But we're talking about what people think is bad and why. People agree you shouldn't assault a kid physically or sexually. It's just they believe it's not "assault" when a cop does it because when it's a cop, they're trying to apprehend a criminal.
Venting Victims of sex crimes aren't emotionally doomed and are able to eventually heal
But we're talking about what people think is bad and why. People agree you shouldn't assault a kid physically or sexually. It's just they believe it's not "assault" when a cop does it because when it's a cop, they're trying to apprehend a criminal.
That's very black and white way of thinking. Lots of people do shitty things, especially if they have almost unlimited authority, which is why cops should be questioned the most since they're in a position of authority over most people. Assaulting a minor physically is a million times less bad than having sex with one according to most normies.
No, roughly apprehending a criminal suspect is a million times less bad than having sex with a kid.
According to most normies that's true, but I bet most users here would disagree with that and think having sex with a teen rostie is a million times less bad than police brutality. Normies even think a regular non-cop adult beating a minor is a lot less bad than having sex with one.
A weed smoker or a j-walker can be considered a criminal to a cucked cop. Usually no one should be apprehended roughly unless they're trying to get away after stealing/vandalizing expensive things or assaulting someone, or using a deadly weapon irresponsibly. Any other non-violent crime that doesn't harm anyone else shouldn't be taken as seriously.
No, I don't think that's true. Take a dad who beats his daughter. Now take a dad who touches his daughter. Both will get fucked up in prison.
Nothing will happen to the guy who beats his daughter. Maybe a soy cuck would try to do something to a daughter beater, but he'd easily get the shit kicked out of him by most men. Whiteknight prisoners for sure would leave a son beater alone, but not a guy who fucked a teen boy.
Last edited:
Well a boy, that's different. Boys can "take" a fist beating. But if you rape a boy, you're a pedophile, you're gay, and you subjected a healthy straight boy to gayness.
The boy can already be gay. If a foid fucked a young boy they wouldn't mess with her, even though it's heterosexual "pedophilia". They would also not bother a man who beat his daughter, only if he fucked her. Beating a teen is way worse than having non-rape sex with one at the end of the day, but normies treat it the opposite way.
When it comes to the double standard of defending the honor of boys & girls, it's not really considered that the boy might've been gay from the start. That's something you figure out when you're older. Matters of sexuality aren't for kids.
And yes, if a grown woman touches a little boy, there's a double standard in favor of her. But no, I'm pretty sure if a man beats his daughter, it's as bad as if he has sex with her.
A boy can be gay and an adult straight foid can corrupt him with her straightness.
Thanks for admitting that. If there's a double standard when men and women do the same thing, that means it's just moral fagging.
Yes, there are many double standards in society. But we're talking about whether or not people hate beating on a kid as much as they do having sex with a kid. If we take out all of the accessory double standards, like whether it's man/boy or woman/boy, if a man beats his daughter he's as much a monster as if he touches his daughter.
That's according to you people who fuck jb's are monsters. You never showed real proof how it damages them for life, the foids who had sex with their boyfriends in their teens are seen as perfectly normal when they become adults.
If society isn't going to punish one gender for something then they shouldn't punish the other. That shows it's really not a big deal if they let half the population slide with it. Sex with teens is natural, unlike beating them, which everyone usually doesn't see as anywhere near as bad as having sex with them. So if they don't care about beating teens, then sex with them is way less bad if we took out all the biases
If we took out all of the biases, we would care about a dad beating/touching his son as much as we would a dad beating/touching his daughter. We wouldn't be nicer to pedophiles, we'd hate everyone.
We'd be way nicer to men who fuck jb's because there's no proven immediate or long term harm from fucking them, unlike beating. It's normie superstition that sex with young teens is bad. It's just something they use to oppress non-chad men, and no one else.
No, again, they're not emotionally mature enough for it.
That's your opinion. Lots of them have sex just fine with teens their age and adults, and grow up to be completely normal.
They don't though. They might be able to hold down a job without suffering a psychotic episode, but that's not what we strive for with "healthy."
Most rich people, successful people and celebrities had sex as teens as well.
A lot of rich successful celebrities also went through drug addictions and suffer weird psychological issues like narcissism. Not healthy.
That's your opinion it's not healthy, junk food is also no healthy, but we let teens buy it. For all we know the drugs and underage sex could've helped those successful people get where they're at. It's not like they were doing crack, meth, or heroin. Teens usually only drink or smoke weed, or take extacy at most. Sex is way less bad for them than extacy. And no one tries to kill drug dealers who sell teens extacy pills.
It's not just my opinion, it's the opinion of enough people that we decided it should be illegal. Just because you make a lot of money doesn't mean other things aren't wrong with you.
Drew Barrymore is what many might call "successful." But thanks to what she was exposed to as a child, her mind was in a bad place despite also being successful in that time.
Just because the majority of normies think something is bad doesn't make it true. Just like how the majority of normie retards are ok with male infant circumcision. The majority of idiots don't always know what's right and wrong, so we can't go by what they think in everything.
Non-rape sex as a teen didn't put her in a bad place as an adult. She's depressed now because she became fat and ugly after being a star.
That just means society needs to be harsher on what's right and wrong, not more tolerant.
Even if she is depressed today, I never said she was depressed today. Because it's not about broad things like "Being depressed" or "acting out." Even if you aren't depressed it doesn't mean your head is as right as it should be.
