Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

What does the eclipse that occurred during Elliot Rodger's birth mean for him and all of humanity?

E

eclispe

Recruit
★★★
Joined
Oct 18, 2023
Posts
200
Firstly, it is important to understand that we are not dealing with signs, nor aspects, nor fixed stars, much less unified attributes. we are just looking to make correlations between the two main stars we have (sun and moon) with events on earth. Secondly, it is important to understand that for all people, astronomical phenomena were, and are, signs of future events. The difference between them is between being signs or influencing events.
Within this aspect, it is evident that it is traditional knowledge, the fact of using the sky, as a means of understanding future events, whether harvests, or even more individual incidents. and contrary to popular belief, yes, it is knowledge that is demonstrated, not in a laboratory, which is impossible, but rather, through the expected manifestation itself. It is important to point out that to confirm the correlation between two things, it is necessary to have the following points:

- The incident that is claimed to be a sign or influencer must have an essential symbolism, equivalent to that of the incidents related to it.
- The events that must be correlated must occur in the initial period and after the incident.
- Events must be unusual, equivalent and also present the essence of the initial event.
- There must be incapacity for probability between the incidents, meaning that it is not an acausal fact.

Analyzing all this, and the events that took place between July 9 and 31, 1991, it is clear that there is an impressive, irrefutable and also very well documented correlation between the solar eclipse of July 11, 1991 and the eclipse lunar prenumbral on July 26, 1991, and one of these events was on the 24th, the birth of Elliot Rodger, exactly 13 days, after the eclipse and Tim Kretschmer, being one of the best documented paranormal phenomena. But what does it all mean? The fact is that, if the correlation is real, we had an astronomical event of great magnitude, which simply brought a whole series of destructive events to the planet, which even makes us question why these phenomena always tend towards chaos, instead of order. and the fact is that they tend towards chaos, because order is just a reset, and everything in the universe simply aims at the purest manifestation, which is, "chaos", in the most social terms. However, beyond this teaching, it is more than obvious that both Elliot and Tim had the most lasting effects of the 1991 eclipse, and it is obvious that if this is the case, we have three main conclusions about them:

- Both Tim and Elliot would inevitably become the cause of some kind of disaster.
- Death is a directed phenomenon.
- Everything that occurred in the lives of Elliot and Tim was a preparation for the future, which would respectively be the attacks, proving at once, from a spiritual point of view, that they were inevitable.

Another phenomenon, related to the Elliot case, was that the first date, in April,was rescheduled due to Elliot becoming strangely ill. If death is truly a targeted phenomenon, this occurred because only on the date of March 23, the people who would die would be in certain locations and therefore could suffer their fate. It is also very interesting to understand the determinism behind all of this, which in a certain way is correlated to causality, since if everything has a cause and its essence is not completely dissociated from the essence of the cause, everything is interconnected and it is impossible to have necessarily, in a matter of events, some kind of randomness. and there is something more: If death is a targeted phenomenon and both Elliot and Tim were made precisely to become killers, it is more than evident that there is an omnipresent extradimensional intelligence, behind the incidents around the world, splitting in half , our notions about theology, freedom and determinism. Another thing that is also clear is that nature does not have a "universal law" and therefore, everything is valid and everything is part of the universe, including murderers and will inevitably be formed, society denying them or accepting them as it may. convenient, which also proves that there is no penalty of any kind after death, since such people would inevitably develop in this way and therefore cannot be judged, including because there is no law to judge them. It is impressive to realize that understanding a single event brings understanding about a series of important questions about human life.

Bonus:
In addition to this discovery, I made another more common and at the same time unusual one: It is possible to make a correlation between criminals with equivalent behaviors and modes of crime, using lunar phases. an example is the full moon. Elliot Rodger, David Attias, Mitchell Johnson, Tim Kretschmer, Guilherme Taucci, Seung Hui Cho, Darren Mack, Omar Mir Seddique Mateen, Futoshi Matsunaga, Kersean Ramey, Charles Carl Roberts IV, Robert James Acremant, Aaron Alexis, Derrick Bird, Eric Borel , Julio Gonzalez. All of these and many more were born on a Full Moon day, or in the days before the full moon.which only confirms that the notions about spirituality and the universe that we have are all wrong.
91f425d8b3fc069dcea8379f7d54eea560bd8417.jpg
 
It means that u r a fanboy who is attributing too much importance to a random meaningless event that was probably a coincidental fluke
 
All this information destroys modern religious and cosmological values and it was there, it just needed to be confirmed.
 
