Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL Most women are “pick mes” despite complaining about them

lyrootics

lyrootics

Greycel
Joined
Feb 22, 2025
Posts
1
Online time
37m 52s
Most women will never realize it.



I noticed that women will throw around that word a lot even with no apparent reasoning. A big reason is simply just having opposite interests, interests that go out of the “gender norm”. Or dressing outside of the norm, acting “out of the norm”. None of these things imply being a pick me. Every human being is different and we exist outside of these social structures.



Women also might feel in competition with “tomboys” because they get more positive male attention. A lot of tomboys interests (although each tomboy is complex) align within male gender norms (enjoying sports, gaming, ect) and men feel like this woman would relate to them more since they have similar thought processes and interests making a relationship with them more attractive. A better potential suitor.



When a woman makes a “dark humour” joke and jokes about things out of the norm (i:e racist jokes) she will be ridiculed by women and called a “attention seeker”. But first of all, why has dark humour been associated with men and considered controversial for women? Well, social conditioning is probably the bigger explanation. (Throughout history and still to this day men are often given more social permission to be provocative, rude, or “edgy,” while women are more often punished for violating warmth, politeness, or respectability expectations. (I:e https://business.missouri.edu/sites...ake_and_Robert_JMP.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com)


This is seen even with children, boys and girls expectations are different, and mothers in particular are more critical of daughters (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/oct/06/most-mums-favour-sons-survey)

But there is also a biological aspect of this, women compared to men score highly on agreeable scores partly because women are more vulnerable and this has been used as a survival strategy against threats (https://taylorlab.psych.ucla.edu/wp...es-to-stress-in-females_tend-and-befriend.pdf)

(Now this is not to defend those cringe com girls, “trad wives” and women who larp in blackpill communities to who clearly fish for attention and confuse them for women who are actually being themselves.)

This also goes back to whenever a woman critiques another woman, does not agree with them or as they say be a “girls girl” they immediately are casted out of the “woman hood” even tho the woman hood is simply about being able to attract Chad and center him for the rest of your life.

Moving on, this is just a huge social network of women judging other women who behave out of the norm but at the same time is also competing with them. For Chad.

Now let’s get to the actual part

Women want Chad and they will do absolutely anything for Chad. There are countless stories of women themselves talking about how women choose “bad boys” and completely obsess over a guy (Chad) to the point they loose their identities, it’s women who become more obsessed in relationships not the other way around. Women will even plot on other women who are married or in a relationship with him to destroy that relationship even if it deeply hurts her female counterpart if the guy is attractive enough. Women will excuse all of chads bad actions, get abused by him and pumped and dumped. Women have no sense of morality when it comes to dealing with an attractive guy, they will do anything to get him. Including betraying their friends and family which the same guys would never do for them. It doesn’t matter in her brain anyway. They center him and only him.

Women’s “intuition” although water, is not real. Women do not even have actual opinions or a sense of morality that they stand by, they change based off the guy she’s with. Women will talk about “feminism” which only applies to less attractive guys, but when it’s a chad they will do anything he says and leave behind their old thinking process.

I do start to notice that other women (particularly in the radical feminism space) call out women like this. Even tho these radical feminists can come to a conscious, a lot of them still do not follow by what they say. Still a few that do that I can somewhat appreciate.
 
they use pickme the way they use incel
 
Women want Chad and they will do absolutely anything for Chad. There are countless stories of women themselves talking about how women choose “bad boys” and completely obsess over a guy (Chad) to the point they loose their identities, it’s women who become more obsessed in relationships not the other way around. Women will even plot on other women who are married or in a relationship with him to destroy that relationship even if it deeply hurts her female counterpart if the guy is attractive enough. Women will excuse all of chads bad actions, get abused by him and pumped and dumped. Women have no sense of morality when it comes to dealing with an attractive guy, they will do anything to get him. Including betraying their friends and family which the same guys would never do for them. It doesn’t matter in her brain anyway. They center him and only him.

