SewerPolarKoala
SevereBipolarKoala
★★
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2026
- Posts
- 1,633
- Online time
- 2d 11h
INTRODUCTION:
Since the middle of 20th century, in contemporary social sciences, predominant theory is Carl Marx’s theory of social conflict, according to these theories different social classes, groups and identities fight over place in this world by pushing their agenda and needs on other groups, it do be similar to view of evolutionary psychology as well, the difference comes in conclusion Marx and evolutionary social sciences reach.
They Marxist conclusion states that because certain groups like men, white people, rich people etc hold more power historically, it’s justified for less evolutionarily dominant groups to pursue absolute power and control (beating up), while it’s forbidden for stronger groups to fight for their interest “beating down” less dominant groups as it perpetuates perceived oppression, that’s where double standards and two tiered policies come from.
Older, and perhaps popular again sociological theory states that social hierarchy is necessary to keep society functional and is a feature, marxists say it’s a bug as unless there is complete equality, society does not function but maintains status Quo.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR WOMEN IN BLACKPILL:
Blackpill correctly states you can’t jump above your league, if you were born somehow inferior it is only good if you accept your place and exist within your boundaries, attempts to override it are correctly called mere copes, not desirable and default goal of existence.
Therefore if women were to accept blackpill as dominant theory of society they would have to admit their inferiority and cease seeking power at all, accepting whatever more evolved groups have to offer, and this causes so called ratchet effect, you cannot take away something that was previously granted (like unfair gynocentric laws) because it would cause unrest in the group in which it needs to be taken away, no mater how illogical and absurd the thing given may be (similarly with abolition of slavery etc)
Since the middle of 20th century, in contemporary social sciences, predominant theory is Carl Marx’s theory of social conflict, according to these theories different social classes, groups and identities fight over place in this world by pushing their agenda and needs on other groups, it do be similar to view of evolutionary psychology as well, the difference comes in conclusion Marx and evolutionary social sciences reach.
They Marxist conclusion states that because certain groups like men, white people, rich people etc hold more power historically, it’s justified for less evolutionarily dominant groups to pursue absolute power and control (beating up), while it’s forbidden for stronger groups to fight for their interest “beating down” less dominant groups as it perpetuates perceived oppression, that’s where double standards and two tiered policies come from.
Older, and perhaps popular again sociological theory states that social hierarchy is necessary to keep society functional and is a feature, marxists say it’s a bug as unless there is complete equality, society does not function but maintains status Quo.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR WOMEN IN BLACKPILL:
Blackpill correctly states you can’t jump above your league, if you were born somehow inferior it is only good if you accept your place and exist within your boundaries, attempts to override it are correctly called mere copes, not desirable and default goal of existence.
Therefore if women were to accept blackpill as dominant theory of society they would have to admit their inferiority and cease seeking power at all, accepting whatever more evolved groups have to offer, and this causes so called ratchet effect, you cannot take away something that was previously granted (like unfair gynocentric laws) because it would cause unrest in the group in which it needs to be taken away, no mater how illogical and absurd the thing given may be (similarly with abolition of slavery etc)