It means that u r a fanboy who is attributing too much importance to a random meaningless event that was probably a coincidental fluke
Such a coincidence, that Tim and Elliot had corresponding behavior and in addition, they went through exactly the same things during their attacks. this is not concidence, and calling it concidence is the last attempt at denial due to fear, because if it is not that way, death is inevitable and everything described in the text is real.
 
Such a coincidence, that Tim and Elliot had corresponding behavior and in addition, they went through exactly the same things during their attacks. this is not concidence, and calling it concidence is the last attempt at denial due to fear, because if it is not that way, death is inevitable and everything described in the text is real.
I then analyzed both cases:
- Both had parents who, despite not being rich, had skills and professions with greater profitability: (director, businessman)
- Both used weapons such as pistols and cars during their attacks.
- Both killed themselves in the same way: a shot to the head on the right side.
- They were both introverts
- Both had few friends and much more online interaction.
- Both had behavioral problems (Elliot-Autism, Tim-Split personality)
- Both were somewhat elitist.
- Both use 9mm pistols in their attacks.
- Both died the same way: Shot to the head from the right side.
- Both used cars during the attacks as a weapon or means of transport (Tim hijacked a car)
- Elliot killed 6 people, and injured 14. Tim killed 15 and injured 9.
- Both were chased by the police during and after the period they were in a car.
- Both were injured in the lower part of the body (Elliot-Hip, Tim-Two legs) by the police.
- Both attacks went through 3 stages, the 2nd stage being Intermediate between locations.
- Elliot emailed his manifesto to his therapist. Kretschmer, killed an employee of a psychiatric institution during his escape.- Both had the first stage of the attack, as being the most deadly.
- Both, during the second stage, revealed their intentions.
 
Is it so difficult to accept that Elliot is a unique person? and that he was already determined to become a murderer, one way or another?
 
Such a coincidence, that Tim and Elliot had corresponding behavior and in addition, they went through exactly the same things during their attacks. this is not concidence, and calling it concidence is the last attempt at denial due to fear, because if it is not that way, death is inevitable and everything described in the text is real.
Ok then Gray which spiritual beliefs does ur post support?
Astrology?
cosmology ?
 
good term and very appropriate. but this is not necessarily a prophecy, it is just an attestation of past facts
So OracleCel?
 
But I don't care about this labeling. I just want sensible people to accept things as they are. our universe is not a "moral" place.
 
and those who reject this only have fear as their motivation, because they know that this is real and that it destroys everything we have in relation to man's perception of the universe.
 
It is very interesting that authors like Lovecraft were the ones who came closest to a realistic description.
 
Do what you want, to be the whole of the law!
 
Least obsessed ER faggot boy.
 
Is it so difficult to accept that Elliot is a unique person? and that he was already determined to become a murderer, one way or another?
No one can convince me that faggots like this don't jerk off to pictures of ER...
 
read the text, Why are you so afraid?
 
Your fear is comical. And it wasn't just Elliot who was born during the eclipse. tim was also born, which ends your argument. hahahahahah
Stop watching Anime.
 
Least schizo .is user
 
Firstly, it is important to understand that we are not dealing with signs, nor aspects, nor fixed stars, much less unified attributes. we are just looking to make correlations between the two main stars we have (sun and moon) with events on earth. Secondly, it is important to understand that for all people, astronomical phenomena were, and are, signs of future events. The difference between them is between being signs or influencing events.
Within this aspect, it is evident that it is traditional knowledge, the fact of using the sky, as a means of understanding future events, whether harvests, or even more individual incidents. and contrary to popular belief, yes, it is knowledge that is demonstrated, not in a laboratory, which is impossible, but rather, through the expected manifestation itself. It is important to point out that to confirm the correlation between two things, it is necessary to have the following points:

- The incident that is claimed to be a sign or influencer must have an essential symbolism, equivalent to that of the incidents related to it.
- The events that must be correlated must occur in the initial period and after the incident.
- Events must be unusual, equivalent and also present the essence of the initial event.
- There must be incapacity for probability between the incidents, meaning that it is not an acausal fact.

