Blackpill Time to spit out some HARD TRUTH about incels developing fetishes for Traps, Lolis and 2D girls
fapping doesnt work for me anymore it took me like an hour last night bc i just wanted the dopamine rush, even lolicon dont work for me
Water is wet theory ngl
Based thread, fuck coomers.
Is this from the sci fi colelction, or the album?
- Children of the Future: On the Prevention of Sexual Pathology (Wilhelm Reich, 1983)
Yes I'm a subhuman
THanks/
Me want 2d girls
Gonna stop you there: wanting to fuck lolis is normal male sexuality prevalent in the vast majority of healthy men.
We just live in a cucked emasculated society where we allow this to be shamed and suppressed.
Trap-fixation is a whole other ballgame and more of a cope to deal with the sexual frustration men get from not being able to fuck lolis.
IE traps are accessible, lolis or not, so some convince themselves they'd prefer traps so they think they're winning at life.
Incorrect. Entirely different causes.
Loli fixation happens when a logical partial misogyny developes in response to the excesses of obese roasties. Has nothing to do with whether you're a virgin or not.
Trap fixation as previous is a cope.
The most I could blame porn for it is you can expose yourself to weird shit in survivable doses and acclimate yourself to normalize it, whereas if your first encounter with a trap was IRL finding out the thing that just sucked your cock also has cock, it'd be too much to process and you'd freak out and get violent.
Or just adult men who realize that a vagina the size of a hallway encrusted with a dozen chads' cum is perhaps not the idealistic vagina for sex.
You have no proof whatsoever that lolicons or even trap fetishists necessarily lose interest in philosophical questions.
If this were true nobody would actually be fucking lolis or traps yet some do.
The biological need is to coom. To coom you need to at least briefly satisfy a psychological need, such as is done in the short-term via fantasy-added-to-fapping which porn occasionally helps with.
The bigger void that I don't think it fills is longer-term psychological needs.
Correct. If you're still cooming you're still filling the biological need though. As above, it falls short psychologically.
Psychological unfulfillment of course will eventually have physical ramifications too. But I don't think this should lead to us saying "all psychological needs are biological needs" because we should use the more specific term to distinguish them from primarily-biological less-psychological ones.
I don't agree with this viewpoint.
The argument here is basically "you will only want variety if you're fapping but not if you're having PIV sex"
Yet we know from the harems kept by sultans this clearly isn't true: even if you're getting regular sex you still want variety.
Muhammad is a most excellent example as he had wives yet wanted Aisha too.
The lolita complex as earliest defined is a fixation on mid-pubescent girls between 10 and 15.
That's a healthy time to pair-bond with a girl and make her a wife destined to mother your babies.
Even earlier Heidi Complex (5-10) or Alice Complex (8-12) stuff (wrongly called lolicon by some) is pretty healthy IMO so long as it's not manifesting into sadistic guro "rip her in half with my dick" type stuff IRL.
The focus here is "here is an unbonded potential partner".
If instead of this you want to fuck carousel roasties that IMO is the cucked dysfunction which results from acclimation / adaptation / frustration.
just write "JBs" ffs, no apostrophe
Nature calls for you to want your offspring to be your own, which is why nature calls us to pair-bond with mid-adolescent girls so by the time they are post-adolescent and rearing children they are loyal mothers.
The question here is "prime for what".
Early 20s is obviously prime for childbearing (fully grown pelvis, less birth complications) while teens is prime for non-reproductive sexual acts and prteen is prime for hand-holding and cuddling.
Intelligence and based self-prioritization is also rampant there, look how they keep out the immigrants and maintain their culture and independence.
Few will view your rants as high-IQ if you keep raping apostrophes like this bro
The ideal girl is a virgin who has not been ejaculated inside by another man.
Seeing preteen girls as the only plausible candidates for this category is just men being realistic in observing the trends of society.
In past years when daughters were kept monitored by their dads and chaperoned and a higher % kept their virginity until marriage, viewing teen or post-teen girls as possible virgins was more plausible which allowed men to have a wider library of possible girls to view as wife material.
