Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory THEORY: And if hypergamy is a nature regulation for the increasing of population?

dyor-why

dyor-why

southcel
Joined
Nov 14, 2021
Posts
32
Just think about it: There will be a point in the future when females will not accept the 95% of men because would be considered ugly or normie.
Only 5% of men would reproduce and the cycle will goes on until we reach a peak (?

Another theory in my mind is this: If humanity goes on despite all the obstacles, the world would be consisted of an only race? No blacks, no asians (god save them), just caucasian faggots around the space :feelsautistic:

However that shit will not happens because climate change :feelsokman: LOOOOOL
 
Hypergamy Is amplified By some sick Bastards who hold Woman to the totem Pole . The Installation of Instagram , OF , Snapchat, Twitter , Tumblr , Tinder , Bumble , Okcupid , Lovo and what have you . Gave Woman their Goddess Complex " And the Ability to Select only the best man Possible ( Hypergamy )


It Is Just a mockery against Man in My Opinion.

@Mainländer @ItsOver4cel @Lebensmüder @Ritalincel @Waffle @Rotter @THE TRUE HONKLER @gimmedatrope999 @kekfuel
 
Last edited:
@[UWSL]
Mainländer
[/UWSL]@Mainländer @[UWSL]
ItsOver4cel
[/UWSL]@ItsOver4cel @[UWSL]L[/UWSL]@Lebensmüder @[UWSL]
Ritalincel
[/UWSL]@Ritalincel @[UWSL]
Waffle
[/UWSL]@Waffle @[UWSL]
Rotter
[/UWSL]@Rotter @[UWSL]
THE TRUE HONKLER
[/UWSL]@THE TRUE HONKLER @[UWSL]
gimmedatrope999
[/UWSL]@gimmedatrope999 @[UWSL]
kekfuel
[/UWSL]@kekfuel
 
Hypergamy Is amplified By some sick Bastards who hold Woman to the totem Pole . The Installation of Instagram , OF , Snapchat, Twitter , Tumblr , Tinder , Bumble , Okcupid , Lovo and what have you . Gave Woman their Goddess Complex " And the Ability to Select only the best man Possible ( Hypergamy )


It Is Just a mockery against Man in My Opinion.

@Mainländer @ItsOver4cel @Lebensmüder @Ritalincel @Waffle @Rotter @THE TRUE HONKLER @gimmedatrope999 @kekfuel
100% this.
"Natural" doesn't mean we have to accept it.
Nature knows no moral.

In nature following things happen:

Necrophilia: look at Rhinella proboscidea which uses it even as a reproductive strategy by squeezing eggs out of dead females or at teiids/ducks that routinely do it for sexual release (male tegus even wait on streets to rape fresh roadkill)

Infanticide: In many species with harems, if the leading male dies the new male kills the offspring

Zoophilia: Male snapping turtles routinely rape other species often while mutilating them (like decapitation/biting off their heads), dolphins/otters do it too

Sexual coercion: Why do you think a mallard has such a long, corkscrew-like dick? For raping females. Why do you think water striders have long legs? For raping females. Antagonistic coevolution due to sexual conflict gave males/females both traits to commit and defend against rape.

Among others that rang from genital plugs (closing off female genitalia after copulation to prevent her from having sex with other males, a kind of chastity belt), to anti-aphrosidiacs (chemicals given to a female to suppress sexual behavior) to inducing abortion/child death (via chemicals in mice).

If nature was something to just accept we wouldn't transplant hearts or fly to different plants, we would still shit in caves and die after minor injuries due to an infection with Tetanus or whatever. If the (natural) behavior of men gets suppressed by society in the long term, why should females not face restrictions?

Just fucking laugh, they always say "X is a social construct/therefore invalidated", but human rights or any rights/morals are nothing more than that either, but in their hubris they think that they are undebatable while in fact everything is debatable depending on the current social climate. They want nature where it suits them and when they deem themselves as the strongest, but as soon as shit happens that they dislike they go crying for daddy state and want lenience (like when a man leaves after impregnation which is still a valid reproduction strategy naturally speaking).

