Blackpill Women have a rejection-mindset, they get pickier as their options increase (ie online dating) and are less likely to be satisfied with their choices

[Gymcelled]

Nothing earth shattering, more confirmations of what we already knew: women are extremely picky, only become pickier with more choice, are less satisfied with their picks than men, etc. It's sort of brutal and amusing how the authors straight say women have a REJECTION-MINDSET.

This study really shows how online dating and social media have completely obliterated the dating market by making women's inherent pickiness much worse than it already was.

BUT REMEMBER, PEOPLE TELL MEN THAT THEY ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO LOWER THEIR STANDARDS
CLOWN FUCKING WORLD @ThoughtfulCel

Here are some direct quotes from the study itself, in the style of the inkwel wiki @Blackpincel

The dating landscape has changed drastically over the past decade, with more and more people looking for a partner online People have never been able to select partners among such an enormous pool of options. [...] The rise of online dating coincided with an increase in the amount of singles in society

People become increasingly likely to reject potential partners to the extent that they are presented with more options

Overall, the adverse effects of choice abundance in dating thus seem to apply particularly to women—the gender that is already much less likely to accept potential partners to begin with, possibly consistent with evolutionary pressures (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).

In all studies, women became increasingly likely to reject potential partners, while for men this effect was either weaker (Study 1), similar (Study 2), or not significant (Study 3).

[...] across all three studies, there was a negative relationship between overall rejection behavior and satisfaction with the partner options participants accepted [...] people who were more rejecting were more likely to be less satisfied with the smaller number of partner options they did accept compared to people who were overall more accepting.

Because women typically reject more, they might also cumulate rejections more quickly and thus more easily adopt a rejection mind-set.

[...] when a choice set increases, people end up being less satisfied with their ultimate partner choice and more prone to reverse their decision [...] when asked to pick the best partner, access to more partner profiles resulted in more searching, more time spent on evaluating bad choice options, and a lower likelihood of selecting the option with the best personal fit

[...] the stream of partner profiles can set in motion an overall feeling of dissatisfaction and pessimism about finding a mate, which leads users to gradually “close off” from mating opportunities. Our findings might therefore explain why people are increasingly dissatisfied and frustrated by modern dating.

[...]across all studies, acceptance rate decreased over the course of online dating.

Figure 1. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Studies 1 and 3. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture of a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package (version 2.2.1). The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

Figure 2. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

Figure 3. The effect of sequence on match rate for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on having a match with a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

Some paragraphs I i liked and the source for those who want to read more

The dating landscape has changed drastically over the past decade, with more and more people looking for a partner online (Hobbs, Owen, & Gerber, 2017). People have never been able to select partners among such an enormous pool of options. As an example, the 10 million active daily users of the popular online dating application Tinder are on average presented with 140 partner options a day (Smith, 2018). While one may expect this drastic increase in mating opportunities to result in an increasing number of romantic relationships, the opposite has occurred: The rise of online dating coincided with an increase in the amount of singles in society (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, 2019; Copen, Daniels, Vespa, & Mosher, 2012; DePaulo, 2017). What could explain this paradox in modern dating?

The abundance of choice in online dating is one of the key factors which explains its success (Lenton & Stewart, 2008). People like having many options to choose from, and the likelihood of finding an option that matches someone’s individual preference should logically increase with more choice (Lancaster, 1990; Patall, Cooper, & Robinson, 2008). However, having extensive choice can have various adverse effects, such as paralysis (i.e., not making any decision at all) and decreased satisfaction (Iyengar & Lepper, 2000; Scheibehenne, Greifeneder, & Todd, 2010; Schwartz, 2004). In fact, it seems that people generally experience less benefits when they have more choice. This observation is reminiscent of the basic economic principle of diminishing returns (Brue, 1993; Shephard & Färe, 1974), in which each unit that is sequentially added to the production process results in less profits.

