I'm putting Traps on the same level as Lolicon for the reason intense interest in niche fetishes is popping up in places like 4chan, reddit and this forum, where lonely men gather to cope. It's has become a universal virgin trait caused not only by a prolonged exposure to easily accessible online pornography, but also a infantile sexuality due to loneliness and involuntary celibacy. The trend of lapsing into childlish daydreams about lolis or girls having dicks underneath their skirts whilst losing interest in the major philosophical questions of the world is always linked with masturbation becoming a substitute to actual romantic relations.
-- The widespread fetishism correlates with the rise of inceldom with the coomer meme serving as a moment of critical self-reflection. Arguing that watching porn is about 'satisfying' ones 'biological needs' is like thinking that drinking a high-sugar high-caffeine can of soda while dehydrated in the middle of a desert will quench your thirst. It will actually make you thirstier, since soda primarily stimulates your oral drives. The pleasure you get is from the process chugging-it-down, not fully satisfying a actually existing need. Porn stimulates the sex drives the same way as it doesn't involve ever accessing the real object of desire. As a coomer you can never be satisfied, your instinct to have romantic relations with a woman is replaced by a industry providing him with endless visual stimuli deprived of a actual encounter with the flesh and blood of a partner, but instead presented as a scenario in which the marginal elements of that encounter are hyper-invested in place of the ‘perfect object’.The fetishist coomer archetype was first outlined and described in detail by Wilhelm Reich in the 1950s, he wrote that when a person indulges in masturbation for too long without making the transition to intercourse in their youth, due to a internal or external inability, the more likely he is to develop fetishes:
"The lascivious desire to look at naked bodies or to expose one’s own sex organs and the temptation to have sexual relations with children also often occur for the first time at this stage. Because of pent-up sexual energy, which finds no satisfactory release, sadistic and masochistic tendencies," (Children of the Future)
--You wil be coping if you're denying that there is no Lolicon = Lolita Complex = sexual attraction to children pipeline going on here. The underlying reason of this is a neurotic infantile sexuality. What's even more of a cope is the sad attempt to justify your ever expanding fetishes on supposedly 'evolutionary' grounds, as deeply rooted instincts that were 'repressed by moralist society'. Flowing this logic you get incels arguing that their fetish for jb's is actually 'nature calling' to reproduce with prime aged women, and depending on the severity of the kink, the 'prime' gets gradually defined in a descending manner: from early 20s, to late teens, 16 and eventually 12. No wonder Lolicon got popularized in japan where hikikomori lifestyle is rampant. From a psychoanalytical pov it makes sense why Loli's are a popular dream gf for some incels, they're a pure fantasmatic projection of a ideal girl for a 25 year old guy with the romantic experience of a 9 year old.
-- The widespread fetishism correlates with the rise of inceldom with the coomer meme serving as a moment of critical self-reflection. Arguing that watching porn is about 'satisfying' ones 'biological needs' is like thinking that drinking a high-sugar high-caffeine can of soda while dehydrated in the middle of a desert will quench your thirst. It will actually make you thirstier, since soda primarily stimulates your oral drives. The pleasure you get is from the process chugging-it-down, not fully satisfying a actually existing need. Porn stimulates the sex drives the same way as it doesn't involve ever accessing the real object of desire. As a coomer you can never be satisfied, your instinct to have romantic relations with a woman is replaced by a industry providing him with endless visual stimuli deprived of a actual encounter with the flesh and blood of a partner, but instead presented as a scenario in which the marginal elements of that encounter are hyper-invested in place of the ‘perfect object’.The fetishist coomer archetype was first outlined and described in detail by Wilhelm Reich in the 1950s, he wrote that when a person indulges in masturbation for too long without making the transition to intercourse in their youth, due to a internal or external inability, the more likely he is to develop fetishes:
"The lascivious desire to look at naked bodies or to expose one’s own sex organs and the temptation to have sexual relations with children also often occur for the first time at this stage. Because of pent-up sexual energy, which finds no satisfactory release, sadistic and masochistic tendencies," (Children of the Future)
--You wil be coping if you're denying that there is no Lolicon = Lolita Complex = sexual attraction to children pipeline going on here. The underlying reason of this is a neurotic infantile sexuality. What's even more of a cope is the sad attempt to justify your ever expanding fetishes on supposedly 'evolutionary' grounds, as deeply rooted instincts that were 'repressed by moralist society'. Flowing this logic you get incels arguing that their fetish for jb's is actually 'nature calling' to reproduce with prime aged women, and depending on the severity of the kink, the 'prime' gets gradually defined in a descending manner: from early 20s, to late teens, 16 and eventually 12. No wonder Lolicon got popularized in japan where hikikomori lifestyle is rampant. From a psychoanalytical pov it makes sense why Loli's are a popular dream gf for some incels, they're a pure fantasmatic projection of a ideal girl for a 25 year old guy with the romantic experience of a 9 year old.
Last edited:
