(Just honestly asking, not condoning any crimes or anything).
Even if one of us were to play the textbook "manipulative pedo" feminists stereotype and try to get a teenage foid to have sex with us in exchange for something, for instance, why does it matter if young Chad has a MUCH more effective way of manipulating her, which is his looks, and he can use it freely with no laws or anything in his way?
Girls are slaves to Chad and can't stop themselves from fucking them no matter how abusive, violent, dangerous, disrespectful, etc, they are, so why does their consent even matter?
It's crystal clear that women are child-like and can't control themselves, they can't make a reasonable, rational, adult decision, they're slaves to their tingles for Chad, I really don't get it why cucks are in favor of women being free when 1. it doesn't benefit non-Chad men (themselves) AT ALL 2. it's not the moral thing to do according to any major religion and 3. women clearly can't put their freedom to good use and end up abused, broken, unfulfilled and bitter themselves after being used as cumrags by uncommitted abusive Chads.
Not to mention single motherhood, abortions, and all the terrible things for children that abound in any society where women are uncontrolled.
On a related note, this is another way in which agecuckoldry (hurr durr older men can't lust over teen girls) is a feminist thing. Being an agecuck implies that one thinks there's a point past which women are able to make good, rational, sensible decisions themselves, independently from patriarchal control. When reality clearly proves the contrary. There's no such point at all. Agecuckoldry= feminist, bluepilled on female nature view.
Even if one of us were to play the textbook "manipulative pedo" feminists stereotype and try to get a teenage foid to have sex with us in exchange for something, for instance, why does it matter if young Chad has a MUCH more effective way of manipulating her, which is his looks, and he can use it freely with no laws or anything in his way?
Girls are slaves to Chad and can't stop themselves from fucking them no matter how abusive, violent, dangerous, disrespectful, etc, they are, so why does their consent even matter?
It's crystal clear that women are child-like and can't control themselves, they can't make a reasonable, rational, adult decision, they're slaves to their tingles for Chad, I really don't get it why cucks are in favor of women being free when 1. it doesn't benefit non-Chad men (themselves) AT ALL 2. it's not the moral thing to do according to any major religion and 3. women clearly can't put their freedom to good use and end up abused, broken, unfulfilled and bitter themselves after being used as cumrags by uncommitted abusive Chads.
Not to mention single motherhood, abortions, and all the terrible things for children that abound in any society where women are uncontrolled.
On a related note, this is another way in which agecuckoldry (hurr durr older men can't lust over teen girls) is a feminist thing. Being an agecuck implies that one thinks there's a point past which women are able to make good, rational, sensible decisions themselves, independently from patriarchal control. When reality clearly proves the contrary. There's no such point at all. Agecuckoldry= feminist, bluepilled on female nature view.
Last edited:
