P
Women want to stratify men while being equal toother women at the same time; not only does that mindset not work, the expect the non-Chads to pay for it.
Blackpill Women have a rejection-mindset, they get pickier as their options increase (ie online dating) and are less likely to be satisfied with their choices
What's that monthly in euro (sorry, europpoor here) ?
If you work 30 hours a week then multiply 30 by 30 by 4, which is $3600 a month, which are about 3000 euros.
Based thread we need more threads like this
@WØLF
lol a good job in Europe makes like 15-20 bucks/h max
Not everyone get that much in Europooria. Where I live minimum wage is 1200€.
tx boyos
Not everyone get that much in Europooria. Where I live minimum wage is 1200€.
Foids still make more than non chads because of affirmative action, they get first priority in decent paying jobs. Raising the minimum wage won't solve the problem for neets, removing affirmative action and cucked laws will.
CLOWN FUCKING WORLD
The dating landscape has changed drastically over the past decade, with more and more people looking for a partner online People have never been able to select partners among such an enormous pool of options. [...] The rise of online dating coincided with an increase in the amount of singles in society
People become increasingly likely to reject potential partners to the extent that they are presented with more options
Overall, the adverse effects of choice abundance in dating thus seem to apply particularly to women—the gender that is already much less likely to accept potential partners to begin with, possibly consistent with evolutionary pressures (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).
In all studies, women became increasingly likely to reject potential partners, while for men this effect was either weaker (Study 1), similar (Study 2), or not significant (Study 3).
[...] across all three studies, there was a negative relationship between overall rejection behavior and satisfaction with the partner options participants accepted [...] people who were more rejecting were more likely to be less satisfied with the smaller number of partner options they did accept compared to people who were overall more accepting.
Because women typically reject more, they might also cumulate rejections more quickly and thus more easily adopt a rejection mind-set.
[...] when a choice set increases, people end up being less satisfied with their ultimate partner choice and more prone to reverse their decision [...] when asked to pick the best partner, access to more partner profiles resulted in more searching, more time spent on evaluating bad choice options, and a lower likelihood of selecting the option with the best personal fit
[...] the stream of partner profiles can set in motion an overall feeling of dissatisfaction and pessimism about finding a mate, which leads users to gradually “close off” from mating opportunities. Our findings might therefore explain why people are increasingly dissatisfied and frustrated by modern dating.
[...]across all studies, acceptance rate decreased over the course of online dating.
View attachment 427170
Figure 1. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Studies 1 and 3. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture of a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package (version 2.2.1). The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.
View attachment 427171
Figure 2. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.
View attachment 427205
Figure 3. The effect of sequence on match rate for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on having a match with a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.
Some paragraphs I i liked and the source for those who want to read more
@SergeantIncel @Master in case you find this interesting
@soymonkcel @Edmund_Kemper @ReturnOfSaddam @your personality @BPJ @cvh1991 @FastBananaCEO
SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals
Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.journals.sagepub.com
lol a good job in Europe makes like 15-20 bucks/h max
tx boyos
Fucking cows
Quality Post
Water is wet thread
@WØLF
This thread is incredible and i appreciate every detail you guys notice. But yeah im never going to score
CLOWN FUCKING WORLD
The dating landscape has changed drastically over the past decade, with more and more people looking for a partner online People have never been able to select partners among such an enormous pool of options. [...] The rise of online dating coincided with an increase in the amount of singles in society
People become increasingly likely to reject potential partners to the extent that they are presented with more options
Overall, the adverse effects of choice abundance in dating thus seem to apply particularly to women—the gender that is already much less likely to accept potential partners to begin with, possibly consistent with evolutionary pressures (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).
In all studies, women became increasingly likely to reject potential partners, while for men this effect was either weaker (Study 1), similar (Study 2), or not significant (Study 3).
[...] across all three studies, there was a negative relationship between overall rejection behavior and satisfaction with the partner options participants accepted [...] people who were more rejecting were more likely to be less satisfied with the smaller number of partner options they did accept compared to people who were overall more accepting.
Because women typically reject more, they might also cumulate rejections more quickly and thus more easily adopt a rejection mind-set.
[...] when a choice set increases, people end up being less satisfied with their ultimate partner choice and more prone to reverse their decision [...] when asked to pick the best partner, access to more partner profiles resulted in more searching, more time spent on evaluating bad choice options, and a lower likelihood of selecting the option with the best personal fit
[...] the stream of partner profiles can set in motion an overall feeling of dissatisfaction and pessimism about finding a mate, which leads users to gradually “close off” from mating opportunities. Our findings might therefore explain why people are increasingly dissatisfied and frustrated by modern dating.
[...]across all studies, acceptance rate decreased over the course of online dating.
View attachment 427170
Figure 1. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Studies 1 and 3. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture of a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package (version 2.2.1). The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.
View attachment 427171
Figure 2. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.
View attachment 427205
Figure 3. The effect of sequence on match rate for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on having a match with a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.
Some paragraphs I i liked and the source for those who want to read more
@SergeantIncel @Master in case you find this interesting
@soymonkcel @Edmund_Kemper @ReturnOfSaddam @your personality @BPJ @cvh1991 @FastBananaCEO
SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals
Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
Goddamn. It's fucking over before it began as an incel because you are forced to solitude yourself from soicety because they didn't like you solely because of your looks. Bookmarked.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