There is some indirect evidence that having more choice in the domain of dating also has negative consequences. For example, when asked to pick the best partner, access to more partner profiles resulted in more searching, more time spent on evaluating bad choice options, and a lower likelihood of selecting the option with the best personal fit (Wu & Chiou, 2009). Likewise, when a choice set increases, people end up being less satisfied with their ultimate partner choice and more prone to reverse their decision (D’Angelo & Toma, 2017). The adverse effects of choice overload are also mentioned in articles in popular media mentioning phenomena such as “Tinder fatigue” (Beck, 2016) or “dating burnout” (Blair, 2017).

Spoiler: What the 3 studies were about

We tested the existence of a rejection mind-set in online dating across three studies. In Study 1, we presented people with pictures of hypothetical partners, to test if and when people’s general choice behavior would change. In Study 2, we presented people with pictures of partners that were actually available and tested the gradual development of their choice behaviors as well as their success rate in terms of mutual interest (i.e., matches). In Study 3, we explored potential underlying psychological mechanisms. Specifically, and in line with choice overload literature, we explored whether the rejection mind-set may be due to people experiencing lower choice satisfaction and less success over the course of online dating. As an additional goal, we explored the potential moderating role of gender. In all studies, we focused on participants between 18 and 30 years old—a group that makes up 79% of all users of online dating applications (Smith, 2018).

@SergeantIncel @Master in case you find this interesting

@soymonkcel @Edmund_Kemper @ReturnOfSaddam @your personality @BPJ @cvh1991 @FastBananaCEO

SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals

Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

journals.sagepub.com

 

[BPJ]

thank you. bookmarked.

 

[ThoughtfulCel]

BUT REMEMBER, PEOPLE TELL MEN THAT THEY ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO LOWER THEIR STANDARDS
CLOWN FUCKING WORLD @ThoughtfulCel

First off, based as fuck post and completely true.

When they say "men" in this case, they're referring to attractive men.

Its literally unattractive women trying to strong arm and shame chad into dating them LOL. Pathetic right?

You're completely right, as women's choices increase, all they do is get tired of the common person and seek the next high. Soon, women will have so many choices that not even chad can satisfy their lust.

Women are black holes, sucking up resources until their is nothing left. They will never be satisfied and will always be unhappy with one person, meanwhile all men want is one good woman.

Truly sad creatures.

 

[Gymcelled]

thank you. bookmarked.

@WØLF

 

[WØLF]

@WØLF

They have entire armies of men to choose from and they’re still not satisfied

Spoiler: Potent ropefuel

https://incels.is/data/video/349/349427-213fe1fd32b3e395ccfc40c36747a947.mp4

[/URL]

 

[Gymcelled]

Its literally unattractive women trying to strong arm and shame chad into dating them LOL. Pathetic right?

Remember the "body positivity" and "healthy at every size" movements? It's literally just morbidly obese women talking about how they're sexy and deserve the best. They would often post pics or comics about obese landwhales with fit guys lmao, but never EVER about them and some obese neckbeard

The hypocrisy of this world never ceases to amaze me

 

[Fancy Alcoholic]

morbidly obese women talking about how they're sexy and deserve the best

is why capitalism doesn't work

 

[Gymcelled]

is why capitalism doesn't work

Elaborate

 

[Fancy Alcoholic]

Elaborate

capitalism created the comfort and living conditions making such creatures believe their degenerate way of life was somehow a viable kind of human experience. While in fact it is not.

 

[Gymcelled]

capitalism created the comfort and living conditions making such creatures believe their degenerate way of life was somehow a viable kind of human experience. While in fact it is not.

Technology/industrialization also fucked us up. Though capitalism accelerated the spread of that technology by a lot

 

[Mulattocel]

Another great thread by our blackpill book keeper

 

[your personality]

Nothing earth shattering, more confirmations of what we already knew: women are extremely picky, only become pickier with more choice, are less satisfied with their picks than men, etc. It's sort of brutal and amusing how the authors straight say women have a REJECTION-MINDSET.

This study really shows how online dating and social media have completely obliterated the dating market by making women's inherent pickiness much worse than it already was.

