Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Women have a rejection-mindset, they get pickier as their options increase (ie online dating) and are less likely to be satisfied with their choices

Robtical

Robtical

Had it with these cucks
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 6, 2018
Posts
29,679
Online
358d 11h 1m
Fancy Alcoholic said:
What is decent to you ? In most normal countries we have minimum wage already.
Most rosties work easy jobs above minimum wage. Most the not wealthy neets here would start working right away if they got at least 30 dollars an hour, and not difficult work, the same decent paying jobs most rosties get priority hired in because of cucked affirmative action.
 
P

Paperman

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Apr 14, 2021
Posts
200
Online
2d 6h 10m
Gymcelled said:
Remember the "body positivity" and "healthy at every size" movements? It's literally just morbidly obese women talking about how they're sexy and deserve the best. They would often post pics or comics about obese landwhales with fit guys lmao, but never EVER about them and some obese neckbeard

The hypocrisy of this world never ceases to amaze me
Women want to stratify men while being equal toother women at the same time; not only does that mindset not work, the expect the non-Chads to pay for it.
 
Fancy Alcoholic

Fancy Alcoholic

Living by the name
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Posts
6,162
Online
34d 7h 15m
Robtical said:
30 dollars an hour
What's that monthly in euro (sorry, europpoor here) ?
 
Robtical

Robtical

Had it with these cucks
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 6, 2018
Posts
29,679
Online
358d 11h 1m
Fancy Alcoholic said:
What's that monthly in euro (sorry, europpoor here) ?
If you work 30 hours a week then multiply 30 by 30 by 4, which is $3600 a month, which are about 3000 euros.
 
Fancy Alcoholic

Fancy Alcoholic

Living by the name
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Posts
6,162
Online
34d 7h 15m
Robtical said:
If you work 30 hours a week then multiply 30 by 30 by 4, which is $3600 a month, which are about 3000 euros.
Not everyone get that much in Europooria. Where I live minimum wage is 1200€.
:feelsrope:
 
Michinomiya Hirohit

Michinomiya Hirohit

emperor
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Posts
11,508
Online
119d 16h 14m
Gymcelled said:
Based thread we need more threads like this
 
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
11,278
Online
124d 7h 40m
Robtical said:
If you work 30 hours a week then multiply 30 by 30 by 4, which is $3600 a month, which are about 3000 euros.
lol a good job in Europe makes like 15-20 bucks/h max

Fancy Alcoholic said:
Not everyone get that much in Europooria. Where I live minimum wage is 1200€.
:feelsrope:
:cryfeels::cryfeels::feelsrope::feelsrope:

Michinomiya Hirohit said:
Based thread we need more threads like this
Lebensmüder said:
Brutal and ggplot without own theme design pilled. An absolute must-read. Good work as always.
tx boyos :feelsautistic:
 
Robtical

Robtical

Had it with these cucks
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 6, 2018
Posts
29,679
Online
358d 11h 1m
Fancy Alcoholic said:
Not everyone get that much in Europooria. Where I live minimum wage is 1200€.
:feelsrope:
Gymcelled said:
lol a good job in Europe makes like 15-20 bucks/h max
Foids still make more than non chads because of affirmative action, they get first priority in decent paying jobs. Raising the minimum wage won't solve the problem for neets, removing affirmative action and cucked laws will.
 
calimal8899

calimal8899

Banned
-
Joined
Jun 25, 2021
Posts
14
Online
15h 49m
Gymcelled said:
:feelsStudy: Nothing earth shattering, more confirmations of what we already knew: women are extremely picky, only become pickier with more choice, are less satisfied with their picks than men, etc. It's sort of brutal and amusing how the authors straight say women have a REJECTION-MINDSET.

:feelsstudy: This study really shows how online dating and social media have completely obliterated the dating market by making women's inherent pickiness much worse than it already was.

:blackpill: BUT REMEMBER, PEOPLE TELL MEN THAT THEY ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO LOWER THEIR STANDARDS
CLOWN FUCKING WORLD :feelsclown: ThoughtfulCel @ThoughtfulCel

:blackpill: Here are some direct quotes from the study itself, in the style of the inkwel wiki Blackpincel @Blackpincel

The dating landscape has changed drastically over the past decade, with more and more people looking for a partner online People have never been able to select partners among such an enormous pool of options. [...] The rise of online dating coincided with an increase in the amount of singles in society

People become increasingly likely to reject potential partners to the extent that they are presented with more options


Overall, the adverse effects of choice abundance in dating thus seem to apply particularly to women—the gender that is already much less likely to accept potential partners to begin with, possibly consistent with evolutionary pressures (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).

In all studies, women became increasingly likely to reject potential partners, while for men this effect was either weaker (Study 1), similar (Study 2), or not significant (Study 3).


[...] across all three studies, there was a negative relationship between overall rejection behavior and satisfaction with the partner options participants accepted [...] people who were more rejecting were more likely to be less satisfied with the smaller number of partner options they did accept compared to people who were overall more accepting.

Because women typically reject more, they might also cumulate rejections more quickly and thus more easily adopt a rejection mind-set.

[...] when a choice set increases, people end up being less satisfied with their ultimate partner choice and more prone to reverse their decision [...] when asked to pick the best partner, access to more partner profiles resulted in more searching, more time spent on evaluating bad choice options, and a lower likelihood of selecting the option with the best personal fit

[...] the stream of partner profiles can set in motion an overall feeling of dissatisfaction and pessimism about finding a mate, which leads users to gradually “close off” from mating opportunities. Our findings might therefore explain why people are increasingly dissatisfied and frustrated by modern dating.


