know, mods can seem strict at times, but its only for the greater good of the forum.
Colvin76
I'm sure if you ask any person why they were banned or warned, they'd give the same type of response that paints their actions in an innocent light and that mods are wrong, e.g. "it was a joke bro" or "I only baited people to post about the topic I didn't post on the topic itself" (which in itself breaks the rules).I messaged him, his ban reason was pretty lame tbh
What? When did he get a ban?@Edmund_Kemper is he perma banned ?