Same, and clearly remember the pressures of people expecting you to act as if you feel otherwise, and of course you play along, but realize that so many guys are playing along.
It's a humiliating experience so much so that guys begin to believe their own lies and LARP like they never had those interests.
plus comme "around the cock"
Naw he's coping because he can't embrace he's denying his inner lolicon and coping by prioritizing roasties as prime coom material.
That's because if you don't actually have a roastie GF there's nobody to whip you into pretending that the roastie is the ideal so you get your daily coom from her.
Incorrect as pedophilia is pre-pubescent fixation and roricon is mid-pubescent fixation.
Only stuff like babycon/toddlercon/heicon/alicon is pedophilia-related.
You clearly have not sampled the entire variety if you think that's 100% of the fandom
Tsundere and Yandere are huge amongst lolis, lolidom is huge.
The ideal GF must be a bitter 50yo roastie who despises men and tries to sabotage us because it would be such a testament to our masculinity to whip her into shape?
Heterosexual gynophilia is not about taming some ravenous grizzly. If the whole point was just to affirm our masculinity by overcoming the largest challenge possible and sexually dominating them then we'd all be a bunch of faggot niggers rape-sodomizing other guys' anuses.
You're basically thinking about sex the way a heterosexual androphilic foid does: about sex 'taming' some 'hard-to-get' beast.
That's just not how healthy men think of relationships: we are coded to want nurturers for ourself and our possible children.
Mental opinions about sex are still mentality, not sure why you're designating sexual development as a distinct thing.
Basically if you can have anything (ie artists can draw the most beautiful stuff) then you go for the ideals.
Anime-con-going-weeabos (including myself a decade or so ago) can appreciate loli ideals while still being willing to settle for an accessible landwhale because having aesthetic ideals of neoteny does not prevent practical appreciation of physical beings with all their flaws, akin to our own.
It's a coexistence I think few foids have mastered since they fantasize over the alpha males but won't settle for sub-alphas anywhere near as often as we.
Point out a society that's not youth-obsessed.
There is nothing infantile about wanting lolis.
Babies do not want lolis, they want boobies.
If you are a baby, you want giant mega-milk tits to suck upon.
It's fixating on THAT which is regression into infantile attitudes, basically wanting to fuck your mom.
Boobies on girls is fine to tolerate but it's homosexual-adjacent if that's your actual erotic focus TBH.
When I get aroused by the idea of boobjobs w/ giant boobies and stuff it's not because of the aesthetic of it but rather the imagined sensations and of the servile and/or dominating attitudes a lady might use while giving one.
When I get aroused by the idea of titfucking it's not because I want to fuck the tits, but because of how the girl might react psychologically to getting her tits fucked.
When I think of fucking a girl PIV and her boobs jiggling, what arouses me isn't 'boobs are jiggling' but moreso how a girl reacts to "my boobs are jiggling and I can't control it, how embarassing".
It's basically similar to the idea of fucking a girl with a muffintop or whatev. Her excess flesh falls beyond the aesthetic ideal but you can love a girl w/ imperfections especially as you love her mind which adapts to them.
OP has clearly compromised your ability to punctuate, purge yourself of this contagious habit plz.
Of course. OP wants to LARP that Chad isn't fucking the lolis too, that he's only fucking the roasties because he's so healthy and sexually fulfilled.
What a pathetic cope.
I get it though.
If you can pretend that the only guys who want to fuck the lolis are the guys who can't, you can imagine the lolis are still virgins.
I want to believe they're still virgins too OP.
OP is just trying to malign lolicon w/ trapcon by equating them even though they're entirely different.
There is a gradual descent of cope you need to recognize guys:
1) lolis are unattainable, so I am attracted to roasties
2) roasties are unattainable, so I am attracted to traps
3) traps are unattainable, so I am attracted to bears
Normies are usually tier-1 cope, but the actual healthy default of mankin is tier-0 with no copes where you embrace the logical apex of feminine (neotenous) beauty which is the loli.
Similar threads
Mixedcel59
Users who are viewing this thread