BUT REMEMBER, PEOPLE TELL MEN THAT THEY ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO LOWER THEIR STANDARDS
CLOWN FUCKING WORLD @ThoughtfulCel

Here are some direct quotes from the study itself, in the style of the inkwel wiki @Blackpincel

The dating landscape has changed drastically over the past decade, with more and more people looking for a partner online People have never been able to select partners among such an enormous pool of options. [...] The rise of online dating coincided with an increase in the amount of singles in society

People become increasingly likely to reject potential partners to the extent that they are presented with more options

Overall, the adverse effects of choice abundance in dating thus seem to apply particularly to women—the gender that is already much less likely to accept potential partners to begin with, possibly consistent with evolutionary pressures (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).

In all studies, women became increasingly likely to reject potential partners, while for men this effect was either weaker (Study 1), similar (Study 2), or not significant (Study 3).

[...] across all three studies, there was a negative relationship between overall rejection behavior and satisfaction with the partner options participants accepted [...] people who were more rejecting were more likely to be less satisfied with the smaller number of partner options they did accept compared to people who were overall more accepting.

Because women typically reject more, they might also cumulate rejections more quickly and thus more easily adopt a rejection mind-set.

[...] when a choice set increases, people end up being less satisfied with their ultimate partner choice and more prone to reverse their decision [...] when asked to pick the best partner, access to more partner profiles resulted in more searching, more time spent on evaluating bad choice options, and a lower likelihood of selecting the option with the best personal fit

[...] the stream of partner profiles can set in motion an overall feeling of dissatisfaction and pessimism about finding a mate, which leads users to gradually “close off” from mating opportunities. Our findings might therefore explain why people are increasingly dissatisfied and frustrated by modern dating.

[...]across all studies, acceptance rate decreased over the course of online dating.


View attachment 427170

Figure 1. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Studies 1 and 3. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture of a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package (version 2.2.1). The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

View attachment 427171
Figure 2. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

View attachment 427205
Figure 3. The effect of sequence on match rate for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on having a match with a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

Some paragraphs I i liked and the source for those who want to read more









@SergeantIncel @Master in case you find this interesting

@soymonkcel @Edmund_Kemper @ReturnOfSaddam @your personality @BPJ @cvh1991 @FastBananaCEO

SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals

Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

journals.sagepub.com

Women are the only ones beside chad that can successfully pull off a dgaf mindset. Guys that try to do that end up unsuccessful and just start feuding with others over ego issues. Even before that does a nonchad male having a dgaf mindset change anything? No.

 

[Deleted member 33778]

Remember the "body positivity" and "healthy at every size" movements? It's literally just morbidly obese women talking about how they're sexy and deserve the best. They would often post pics or comics about obese landwhales with fit guys lmao, but never EVER about them and some obese neckbeard

The hypocrisy of this world never ceases to amaze me

Based. It's funny to me, this "accept fat women" movement. Obesity and generally being overweight is something that SHOULD NOT be accepted or encouraged, as it is an indicator of poor health. If not addressed it will only get worse. However, there is no "accept short men" movement. Short men are shamed for their height, something they had no control over. Short height is also not indicative of poor health. Water is wet I know, and I know this comes back to short height = "poor genetics", but this shit infuriates me.

 

[Speedloader]

Dn rd but i hate wombmenz

 

[Gymcelled]

Based. It's funny to me, this "accept fat women" movement. Obesity and generally being overweight is something that SHOULD NOT be accepted or encouraged, as it is an indicator of poor health. If not addressed it will only get worse. However, there is no "accept short men" movement. Short men are shamed for their height, something they had no control over. Short height is also not indicative of poor health. Water is wet I know, and I know this comes back to short height = "poor genetics", but this shit infuriates me.

We're told to accept a horrible behavior, a choice (stuffing yourself with too much food for years) while men who are born ugly, short, predisposed to balding etc are treated like subhumans or clowns

An actual body positivity movement would be about people born with strange bodies, people born ugly, people with 3rd degree burns or horrible scars that disfigure them. Instead it's entirely aimed at lazy narcissistic women who can't put the fork down @ThoughtfulCel i always feel liked tagging you for clown world/hypocrisy shit

 

[ThoughtfulCel]

We're told to accept a horrible behavior, a choice (stuffing yourself with too much food for years) while men who are born ugly, short, predisposed to balding etc are treated like subhumans or clowns

An actual body positivity movement would be about people born with strange bodies, people born ugly, people with 3rd degree burns or horrible scars that disfigure them. Instead it's entirely aimed at lazy narcissistic women who can't put the fork down @ThoughtfulCel i always feel liked tagging you for clown world/hypocrisy shit

The whole body positivity movement is such a croc of bullshit.

It's just women who have zero self control who still want a shot at the top 10% of men.

So just like women usually do, they think the best way is to shame Chad until he accepts them.

 

[Gymcelled]

The whole body positivity movement is such a croc of bullshit.

It's just women who have zero self control who still want a shot at the top 10% of men.

So just like women usually do, they think the best way is to shame Chad until he accepts them.

Meanwhile men fucking destroy themselves tirelessly with self improvement, game, hobbymaxxing, moneymaxxing, statusmaxxing etc only to fail miserably all the time and be told they're not doing anything and aren't entitled to anything

 

[BITG]

More evidence OLD =\= IRL dating. People need to stop with that misinformation. If that was the case, 80% of men wouldn’t have sex, but most men do.

Foids are not as picky IRL, but they still are picky of course, it’s just not to an insane degree.

The reason most incels are incel is because average/slightly below average looks + no social circle.

 

[Deleted member 32725]

When can we start giving women anthrax bombs in Gary's Mod?

 

[SchrodingersDick]

another water is wet tier “scientific finding”.

tbh we should all just make declarations on all fields related to sexual dynamics. We are right about everything anyways. Muh scientists don’t even have to do anything anymore.

 

[Gymcelled]

More evidence OLD =\= IRL dating. People need to stop with that misinformation. If that was the case, 80% of men wouldn’t have sex, but most men do.

Foids are not as picky IRL, but they still are picky of course, it’s just not to an insane degree.

The reason most incels are incel is because average/slightly below average looks + no social circle.

Women are as picky as logistics and lack of social pressure allow them to, their hypergamy and pickiness become near infinite if they're left unchecked.

If women could, they would only fuck and date the biggest, the most elite gigachads on earth.

Pre social media, pre tinder, pre internet they just didn't have the tools to search and filter men the way they do today. And chads couldn't broadcast their genetic superiority like they can today. Back in the boomer era women could only get local guys. Your local chadlite that one guy they dreamed of and might have chased. The celeb chads they saw in movies were so distant and inaccessible that women didn't quite set those as their new standards. You only had to compete against a tiny, statistically insignificant fraction of the pool of men you have to compete with nowadays

That's also why there's a tiny bit of truth to locationcels and locationmaxxers. Big cities and dense urban areas aren't quite the same as small towns and the countryside. Some 3rd world countries also aren't as big on social media and dating apps as the 1st world yet either so that also makes a difference. But every day that passes the location factors loses ground because social media, dating apps and big cities are taking over the world.

 

[BITG]

Women are as picky as logistics and lack of social pressure allow them to, their hypergamy and pickiness become near infinite if they're left unchecked.

If women could, they would only fuck and date the biggest, the most elite gigachads on earth.

Pre social media, pre tinder, pre internet they just didn't have the tools to search and filter men the way they do today. And chads couldn't broadcast their genetic superiority like they can today. Back in the boomer era women could only get local guys. Your local chadlite that one guy they dreamed of and might have chased. The celeb chads they saw in movies were so distant and inaccessible that women didn't quite set those as their new standards. You only had to compete against a tiny, statistically insignificant fraction of the pool of men you have to compete with nowadays

That's also why there's a tiny bit of truth to locationcels and locationmaxxers. Big cities and dense urban areas aren't quite the same as small towns and the countryside. Some 3rd world countries also aren't as big on social media and dating apps as the 1st world yet either so that also makes a difference. But every day that passes the location factors loses ground because social media, dating apps and big cities are taking over the world.

 

[cvh1991]

Nothing earth shattering, more confirmations of what we already knew: women are extremely picky, only become pickier with more choice, are less satisfied with their picks than men, etc. It's sort of brutal and amusing how the authors straight say women have a REJECTION-MINDSET.

This study really shows how online dating and social media have completely obliterated the dating market by making women's inherent pickiness much worse than it already was.

