Sir Silentium
π―πππ ππππ β
β
β
β
β
β
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2025
- Posts
- 11,421
- Online time
- 7d 5h
Why do so many, if not the majority, of hardmaxxes fail?
Because surgeries should stem around phenotype congruency, in which many don't. If you copy the attractive feature of one phenotype, it will not harmonise with the other. Sure some are applicable cross-phenotypes, but many aren't.
Especially for people consuming blackpill content, wanting someone else's looks differentiating to that of their natural phenotype - so they end up getting surgery to make themselves look like the other person, which leads to looking uncanny and even worse off than before. They'll look at the PSL ratios that are not phenotypically adjusted. Your phenotype determines the general range your ratios can be in. Watching this content leads people to overly push for ultra specific bone structure and eye shapes, that would look unnatural/uncanny on them.
E.g if an Asian were to get the "attractive" blue eyes, then he would look uncanny, as only the brown eyes are his phenotype.
Biologically we are attracted to people that look natural, not uncanny (with PSL type looks), so if you don't look natural, you won't be desirable. Instead for people being stupid enough to even consider hardmaxxing, they should at least look up pictures of their phenotype, and see what they could improve to still look "natural" - which is another post on it's own as it is rare to look better after modern day hardmaxxing.
If you don't look natural after hardmaxxing aka phenotypically congruent, you would have done yourself a disservice.
Michael Jackson is a great example of this. At first he stays somewhat relative to his phenotype, but then eventually leads away to wanting even more white looking characteristics, leading to an uncanny look.
Or this guy, getting strong jaw/eye hardmaxxes to that which is clearly completely different to his phenotype.
Genetics always wins
@Lo3e @InvoluntaryChigga @whrt
Because surgeries should stem around phenotype congruency, in which many don't. If you copy the attractive feature of one phenotype, it will not harmonise with the other. Sure some are applicable cross-phenotypes, but many aren't.
Especially for people consuming blackpill content, wanting someone else's looks differentiating to that of their natural phenotype - so they end up getting surgery to make themselves look like the other person, which leads to looking uncanny and even worse off than before. They'll look at the PSL ratios that are not phenotypically adjusted. Your phenotype determines the general range your ratios can be in. Watching this content leads people to overly push for ultra specific bone structure and eye shapes, that would look unnatural/uncanny on them.
E.g if an Asian were to get the "attractive" blue eyes, then he would look uncanny, as only the brown eyes are his phenotype.
Biologically we are attracted to people that look natural, not uncanny (with PSL type looks), so if you don't look natural, you won't be desirable. Instead for people being stupid enough to even consider hardmaxxing, they should at least look up pictures of their phenotype, and see what they could improve to still look "natural" - which is another post on it's own as it is rare to look better after modern day hardmaxxing.
If you don't look natural after hardmaxxing aka phenotypically congruent, you would have done yourself a disservice.
Michael Jackson is a great example of this. At first he stays somewhat relative to his phenotype, but then eventually leads away to wanting even more white looking characteristics, leading to an uncanny look.
Or this guy, getting strong jaw/eye hardmaxxes to that which is clearly completely different to his phenotype.
Genetics always wins
@Lo3e @InvoluntaryChigga @whrt





