You ITcels get your nouns messed up, the preferred term for mid-pubescent preference for foids is hebephilia, ephebophilia is for fags.
Neoteny and femininity have a strong correlation so if you mean less hetero I would protest.
If you think it's all about tit size then some 90 year old grannies have super-long tits past their ankles to suckle on bro.
If you think it's all about cushion then enjoy your landwhales.
The end goal should certainly be for them to grow to suckle your spawn for you, but why should there be an immediate need for that?
I can't decide which one of you is the normie LARPing as incel. Possibly both.
Ok Pokemon
Spoken like a doomer.
I am doomed though tbh
Don't remind me of my own life.I am doomed though tbh
Based and maniacpilled minioncel.
B
The ability to do calculus, for example.
No, you faggot. You can question it all you want, but even the female brain is functionally capable of higher level cognition. That they don't exercise it is another issue.
None.
And you sound like a dumbass by assuming that I meant the age of consent should be absurdly high.
You didn't understand. Try again.
This is patently false and literally a retarded thing to say.
Again, this is false. Your brain develops more and more gray matter and neurons until full growth. That is what determines your brain power.
Your lack of data (sensory input) does have a negative impact on your processing power, though, similar to muscle atrophy in a prolonged coma.
Not sure if you're serious or being facetious, or if you're just low IQ. The point is literally this discussion.
What's "biologically mature" though?
"growth in the pelvis of males may continue until 21 of age, and females may complete pelvic growth even later"
AOC 22 because pelvis has to be at max size before sex is okay?
That's what this leads to unless you want to explain why to draw the line X degrees earlier but not Y degrees earlier.
It doesn't take a Da Vinci to see that pelvic growth isn't the determinant for suitability for sexual activity. Puberty happens well before you're body finishes growing.
I've already said that it's a combination of sexual and cognitive development and your trying to pigeonhole my point by bringing up maximal pelvic growth as a counter argument?
Bruh.... You're trying really hard to justify being a pedofag.
Last edited:
Lmao made me chuckle
L
Muh pedo
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CANNOT POST LOLI, YOU SICKO. THINK OF THE CHILDREN.
you are ER
As a concept, women are some of the most vile things on a notably vile planet.
B
Pedos coming out of the woodwork for this one.
I'd rather be executed than LTR a foid that I did not personally deflower.
social media ruined it all
I’m not a pedo, he has a point. Foids are most fertile when they’re around 13 & 14 so why would men not be more attracted to that? People like you think that being attracted to anything other than 21 y/o roast beef with 100’s of miles of chad dick on their resume already is bad.
T
this is actually funny because i only know stupid women. maybe one of them was smart. apart from that, all stupid. good at nothing. lifestyle is drinking and trying to get a bf, then child.theyre all worthless man, zero passions, zero brain and dreams
99% of women i know are the same, zero hobbies and interests, drink till school ends, then get any job and get pregnant with boyfriend asap so she can quit the job, did I mention benefits?
yep, all the women i know prefer to get a child and hop on child benefits that you pay taxes for. they dont want to make good carried and earn good money, or save money so she doesnt have to get benefits. Lulz
B
Some of you guys are so fucking dumb it hurts.
I didn't say that anywhere. But please, continue being retarded, don't let me stop you.
I
Whatever, I would still get a girlfriend if I could.
Passing calculus would be an acceptable prereq for a sex license assuming you could stop foids from cheating on it.
It's more important that they have experience exercising it, rather than the hypothetical capability.
I didn't assume that: I said you sounded like you were approaching it. If you take an approach of "wait til parts stop growing" you have to explain why some parts and not all parts.
If you mean something else then you need to be more specific to be understood, otherwise people will just guess as best they can.
Please show me evidence it is false.
Do you disagree with everything written in https://www.questia.com/magazine/1G1-58037920/are-babies-smarter-than-adults for example?
Are you sure it's neurons alone? What about connections/synapses per neuron? That goes down as one ages.
Er no, the reason you would want to set standards in foid partner IQ is not to have a discussion with me, I'm sure.
However our discussion is examining that point and reasons surrounding it.
I know that, you were differentiating pubescent 10yos and pubescent 16yos, and I'm saying that if you are going to set standards for things based on some kind of milestone criteria, one might randomly fixate on pelvic fusion rather than prefrontal cortex completion, both of which usually happen after 16 when someone is even more mature, so why set it earlier at 16?
Maximum pelvic growth would make sense regarding safe child delivery, which is a concern that is brought up about young mothers.
Wouldn't you consider that part of sexual development?
Ad hom detracts from argument, if you want to fuck 16 year old mid-pubescents and not 10 year old mid-pubescents that's fine, and neither of them being pedophilia shouldn't stop you from making moral arguments regarding the differences.
Dude, please no
Do you recall any research on that? I did some random googling and found an image suggesting otherwise.
I think it makes sense to be more attracted to women PRIOR to their peak of fertility because in a perfect romantic world, you wouldn't necessarily be trying to have kids immediately upon meeting a woman. You'd want to spend a few years taking her on strolls through the local orchards.
Last edited:
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