BUT REMEMBER, PEOPLE TELL MEN THAT THEY ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO LOWER THEIR STANDARDS
CLOWN FUCKING WORLD @ThoughtfulCel

Here are some direct quotes from the study itself, in the style of the inkwel wiki @Blackpincel

The dating landscape has changed drastically over the past decade, with more and more people looking for a partner online People have never been able to select partners among such an enormous pool of options. [...] The rise of online dating coincided with an increase in the amount of singles in society

People become increasingly likely to reject potential partners to the extent that they are presented with more options

Overall, the adverse effects of choice abundance in dating thus seem to apply particularly to women—the gender that is already much less likely to accept potential partners to begin with, possibly consistent with evolutionary pressures (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).

In all studies, women became increasingly likely to reject potential partners, while for men this effect was either weaker (Study 1), similar (Study 2), or not significant (Study 3).

[...] across all three studies, there was a negative relationship between overall rejection behavior and satisfaction with the partner options participants accepted [...] people who were more rejecting were more likely to be less satisfied with the smaller number of partner options they did accept compared to people who were overall more accepting.

Because women typically reject more, they might also cumulate rejections more quickly and thus more easily adopt a rejection mind-set.

[...] when a choice set increases, people end up being less satisfied with their ultimate partner choice and more prone to reverse their decision [...] when asked to pick the best partner, access to more partner profiles resulted in more searching, more time spent on evaluating bad choice options, and a lower likelihood of selecting the option with the best personal fit

[...] the stream of partner profiles can set in motion an overall feeling of dissatisfaction and pessimism about finding a mate, which leads users to gradually “close off” from mating opportunities. Our findings might therefore explain why people are increasingly dissatisfied and frustrated by modern dating.

[...]across all studies, acceptance rate decreased over the course of online dating.


View attachment 427170

Figure 1. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Studies 1 and 3. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture of a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package (version 2.2.1). The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

View attachment 427171
Figure 2. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

View attachment 427205
Figure 3. The effect of sequence on match rate for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on having a match with a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

Some paragraphs I i liked and the source for those who want to read more









@SergeantIncel @Master in case you find this interesting

@soymonkcel @Edmund_Kemper @ReturnOfSaddam @your personality @BPJ @cvh1991 @FastBananaCEO

SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals

Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

journals.sagepub.com

I save all of your posts as debate references ngl — having these study citations is very valuable for determining what is true and it makes it all the more rage fuel how the vast majority of society denies reality and has lights men all the time.

Remember the "body positivity" and "healthy at every size" movements? It's literally just morbidly obese women talking about how they're sexy and deserve the best. They would often post pics or comics about obese landwhales with fit guys lmao, but never EVER about them and some obese neckbeard

The hypocrisy of this world never ceases to amaze me

Based and well said

Another great thread by our blackpill book keeper

Indeed

 

[Deleted member 5712]

Another post and another day where I bang my desk in frustration on why women have any choice at all. We'd be living in a Utopia by now if they were put in their place.

 

[Izayacel]

Hypergamy and social Media are the downthrotten of your current era

 

[HeroinNihilism]

ted kaczynski had the right idea about technology destroying the natural border of civilizations, we’ve uploaded our personhood on a fake medium of communication. That is not the nature of human biology and our consequence is a world of lonely hateful men, it’s going to get worse too, society will collapse once all ugly normfucks are unable to breed.

glowcels, I do not condone bombing random ppl

 

[Gymcelled]

ted kaczynski had the right idea about technology destroying the natural border of civilizations, we’ve uploaded our personhood on a fake medium of communication. That is not the nature of human biology and our consequence is a world of lonely hateful men, it’s going to get worse too, society will collapse once all ugly normfucks are unable to breed.

glowcels, I do not condone bombing random ppl

This tbh

 

[Reprobus]

another water is wet tier “scientific finding”.

tbh we should all just make declarations on all fields related to sexual dynamics. We are right about everything anyways. Muh scientists don’t even have to do anything anymore.

 

[Linesnap99]

yeah just like one study on involving ice cream. the more choise one has the less contend he is.

 

[Gymcelled]

yeah just like one study on involving ice cream. the more choise one has the less contend he is.

