Jockcel
go AB
-
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2017
- Posts
- 10,508
Free gambler, he admitted he larped when he said he got a kiss.
He posted a thread about an illegal acitivity. I gave him a 30% warning which put him at a warning level of 60. He will be back in a day and he was very nice in the pm.why did @FrailPaleStaleMale get banned?
Had been sent a warning that put him at 80% as a result of him making a thread in which he was claiming a bunch of outlandish stuff about the admin, which I suspected was done to cause drama in the forum because of the user's history. He then PM'd me claiming he had proof of his claims and when I asked him to show it to me he proceeded to jerk me around for 5 minutes teasing me about his undeniable proof without providing anything other than a screenshot of a random brief discord exchange (3 lines) in which all names were censored. Mind you, he was claiming that Sergeant works for mossad and a bunch of things of that nature, which the screenshot had nothing to do with. After I expressed that I was obviously unsatisfied with his supposed proof he said "Lol Im SS this to my incel gang" as if doing an epic trole was his intention all along. I permabanned him after that. He was a drama-inciting attention whore.what happened to @AfrikanCel
high iq banHad been sent a warning that put him at 80% as a result of him making a thread in which he was claiming a bunch of outlandish stuff about the admin, which I suspected was done to cause drama in the forum because of the user's history. He then PM'd me claiming he had proof of his claims and when I asked him to show it to me he proceeded to jerk me around for 5 minutes teasing me about his undeniable proof without providing anything other than a screenshot of a random brief discord exchange (3 lines) in which all names were censored. Mind you, he was claiming that Sergeant works for mossad and a bunch of things of that nature, which the screenshot had nothing to do with. After I expressed that I was obviously unsatisfied with his supposed proof he said "Lol Im SS this to my incel gang" as if doing an epic trole was his intention all along. I permabanned him after that. He was a drama-inciting attention whore.
Had been sent a warning that put him at 80% as a result of him making a thread in which he was claiming a bunch of outlandish stuff about the admin, which I suspected was done to cause drama in the forum because of the user's history. He then PM'd me claiming he had proof of his claims and when I asked him to show it to me he proceeded to jerk me around for 5 minutes teasing me about his undeniable proof without providing anything other than a screenshot of a random brief discord exchange (3 lines) in which all names were censored. Mind you, he was claiming that Sergeant works for mossad and a bunch of things of that nature, which the screenshot had nothing to do with. After I expressed that I was obviously unsatisfied with his supposed proof he said "Lol Im SS this to my incel gang" as if doing an epic trole was his intention all along. I permabanned him after that. He was a drama-inciting attention whore.
Oh boy, what forum is that?
its called looksmax. IMO its for cucks.Oh boy, what forum is that?
Does he not realize that looksmax is owned by the same guy that owns .me?
rofl i don't think so but if i scroll down that thread its more ppl talking bad about incel.me smhDoes he not realize that looksmax is owned by the same guy that owns .me?
Can you link the thread please LOLrofl i don't think so but if i scroll down that thread its more ppl talking bad about incel.me smh
https://looksmax.org/threads/im-done-with-incels-me.233/Can you link the thread please LOL
While likely true, people get banned for basicly breathing at this point, so it's not a suprise that they get sour.To be fair the guys bashing .me in that thread are mostly just sour cause they got banned
Come clean: are you a filthy breather or not??While likely true, people get banned for basicly breathing at this point, so it's not a suprise that they get sour.
I'mCome clean: are you a filthy breather or not??
I'm
Edit: Stop breaking the 4th law
You were part of the whole "ban female avatars movement" so you probobly have extra sympathy points by mods. While that won't make you imune, you won't get random 20 % warnings like i did a few mins ago.LMAO
I still dont understand how people get banned that easily tho, Ive been on this site for 6 months now and I have yet to receive a single warning
Im actually tempted to break some rule just so I could get warned and see how it feels like tbh
I'm
Edit: Stop breaking the 4th wall
You got 20% for insulting another user's looks, on an incel website (targeted attack). This one should be a no-brainer.You were part of the whole "ban female avatars movement" so you probobly have extra sympathy points by mods. While that won't make you imune, you won't get random 20 % warnings like i did a few mins ago.
