Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Why hardmaxxing fails

Sir Silentium

Sir Silentium

π•―π–Šπ–šπ–˜ π–π–šπ–‘π–™ †
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Joined
Jan 8, 2025
Posts
11,421
Online time
7d 5h
Why do so many, if not the majority, of hardmaxxes fail?
Because surgeries should stem around phenotype congruency, in which many don't. If you copy the attractive feature of one phenotype, it will not harmonise with the other. Sure some are applicable cross-phenotypes, but many aren't.

Especially for people consuming blackpill content, wanting someone else's looks differentiating to that of their natural phenotype - so they end up getting surgery to make themselves look like the other person, which leads to looking uncanny and even worse off than before. They'll look at the PSL ratios that are not phenotypically adjusted. Your phenotype determines the general range your ratios can be in. Watching this content leads people to overly push for ultra specific bone structure and eye shapes, that would look unnatural/uncanny on them.
E.g if an Asian were to get the "attractive" blue eyes, then he would look uncanny, as only the brown eyes are his phenotype.

Biologically we are attracted to people that look natural, not uncanny (with PSL type looks), so if you don't look natural, you won't be desirable. Instead for people being stupid enough to even consider hardmaxxing, they should at least look up pictures of their phenotype, and see what they could improve to still look "natural" - which is another post on it's own as it is rare to look better after modern day hardmaxxing.
If you don't look natural after hardmaxxing aka phenotypically congruent, you would have done yourself a disservice.


Michael Jackson is a great example of this. At first he stays somewhat relative to his phenotype, but then eventually leads away to wanting even more white looking characteristics, leading to an uncanny look.
1780871572349


Or this guy, getting strong jaw/eye hardmaxxes to that which is clearly completely different to his phenotype.
1780871777004



Genetics always wins

@Lo3e @InvoluntaryChigga @whrt
 
Michael Jackson is a great example of this. At first he stays somewhat relative to his phenotype, but then eventually leads away to wanting even more white looking characteristics, leading to an uncanny look.
he had vitiligo.
 
Why do so many, if not the majority, of hardmaxxes fail?
Because surgeries should stem around phenotype congruency, in which many don't. If you copy the attractive feature of one phenotype, it will not harmonise with the other. Sure some are applicable cross-phenotypes, but many aren't.

Especially for people consuming blackpill content, wanting someone else's looks differentiating to that of their natural phenotype - so they end up getting surgery to make themselves look like the other person, which leads to looking uncanny and even worse off than before. They'll look at the PSL ratios that are not phenotypically adjusted. Your phenotype determines the general range your ratios can be in. Watching this content leads people to overly push for ultra specific bone structure and eye shapes, that would look unnatural/uncanny on them.
E.g if an Asian were to get the "attractive" blue eyes, then he would look uncanny, as only the brown eyes are his phenotype.

Biologically we are attracted to people that look natural, not uncanny (with PSL type looks), so if you don't look natural, you won't be desirable. Instead for people being stupid enough to even consider hardmaxxing, they should at least look up pictures of their phenotype, and see what they could improve to still look "natural" - which is another post on it's own as it is rare to look better after modern day hardmaxxing.
If you don't look natural after hardmaxxing aka phenotypically congruent, you would have done yourself a disservice.


Michael Jackson is a great example of this. At first he stays somewhat relative to his phenotype, but then eventually leads away to wanting even more white looking characteristics, leading to an uncanny look.
View attachment 1744043

Or this guy, getting strong jaw/eye hardmaxxes to that which is clearly completely different to his phenotype.
View attachment 1744044


Genetics always wins

@Lo3e @InvoluntaryChigga @whrt
What is hardmaxxing?
 