Most normies have very little choice so whenever they manage to land any girl they start larping as if she's everything they've always wanted

 

[HeroinNihilism]

Nice post, man.

Tinder should get banned. It's affecting negatively most young people's lives, no matter if they use it or not. It should be considered a public health crisis. Am I exaggerating?

Nope, no exaggeration at all. It will never be addressed because everybody in charge of everything are already having great love lives. Also godamn bluepilled normans continue to simp because they have no self-awareness and still actually believe that being nice to women is the key for everything.

 

[Gymcelled]

Nice post, man.

Tinder should get banned. It's affecting negatively most young people's lives, no matter if they use it or not. It should be considered a public health crisis. Am I exaggerating?

Nope, no exaggeration at all. It will never be addressed because everybody in charge of everything are already having great love lives. Also godamn bluepilled normans continue to simp because they have no self-awareness and still actually believe that being nice to women is the key for everything.

It will never be recognized as such so long as we live in a gynocentric society + so long as men can't admit that they arent all chads

Every dude out there thinks he's at worst a temporarily embarrassed chad. He thinks he has chad potential in some way

 

[Izayacel]

It will never be recognized as such so long as we live in a gynocentric society + so long as men can't admit that they arent all chads

Every dude out there thinks he's at worst a temporarily embarrassed chad. He thinks he has chad potential in some way

They are incels in denial

Man where Setup to be in a societal disadvantage ( Nobody cares about If your Working or Not , but about your Status and Looks )

But still keeping Them delusional about it.

 

[Deleted member 34161]

Brutal suifuel

 

[FukFeminism]

this shit is getting out of control.

 

[EasternEuNeckCell98]

Anyone whould be picky if they had 100 options to choose from.Plus tinder is 90% men.ITS OVER

 

[LeFrenchCel]

99/1 rule in the next few years

 

[Gymcelled]

when i was on campus, at college in the bronx ny, i decided to hit the campus gym 3-4 times a week for a hour and half to 2 hours. After 2 months , all i got was mostly fat/obese women hitting on me, and giving hints for me to take them out on friday nights. I said this is brutal i wasn't expecting no sexy or fit women, but this is pathetic

You got that with only 2 months of trying?

@Transcended Trucel imagine getting something in return for your hard work so quickly

 

[Transcended Trucel]

You got that with only 2 months of trying?

@Transcended Trucel imagine getting something in return for your hard work so quickly

the guy mogs us hard. wouldn't be surprised if he was high tier normie

 

[doomed2failio]

Tired of life. No woman looks at men in the gym for settling down. They want to get dicked by guys out of their league and even better if they are better looking guys than what their prettiest friends get.

Weirdly, fat chicks at least approach. They learned that as a chick they get very little rejection even get dates from a guy because of politeness. Guy pays for food, and their fat asses get hooked on asking guys out.

if fatcels guys get rewarded with free dinner theyd ask every girl out just because they eat so much.

 

[Lebensmüder]

Nothing earth shattering, more confirmations of what we already knew: women are extremely picky, only become pickier with more choice, are less satisfied with their picks than men, etc. It's sort of brutal and amusing how the authors straight say women have a REJECTION-MINDSET.

This study really shows how online dating and social media have completely obliterated the dating market by making women's inherent pickiness much worse than it already was.

BUT REMEMBER, PEOPLE TELL MEN THAT THEY ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO LOWER THEIR STANDARDS
CLOWN FUCKING WORLD @ThoughtfulCel

Here are some direct quotes from the study itself, in the style of the inkwel wiki @Blackpincel

The dating landscape has changed drastically over the past decade, with more and more people looking for a partner online People have never been able to select partners among such an enormous pool of options. [...] The rise of online dating coincided with an increase in the amount of singles in society

People become increasingly likely to reject potential partners to the extent that they are presented with more options

Overall, the adverse effects of choice abundance in dating thus seem to apply particularly to women—the gender that is already much less likely to accept potential partners to begin with, possibly consistent with evolutionary pressures (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).

In all studies, women became increasingly likely to reject potential partners, while for men this effect was either weaker (Study 1), similar (Study 2), or not significant (Study 3).

