Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Ban Discussion Megathread

Free my nigga @NIGGER BOJANGLES out the cage. He dindu nuffin mods are just raycist
 
@Sheogorath ?
sent me MLP softcore porn so I did what I do best:
Pin on Anime fan
 
Im not defending him, but its ridicolous that he got permabanned for this meanwhile hardcore racebaiters can do whatever the fuck they want just because of their join date
He was a redpill coper shilling his youtube channel.
 
It's clear that despite not being mentioned in the rules, genuine expression of inclination to bestiality falls under the same category as LGBT.
the last guy I remember getting banned shortly after telling me the things he'd like to do (or in his case actually does) with mares was @Hokmacel
 
the last guy I remember getting banned shortly after telling me the things he'd like to do (or in his case actually does) with mares was @Hokmacel

I dislike bestiality, obviously, so I don't have a problem with mods doing this. Of course, to be clear, mentioning it is not an issue, like when the dogpill is discussed. It is just when guys make a point of saying they are inclined to bestiality. Wanting to have sex with non-human animals is disgusting. Under no circumstances do I take a moral angle to sexual matters or anything, but under any sun this is just sick, we are dealing with sick freaks. (also, while arguably different in a sense, in the final analysis it is truly no better when dirt poor people in backwater circumstances who don't even conceptualize it fuck their donkey or whatever.) I couldn't see myself having a problem with mods consistently banning such people, because they are sick in the head and it is a circumstance where I can only respond: "I see why you're an incel."

Part of me thinks it makes sense to mention it in the rules, but then again how many abhorrent things should they be forced to mention? After a certain point, there are some things like this where it makes more sense to just see it, and ban it. (and I am someone generally inclined to if anything criticize those who say the moderation needs to be more strict, and to not necessarily think bans are justified, and to question and criticize them.)

The rules are clear that LGBT is banned and that content that would sexualize minors whatsoever is banned. That is sufficient for the rules, so this is just a circumstances where it would be excessive to mention it in the rules, but warrants being banned where it crops up.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Justanotherbloke
Replies
18
Views
705
Oneitiscel
Oneitiscel
Shaktiman
Replies
13
Views
2K
VeryNiceGuy
VeryNiceGuy
Leonardo Part V
Replies
34
Views
2K
Angry_runt
Angry_runt
DefeatedIncel
Replies
25
Views
952
TooSomething
TooSomething

Users who are viewing this thread

  • AsakangaHalo
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top