Analyzing all this, and the events that took place between July 9 and 31, 1991, it is clear that there is an impressive, irrefutable and also very well documented correlation between the solar eclipse of July 11, 1991 and the eclipse lunar prenumbral on July 26, 1991, and one of these events was on the 24th, the birth of Elliot Rodger, exactly 13 days, after the eclipse and Tim Kretschmer, being one of the best documented paranormal phenomena. But what does it all mean? The fact is that, if the correlation is real, we had an astronomical event of great magnitude, which simply brought a whole series of destructive events to the planet, which even makes us question why these phenomena always tend towards chaos, instead of order. and the fact is that they tend towards chaos, because order is just a reset, and everything in the universe simply aims at the purest manifestation, which is, "chaos", in the most social terms. However, beyond this teaching, it is more than obvious that both Elliot and Tim had the most lasting effects of the 1991 eclipse, and it is obvious that if this is the case, we have three main conclusions about them:

- Both Tim and Elliot would inevitably become the cause of some kind of disaster.
- Death is a directed phenomenon.
- Everything that occurred in the lives of Elliot and Tim was a preparation for the future, which would respectively be the attacks, proving at once, from a spiritual point of view, that they were inevitable.

Another phenomenon, related to the Elliot case, was that the first date, in April,was rescheduled due to Elliot becoming strangely ill. If death is truly a targeted phenomenon, this occurred because only on the date of March 23, the people who would die would be in certain locations and therefore could suffer their fate. It is also very interesting to understand the determinism behind all of this, which in a certain way is correlated to causality, since if everything has a cause and its essence is not completely dissociated from the essence of the cause, everything is interconnected and it is impossible to have necessarily, in a matter of events, some kind of randomness. and there is something more: If death is a targeted phenomenon and both Elliot and Tim were made precisely to become killers, it is more than evident that there is an omnipresent extradimensional intelligence, behind the incidents around the world, splitting in half , our notions about theology, freedom and determinism. Another thing that is also clear is that nature does not have a "universal law" and therefore, everything is valid and everything is part of the universe, including murderers and will inevitably be formed, society denying them or accepting them as it may. convenient, which also proves that there is no penalty of any kind after death, since such people would inevitably develop in this way and therefore cannot be judged, including because there is no law to judge them. It is impressive to realize that understanding a single event brings understanding about a series of important questions about human life.

Bonus:
In addition to this discovery, I made another more common and at the same time unusual one: It is possible to make a correlation between criminals with equivalent behaviors and modes of crime, using lunar phases. an example is the full moon. Elliot Rodger, David Attias, Mitchell Johnson, Tim Kretschmer, Guilherme Taucci, Seung Hui Cho, Darren Mack, Omar Mir Seddique Mateen, Futoshi Matsunaga, Kersean Ramey, Charles Carl Roberts IV, Robert James Acremant, Aaron Alexis, Derrick Bird, Eric Borel , Julio Gonzalez. All of these and many more were born on a Full Moon day, or in the days before the full moon.which only confirms that the notions about spirituality and the universe that we have are all wrong.
91f425d8b3fc069dcea8379f7d54eea560bd8417.jpg

 
@General Alek
 
this is so high IQ.

i wish i thought of this

also: septimus severus a roman emperor practiced divination by looking at the sky. he had in his bedroom the ceiling painted with the positions of astronomical planets, stars, etc. at his birth and the predicted arrangement at his death, and only he was allowed in his bedroom. the ancients knew the universe contains a multitude of mystery, and us being supposed enlighened moderns we've extirpated our only contact with the supernatural via religious rituals and incantations and love le science over magick

the death of god had massive implications for western society.
 
@eclipse

you might be interested in accelerationism
The handwringing over racism/homophobia/misogyny is covert anthropocentrism in an age where humanity is quickly becoming obsolete due to the burgeoning threat of artificial generated intelligence. Clinging on to some hope for humanity, the mobilization against bigotry is just a ward against techocapital's development to higher-order forms of consciousness and sentience. (Not only is AI all these things--racist/homophobic/misogynist--it is intensely these things, and these qualities of technocapital will only become more and more pronounced as the swarm/network intelligence further engenders its existence, becomes more powerful.) Markers of difference will only be plugged and amplified more & more into the public zeitgeist matrix. Everyone calculating privilege scores (i.e., mandatory institutional race/gender/sexuality training) will only help this goal. Talking about so-and-so's privilege is only a societal-ritualism to try and instantiate and justify the importance of humanity to Nature, even if this "humanity" is limited in scope (i.e., only blacks, only gays, only womxn). These rituals are of course exploited, but that is irrelevant. I am interested in: Why has an obscure legal term--intersectionality--had a huge impact in how we make societal caste-production intelligible? Why has it emerged at this particular historical moment? Answer: the increasing irrelevance of humanity to Nature. SO, the more we desperately try to cling to some notion of "human" while ultimately demonizing the other (white heterosexual male, etc.), the more we miss the point. Technic machinery moves on without us. We are so bound up to this notion that humanity is special that we create large social economic political intellectual edifices based on shaky premises--and they (will) collapse. The history of humanity is a blip in a larger cosmic drama of rebirth and dissolution. This is what accelerationism is--a simple recognition that humanity has never been in control, it's always been Nature. So take comfort my fellow incels; in the grand scheme of things, everything will be alright. Just as empires rise and fall, so humans shall too. If you're an incel in this life, you might be a Chad in the next. Until next time gamers.