[...] across all three studies, there was a negative relationship between overall rejection behavior and satisfaction with the partner options participants accepted [...] people who were more rejecting were more likely to be less satisfied with the smaller number of partner options they did accept compared to people who were overall more accepting.

Because women typically reject more, they might also cumulate rejections more quickly and thus more easily adopt a rejection mind-set.

[...] when a choice set increases, people end up being less satisfied with their ultimate partner choice and more prone to reverse their decision [...] when asked to pick the best partner, access to more partner profiles resulted in more searching, more time spent on evaluating bad choice options, and a lower likelihood of selecting the option with the best personal fit

[...] the stream of partner profiles can set in motion an overall feeling of dissatisfaction and pessimism about finding a mate, which leads users to gradually “close off” from mating opportunities. Our findings might therefore explain why people are increasingly dissatisfied and frustrated by modern dating.

[...]across all studies, acceptance rate decreased over the course of online dating.


View attachment 427170

Figure 1. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Studies 1 and 3. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture of a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package (version 2.2.1). The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

View attachment 427171
Figure 2. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

View attachment 427205
Figure 3. The effect of sequence on match rate for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on having a match with a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

Some paragraphs I i liked and the source for those who want to read more









@SergeantIncel @Master in case you find this interesting

@soymonkcel @Edmund_Kemper @ReturnOfSaddam @your personality @BPJ @cvh1991 @FastBananaCEO

SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals

Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

journals.sagepub.com

Brutal and ggplot without own theme design pilled. An absolute must-read. Good work as always.

 

[Robtical]

capitalism created the comfort and living conditions making such creatures believe their degenerate way of life was somehow a viable kind of human experience. While in fact it is not.

We don't have capitalism, we have socialism. As long as rosties vote and take non chad's tax money "capitalism" won't work. We need real capitalism and get rid of the cucked government, and the dumb laws whores and cucks voted for.

 

[Fancy Alcoholic]

We don't have capitalism, we have socialism. As long as rosties vote and take non chad's tax money "capitalism" won't work. We need real capitalism and get rid of the cucked government, and the dumb laws whores and cucks voted for.

If werlfare state is gone then all NEETS will die of starvation. Kinda lifefuel tbh

 

[Robtical]

If werlfare state is gone then all NEETS will die of starvation. Kinda lifefuel tbh

Neets would be able to provide for their unemployed looksmatches if there was no single mom welfare or cucked affirmative action laws, that give foids priority into all the best jobs that non chads are more qualified for.

 

[Fancy Alcoholic]

Neets would be able to provide for their unemployed looksmatches if there was no single mom welfare or cucked affirmative action laws, that give foids priority into all the best jobs that non chads are more qualified for.

Most NEETS are parasites by choice tho. They would probably rot to death in their own feces rather than find a job just sayian.

 

[Robtical]

Most NEETS are parasites by choice tho. They would probably rot to death in their own feces rather than find a job just sayian.

That's what the cucked media tries to brainwash people to think, so they can devalue men and value rosties as "hard workers" instead.

 

[Fancy Alcoholic]

That's what the cucked media tries to brainwash people to think, so they can devalue men and value rosties as "hard workers" instead.

Nah bro. Just ask neets on this forum. Most of them are happy to not work.

 

[Robtical]

Nah bro. Just ask neets on this forum. Most of them are happy to not work.

I can make a poll and ask the neets if they'd take an easy decent paying job without fear of sexual harassment accusations, and 90% would take it, the others are already rich because of their parents or have mental problems. I'm neet and I know I'd take a decent paying job like that.

 

[Fancy Alcoholic]

I can make a poll and ask the neets if they'd take an easy decent paying job without fear of sexual harassment accusations, and 90% would take it, the others are already rich because of their parents or have mental problems. I'm neet and I know I'd take a decent paying job like that.

What is decent to you ? In most normal countries we have minimum wage already.

 

[Robtical]

What is decent to you ? In most normal countries we have minimum wage already.

Most rosties work easy jobs above minimum wage. Most the not wealthy neets here would start working right away if they got at least 30 dollars an hour, and not difficult work, the same decent paying jobs most rosties get priority hired in because of cucked affirmative action.