Women’s “intuition” although water, is not real. Women do not even have actual opinions or a sense of morality that they stand by, they change based off the guy she’s with. Women will talk about “feminism” which only applies to less attractive guys, but when it’s a chad they will do anything he says and leave behind their old thinking process.
you're right it's like a reverse of the usual thing where the bottom 80% of men are invisible to women.
now they see the bottom 80% of men when it comes to disparaging their preferences for a nice wife, a "pickme"
but they can't see the top 20% of men when it comes to bending over for them in every way
 
Most women will never realize it.



I noticed that women will throw around that word a lot even with no apparent reasoning. A big reason is simply just having opposite interests, interests that go out of the “gender norm”. Or dressing outside of the norm, acting “out of the norm”. None of these things imply being a pick me. Every human being is different and we exist outside of these social structures.



Women also might feel in competition with “tomboys” because they get more positive male attention. A lot of tomboys interests (although each tomboy is complex) align within male gender norms (enjoying sports, gaming, ect) and men feel like this woman would relate to them more since they have similar thought processes and interests making a relationship with them more attractive. A better potential suitor.



When a woman makes a “dark humour” joke and jokes about things out of the norm (i:e racist jokes) she will be ridiculed by women and called a “attention seeker”. But first of all, why has dark humour been associated with men and considered controversial for women? Well, social conditioning is probably the bigger explanation. (Throughout history and still to this day men are often given more social permission to be provocative, rude, or “edgy,” while women are more often punished for violating warmth, politeness, or respectability expectations. (I:e https://business.missouri.edu/sites...ake_and_Robert_JMP.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com)


This is seen even with children, boys and girls expectations are different, and mothers in particular are more critical of daughters (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/oct/06/most-mums-favour-sons-survey)

But there is also a biological aspect of this, women compared to men score highly on agreeable scores partly because women are more vulnerable and this has been used as a survival strategy against threats (https://taylorlab.psych.ucla.edu/wp...es-to-stress-in-females_tend-and-befriend.pdf)

(Now this is not to defend those cringe com girls, “trad wives” and women who larp in blackpill communities to who clearly fish for attention and confuse them for women who are actually being themselves.)

This also goes back to whenever a woman critiques another woman, does not agree with them or as they say be a “girls girl” they immediately are casted out of the “woman hood” even tho the woman hood is simply about being able to attract Chad and center him for the rest of your life.

Moving on, this is just a huge social network of women judging other women who behave out of the norm but at the same time is also competing with them. For Chad.

Now let’s get to the actual part

Women want Chad and they will do absolutely anything for Chad. There are countless stories of women themselves talking about how women choose “bad boys” and completely obsess over a guy (Chad) to the point they loose their identities, it’s women who become more obsessed in relationships not the other way around. Women will even plot on other women who are married or in a relationship with him to destroy that relationship even if it deeply hurts her female counterpart if the guy is attractive enough. Women will excuse all of chads bad actions, get abused by him and pumped and dumped. Women have no sense of morality when it comes to dealing with an attractive guy, they will do anything to get him. Including betraying their friends and family which the same guys would never do for them. It doesn’t matter in her brain anyway. They center him and only him.

Women’s “intuition” although water, is not real. Women do not even have actual opinions or a sense of morality that they stand by, they change based off the guy she’s with. Women will talk about “feminism” which only applies to less attractive guys, but when it’s a chad they will do anything he says and leave behind their old thinking process.

I do start to notice that other women (particularly in the radical feminism space) call out women like this. Even tho these radical feminists can come to a conscious, a lot of them still do not follow by what they say. Still a few that do that I can somewhat appreciate.
Women call out other women for being pick me towards men even though they themselves and 99% of women in general are pick mes for women so how is that any better? Your still being a pick me but just for the other side
 
Female nature can be especially disastrous in the sense that they cannot and will not correlate their attraction to morality.
They can acknowledge someone doing something bad, sure, but if that *man* happens to be extremely attractive their nature literally blocks the negative feelings they have over that action having been done, all for the tiny chance that he will pick her to breed in the sea of women he can pick from.
Everyone has seen the tinder experiments of dudes posing as chads on dating sites and despite claiming to have committed heinous crimes in the past, still gets tens of matches daily.

I'm not saying this to be misogynistic either. I believe that men most definitely would look past certain heinous crimes that a woman had committed if it would give them a chance of dating her. It's just that the overwhelmingly vast majority of crimes (especially violent ones) are committed by men, so this rarely ever happens.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top