Blackpill Women have a rejection-mindset, they get pickier as their options increase (ie online dating) and are less likely to be satisfied with their choices

Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
10,622
Online
115d 13h 14m
:feelsStudy: Nothing earth shattering, more confirmations of what we already knew: women are extremely picky, only become pickier with more choice, are less satisfied with their picks than men, etc. It's sort of brutal and amusing how the authors straight say women have a REJECTION-MINDSET.

:feelsstudy: This study really shows how online dating and social media have completely obliterated the dating market by making women's inherent pickiness much worse than it already was.

:blackpill: BUT REMEMBER, PEOPLE TELL MEN THAT THEY ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO LOWER THEIR STANDARDS
CLOWN FUCKING WORLD :feelsclown: @ThoughtfulCel

:blackpill: Here are some direct quotes from the study itself, in the style of the inkwel wiki @Blackpincel

The dating landscape has changed drastically over the past decade, with more and more people looking for a partner online People have never been able to select partners among such an enormous pool of options. [...] The rise of online dating coincided with an increase in the amount of singles in society

People become increasingly likely to reject potential partners to the extent that they are presented with more options


Overall, the adverse effects of choice abundance in dating thus seem to apply particularly to women—the gender that is already much less likely to accept potential partners to begin with, possibly consistent with evolutionary pressures (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).

In all studies, women became increasingly likely to reject potential partners, while for men this effect was either weaker (Study 1), similar (Study 2), or not significant (Study 3).


[...] across all three studies, there was a negative relationship between overall rejection behavior and satisfaction with the partner options participants accepted [...] people who were more rejecting were more likely to be less satisfied with the smaller number of partner options they did accept compared to people who were overall more accepting.

Because women typically reject more, they might also cumulate rejections more quickly and thus more easily adopt a rejection mind-set.

[...] when a choice set increases, people end up being less satisfied with their ultimate partner choice and more prone to reverse their decision [...] when asked to pick the best partner, access to more partner profiles resulted in more searching, more time spent on evaluating bad choice options, and a lower likelihood of selecting the option with the best personal fit

[...] the stream of partner profiles can set in motion an overall feeling of dissatisfaction and pessimism about finding a mate, which leads users to gradually “close off” from mating opportunities. Our findings might therefore explain why people are increasingly dissatisfied and frustrated by modern dating.


[...]across all studies, acceptance rate decreased over the course of online dating.




Figure 1. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Studies 1 and 3. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture of a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package (version 2.2.1). The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.


Figure 2. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.


Figure 3. The effect of sequence on match rate for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on having a match with a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

Some paragraphs I i liked and the source for those who want to read more


The dating landscape has changed drastically over the past decade, with more and more people looking for a partner online (Hobbs, Owen, & Gerber, 2017). People have never been able to select partners among such an enormous pool of options. As an example, the 10 million active daily users of the popular online dating application Tinder are on average presented with 140 partner options a day (Smith, 2018). While one may expect this drastic increase in mating opportunities to result in an increasing number of romantic relationships, the opposite has occurred: The rise of online dating coincided with an increase in the amount of singles in society (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, 2019; Copen, Daniels, Vespa, & Mosher, 2012; DePaulo, 2017). What could explain this paradox in modern dating?

The abundance of choice in online dating is one of the key factors which explains its success (Lenton & Stewart, 2008). People like having many options to choose from, and the likelihood of finding an option that matches someone’s individual preference should logically increase with more choice (Lancaster, 1990; Patall, Cooper, & Robinson, 2008). However, having extensive choice can have various adverse effects, such as paralysis (i.e., not making any decision at all) and decreased satisfaction (Iyengar & Lepper, 2000; Scheibehenne, Greifeneder, & Todd, 2010; Schwartz, 2004). In fact, it seems that people generally experience less benefits when they have more choice. This observation is reminiscent of the basic economic principle of diminishing returns (Brue, 1993; Shephard & Färe, 1974), in which each unit that is sequentially added to the production process results in less profits.

There is some indirect evidence that having more choice in the domain of dating also has negative consequences. For example, when asked to pick the best partner, access to more partner profiles resulted in more searching, more time spent on evaluating bad choice options, and a lower likelihood of selecting the option with the best personal fit (Wu & Chiou, 2009). Likewise, when a choice set increases, people end up being less satisfied with their ultimate partner choice and more prone to reverse their decision (D’Angelo & Toma, 2017). The adverse effects of choice overload are also mentioned in articles in popular media mentioning phenomena such as “Tinder fatigue” (Beck, 2016) or “dating burnout” (Blair, 2017).

We tested the existence of a rejection mind-set in online dating across three studies. In Study 1, we presented people with pictures of hypothetical partners, to test if and when people’s general choice behavior would change. In Study 2, we presented people with pictures of partners that were actually available and tested the gradual development of their choice behaviors as well as their success rate in terms of mutual interest (i.e., matches). In Study 3, we explored potential underlying psychological mechanisms. Specifically, and in line with choice overload literature, we explored whether the rejection mind-set may be due to people experiencing lower choice satisfaction and less success over the course of online dating. As an additional goal, we explored the potential moderating role of gender. In all studies, we focused on participants between 18 and 30 years old—a group that makes up 79% of all users of online dating applications (Smith, 2018).

@SergeantIncel @Master in case you find this interesting

@soymonkcel @Edmund_Kemper @ReturnOfSaddam @your personality @BPJ @cvh1991 @FastBananaCEO

 
Last edited:
BPJ

BPJ

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Jan 30, 2021
Posts
259
Online
5d 6h 8m
thank you. bookmarked.
 
ThoughtfulCel

ThoughtfulCel

G.O.R.I.L.L.A _M.A.X.I.N.G
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
17,816
Online
268d 13h 20m
:blackpill: BUT REMEMBER, PEOPLE TELL MEN THAT THEY ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO LOWER THEIR STANDARDS
CLOWN FUCKING WORLD :feelsclown: @ThoughtfulCel
First off, based as fuck post and completely true.

When they say "men" in this case, they're referring to attractive men.

Its literally unattractive women trying to strong arm and shame chad into dating them LOL. Pathetic right?

You're completely right, as women's choices increase, all they do is get tired of the common person and seek the next high. Soon, women will have so many choices that not even chad can satisfy their lust.

Women are black holes, sucking up resources until their is nothing left. They will never be satisfied and will always be unhappy with one person, meanwhile all men want is one good woman.

Truly sad creatures.
 
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
10,622
Online
115d 13h 14m
Its literally unattractive women trying to strong arm and shame chad into dating them LOL. Pathetic right?
Remember the "body positivity" and "healthy at every size" movements? It's literally just morbidly obese women talking about how they're sexy and deserve the best. They would often post pics or comics about obese landwhales with fit guys lmao, but never EVER about them and some obese neckbeard

The hypocrisy of this world never ceases to amaze me
 
Fancy Alcoholic

Fancy Alcoholic

Brand new Feeling
★★★★
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Posts
4,385
Online
21d 18h 24m
Elaborate :feelsmage:
capitalism created the comfort and living conditions making such creatures believe their degenerate way of life was somehow a viable kind of human experience. While in fact it is not.
 
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
10,622
Online
115d 13h 14m
capitalism created the comfort and living conditions making such creatures believe their degenerate way of life was somehow a viable kind of human experience. While in fact it is not.
Technology/industrialization also fucked us up. Though capitalism accelerated the spread of that technology by a lot
 
Mulattocel

Mulattocel

Veteran
★★★
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Posts
1,208
Online
33d 1h 13m
Another great thread by our blackpill book keeper
 
your personality

your personality

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2020
Posts
26,003
Online
111d 5h 29m
:feelsStudy: Nothing earth shattering, more confirmations of what we already knew: women are extremely picky, only become pickier with more choice, are less satisfied with their picks than men, etc. It's sort of brutal and amusing how the authors straight say women have a REJECTION-MINDSET.

:feelsstudy: This study really shows how online dating and social media have completely obliterated the dating market by making women's inherent pickiness much worse than it already was.

