Hypergamy Is amplified By some sick Bastards who hold Woman to the totem Pole . The Installation of Instagram , OF , Snapchat, Twitter , Tumblr , Tinder , Bumble , Okcupid , Lovo and what have you . Gave Woman their Goddess Complex " And the Ability to Select only the best man Possible ( Hypergamy )
It Is Just a mockery against Man in My Opinion.
@Mainländer @ItsOver4cel @Lebensmüder @Ritalincel @Waffle @Rotter @THE TRUE HONKLER @gimmedatrope999 @kekfuel
100% this.
"Natural" doesn't mean we have to accept it.
Nature knows no moral.
In nature following things happen:
Necrophilia: look at
Rhinella proboscidea which uses it even as a reproductive strategy by squeezing eggs out of dead females or at teiids/ducks that routinely do it for sexual release (male tegus even wait on streets to rape fresh roadkill)
Infanticide: In many species with harems, if the leading male dies the new male kills the offspring
Zoophilia: Male snapping turtles routinely rape other species often while mutilating them (like decapitation/biting off their heads), dolphins/otters do it too
Sexual coercion: Why do you think a mallard has such a long, corkscrew-like dick? For raping females. Why do you think water striders have long legs? For raping females. Antagonistic coevolution due to sexual conflict gave males/females both traits to commit and defend against rape.
Among others that rang from genital plugs (closing off female genitalia after copulation to prevent her from having sex with other males, a kind of chastity belt), to anti-aphrosidiacs (chemicals given to a female to suppress sexual behavior) to inducing abortion/child death (via chemicals in mice).
If nature was something to just accept we wouldn't transplant hearts or fly to different plants, we would still shit in caves and die after minor injuries due to an infection with Tetanus or whatever. If the (natural) behavior of men gets suppressed by society in the long term, why should females not face restrictions?
Just fucking laugh, they always say "X is a social construct/therefore invalidated", but human rights or any rights/morals are nothing more than that either, but in their hubris they think that they are undebatable while in fact everything is debatable depending on the current social climate. They want nature where it suits them and when they deem themselves as the strongest, but as soon as shit happens that they dislike they go crying for daddy state and want lenience (like when a man leaves after impregnation which is still a valid reproduction strategy naturally speaking).
If you say one natural behavior is good/acceptable, the others are too.