Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment Which status would you prefer women to have in society?

Which status would you prefer women to have in society?

  • Above - like things are now in most of the west

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    165
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
38,247
Child sounds fair enough, these whores shouldn't be allowed to get away with too much. There should be a framework for corporal punishment of women and situations in which you can honour kill them, but there should be protections against obvious abuse of the framework for no good reason.
 
Lower than dirt particles preferably.
 
All who choosed objects are low iq. Never in human history foids was treated as objects. The best variants - child/inferior adult. Whats how you build stable and strong society
 
Honestly equality don't exist in any foid mind, equality is a term that only males know of, most of our existence we fight for mating rights, our reproduction system is tremendous unequal and we just projected this sentiment to females.

We are the ones who gave them freedom and voting rights, we the beta males, a chad would have never done that because they already control woman in whatever way they want, we as fucking orbiters tried rightbuxxing to gain some appreciation again failing miserably.
 
Honestly equality don't exist in any foid mind, equality is a term that only males know of, most of our existence we fight for mating rights vs chads, our reproduction system is tremendous unequal and we just projected this sentiment to females.

We are the ones who gave them freedom and voting rights, we the beta males, a chad would have never done that because they already control woman in whatever way they want, we as fucking orbiters tried rightbuxxing to gain some appreciation again failing miserably.
I meant it as in equality before the law but truth is, true legal equality means they're above since they already have more value.

But what's your vote?
 
Obviously Object, I am not sure why you have made so many options.
 
All who choosed objects are low iq. Never in human history foids was treated as objects. The best variants - child/inferior adult. Whats how you build stable and strong society
Guess what? Feminazis consider men (sub8 men) as lower than objects, they just want to get rid of us from the face of the earth.
I always like to fill all 10 options when making a poll.
It's over for moreoptioncels.
 
Object, I just want them dead at this point.
 
Guess what? Feminazis consider men (sub8 men) as lower than objects, they just want to get rid of us from the face of the earth.
Guess what? They will be all dead during next 2-3 years after that because of collapse of society cuz they are worthless, so wish them luck. Child/inferior adult is the best choice for proper functioning society, not some angry vengeance sexual fantasy.

Also do you want you dauther to be an object to her husband in such a society?
 
They all have the mentality of a child.
 
@Robtical
@StormlitAqua
@Leucosticte
@knajjd
@lessthanhuman
@KilluminoidBR
@Zyros

Curious to see your votes.
 
Guess what? They will be all dead during next 2-3 years after that because of collapse of society cuz they are worthless, so wish them luck. Child/inferior adult is the best choice for proper functioning society, not some angry vengeance sexual fantasy.

Also do you want you dauther to be an object to her husband in such a society?
If I have a daughter then i wont have a daughter do you undERSTAND? Problem solved
Lower than dirt particles preferably.
Object, I just want them dead at this point.
 
@mylifeistrash
@Ledgemund

As well.
 
Between equal and equal adullt. Bit okay with slut shamung hut not with marriage. Just objective neutral treatment.

All the above options are major patriachy cope. Any below options are numale feminist cuck.
 
I meant it as in equality before the law but truth is, true legal equality means they're above since they already have more value.

But what's your vote?

my vote is to erase genders
 
my vote is to erase genders
Impossible. It will always be a reality and people will treat other people differently according to it.
 
YOUR VOTE WILL BE PUBLICLY VIEWABLE
 
YOUR VOTE WILL BE PUBLICLY VIEWABLE
Sorry, I think anonymous polls are kinda boring. You shouldn't be afraid to be hated by cucktears though, since we all already are.
 
Impossible. It will always be a reality and people will treat other people differently according to it.
humans should be devoid of sex and gender and reproduction is done by cloning or some shit.
Sorry, I think anonymous polls are kinda boring. You shouldn't be afraid to be hated by cucktears though, since we all already are.
don't worry bro.
 
Impossible. It will always be a reality and people will treat other people differently according to it.
I meant eugenics and reproduction through genetic engineering, there is no point in preserve a flawed/outdated system I didn't mean fucking LGBTeism.
 
@Mml explain your vote boyo.
 
Genetic engineering and the end of patriarchy, the patriarchy will not last for 1 million years we were just unlucky to be born at the end of it.
 
Like how they've treated us all our lives.
 
We had object, animal, child, inferior adult, most of these systems degenerated in what we have now, the only one that still exist is islam because they are using hardcore propaganda and brainwash like nazis did, this is basically blackpilling society everyday every few hours so males don't degenerate in white knights (incels) or polygamous degenerates (chads), foids are also brainwashed to go against their own hypergamy.
 
