Why are people adverse to the idea of having an elite class rule over their country? The unwashed masses don't deserve power

[Pikacel]

Now we see what's going on in Iran it's time we learn our lesson and give our rulers a break. I understand dictatorships and colonialism = le bad but think about it. Only 200-300 years ago, Europeans were facing the same issues that us non-whites are facing now. Brutal revolutions, corruption, poverty, civil war etc.

The main solution that allowed them to develop was the concept of an enlightened Germanic monarchy and aristocracy. By selecting only the finest most educated people of high birth to have power they were able to guide their states towards prosperity, education, security and industry. This is what allowed the Russian Empire to grow and prosper until Jewish Bolsheviks gave power to the unwashed Asiatic and Untermensch masses. Likewise, Poland and Czechs have much to owe from being ruled and developed by Germanic enlightened ruler such as the Prussian elite class, Austrian and Russian aristocracy as did Serbia from Austrian Germanic governance (There's no way Nikola Tesla could have flourished under a typical Orthodox despotism).

Even China, Korea and other Ricecels benefited from being dragged out of despotism, poverty and ignorance by the Japanese high culture.

IMO we need to drop this obsession we have with deposing 'dictatorships' (tbh dictators are figureheads at best) and 'liberal democracy', our people simply aren't high IQ or educated enough to know what's best for them and certain races are just better off being governed by betters. Like what does some illiterate shitskin peasant or desert camel herder need democracy and liberal rights for XDDDDDDDD

Kurdish people for example are way better off being ruled by Persian/Turk/Arab, an independent Kurdistan would collapse almost immediately. Kurds are complete animals and can't be trusted with any form of power. They must be domesticated and herded like cattle by superior peoples

Whenever the people gain power you end up with clusterfuck like Iraq, Somalia, Libya, Sudan etc. Foreign powers funding 10 different rebel groups, every ethnicity wants to rule, nobody wants to compromise with each other, ISIS knockoffs running wild. Just a complete clusterfuck. Then the people start praying to God for another dictator. But didn't you want freedom and democracy in the first place?

@retributor @Zeref @Anarcho Nihilist @Zer0/∞ @Macaca nigra @fokusin

 

[Hoodpreet]

Based. We shitnics are if anything more in need of a dictatorship than whites considering the sheer level of class stratification in the IQ distributions of our gene pools

 

[Macaca nigra]

Even man who took down Saddam statue regrets saying now they are ruled by 1000 corrupt Saddams.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9wC6W7EJpg

 

[fatass30000]

you say this until one of the dictators ends up like kim jong un and takes all your copes away and your only option is to stare at a wall with your dick in your hand.

 

[fokusin]

Most people in general were illiterate back then so it made sense to have an elite class rule because they were educated

 

[Pikacel]

you say this until one of the dictators ends up like kim jong un and takes all your copes away and your only option is to stare at a wall with your dick in your hand.

It’s not that bad tbh

A neglectful democracy would still have the same issues, shit economy, famine, exploitation etc. Dictatorship at least adds an entertaining fat guy to the mix

 

[Pikacel]

Most people in general were illiterate back then so it made sense to have an elite class rule because they were educated

Yep and a lot of developing countries still have like illiterate country bumpkins and people forced into the workforce after primary education

 

[Macaca nigra]

I never seen a successful democracy in any ethnic countries, only corruption, civil war, and poor economy. When I see dictatorship countries they are stable and safer.

 

[Rapemaxxer]

From what I have seen, it's only ethnics who benefit from this type of oligarchy where all the power is concentrated in the hands of an elite few. Whites are sufficiently high trust enough to pull off liberal democracy. But just because something works for whites doesn't mean it would work the same for other races. I think each race has its own civilizational character.

For example, the ancient system in India where Brahmins held all the power, Kshatriyas implemented the laws by force and the rest of the castes followed them, works very well for curries. India is fundamentally meant to be an oligarchy. It's truly unfortunate curries have fallen prey to globohomo and heedlessly adopted western style democracy.

 

[Zeref]

Now we see what's going on in Iran it's time we learn our lesson and give our rulers a break. I understand dictatorships and colonialism = le bad but think about it. Only 200-300 years ago, Europeans were facing the same issues that us non-whites are facing now. Brutal revolutions, corruption, poverty, civil war etc.

The main solution that allowed them to develop was the concept of an enlightened Germanic monarchy and aristocracy. By selecting only the finest most educated people of high birth to have power they were able to guide their states towards prosperity, education, security and industry. This is what allowed the Russian Empire to grow and prosper until Jewish Bolsheviks gave power to the unwashed Asiatic and Untermensch masses. Likewise, Poland and Czechs have much to owe from being ruled and developed by Germanic enlightened ruler such as the Prussian elite class, Austrian and Russian aristocracy as did Serbia from Austrian Germanic governance (There's no way Nikola Tesla could have flourished under a typical Orthodox despotism).

Even China, Korea and other Ricecels benefited from being dragged out of despotism, poverty and ignorance by the Japanese high culture.

IMO we need to drop this obsession we have with deposing 'dictatorships' (tbh dictators are figureheads at best) and 'liberal democracy', our people simply aren't high IQ or educated enough to know what's best for them and certain races are just better off being governed by betters. Like what does some illiterate shitskin peasant or desert camel herder need democracy and liberal rights for XDDDDDDDD

Kurdish people for example are way better off being ruled by Persian/Turk/Arab, an independent Kurdistan would collapse almost immediately. Kurds are complete animals and can't be trusted with any form of power. They must be domesticated and herded like cattle by superior peoples

Whenever the people gain power you end up with clusterfuck like Iraq, Somalia, Libya, Sudan etc. Foreign powers funding 10 different rebel groups, every ethnicity wants to rule, nobody wants to compromise with each other, ISIS knockoffs running wild. Just a complete clusterfuck. Then the people start praying to God for another dictator. But didn't you want freedom and democracy in the first place?