You lose harmony when you hardmax, you basically trade your facial harmony for a top tier feature, or an other example is when a manlet does limb lengthening surgery and he’ll have t-Rex arms afterwards, but tbh even if the manlet had a high ape index and he added that extra few inches of height, something will still look off because of his now very long legs, so unless you add torso length it’ll always look uncanny.
 
surgery is too scary for me to ever consider, also its pointless and cucked to spend that much for a chance to get into a realationship just for it to make you miserable because foids are evil whores
 
Facial harmony is cope. You just have to make sure your hardmaxx fits your ratios and masculine-youthful balance
 
You lose harmony when you hardmax, you basically trade your facial harmony for a top tier feature, or an other example is when a manlet does limb lengthening surgery and he’ll have t-Rex arms afterwards, but tbh even if the manlet had a high ape index and he added that extra few inches of height, something will still look off because of his now very long legs, so unless you add torso length it’ll always look uncanny.
Yes, proportions will be destroyed. Further looking unnatural/uncanny
 
surgery is too scary for me to ever consider, also its pointless and cucked to spend that much for a chance to get into a realationship just for it to make you miserable because foids are evil whores
Yep. It's not like surgery guarantee us a good looking women at all, in fact I'd say the vast majorities of surgeries barely make a noticeable difference - and would not have been worth it in the first place.
 
Facial harmony is cope. You just have to make sure your hardmaxx fits your ratios and masculine-youthful balance
Facial harmony = attraction.
Features must be balanced and proportionate relative to each other.

1780875758495

^ This is key, and without it you will not look very attractive
 
BGM ascended imo
 
Facial harmony = attraction.
Features must be balanced and proportionate relative to each other.

View attachment 1744076
^ This is key, and without it you will not look very attractive
This is just ratios. β€œFacial harmony” is an amorphous term used by newgen BPers that means a whole lot of nothing. Like I’ve seen these niggas say supermodels like Sean O Pry or Elias De Poot β€œdon’t have facial harmony”
 
Why do so many, if not the majority, of hardmaxxes fail?
Because surgeries should stem around phenotype congruency, in which many don't. If you copy the attractive feature of one phenotype, it will not harmonise with the other. Sure some are applicable cross-phenotypes, but many aren't.

Especially for people consuming blackpill content, wanting someone else's looks differentiating to that of their natural phenotype - so they end up getting surgery to make themselves look like the other person, which leads to looking uncanny and even worse off than before. They'll look at the PSL ratios that are not phenotypically adjusted. Your phenotype determines the general range your ratios can be in. Watching this content leads people to overly push for ultra specific bone structure and eye shapes, that would look unnatural/uncanny on them.
E.g if an Asian were to get the "attractive" blue eyes, then he would look uncanny, as only the brown eyes are his phenotype.

Biologically we are attracted to people that look natural, not uncanny (with PSL type looks), so if you don't look natural, you won't be desirable. Instead for people being stupid enough to even consider hardmaxxing, they should at least look up pictures of their phenotype, and see what they could improve to still look "natural" - which is another post on it's own as it is rare to look better after modern day hardmaxxing.
If you don't look natural after hardmaxxing aka phenotypically congruent, you would have done yourself a disservice.


Michael Jackson is a great example of this. At first he stays somewhat relative to his phenotype, but then eventually leads away to wanting even more white looking characteristics, leading to an uncanny look.
View attachment 1744043

Or this guy, getting strong jaw/eye hardmaxxes to that which is clearly completely different to his phenotype.
View attachment 1744044


Genetics always wins

@Lo3e @InvoluntaryChigga @whrt
truth nuke, your takes truly never fail, but asians can get blue eyes naturally, they look striking on them because of contrast but it's very rare for it to happen
 
truth nuke, your takes truly never fail, but asians can get blue eyes naturally, they look striking on them because of contrast but it's very rare for it to happen
Really? Ah I looked it up and it's true, although only really in South and Central Asia - as some still carry the recessive allele from Europeans mixing.
And of course for the recessive allele to appear in the offspring, both parents need to be carrying it - and only then there is a 25% chance the child gets it (as a recessive gene).
That's pretty cool, I'd love to see a blue eyed Asian.

But thank you, and yes back to my point the example with the Asians having different coloured eyes was a poor choice, a better example could have been blonde hair on a black person.
 