read nick land's quick and dirty introduction to accelreatoinsim. you cna't find it online only on archive websites so i'll post it here

A QUICK-AND-DIRTY INTRODUCTION TO ACCELERATIONISM

Nick Land - May 25, 2017 -

Anyone trying to work out what they think about accelerationism better do so quickly. That’s the nature of the thing. It was already caught up with trends that seemed too fast to track when it began to become self-aware, decades ago. It has picked up a lot of speed since then.

Accelerationism is old enough to have arrived in waves, which is to say insistently, or recurrently, and each time the challenge is more urgent. Among its predictions is the expectation that you’ll be too slow to deal with it coherently. Yet if you fumble the question it poses – because rushed – you lose, perhaps very badly. It’s hard. (For our purposes here “you” are standing in as a bearer of “the opinions of mankind”.)

Time-pressure, by its very nature, is difficult to think about. Typically, while the opportunity for deliberation is not necessarily presumed, it is at least – with overwhelming likelihood – mistaken for an historical constant, rather than a variable. If there was ever time to think, we think, there still is and will always be. The definite probability that the allotment of time to decision-making is undergoing systematic compression remains a neglected consideration, even among those paying explicit and exceptional attention to the increasing rapidity of change.

In philosophical terms, the deep problem of acceleration is transcendental. It describes an absolute horizon – and one that is closing in. Thinking takes time, and accelerationism suggests we’re running out of time to think that through, if we haven’t already. No contemporary dilemma is being entertained realistically until it is also acknowledged that the opportunity for doing so is fast collapsing.

The suspicion has to arrive that if a public conversation about acceleration is beginning, it’s just in time to be too late. The profound institutional crisis that makes the topic ‘hot’ has at its core an implosion of social decision-making capability. Doing anything, at this point, would take too long. So instead, events increasingly just happen. They seem ever more out of control, even to a traumatic extent. Because the basic phenomenon appears to be a brake failure, accelerationism is picked up again.

Accelerationism links the implosion of decision-space to the explosion of the world – that is, to modernity. It is important therefore to note that the conceptual opposition between implosion and explosion does nothing to impede their real (mechanical) coupling. Thermonuclear weapons provide the most vividly illuminating examples. An H-bomb employs an A-bomb as a trigger. A fission reaction sparks a fusion reaction. The fusion mass is crushed into ignition by a blast process. (Modernity is a blast.)

This is already to be talking about cybernetics, which also returns insistently, in waves. It amplifies to howl, and then dissipates into the senseless babble of fashion, until the next blast-wave hits.

For accelerationism the crucial lesson was this: A negative feedback circuit – such as a steam-engine ‘governor’ or a thermostat – functions to keep some state of a system in the same place. Its product, in the language formulated by French philosophical cyberneticists Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, is territorialization. Negative feedback stabilizes a process, by correcting drift, and thus inhibiting departure beyond a limited range. Dynamics are placed in the service of fixity – a higher-level stasis, or state. All equilibrium models of complex systems and processes are like this. To capture the contrary trend, characterized by self-reinforcing errancy, flight, or escape, D&G coin the inelegant but influential term deterritorialization. Deterritorialization is the only thing accelerationism has ever really talked about.

In socio-historical terms, the line of deterritorialization corresponds to uncompensated capitalism. The basic – and, of course, to some real highly consequential degree actually installed – schema is a positive feedback circuit, within which commercialization and industrialization mutually excite each other in a runaway process, from which modernity draws its gradient. Karl Marx and Friedrich Nietzsche were among those to capture important aspects of the trend. As the circuit is incrementally closed, or intensified, it exhibits ever greater autonomy, or automation. It becomes more tightly auto-productive (which is only what ‘positive feedback’ already says). Because it appeals to nothing beyond itself, it is inherently nihilistic. It has no conceivable meaning beside self-amplification. It grows in order to grow. Mankind is its temporary host, not its master. Its only purpose is itself.