@retributor @Zeref @Anarcho Nihilist @Zer0/∞ @Macaca nigra @fokusin

It's called benovelant dictatorship, the problem lies in who would be the successor after the dictator dies. Nothing guarantees another benovelant dictator

 

[Zeref]

I think it would be better if we have one or two benovelant dictators who first civilize a population and than democratize the institutions. But again nothing guarantees another power hungry tryrant comes to power.

 

[retributor]

Most people today were born to the slave class because of the explosion in need for labour after the industrial revolution.

 

[Zer0/∞]

you say this until one of the dictators ends up like kim jong un and takes all your copes away and your only option is to stare at a wall with your dick in your hand.

Stop slandering Kim Jong Un, 99% of “facts” about North Korea is paid propaganda by the South.

 

[Defetivecuckachu]

I expected to cringe hard but you make a good point.

I've watched my generally left-of-centre white Anglo country get more and more left, and more and more dumbed down over the last 20 years, by libtard morons who think fighting homophobia and racism are the most important things in the world, and we should just bankrupt the country trying to do that even harder than we did it last year. And that's just the general voting public! The politicians are even worse.

I'd resent being ruled by some kind of untouchable czar but the country would probably better off, provided the czar wasn't just another libtard...

 

[VanGobbel]

every country should implement changes and progress in their own pace. No need to exactly copy other countries.

 

[Anarcho Nihilist]

Now we see what's going on in Iran it's time we learn our lesson and give our rulers a break. I understand dictatorships and colonialism = le bad but think about it. Only 200-300 years ago, Europeans were facing the same issues that us non-whites are facing now. Brutal revolutions, corruption, poverty, civil war etc.

The main solution that allowed them to develop was the concept of an enlightened Germanic monarchy and aristocracy. By selecting only the finest most educated people of high birth to have power they were able to guide their states towards prosperity, education, security and industry. This is what allowed the Russian Empire to grow and prosper until Jewish Bolsheviks gave power to the unwashed Asiatic and Untermensch masses. Likewise, Poland and Czechs have much to owe from being ruled and developed by Germanic enlightened ruler such as the Prussian elite class, Austrian and Russian aristocracy as did Serbia from Austrian Germanic governance (There's no way Nikola Tesla could have flourished under a typical Orthodox despotism).

Even China, Korea and other Ricecels benefited from being dragged out of despotism, poverty and ignorance by the Japanese high culture.

IMO we need to drop this obsession we have with deposing 'dictatorships' (tbh dictators are figureheads at best) and 'liberal democracy', our people simply aren't high IQ or educated enough to know what's best for them and certain races are just better off being governed by betters. Like what does some illiterate shitskin peasant or desert camel herder need democracy and liberal rights for XDDDDDDDD

Kurdish people for example are way better off being ruled by Persian/Turk/Arab, an independent Kurdistan would collapse almost immediately. Kurds are complete animals and can't be trusted with any form of power. They must be domesticated and herded like cattle by superior peoples

Whenever the people gain power you end up with clusterfuck like Iraq, Somalia, Libya, Sudan etc. Foreign powers funding 10 different rebel groups, every ethnicity wants to rule, nobody wants to compromise with each other, ISIS knockoffs running wild. Just a complete clusterfuck. Then the people start praying to God for another dictator. But didn't you want freedom and democracy in the first place?

@retributor @Zeref @Anarcho Nihilist @Zer0/∞ @Macaca nigra @fokusin

Yes and no. The elite must take care of the quality of its population, at least by providing education and protecting it from degradation. Tsarist Russia is a relevant example. The elite of Tsarist Russia was quite morally corrupt, and decades of serfdom had corrupted the Russian nobility. Before Peter III and Catherine II, Russian nobles were forced to serve in the military or civil service, but Peter III and his wife, Catherine II, issued a decree granting nobles their freedom. Since 1762, nobles could not be physically punished, and they were free to choose whether to serve the king or simply live off their estates and serfs. This led to their corruption, and they lost interest in everything except balls, alcohol, whores, and occasionally dueling. Therefore, the active people were either foreigners who wanted to join the Russian service in order to advance faster, or commoners who wanted to reach the rank of colonel in the army or full state councilor in the civil service in order to obtain hereditary nobility for their children. Corruption and incompetence were total. The only enemy that Russia successfully defeated was the Turks, who were more backward.
But the most important thing is that the elite of the Russian Empire treated the majority of the population (the serfs) like cattle and kept them in slavery until 1861. This liberation was a result of the defeat in the Crimean War. However, they were simply freed and thrown into life without any land, which they had to buy on credit from the landowners for decades. They were not educated. Therefore, when the Bolsheviks came in October 1917 and started making promises of cosmic proportions, such as "Land to the Peasants, Factories to the Workers, and Peace to the Peoples," they simply believed them because they were uneducated. And yes, a few hundred Jewish propagandists and commissars were enough to deceive millions.
That's why the Bolsheviks won, because the majority of the population was made up of poor, stupid peasants who were so stupid that they bought into all the Bolsheviks' promises of an ideal state where those who were nothing would become everything. We will destroy the old world and build a new one on its ruins.