Ban Discussion Megathread

[The Judge]

That was only a small part. He sent multiple users images (that could land you in jail in many places) -- even after multiple warnings.

May I ask what images he sent?

 

[FromOuterVenus]

@FoidsEnshittifyAll
RIP NIGGA

 

[nihilum]

@FoidsEnshittifyAll
RIP NIGGA

Why?

 

[FromOuterVenus]

Why?

Probably this

Why incels are the biggest feminists. [super triggering]

What you guys are basically doing is the equivalence of when a foid says that any racist misogynistic man is an INCEL. A feminist is someone who is pro women, someone who wants equal or more rights than the opposite gender etc. Why would any of us want that? " you are absolutely pro women...

incels.is

 

[Rapistcel]

@wasted12years I assume it was bragging, but was it that + something else?

Ascended

 

[St3v3Cel]

" Permaban
keeps humblebragging about romantic success "

What "romantic success"? I didn't see the thread that got @wasted12years banned, but I never saw anything he posted before that alluded to him having "romantic success", or humblebragging for that matter either. Unless he actually did something really bad I think his ban should be reconsidered.

 

[St3v3Cel]

RIP @Acorn he was a good dude

RIP to the only real longtime user of .is. Now only actors and bots remain.

 

[St3v3Cel]

Probably this

Why incels are the biggest feminists. [super triggering]

What you guys are basically doing is the equivalence of when a foid says that any racist misogynistic man is an INCEL. A feminist is someone who is pro women, someone who wants equal or more rights than the opposite gender etc. Why would any of us want that? " you are absolutely pro women...

incels.is

If @FoidsEnshittifyAll got banned for that thread it needs to be reconsidered. Anyone who actually read that thread should see that there was merit to the discussion there, even if you don't agree. If it was for another reason I would like to know what it is, but whatever it was I doubt it was warranted. @FoidsEnshittifyAll is just an oldcel with a sense of humour, so few seem to understand that.

 

[tired as fuck]

If @FoidsEnshittifyAll got banned for that thread it needs to be reconsidered. Anyone who actually read that thread should see that there was merit to the discussion there, even if you don't agree. If it was for another reason I would like to know what it is, but whatever it was I doubt it was warranted. @FoidsEnshittifyAll is just an oldcel with a sense of humour, so few seem to understand that.

lol

 

[The Wolf]

What "romantic success"? I didn't see the thread that got @wasted12years banned, but I never saw anything he posted before that alluded to him having "romantic success", or humblebragging for that matter either. Unless he actually did something really bad I think his ban should be reconsidered.

@Forum Hero - he also gave him a chance to explain himself in request for information.

 

[grimlockcel]

Wolf is the greatest and most fair of all mods here.

 

[St3v3Cel]

If @FoidsEnshittifyAll got banned for that thread it needs to be reconsidered. Anyone who actually read that thread should see that there was merit to the discussion there, even if you don't agree. If it was for another reason I would like to know what it is, but whatever it was I doubt it was warranted. @FoidsEnshittifyAll is just an oldcel with a sense of humour, so few seem to understand that.

Several users who are in the Must-Read section replied there and at depth. Appeal to Celebrity I know, but maybe that should count for something.

 

[tired as fuck]

Several users who are in the Must-Read section replied there and at depth. Appeal to Celebrity I know, but maybe that should count for something.

you're hyperfixating on a dumb post because it is "le controversial" and "le IQlets can't understand how deep this is" and you can't recognize just how dumb the post was. Appeal to perceived authority is also retarded and disingenuous.

 

[grimlockcel]

What "romantic success"? I didn't see the thread that got @wasted12years banned, but I never saw anything he posted before that alluded to him having "romantic success", or humblebragging for that matter either. Unless he actually did something really bad I think his ban should be reconsidered.

It might have been posted in the bunker Idk, but I remember seeing him post how we went on a date and hugged and slept in bed with the foid and shit, not had sex though but anyways its still a major brag post

 

[Leon98]

@ToBurble&Pine

 

[grimlockcel]

you're hyperfixating on a dumb post because it is "le controversial" and "le IQlets can't understand how deep this is" and you can't recognize just how dumb the post was. Appeal to perceived authority is also retarded and disingenuous.