Only that will do away with the incels, patriarchy is just a way of working hard to have blunt sex with your wife after a while. Your vagina will also be wider after the children (several in the traditional) making your little dick no pleasure right.
 
Genetic engineering, genetic engineering, genetic engineering, genetic engineering .... !!! You do not even learn.
 
If I have a daughter then i wont have a daughter do you undERSTAND? Problem solved
:lul:
Between equal and equal adullt. Bit okay with slut shamung hut not with marriage. Just objective neutral treatment.

All the above options are major patriachy cope. Any below options are numale feminist cuck.
This
 
baby making or daycare and nothing else

women only have one job and they can't even do that right
 
I was going to say, "child," but the problem is they already are subconsciously considered that.

They're the ultimate protected class. They're never really held responsible for their actions. They get to be as emotional, etc. as they want, and it's just who they are, and it's all your fault. They have brains of mush but we pretend that what they have to say is profound, just like we do with children (which is utterly comical; children are what we USED TO BE, you fucking idiots. What could those little undeveloped retards know that a developed version of them wouldn't?).

So the problem is that we give them the same kind of laughable respect we give to children (and ought not to).

So I say, "animal." It has the capacity to feel pain, so we shouldn't physically harm it if it's not necessary. But we shouldn't pretend that it's human.
 
I don't care that much about having power over women. I'm way too emphatic for that honestly.
I'd say the ideal would be "Equal Adult", but "Inferior Adult" could also be an option in relatively extreme cases.
@Mml explain your vote boyo.
Obviously an undercover foid.
 
Last edited:
Thhey don´t deserve to be even objects tbh.
 
I wanted to say object but I can see that being problematic if children are involved. Like I wouldn't want my dad to be able to legally kill my mom. So I'll go with animal.
 
Between child and inferior adult, sometimes up to inferior adult depending on how high their iq is.
 
Object or child
 
Objects. Id buy a hot foid from a dealership and drive that shit till its dead :feelsokman:
 
Obviously Object, I am not sure why you have made so many options.
I choose animal, its the sweet spot, if a man tortures your future wife she isn't going to be mentally stable, also as an object they could fuck her if they wanted, so you end up with a used up foid anyways. Animal allows a father to discipline and own his daughter, but not brutalize her to the point of where it isn't even worth being with her (too much baggage).
 
We had object, animal, child, inferior adult, most of these systems degenerated in what we have now, the only one that still exist is islam because they are using hardcore propaganda and brainwash like nazis did, this is basically blackpilling society everyday every few hours so males don't degenerate in white knights (incels) or polygamous degenerates (chads), foids are also brainwashed to go against their own hypergamy.
based Islam, the only religion left standing
 
I don’t like people who beat their animals. I respect dogs and cats and I feel pity for them when they are owned by a bad person.

With women it’s a different thing. Thought their self-conscience is at the same level of that of a dog and their instincts prevale over their rational mind, somehow femoids are considered to be human being.

In my opinion, femoid status should be between that of a child and a dog, inferior to a male child and superior of a dog.

People who beats their femoids don’t have to damage them when they are fertile, after 30yo should be legal to kill them for sadistic pleasure. But under 30 femoids should have at least the same dignity of a dog or a male child.
A male child past the age of 4 have to be considered a higher class human than a 30yo fully grown adult woman.
 
Would you therefore also have low-IQ males as second class citizens as well? I know you despise women but it is hard to deny that at least some women are smarter than some men. Marie Curie > Wayne Rooney for an example, if status in your society is defined by IQ you’d have to account for that for it look in way objectively justifiable.
If the man has low iq and no skills or talents then he won't be allowed to get married, and can only escortcel or use sexbots. No voting rights should be granted to him either.
 
If the man has low iq and no skills or talents then he won't be allowed to get married, and can only escortcel or use sexbots. No voting rights should be granted to him either.
So it is IQ that is your most important variable for imparting status, in that case; what would your policy be on exceptionally high-IQ women? Even if you believe them to be scarce, you can accept that there are at least some in the world.
 

Similar threads

SociallyStupid
Replies
28
Views
441
TheCatMan
TheCatMan
Eternalifeofdoom
Replies
3
Views
175
Eternalifeofdoom
Eternalifeofdoom
packardD
Replies
12
Views
244
anon
anon
autisticmanchild
Replies
8
Views
184
Regressive
Regressive

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top