Discussion All other races should thank God they are not curries.

[Copexodius Maximus]

If you think we all come out looking like Meeks, you're coping.

Nah, never said that. But most mulattos looks better than blacks.

 

[TheDarkEnigma]

Nah, never said that. But most mulattos looks better than blacks.

Tyrone mogs mulattoes. Being Tyrone you can play JBB and BBC. We're too white for that but we're not white enough for JBW to work.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Tyrone mogs mulattoes. Being Tyrone you can play JBB and BBC. We're too white for that but we're not white enough for JBW to work.

Mulattos mog full blacks. Both nigger whores and cumskin whores prefer mulattos. You are underselling.

 

[TheDarkEnigma]

Mulattos mog full blacks. Both nigger whores and cumskin whores prefer mulattos. You are underselling.

I would rather be full nig, tbh.

 

[CurrycelRaja]

All thanks to Aryans, Iranians, and Arab blood mixing with them. These are the people who achieved good historical stuff

Not these

Blacks are definitely inferior to Indians, but Mulattos (Arab/European mix) are superior to Indians.

Abos are THE worst though

If curris larp as Arab/Hispanic, they will have better stereotypes/halo.

Lol

COPE
Pakistani Punjabis are the OGs from Indus River Valley
They fucked up Alexander the Great
Toppled Great Britain
And now run the UK FROM MASS MIGRATION
Call us ugly
We will take Europe and end the white race till it’s nothing more than mutt race
RAPEMAXX
GROOMING GANGSBASED SHIT

 

[Hikikomori_cel]

Still better than being a mongrel. East Asians might iqmog and have more developed contries, but in looks department we are the 2nd worst after Abos. Atleast curries have caucasoid skull structure and, i know, dark-skin is not aesthetic at all, however i wouldn't consider it to be a literal death sentence. Meanwhile gook men are literally fucked in every way possible; disgusting slit-eyes, no browridge and eyebrows, vomit inducing maxilla, flat nose and, the worst part, small cocks. It never began

 

[SentimentalCel]

India's iq is low because a lot of poor curries are also counted

Most of the great kingdoms were not made by outsiders lol. Guptas, Cholas, Mauryas were not outsiders

All poor Indians are counted. That's the point. They are poor because in large part they cannot sustain themselves.

The OG Indus Valley Civilization was cool and had excellent genes for the continent (closest related to Mandarin Chinese) but they went extinct and the remaining Indusians moved south to the Deccan Plateau and became Dravidians after mixing heavily with Aboriginals and Australoids. The Dravidians remained primitive.

Then Afghan Indo-European rapists (Aryans) came down and raped their way into the Indo-Gangetic plain and made Hindu Civilization, creating the caste system, putting Aryans on top and Dravidians on bottom and miscegenating a lot.

Both groups were dysgenic, but Aryans were the ones who created the local civilization Indians had, which never expanded beyond its own borders.

At least China conquered central Asia, Korea, Japan, Mongolia, Manchuria and Vietnam at various times despite controlling a much larger area.

With time, India became even MORE dysgenic, as the pretentious Brahmin Aryans refused to breed and the lower castes continued to multiply rapidly.

Indians are only good at complying with all authority and multiplying in South Asia. That's why the elites want so many to move to America and Canada.

They seem high IQ because of extreme vetting of the population, just like recently arrived African immigrants seem high IQ- but their race as a whole is not.

 

[Subhuman100]

Still better than being a mongrel. East Asians might iqmog and have more developed contries, but in looks department we are the 2nd worst after Abos. Atleast curries have caucasoid skull structure and, i know, dark-skin is not aesthetic at all, however i wouldn't consider it to be a literal death sentence. Meanwhile gook men are literally fucked in every way possible; disgusting slit-eyes, no browridge and eyebrows, vomit inducing maxilla, flat nose and, the worst part, small cocks. It never began

Both ways tbh. Curries can pull off a masculine look better with beards but rices can do the pretty boy look better. Kpop popularity has given a boost to ricemen while curries don't have anything.

All poor Indians are counted. That's the point. They are poor because in large part they cannot sustain themselves.

The OG Indus Valley Civilization was cool and had excellent genes for the continent (closest related to Mandarin Chinese) but they went extinct and the remaining Indusians moved south to the Deccan Plateau and became Dravidians after mixing heavily with Aboriginals and Australoids. The Dravidians remained primitive.

Then Afghan Indo-European rapists (Aryans) came down and raped their way into the Indo-Gangetic plain and made Hindu Civilization, creating the caste system, putting Aryans on top and Dravidians on bottom and miscegenating a lot.

Both groups were dysgenic, but Aryans were the ones who created the local civilization Indians had, which never expanded beyond its own borders.

At least China conquered central Asia, Korea, Japan, Mongolia, Manchuria and Vietnam at various times despite controlling a much larger area.

With time, India became even MORE dysgenic, as the pretentious Brahmin Aryans refused to breed and the lower castes continued to multiply rapidly.

Indians are only good at complying with all authority and multiplying in South Asia. That's why the elites want so many to move to America and Canada.

They seem high IQ because of extreme vetting of the population, just like recently arrived African immigrants seem high IQ- but their race as a whole is not.

Really? Were the Indus Valley people not Dravidians?

Do agree the abbo dna fucked up the genetics of south asia overall