I stomped on that nigga in the debate. I just ran the entire thread through a debate ai judge that is unbias etc, (I fed it a huge system prompt to be as unbias, logical etc as possible, and to weigh in all possible context)

And it straight up said I won in the end

Table

Rank​	Contestant​	Score​	%​	Verdict​
1​	grimlockcel​	51/70​	72.9%​	Won the debate.​
2​	GeckoBus​	45/70​	64.3%​	Intellectually serious, but scope problems and overreach.​
3​	St3v3Cel​	26/70​	37.1%​	Smart defender of a bad thesis. Retreats under pressure.​
4​	FoidsEnshittifyAll (OP)​	20/70​	28.6%​	Provocative but intellectually bankrupt.​
5​	Frail Link​	18/70​	25.7%​	Pure amplification, no original thought.​
6​	Everyone else​	N/A​	—​	Not substantive enough to score.​

He was the only person in that thread who:

1. Respected the difference between a forum and a demographic — the most empirically consequential distinction
2. Identified the actual logical fallacy — false equivalence, definitional sleight-of-hand
3. Refused to let the OP colonize his experience — "I don't think about women all day" may or may not be fully true, but the principle of not letting someone else define your interiority matters
4. Didn't need to reframe reality into a dark joke to process it — the OP's entire framework requires you to find your own degradation humorous; grimlockcel rejected that frame
5. Would be understood by a normal person — his objections don't require forum-specific vocabulary to make sense

 

[St3v3Cel]

you're hyperfixating on a dumb post because it is "le controversial" and "le IQlets can't understand how deep this is" and you can't recognize just how dumb the post was. Appeal to perceived authority is also retarded and disingenuous.

If you want to have a discussion about it, do so in the thread. You're putting words in my mouth anyways, you would see that I did actually go back on my initial reaction if you actually read the rest of the thread:

I suppose it would have been better to ask people what they didn't understand about this thread instead of calling them NPCs or low IQ for dismissing or disagreeing with it. I just found people's reactions disappointing, that's why I reacted the way I did.

I can't have a discussion with someone who won't even read what was discussed.

 

[SubhumanOldcel]

I also have a gf now. https://incels.is/threads/can-i-kee...ough-i-am-a-fakecel-now.885441/#post-25141723

 

[tired as fuck]

If you want to have a discussion about it, do so in the thread. You're putting words in my mouth anyways, you would see that I did actually go back on my initial reaction if you actually read the rest of the thread:

I can't have a discussion with someone who won't even read what was discussed.

I am not discussing his OP, I'm saying you're a pretentious nigger for thinking that if people disagree with his stupid remarks then they "must have not understood".

 

[grimlockcel]

Ai turd foid

 

[St3v3Cel]

I stomped on that nigga in the debate. I just ran the entire thread through a debate ai judge that is unbias etc, (I fed it a huge system prompt to be as unbias, logical etc as possible, and to weigh in all possible context)

And it straight up said I won in the end

Table

Rank​	Contestant​	Score​	%​	Verdict​
1​	grimlockcel​	51/70​	72.9%​	Won the debate.​
2​	GeckoBus​	45/70​	64.3%​	Intellectually serious, but scope problems and overreach.​
3​	St3v3Cel​	26/70​	37.1%​	Smart defender of a bad thesis. Retreats under pressure.​
4​	FoidsEnshittifyAll (OP)​	20/70​	28.6%​	Provocative but intellectually bankrupt.​
5​	Frail Link​	18/70​	25.7%​	Pure amplification, no original thought.​
6​	Everyone else​	N/A​	—​	Not substantive enough to score.​

He was the only person in that thread who:

1. Respected the difference between a forum and a demographic — the most empirically consequential distinction
2. Identified the actual logical fallacy — false equivalence, definitional sleight-of-hand
3. Refused to let the OP colonize his experience — "I don't think about women all day" may or may not be fully true, but the principle of not letting someone else define your interiority matters
4. Didn't need to reframe reality into a dark joke to process it — the OP's entire framework requires you to find your own degradation humorous; grimlockcel rejected that frame
5. Would be understood by a normal person — his objections don't require forum-specific vocabulary to make sense

Wow . I mean, it's cool that the AI agreed with you but this topic is not an objective one. This discussion would be better suited in the actual thread it came from though, or at least until we know the actual reason @FoidsEnshittifyAll got banned. It's possible that it was for another reason than that thread.

