D
(and @speedtypingincel) permanent.Mods,
permanent.
temporary.
requested.
D
This is the price to pay for a strict mod team. If the mods werent so brutal, this place would turn into a shithole like /r9k/.
I know, mods can seem strict at times, but its only for the greater good of the forum.
@Barnacle
@needsolution legendary postmaxxer , goodbye
@needsolution legendary postmaxxer , goodbye
E
@Barnacle what happened? why was he banned?
D
@Reddit_is_for_cucks temp or perm?
T
it says temp if I hover over his name
Temp.
sent to gulag
T
free @needsolution
They’re
@Eugenicist Temp/Perm/Requested?
Perm. He got up to 100 percent after his 6th warning specifically for cherrypicking. Another moderator had a discussion with him via PM specifically for cherrypicking, but he did it 2 more times after that anyway.
I think punishments regarding freedom of speech need to be toned down or banished. Lots of incels are banned for saying they love someone because it's worshipping.
TBH this fear of the forum turning into /r9k/ is unjustified. Mods spent half their days in here and can't even afford to be competent enough to filter the influx of new accounts. You have a full box asking applicants to describe their lives and beliefs, use it accordingly instead of restraining current users.
TBH this fear of the forum turning into /r9k/ is unjustified. Mods spent half their days in here and can't even afford to be competent enough to filter the influx of new accounts. You have a full box asking applicants to describe their lives and beliefs, use it accordingly instead of restraining current users.
The biggest threat to Incels on this forum at the moment seems to be getting banned for reasons unrelated to a users Inceldom, and that's a problem in my eye. If someone makes a bad argument by for example "cherrypicking" let people point it out instead of giving them a warning/ban.
We all know which types of Incels gets targeted the most because of that rule the most, and then of course there's the low effort rule. It'd be one thing if it was just mass spam or random gibberish cluttering up the forum, that is worthy of a ban, if not a permanent one, but that's not what most people get warned/banned for in regards to low effort.
And then of course there's shitposting/jokes taken the wrong way, and trolling. Is this really such a big deal? This stuff is male humor at its peak, and we're supposed to be a male community, we should embrace these things, not shun them. These things make communities stronger, not weaker.
I don't think anyone here truly wants this place to be lawless, but shouldn't the rules be used to target non Incels/people who actually genuinely hate us/are trying to hurt Incels, rather than our own whether we agree with or disagree with them?
We all know which types of Incels gets targeted the most because of that rule the most, and then of course there's the low effort rule. It'd be one thing if it was just mass spam or random gibberish cluttering up the forum, that is worthy of a ban, if not a permanent one, but that's not what most people get warned/banned for in regards to low effort.
And then of course there's shitposting/jokes taken the wrong way, and trolling. Is this really such a big deal? This stuff is male humor at its peak, and we're supposed to be a male community, we should embrace these things, not shun them. These things make communities stronger, not weaker.
I don't think anyone here truly wants this place to be lawless, but shouldn't the rules be used to target non Incels/people who actually genuinely hate us/are trying to hurt Incels, rather than our own whether we agree with or disagree with them?
based
imo think it isnt much of a problem when it stays in offtopic
i guess most people get banned cause they go low inhib in Inceldom Discussion
Its good that the main forum is limited to serious discussion tbh .
Maybe the rules should be a little less strict in offtopic ...
did you quote me before? I got a notification here.
E
What do you mean by cherry-picking?
R
What type of cherrypicking? For bluepill?
Im glad that moron got banned talking about the driverlicense pill. That shit is a fucking joke. We got lastgerman doing it we dont need more.
Nah, we have enough trolling and shitposting. Keep that shit in offtopic. No need to turn a serious cause into a low IQ meme.
J
@Colvin76
Temp.
@needsolution
D
Agreed.
D
Rip the bbccel
R
Lol brutal, what for?
D
@Colvin76 bruh
@Colvin76 brutal
D
What happened with him?
@Edmund_Kemper
D
@Edmund_Kemper i mean btw
The funny side is how we win. Comedy shapes society. If we can make people laugh we win.
P
This is true. Those Virgin vs Chad memes are a big power tool for incels.
@Edmund_Kemper is temp banned
P
Colvin76
I messaged him, his ban reason was pretty lame tbh
I don’t think I’ll be missed if I’m banned then again no one misses me from real life anymore not since I was 12.
R
I'm sure if you ask any person why they were banned or warned, they'd give the same type of response that paints their actions in an innocent light and that mods are wrong, e.g. "it was a joke bro" or "I only baited people to post about the topic I didn't post on the topic itself" (which in itself breaks the rules).
What? When did he get a ban?
Wtf why was my nigga @Colvin76 banned.
D
temps' me
T
banter in ban discussion, back to the cage
D
nigga what
R
I miss @startcel
From my POV:
1. The process taken in this case by Personalityinkwell is basically what we want people to do - and I didn't express anything to the contrary. What I said was effectively a more case-specific version of "take what you hear with a grain of salt." In doing so, I basically summarized what the warning was about in the first place toward the end.
2. This is in no way, shape, or form an abdication of responsibility from a ban. It falls in line with our policy of not being responsible to reveal and explain every warning in detail, which is a completely different matter. Warnings are generally a matter between the user and the moderation staff; vapid curiosity is not a sufficient reason for us to invest time explaining every query posted here, as that would add countless manhours, be a repetitive exercise, and would likely be met with the same kind of bias that is exhibited by the person who receives the warning anyway. There is no veneer of transparency. Fairness is of course upheld as much as we as a team can, particularly in cases of prominent permanent bans, which include a review of the warning history and discussion among the whole moderator team so that no prominent permanent ban is purely the decision of one moderator (unless the violation is extreme and painfully obvious, like ascension posts).
Because most discussions of race on this forum are effectively bait, and those that aren't often devolve into shit anyway. However, there are many threads that do not get closed/users who do not get warned when discussing race because they do so without pretense and/or are based on studies/data. So, there is no ban on racial discussion; it's simply against the rules to do things like BBC spam, cherrypick, etc.
PERMA Ban all white knights, cucks, moralfags, anime fags, postmaxers, soy boys, and tranny loving faggots onsight.
@jerrycan dan free him
It ain't happening.
Similar threads
Emba
Toxic Femininity
North Dakota Judge Says Abortion Ban Unconstitutional Because Abortion Makes Women Happy
- Shaktiman
- The Lounge
Lurkercel_678
- THE TRUE CAMARO
- The Lounge
THE TRUE CAMARO
Blackpill Monk
Users who are viewing this thread