:blackpill: BUT REMEMBER, PEOPLE TELL MEN THAT THEY ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO LOWER THEIR STANDARDS
CLOWN FUCKING WORLD :feelsclown: @ThoughtfulCel

:blackpill: Here are some direct quotes from the study itself, in the style of the inkwel wiki @Blackpincel

The dating landscape has changed drastically over the past decade, with more and more people looking for a partner online People have never been able to select partners among such an enormous pool of options. [...] The rise of online dating coincided with an increase in the amount of singles in society

People become increasingly likely to reject potential partners to the extent that they are presented with more options


Overall, the adverse effects of choice abundance in dating thus seem to apply particularly to women—the gender that is already much less likely to accept potential partners to begin with, possibly consistent with evolutionary pressures (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).

In all studies, women became increasingly likely to reject potential partners, while for men this effect was either weaker (Study 1), similar (Study 2), or not significant (Study 3).


[...] across all three studies, there was a negative relationship between overall rejection behavior and satisfaction with the partner options participants accepted [...] people who were more rejecting were more likely to be less satisfied with the smaller number of partner options they did accept compared to people who were overall more accepting.

Because women typically reject more, they might also cumulate rejections more quickly and thus more easily adopt a rejection mind-set.

[...] when a choice set increases, people end up being less satisfied with their ultimate partner choice and more prone to reverse their decision [...] when asked to pick the best partner, access to more partner profiles resulted in more searching, more time spent on evaluating bad choice options, and a lower likelihood of selecting the option with the best personal fit

[...] the stream of partner profiles can set in motion an overall feeling of dissatisfaction and pessimism about finding a mate, which leads users to gradually “close off” from mating opportunities. Our findings might therefore explain why people are increasingly dissatisfied and frustrated by modern dating.


[...]across all studies, acceptance rate decreased over the course of online dating.


View attachment 427170

Figure 1. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Studies 1 and 3. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture of a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package (version 2.2.1). The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

View attachment 427171
Figure 2. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

View attachment 427205
Figure 3. The effect of sequence on match rate for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on having a match with a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

Some paragraphs I i liked and the source for those who want to read more










@SergeantIncel @Master in case you find this interesting

@soymonkcel @Edmund_Kemper @ReturnOfSaddam @your personality @BPJ @cvh1991 @FastBananaCEO

Women are the only ones beside chad that can successfully pull off a dgaf mindset. Guys that try to do that end up unsuccessful and just start feuding with others over ego issues. Even before that does a nonchad male having a dgaf mindset change anything? No.
 
Shadow-cel

Shadow-cel

Peace will come...someday
★★★★
Joined
Mar 17, 2021
Posts
896
Online
15d 8h 34m
Remember the "body positivity" and "healthy at every size" movements? It's literally just morbidly obese women talking about how they're sexy and deserve the best. They would often post pics or comics about obese landwhales with fit guys lmao, but never EVER about them and some obese neckbeard

The hypocrisy of this world never ceases to amaze me
Based. It's funny to me, this "accept fat women" movement. Obesity and generally being overweight is something that SHOULD NOT be accepted or encouraged, as it is an indicator of poor health. If not addressed it will only get worse. However, there is no "accept short men" movement. Short men are shamed for their height, something they had no control over. Short height is also not indicative of poor health. Water is wet I know, and I know this comes back to short height = "poor genetics", but this shit infuriates me.
 
Speedloader

Speedloader

Lamp oil. Rope. Bombs
★★★★★
Joined
May 14, 2019
Posts
15,020
Online
176d 21h 39m
Dn rd but i hate wombmenz
 
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
10,622
Online
115d 13h 14m
Based. It's funny to me, this "accept fat women" movement. Obesity and generally being overweight is something that SHOULD NOT be accepted or encouraged, as it is an indicator of poor health. If not addressed it will only get worse. However, there is no "accept short men" movement. Short men are shamed for their height, something they had no control over. Short height is also not indicative of poor health. Water is wet I know, and I know this comes back to short height = "poor genetics", but this shit infuriates me.
We're told to accept a horrible behavior, a choice (stuffing yourself with too much food for years) while men who are born ugly, short, predisposed to balding etc are treated like subhumans or clowns