No, it just means society are retards that can't tell the difference between right and wrong. Not too long ago there was slavery and they killed gays. Just because society are being assholes to one group of people to correct it doesn't mean they have to be assholes to everyone, they just need to stop being assholes. Society should leave men who fuck jb's alone too, because they can never prove that it's harmful, it's just moralfagging. They don't even take foids who fuck teens seriously, and they never will, because deep down they know there's no problem with it.
There's no proof teen sex caused any of her mental problems, same with anyone else who had teen sex. On this forum they actually say if you don't have teen sex you're more likely to get mental problems, and I agree with that.
Last edited:
Because we have a warped perspective on mental problems.
No, we're way ahead of the normie cucks on this topic.
I don't think we are. Just a few pages ago the thinking was "As long as she's happy in the marriage, a teen bride is fine." Very limited. Just because you're happy with your spouse doesn't mean you're mentally sound.
There's no proof that they're not mentally sound.
They exhibit behavior that we don't consider healthy. Like Slaughter. Her dependency is the product of her being too immature for a sexual relationship. Dependency is mental unsoundness in the guise of a happy relationship.
That's not always the case with teen relationships. A foid's dependency on her mate is a good thing anyway, better than them being "independent" and riding the cock carousel. Only soycucks think a foid depending on her mate is a bad thing. Lots of guys here would be super dependent in a relationship with a foid, and we never even had teen sex.
Not always the case, they might exhibit some other unhealthy mental health trait.
And dependency like that is bad no matter what age you are. We might be of legal age, but that doesn't mean we're mentally sound. However, that makes us outliers. Abnormalities. Normal healthy adults aren't like us.
Foids are naturally dependent. Even if you try to free them from their dependency with laws and welfare, they will still find a chad to be dependent on. It's not abnormal to be depend on someone these days, non-chad men make up 80% of the male population and most are dependent on foids, even though that's not what nature intends. So it should be considered a normal thing to be dependent, if no one cares when it happens to the majority of men, and foids are naturally dependent. Sexbots and artifcial wombs will help make men more independent in these cucked times, but that's why feminists and cucks want to stop it. The only reason an 18+ foid is more "independent" than a young one is because she had more time riding the cock carousel, so she becomes more picky, although if she didn't ride the cock carousel she wouldn't have increased her pickiness since when she was a teen. Learning to be picky doesn't mean you're independent. 80% of men are actually taught not to be picky, so it shouldn't matter when it happens to foids since no one is willing to do anything when it happens to men, it should be seen as normal because men will never get helped.
Last edited:
Who says we don't care when it happens to men? I'm not denying that we don't, I just haven't heard of this. If we don't care, we should.
And her dependency wasn't based in how un-picky she was. There are plenty of men Slaughter could have today. But her brain is fucked from being with Dahvie Vanity. She still misses him, and resents him for not being what she hoped he would be. Instead of just moving on without thinking about him.
Almost no one cares when that happens to men. We're just supposed to "suck it up" about everything. So jfl if you care when it happens to random foids, meanwhile they're unwilling to change anything to help men. How things should be isn't the same as how things are.
Last edited:
E
I dare someone to show me scientific proof that age gaps inherently cause trauma and NOT society's disapproval because i think it's only society's disapproval NOT the age gap that traumatizes them
I don't think they get traumatized at all, the teens that act traumatized are only doing it for attention and victim points. No teen will really be traumatized for life from non-rape sex.
E
being incel is much more traumatic
All that means is that we should care more, so that we care when it happens to men. Not that we should care less.
You can't even keep track of what counts as "trauma."
E
if those people want real trauma they should feel something that IS painful
Normies will never start caring for men when it comes to that. The only time men matter to normies is when an adult man has sex with a male teen. In other cases they will never care. An oppressed slave shouldn't care about the ultimate well being of the group that oppresses him. To equal the playing field, we need to care less when it happens to foids, because no one will care about it happening to men.
E
foid predators always get away with it
Even the playing field against who? My enemy isn't victims.
Which is proof it's not a big deal because normies will never take them seriously.
They're our oppressors. They're getting in the way of men's issues being taken seriously, so jfl at caring about them being "dependent" on non-chad men.
I don't think assault victims want men's issues to be dismissed. Now, virtue signalers on behalf of assault victims might want that, but my beef is with the signalers, not the victims.
Most those jb foid "victims" who have sex, try to minimize the same problems teen boys face when older foids have sex with them. Jb foids who have sex just act like victims for sympathy, and for cucks to donate money and free services to them. They don't care about male teen victims who have sex, they don't even want them to get help or they'd be taken seriously by now.
Fuck those dumb piece of shit whores, and the cucks who allow them to do that.
Have you seen this somewhere?
Everywhere. Almost no foids stand up for teen boys who were raped by adult rosties, but there are tons of foids that bitch when an adult man has sex with a female jb. Most foids obviously don't care when it happens to teen boys, so it would be cucked to care when it happens to them.
You said "try to minimize." I haven't seen this.
They minimize it by only talking about it when it happens to foids, and ignoring it when it happens to boys. Fuck them for doing that meanwhile trying to get sympathy only for teen whores.
That's on the advocates, not the victims. If men are underrepresented, you blame #MeToo for not representing them. Not the assault victims themselves.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