I didn't adress any exact user. If someone got offfended that's their ownYou got 20% for insulting another user's looks, on an incel website (targeted attack). This one should be a no-brainer.
Just because you used a roundabout way to do it, doesn't make it not targeted. For example, if I say that there exists a user whose username starts with D and ends with kim and has over 5000 posts and lol he's short and ugly af (never seen your face, just an example), then that's just a roundabout way of reaching the same goal and should be punishable.I didn't adress any exact user. If someone got offfended that's their own
Damn i guess i should've reported all the people who have said i'm an ugly slav in the past. I wonder if they would've had warnings for that.Just because you used a roundabout way to do it, doesn't make it not targeted. For example, if I say that there exists a user whose username starts with D and ends with kim and has over 5000 posts and lol he's short and ugly af (never seen your face, just an example), then that's just a roundabout way of reaching the same goal and should be punishable.
If you found it to be a targeted attack against your known image, and you reported it, it would likely be actioned.Damn i guess i should've reported all the people who have said i'm an ugly slav in the past. I wonder if they would've had warnings for that.
Fuck gambler.Free gambler, he admitted he larped when he said he got a kiss.
Lol. Do you even know who he is?Fuck gambler.
YeLol. Do you even know who he is?
The warning was made by mental_out and the reason was a targeted attack. He was heightshaming a certain user repeatedly. However he is at a warning level of 90 which means that it is not a permanent banRip @Swagwaffle
Why?
Update : Another warning was added by Serge which means that he is permanently banned.Rip @Swagwaffle
Why?
Sarge delivers, as always.Stay tuned. More news at 8.
Indeed.no rip for him
it was a ban evasion alt.What happened to uglyman? was he a larper?
Why was @FrailPaleStaleMale banned?
Spamming lame gore threads in OT.
Spamming would be if he posted the same video over and over. Which he didn't do, he posted the totally different video every time, that's not spamming. And nowhere in the rules does it say that gore isn't allowed.
Seems to me like he was banned only because you said so, you are the only one who finds them "lame". Many other users post gore regularly as well.
I really don't understand why would mods listen to you when you straight up insulted them in the title of your thread before you changed it.
Because this wasn't anywhere in the rules I think warning him to don't post them anymore in the future would be sufficient, 30% ban was kinda excessive imo.
For spamming.Why was @FrailPaleStaleMale banned?
Not necessarily. OffTopic was riddled with his animal gore threads.Spamming would be if he posted the same video over and over.
He was the one who brought it to my attention. His input, while appreciated, had a negligible impact in my (our) decision.Seems to me like he was banned only because you said so, you are the only one who finds them "lame".
He had already received 8 warnings prior to this one. Maybe it was a little excessive, but he doesn't seem to understand that it's a privilege to post in this forum, not a right.30% ban was kinda excessive imo.
it's a privilege to post in this forum, not a right.
Spamming would be if he posted the same video over and over. Which he didn't do, he posted the totally different video every time, that's not spamming. And nowhere in the rules does it say that gore isn't allowed.
Seems to me like he was banned only because you said so, you are the only one who finds them "lame". Many other users post gore regularly as well.
I really don't understand why would mods listen to you when you straight up insulted them in the title of your thread before you changed it.
Because this wasn't anywhere in the rules I think warning him to don't post them anymore in the future would be sufficient, 30% ban was kinda excessive imo.
Not necessarily. OffTopic was riddled with his animal gore threads.
This is spam.
that's not the definition of spam.Like I said spamming would be if that whole page was covered in the same post/video.
What's so oo about wat I said? I want him to know that there are consequences to his actions because I believe he knew he was spamming / filling offtopic with a bunch of threads that were taking away visibility from others / whatever you wanna call it, thinking that there would be no consequences. Well, there are.
It came out very different than that. It came out as "we own this cool place, and we decided to let you guys in, but remember that it's our cool place", which while technicaly true, this place wouldn't be cool without the existing community.What's so oo about wat I said? I want him to know that there are consequences to his actions because I believe he knew he was spamming / filling offtopic with a bunch of threads that were taking away visibility from others / whatever you wanna call it, thinking that there would be no consequences. Well, there are.
that's not the definition of spam.