An actual body positivity movement would be about people born with strange bodies, people born ugly, people with 3rd degree burns or horrible scars that disfigure them. Instead it's entirely aimed at lazy narcissistic women who can't put the fork down :feelsclown: @ThoughtfulCel i always feel liked tagging you for clown world/hypocrisy shit
 
ThoughtfulCel

ThoughtfulCel

G.O.R.I.L.L.A _M.A.X.I.N.G
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
17,816
Online
268d 13h 20m
We're told to accept a horrible behavior, a choice (stuffing yourself with too much food for years) while men who are born ugly, short, predisposed to balding etc are treated like subhumans or clowns

An actual body positivity movement would be about people born with strange bodies, people born ugly, people with 3rd degree burns or horrible scars that disfigure them. Instead it's entirely aimed at lazy narcissistic women who can't put the fork down :feelsclown: @ThoughtfulCel i always feel liked tagging you for clown world/hypocrisy shit
The whole body positivity movement is such a croc of bullshit.

It's just women who have zero self control who still want a shot at the top 10% of men.

So just like women usually do, they think the best way is to shame Chad until he accepts them.
 
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
10,622
Online
115d 13h 14m
The whole body positivity movement is such a croc of bullshit.

It's just women who have zero self control who still want a shot at the top 10% of men.

So just like women usually do, they think the best way is to shame Chad until he accepts them.
Meanwhile men fucking destroy themselves tirelessly with self improvement, game, hobbymaxxing, moneymaxxing, statusmaxxing etc only to fail miserably all the time and be told they're not doing anything and aren't entitled to anything :feelsUnreal:
 
BITG

BITG

Mentally crippled by lonely teen years
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 3, 2019
Posts
6,986
Online
84d 17h 17m
More evidence OLD =\= IRL dating. People need to stop with that misinformation. If that was the case, 80% of men wouldn’t have sex, but most men do.

Foids are not as picky IRL, but they still are picky of course, it’s just not to an insane degree.

The reason most incels are incel is because average/slightly below average looks + no social circle.
 
ThePopeofCope

ThePopeofCope

Nowhere I Belong
Joined
Feb 3, 2021
Posts
3,037
Online
7d 19h 33m
When can we start giving women anthrax bombs in Gary's Mod?
 
SchrodingersDick

SchrodingersDick

Skeleton Volume = Life Quality
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 7, 2018
Posts
7,737
Online
43d 21h 57m
another water is wet tier “scientific finding”.

tbh we should all just make declarations on all fields related to sexual dynamics. We are right about everything anyways. Muh scientists don’t even have to do anything anymore.
 
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
10,622
Online
115d 13h 14m
More evidence OLD =\= IRL dating. People need to stop with that misinformation. If that was the case, 80% of men wouldn’t have sex, but most men do.

Foids are not as picky IRL, but they still are picky of course, it’s just not to an insane degree.

The reason most incels are incel is because average/slightly below average looks + no social circle.
Women are as picky as logistics and lack of social pressure allow them to, their hypergamy and pickiness become near infinite if they're left unchecked.

If women could, they would only fuck and date the biggest, the most elite gigachads on earth.

Pre social media, pre tinder, pre internet they just didn't have the tools to search and filter men the way they do today. And chads couldn't broadcast their genetic superiority like they can today. Back in the boomer era women could only get local guys. Your local chadlite that one guy they dreamed of and might have chased. The celeb chads they saw in movies were so distant and inaccessible that women didn't quite set those as their new standards. You only had to compete against a tiny, statistically insignificant fraction of the pool of men you have to compete with nowadays

That's also why there's a tiny bit of truth to locationcels and locationmaxxers. Big cities and dense urban areas aren't quite the same as small towns and the countryside. Some 3rd world countries also aren't as big on social media and dating apps as the 1st world yet either so that also makes a difference. But every day that passes the location factors loses ground because social media, dating apps and big cities are taking over the world.
 
BITG

BITG

Mentally crippled by lonely teen years
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 3, 2019
Posts
6,986
Online
84d 17h 17m
Women are as picky as logistics and lack of social pressure allow them to, their hypergamy and pickiness become near infinite if they're left unchecked.

If women could, they would only fuck and date the biggest, the most elite gigachads on earth.