Why do so many, if not the majority, of hardmaxxes fail?
Because surgeries should stem around phenotype congruency, in which many don't. If you copy the attractive feature of one phenotype, it will not harmonise with the other. Sure some are applicable cross-phenotypes, but many aren't.

Especially for people consuming blackpill content, wanting someone else's looks differentiating to that of their natural phenotype - so they end up getting surgery to make themselves look like the other person, which leads to looking uncanny and even worse off than before. They'll look at the PSL ratios that are not phenotypically adjusted. Your phenotype determines the general range your ratios can be in. Watching this content leads people to overly push for ultra specific bone structure and eye shapes, that would look unnatural/uncanny on them.
E.g if an Asian were to get the "attractive" blue eyes, then he would look uncanny, as only the brown eyes are his phenotype.

Biologically we are attracted to people that look natural, not uncanny (with PSL type looks), so if you don't look natural, you won't be desirable. Instead for people being stupid enough to even consider hardmaxxing, they should at least look up pictures of their phenotype, and see what they could improve to still look "natural" - which is another post on it's own as it is rare to look better after modern day hardmaxxing.
If you don't look natural after hardmaxxing aka phenotypically congruent, you would have done yourself a disservice.


Michael Jackson is a great example of this. At first he stays somewhat relative to his phenotype, but then eventually leads away to wanting even more white looking characteristics, leading to an uncanny look.
View attachment 1744043

Or this guy, getting strong jaw/eye hardmaxxes to that which is clearly completely different to his phenotype.
View attachment 1744044


Genetics always wins

@Lo3e @InvoluntaryChigga @whrt
Cause you can't fix your genetics
 
Hardm
Why do so many, if not the majority, of hardmaxxes fail?
Because surgeries should stem around phenotype congruency, in which many don't. If you copy the attractive feature of one phenotype, it will not harmonise with the other. Sure some are applicable cross-phenotypes, but many aren't.

Especially for people consuming blackpill content, wanting someone else's looks differentiating to that of their natural phenotype - so they end up getting surgery to make themselves look like the other person, which leads to looking uncanny and even worse off than before. They'll look at the PSL ratios that are not phenotypically adjusted. Your phenotype determines the general range your ratios can be in. Watching this content leads people to overly push for ultra specific bone structure and eye shapes, that would look unnatural/uncanny on them.
E.g if an Asian were to get the "attractive" blue eyes, then he would look uncanny, as only the brown eyes are his phenotype.

Biologically we are attracted to people that look natural, not uncanny (with PSL type looks), so if you don't look natural, you won't be desirable. Instead for people being stupid enough to even consider hardmaxxing, they should at least look up pictures of their phenotype, and see what they could improve to still look "natural" - which is another post on it's own as it is rare to look better after modern day hardmaxxing.
If you don't look natural after hardmaxxing aka phenotypically congruent, you would have done yourself a disservice.


Michael Jackson is a great example of this. At first he stays somewhat relative to his phenotype, but then eventually leads away to wanting even more white looking characteristics, leading to an uncanny look.
View attachment 1744043

Or this guy, getting strong jaw/eye hardmaxxes to that which is clearly completely different to his phenotype.
View attachment 1744044


Genetics always wins

@Lo3e @InvoluntaryChigga @whrt
Hardmaxxing usually make you look even worse.
 
Hardm

Hardmaxxing usually make you look even worse.
Yes I agree, and gives off more of an unnatural look that accounts for a large part
 
Yes I agree, and gives off more of an unnatural look that accounts for a large part
People who get legs surgery are retards, they literally die in 10 years.
 
People who get legs surgery are retards, they literally die in 10 years.
Yes I agree. I'm interested on your reasoning behind this claim
 

Similar threads

Sir Silentium
Replies
26
Views
1K
Sir Silentium
Sir Silentium
Sir Silentium
Replies
3
Views
407
Lo3e
Lo3e
Sir Silentium
Replies
86
Views
2K
nihilum
nihilum
AsiaCel
Replies
33
Views
1K
ColderManTruce
ColderManTruce
Michael's Cross
Replies
4
Views
420
anon65
anon65

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top