“Accelerate the process,” recommended Deleuze & Guattari in their 1972 Anti-Oedipus, citing Nietzsche to re-activate Marx. Although it would take another four decades before “accelerationism” was named as such, critically, by Benjamin Noys, it was already there, in its entirety. The relevant passage is worth repeating in full (as it would be, repeatedly, in all subsequent accelerationist discussion):

… which is the revolutionary path? Is there one?—To withdraw from the world market, as Samir Amin advises Third World countries to do, in a curious revival of the fascist “economic solution”? Or might it be to go in the opposite direction? To go still further, that is, in the movement of the market, of decoding and deterritorialization? For perhaps the flows are not yet deterritorialized enough, not decoded enough, from the viewpoint of a theory and a practice of a highly schizophrenic character. Not to withdraw from the process, but to go further, to “accelerate the process,” as Nietzsche put it: in this matter, the truth is that we haven’t seen anything yet.

The point of an analysis of capitalism, or of nihilism, is to do more of it. The process is not to be critiqued. The process is the critique, feeding back into itself, as it escalates. The only way forward is through, which means further in.

Marx has his own ‘accelerationist fragment’ which anticipates the passage from Anti-Oedipus remarkably. He says in an 1848 speech ‘On the Question of Free Trade’:

…in general, the protective system of our day is conservative, while the free trade system is destructive. It breaks up old nationalities and pushes the antagonism of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie to the extreme point. In a word, the free trade system hastens the social revolution. It is in this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, that I vote in favor of free trade.

In this germinal accelerationist matrix, there is no distinction to be made between the destruction of capitalism and its intensification. The auto-destruction of capitalism is what capitalism is. “Creative destruction” is the whole of it, beside only its retardations, partial compensations, or inhibitions. Capital revolutionizes itself more thoroughly than any extrinsic ‘revolution’ possibly could. If subsequent history has not vindicated this point beyond all question, it has at least simulated such a vindication, to a maddening degree.

In 2013, Nick Srnicek and Alex Williams sought to resolve this intolerable – even ‘schizophrenic’ – ambivalence in their ‘Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics,’ which aimed to precipitate a specifically anti-capitalist ‘Left-accelerationism’, clearly demarcated over against its abominably pro-capitalist ‘Right-accelerationist’ shadow. This project – predictably – was more successful at re-animating the accelerationist question than at ideologically purifying it in any sustainable way. It was only by introducing a wholly artificial distinction between capitalism and modernistic technological acceleration that their boundary lines could be drawn at all. The implicit call was for a new Leninism without the NEP (and with the Utopian techno-managerial experiments of Chilean communism drawn upon for illustration).

Capital, in its ultimate self-definition, is nothing beside the abstract accelerative social factor. Its positive cybernetic schema exhausts it. Runaway consumes its identity. Every other determination is shucked-off as an accident, at some stage of its intensification process. Since anything able to consistently feed socio-historical acceleration will necessarily, or by essence, be capital, the prospect of any unambiguously ‘Left-accelerationism’ gaining serious momentum can be confidently dismissed. Accelerationism is simply the self-awareness of capitalism, which has scarcely begun. (“We haven’t seen anything yet.”)

At the time of writing, Left-accelerationism appears to have deconstructed itself back into traditional socialist politics, and the accelerationist torch has passed to a new generation of brilliant young thinkers advancing an ‘Unconditional Accelerationism’ (neither R/Acc., or L/Acc., but U/Acc.). Their online identities – if not in any easily extricable way their ideas – can be searched-out through the peculiar social-media hash-tag #Rhetttwitter.

As blockchains, drone logistics, nanotechnology, quantum computing, computational genomics, and virtual reality flood in, drenched in ever-higher densities of artificial intelligence, accelerationism won’t be going anywhere, unless ever deeper into itself. To be rushed by the phenomenon, to the point of terminal institutional paralysis, is the phenomenon. Naturally – which is to say completely inevitably – the human species will define this ultimate terrestrial event as a problem. To see it is already to say: We have to do something. To which accelerationism can only respond: You’re finally saying that now? Perhaps we ought to get started? In its colder variants, which are those that win out, it tends to laugh.

Nick Land is an independent writer living in Shanghai.

***

Note:

Urbanomic’s #Accelerate: The Accelerationist Reader, remains by far the most comprehensive introduction to accelerationism. The book was published in 2014, however, and a lot has happened since then.

The Wikipedia entry on ‘Accelerationism’ is short, but of exceptionally high quality.

For the Srnicek and Williams ‘Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics’ see this.
 

Similar threads

Subhuman Niceguy
Replies
7
Views
147
proudweeb
proudweeb
RealSchizo
Replies
33
Views
526
MrZez
MrZez
F
Replies
18
Views
1K
Paperman
P
Tesla
Replies
1
Views
298
Cybersex is our hope
Cybersex is our hope
highschoolcel
Replies
6
Views
231
Natey Nate
Natey Nate

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top