Pre social media, pre tinder, pre internet they just didn't have the tools to search and filter men the way they do today. And chads couldn't broadcast their genetic superiority like they can today. Back in the boomer era women could only get local guys. Your local chadlite that one guy they dreamed of and might have chased. The celeb chads they saw in movies were so distant and inaccessible that women didn't quite set those as their new standards. You only had to compete against a tiny, statistically insignificant fraction of the pool of men you have to compete with nowadays

That's also why there's a tiny bit of truth to locationcels and locationmaxxers. Big cities and dense urban areas aren't quite the same as small towns and the countryside. Some 3rd world countries also aren't as big on social media and dating apps as the 1st world yet either so that also makes a difference. But every day that passes the location factors loses ground because social media, dating apps and big cities are taking over the world.
 
cvh1991

cvh1991

Officer
★★★
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Posts
703
Online
3d 17h 9m
:feelsStudy: Nothing earth shattering, more confirmations of what we already knew: women are extremely picky, only become pickier with more choice, are less satisfied with their picks than men, etc. It's sort of brutal and amusing how the authors straight say women have a REJECTION-MINDSET.

:feelsstudy: This study really shows how online dating and social media have completely obliterated the dating market by making women's inherent pickiness much worse than it already was.

:blackpill: BUT REMEMBER, PEOPLE TELL MEN THAT THEY ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO LOWER THEIR STANDARDS
CLOWN FUCKING WORLD :feelsclown: @ThoughtfulCel

:blackpill: Here are some direct quotes from the study itself, in the style of the inkwel wiki @Blackpincel

The dating landscape has changed drastically over the past decade, with more and more people looking for a partner online People have never been able to select partners among such an enormous pool of options. [...] The rise of online dating coincided with an increase in the amount of singles in society

People become increasingly likely to reject potential partners to the extent that they are presented with more options


Overall, the adverse effects of choice abundance in dating thus seem to apply particularly to women—the gender that is already much less likely to accept potential partners to begin with, possibly consistent with evolutionary pressures (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).

In all studies, women became increasingly likely to reject potential partners, while for men this effect was either weaker (Study 1), similar (Study 2), or not significant (Study 3).


[...] across all three studies, there was a negative relationship between overall rejection behavior and satisfaction with the partner options participants accepted [...] people who were more rejecting were more likely to be less satisfied with the smaller number of partner options they did accept compared to people who were overall more accepting.

Because women typically reject more, they might also cumulate rejections more quickly and thus more easily adopt a rejection mind-set.

[...] when a choice set increases, people end up being less satisfied with their ultimate partner choice and more prone to reverse their decision [...] when asked to pick the best partner, access to more partner profiles resulted in more searching, more time spent on evaluating bad choice options, and a lower likelihood of selecting the option with the best personal fit

[...] the stream of partner profiles can set in motion an overall feeling of dissatisfaction and pessimism about finding a mate, which leads users to gradually “close off” from mating opportunities. Our findings might therefore explain why people are increasingly dissatisfied and frustrated by modern dating.


[...]across all studies, acceptance rate decreased over the course of online dating.


View attachment 427170

Figure 1. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Studies 1 and 3. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture of a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package (version 2.2.1). The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

View attachment 427171
Figure 2. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

View attachment 427205
Figure 3. The effect of sequence on match rate for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on having a match with a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

Some paragraphs I i liked and the source for those who want to read more










@SergeantIncel @Master in case you find this interesting

@soymonkcel @Edmund_Kemper @ReturnOfSaddam @your personality @BPJ @cvh1991 @FastBananaCEO

I save all of your posts as debate references ngl — having these study citations is very valuable for determining what is true and it makes it all the more rage fuel how the vast majority of society denies reality and has lights men all the time.
Remember the "body positivity" and "healthy at every size" movements? It's literally just morbidly obese women talking about how they're sexy and deserve the best. They would often post pics or comics about obese landwhales with fit guys lmao, but never EVER about them and some obese neckbeard

The hypocrisy of this world never ceases to amaze me
Based and well said
Another great thread by our blackpill book keeper
Indeed
 
P

Pumkin

Mythic
★★★
Joined
Apr 14, 2018
Posts
4,774
Online
16d 23h 1m
Another post and another day where I bang my desk in frustration on why women have any choice at all. We'd be living in a Utopia by now if they were put in their place.
 