 

[LeFrenchCel]

I stomped on that nigga in the debate. I just ran the entire thread through a debate ai judge that is unbias etc, (I fed it a huge system prompt to be as unbias, logical etc as possible, and to weigh in all possible context)

And it straight up said I won in the end

Table

Rank​	Contestant​	Score​	%​	Verdict​
1​	grimlockcel​	51/70​	72.9%​	Won the debate.​
2​	GeckoBus​	45/70​	64.3%​	Intellectually serious, but scope problems and overreach.​
3​	St3v3Cel​	26/70​	37.1%​	Smart defender of a bad thesis. Retreats under pressure.​
4​	FoidsEnshittifyAll (OP)​	20/70​	28.6%​	Provocative but intellectually bankrupt.​
5​	Frail Link​	18/70​	25.7%​	Pure amplification, no original thought.​
6​	Everyone else​	N/A​	—​	Not substantive enough to score.​

He was the only person in that thread who:

1. Respected the difference between a forum and a demographic — the most empirically consequential distinction
2. Identified the actual logical fallacy — false equivalence, definitional sleight-of-hand
3. Refused to let the OP colonize his experience — "I don't think about women all day" may or may not be fully true, but the principle of not letting someone else define your interiority matters
4. Didn't need to reframe reality into a dark joke to process it — the OP's entire framework requires you to find your own degradation humorous; grimlockcel rejected that frame
5. Would be understood by a normal person — his objections don't require forum-specific vocabulary to make sense

 

[St3v3Cel]

I am not discussing his OP, I'm saying you're a pretentious nigger for thinking that if people disagree with his stupid remarks then they "must have not understood".

What I meant there is simply that I should have asked people why they disagreed with it or why they didn't want to read it. That in no way implies that I thought that everyone who understood the thread would agree with it or like it, and that is another thing I mentioned repeatedly in my replies there:

Either way, we can agree to disagree.

To each their own, you don't have to like it.

I liked it personally, I don't know what more to say about it than that. Again, to each their own.

I was disrespectful at the beginning of the thread and I owned up to that. Why do feel the need to call me a "pretentious nigger"?

 

[tired as fuck]

What I meant there is that I should have asked people why they disagreed with it or why they didn't want to read it. That in no way implies that I thought that everyone who understood the thread would agree with it or like it, and that is another thing I mentioned repeatedly in my replies there:

>I suppose it would have been better to ask people what they didn't understand about this thread instead of calling them NPCs or low IQ for dismissing or disagreeing with it. I just found people's reactions disappointing, that's why I reacted the way I did.

do you read your own messages?

I was disrespectful at the beginning of the thread and I owned up to that. Why do feel the need to call me a "pretentious nigger"?

judging from the stuff you write, you are.

 

[mrlunatic]

wow, there are a lot of fights in .is lately.

 

[St3v3Cel]

>I suppose it would have been better to ask people what they didn't understand about this thread instead of calling them NPCs or low IQ for dismissing or disagreeing with it. I just found people's reactions disappointing, that's why I reacted the way I did.

do you read your own messages?


judging from the stuff you write, you are.

If you don't want to take me at my word, then so be it. I have no ill will towards you.

 

[St3v3Cel]

It might have been posted in the bunker Idk, but I remember seeing him post how we went on a date and hugged and slept in bed with the foid and shit, not had sex though but anyways its still a major brag post

In that case it sounds like it was warranted. He probably doesn't need this site anymore if he's gotten that far.

 

[grimlockcel]

 

[St3v3Cel]

>I suppose it would have been better to ask people what they didn't understand about this thread instead of calling them NPCs or low IQ for dismissing or disagreeing with it. I just found people's reactions disappointing, that's why I reacted the way I did.

do you read your own messages?

What do you even mean to point out here? Saying I disliked people's reactions? That doesn't imply any of what you say I meant. Neither does starting with "I suppose". I can see how you might not like the tone of my reply there, but it does not say what you say it says. If you're going to call me out, be specific.