[...]across all studies, acceptance rate decreased over the course of online dating.


View attachment 427170

Figure 1. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Studies 1 and 3. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture of a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package (version 2.2.1). The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

View attachment 427171
Figure 2. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

View attachment 427205
Figure 3. The effect of sequence on match rate for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on having a match with a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

Some paragraphs I i liked and the source for those who want to read more










SergeantIncel @SergeantIncel Master @Master in case you find this interesting

soymonkcel @soymonkcel Edmund_Kemper @Edmund_Kemper ReturnOfSaddam @ReturnOfSaddam Y @your personality BPJ @BPJ cvh1991 @cvh1991 FastBananaCEO @FastBananaCEO

:feelshmm:
 
Michinomiya Hirohit

Michinomiya Hirohit

emperor
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Posts
11,508
Online
119d 16h 14m
Gymcelled said:
lol a good job in Europe makes like 15-20 bucks/h max


:cryfeels::cryfeels::feelsrope::feelsrope:



tx boyos :feelsautistic:
 
Autist

Autist

‎PLVS VLTRA
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 23, 2021
Posts
8,162
Online
3d 13h 13m
Fucking cows
 
polar inertia

polar inertia

oldcel, mentalcel, wagecel
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Posts
951
Online
11d 17h 3m
Quality Post :feelsokman:
 
Sadandangrycel

Sadandangrycel

Legend
★★
Joined
Sep 9, 2020
Posts
3,687
Online
29d 1h 34m
Water is wet thread
 
Samedamntime

Samedamntime

Greycel
Joined
Apr 9, 2021
Posts
42
Online
7h 23m
Gymcelled said:
:feelsStudy: Nothing earth shattering, more confirmations of what we already knew: women are extremely picky, only become pickier with more choice, are less satisfied with their picks than men, etc. It's sort of brutal and amusing how the authors straight say women have a REJECTION-MINDSET.

:feelsstudy: This study really shows how online dating and social media have completely obliterated the dating market by making women's inherent pickiness much worse than it already was.

:blackpill: BUT REMEMBER, PEOPLE TELL MEN THAT THEY ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO LOWER THEIR STANDARDS
CLOWN FUCKING WORLD :feelsclown: ThoughtfulCel @ThoughtfulCel

:blackpill: Here are some direct quotes from the study itself, in the style of the inkwel wiki Blackpincel @Blackpincel

The dating landscape has changed drastically over the past decade, with more and more people looking for a partner online People have never been able to select partners among such an enormous pool of options. [...] The rise of online dating coincided with an increase in the amount of singles in society

People become increasingly likely to reject potential partners to the extent that they are presented with more options


Overall, the adverse effects of choice abundance in dating thus seem to apply particularly to women—the gender that is already much less likely to accept potential partners to begin with, possibly consistent with evolutionary pressures (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).

In all studies, women became increasingly likely to reject potential partners, while for men this effect was either weaker (Study 1), similar (Study 2), or not significant (Study 3).


[...] across all three studies, there was a negative relationship between overall rejection behavior and satisfaction with the partner options participants accepted [...] people who were more rejecting were more likely to be less satisfied with the smaller number of partner options they did accept compared to people who were overall more accepting.

Because women typically reject more, they might also cumulate rejections more quickly and thus more easily adopt a rejection mind-set.

[...] when a choice set increases, people end up being less satisfied with their ultimate partner choice and more prone to reverse their decision [...] when asked to pick the best partner, access to more partner profiles resulted in more searching, more time spent on evaluating bad choice options, and a lower likelihood of selecting the option with the best personal fit

[...] the stream of partner profiles can set in motion an overall feeling of dissatisfaction and pessimism about finding a mate, which leads users to gradually “close off” from mating opportunities. Our findings might therefore explain why people are increasingly dissatisfied and frustrated by modern dating.


[...]across all studies, acceptance rate decreased over the course of online dating.


View attachment 427170

Figure 1. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Studies 1 and 3. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture of a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package (version 2.2.1). The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

View attachment 427171
Figure 2. The effect of sequence on choice behavior for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on acceptance of the picture. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

View attachment 427205
Figure 3. The effect of sequence on match rate for women and men in Study 2. Higher scores represent a higher chance on having a match with a potential partner. The lines in the figure represent smoothed predicted means, using the “loess” algorithm of the ggplot2 package. The gray area around the lines represent the 95% confidence intervals around these predicted means.

Some paragraphs I i liked and the source for those who want to read more










SergeantIncel @SergeantIncel Master @Master in case you find this interesting

soymonkcel @soymonkcel Edmund_Kemper @Edmund_Kemper ReturnOfSaddam @ReturnOfSaddam Y @your personality BPJ @BPJ cvh1991 @cvh1991 FastBananaCEO @FastBananaCEO

This thread is incredible and i appreciate every detail you guys notice. But yeah im never going to score
 
IAmMessiah

IAmMessiah

Pain, misery, suffering, exhaustion, torture
★★★★
Joined
Jul 16, 2021
Posts
371
Online
5d 7h 45m
Goddamn. It's fucking over before it began as an incel because you are forced to solitude yourself from soicety because they didn't like you solely because of your looks. Bookmarked.
 
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape7
shape8
Top