Izayacel

Izayacel

ACCELERATE SPECTRUM "
★★★★★
Joined
May 5, 2018
Posts
5,562
Online
10d 21h 29m
Hypergamy and social Media are the downthrotten of your current era
 
HeroinNihilism

HeroinNihilism

sleep when i’m dead i guess
★★★★
Joined
Aug 22, 2020
Posts
3,349
Online
43d 14h 48m
ted kaczynski had the right idea about technology destroying the natural border of civilizations, we’ve uploaded our personhood on a fake medium of communication. That is not the nature of human biology and our consequence is a world of lonely hateful men, it’s going to get worse too, society will collapse once all ugly normfucks are unable to breed.

glowcels, I do not condone bombing random ppl
 
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
10,622
Online
115d 13h 14m
ted kaczynski had the right idea about technology destroying the natural border of civilizations, we’ve uploaded our personhood on a fake medium of communication. That is not the nature of human biology and our consequence is a world of lonely hateful men, it’s going to get worse too, society will collapse once all ugly normfucks are unable to breed.

glowcels, I do not condone bombing random ppl
This tbh
 
Reprobus

Reprobus

Anarchycel
★★★★★
Joined
May 31, 2018
Posts
6,332
Online
56d 15h 17m
another water is wet tier “scientific finding”.

tbh we should all just make declarations on all fields related to sexual dynamics. We are right about everything anyways. Muh scientists don’t even have to do anything anymore.
 
Linesnap99

Linesnap99

Captain
★★★★★
Joined
Mar 31, 2020
Posts
1,976
Online
16d 3h 57m
yeah just like one study on involving ice cream. the more choise one has the less contend he is.
 
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
10,622
Online
115d 13h 14m
yeah just like one study on involving ice cream. the more choise one has the less contend he is.
Most normies have very little choice so whenever they manage to land any girl they start larping as if she's everything they've always wanted
 
soymonkcel

soymonkcel

Trying to reach longevity escape velocity.
★★★
Joined
Jul 23, 2020
Posts
3,797
Online
30d 16h 5m
Nice post, man.

Tinder should get banned. It's affecting negatively most young people's lives, no matter if they use it or not. It should be considered a public health crisis. Am I exaggerating?
 
HeroinNihilism

HeroinNihilism

sleep when i’m dead i guess
★★★★
Joined
Aug 22, 2020
Posts
3,349
Online
43d 14h 48m
Nice post, man.

Tinder should get banned. It's affecting negatively most young people's lives, no matter if they use it or not. It should be considered a public health crisis. Am I exaggerating?
Nope, no exaggeration at all. It will never be addressed because everybody in charge of everything are already having great love lives. Also godamn bluepilled normans continue to simp because they have no self-awareness and still actually believe that being nice to women is the key for everything.
 
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
10,622
Online
115d 13h 14m
Nice post, man.

Tinder should get banned. It's affecting negatively most young people's lives, no matter if they use it or not. It should be considered a public health crisis. Am I exaggerating?
Nope, no exaggeration at all. It will never be addressed because everybody in charge of everything are already having great love lives. Also godamn bluepilled normans continue to simp because they have no self-awareness and still actually believe that being nice to women is the key for everything.
It will never be recognized as such so long as we live in a gynocentric society + so long as men can't admit that they arent all chads

Every dude out there thinks he's at worst a temporarily embarrassed chad. He thinks he has chad potential in some way
 
Izayacel

Izayacel

ACCELERATE SPECTRUM "
★★★★★
Joined
May 5, 2018
Posts
5,562
Online
10d 21h 29m
It will never be recognized as such so long as we live in a gynocentric society + so long as men can't admit that they arent all chads

Every dude out there thinks he's at worst a temporarily embarrassed chad. He thinks he has chad potential in some way
They are incels in denial

Man where Setup to be in a societal disadvantage ( Nobody cares about If your Working or Not , but about your Status and Looks )

But still keeping Them delusional about it.