If you say one natural behavior is good/acceptable, the others are too.
 
Last edited:
Women have always been hypergamous
 
Hypergamy has always existed, it just so happened that with the Internet and mass urbanization, it was given an opportunity to run rampant. The timing is almost perfect because population is running rampant for a similar reason - industrialization.
 
Hypergamy Is amplified By some sick Bastards who hold Woman to the totem Pole . The Installation of Instagram , OF , Snapchat, Twitter , Tumblr , Tinder , Bumble , Okcupid , Lovo and what have you . Gave Woman their Goddess Complex " And the Ability to Select only the best man Possible ( Hypergamy )


It Is Just a mockery against Man in My Opinion.
The more incels the better. It's only a matter of time until we reach a breaking point and foids lose their rights. We're already starting to see it thanks to the growing popularity of Incels, Incel forums, and Incel lingo. The system will collapse and we'll go back to a Hard Patriarchy.
 
Nah. The average IQ of humans is decreasing. Because stupid femoids are choosing only looks. Only intelligent people changed the world. Without them we were nothing. If foids still gonna continue this hypergamy by only looks, the future people will be pure retard.
 
Last edited:
100% this.
"Natural" doesn't mean we have to accept it.
Nature knows no moral.

In nature following things happen:

Necrophilia: look at Rhinella proboscidea which uses it even as a reproductive strategy by squeezing eggs out of dead females or at teiids/ducks that routinely do it for sexual release (male tegus even wait on streets to rape fresh roadkill)

Infanticide: In many species with harems, if the leading male dies the new male kills the offspring

Zoophilia: Male snapping turtles routinely rape other species often while mutilating them (like decapitation/biting off their heads), dolphins/otters do it too

Sexual coercion: Why do you think a mallard has such a long, corkscrew-like dick? For raping females. Why do you think water striders have long legs? For raping females. Antagonistic coevolution due to sexual conflict gave males/females both traits to commit and defend against rape.

Among others that rang from genital plugs (closing off female genitalia after copulation to prevent her from having sex with other males, a kind of chastity belt), to anti-aphrosidiacs (chemicals given to a female to suppress sexual behavior) to inducing abortion/child death (via chemicals in mice).

If nature was something to just accept we wouldn't transplant hearts or fly to different plants, we would still shit in caves and die after minor injuries due to an infection with Tetanus or whatever. If the (natural) behavior of men gets suppressed by society in the long term, why should females not face restrictions?

Just fucking laugh, they always say "X is a social construct/therefore invalidated", but human rights or any rights/morals are nothing more than that either, but in their hubris they think that they are undebatable while in fact everything is debatable depending on the current social climate. They want nature where it suits them and when they deem themselves as the strongest, but as soon as shit happens that they dislike they go crying for daddy state and want lenience (like when a man leaves after impregnation which is still a valid reproduction strategy naturally speaking).

If you say one natural behavior is good/acceptable, the others are too.
Heat of the sun's core in Celsius IQ
It's what I've been always saying, nature is actually not as pretty as soyciety thinks, and there's examples to spare. Just try to lock yourself up with a tiger and just see what happens, for instance. Very pretty amirite?

Rape is actually pretty common in various species, be it birds, bugs, or even bigger, domesticated animals such as dogs. Heck not even humans with established laws can control their sexual drive sometimes. In the end morals are just a social construct that were created as a mass control weapon alongside religion. Because otherwise, humanity as a whole would just turn into a chaotic fiesta.

If the law didn't exist for 1 day, I can assure you shit would just go wild and people would kill each other for anything, kinda like in the movie ''The Purge''.
 
100% this.
"Natural" doesn't mean we have to accept it.
Nature knows no moral.

In nature following things happen:

Necrophilia: look at Rhinella proboscidea which uses it even as a reproductive strategy by squeezing eggs out of dead females or at teiids/ducks that routinely do it for sexual release (male tegus even wait on streets to rape fresh roadkill)

Infanticide: In many species with harems, if the leading male dies the new male kills the offspring

Zoophilia: Male snapping turtles routinely rape other species often while mutilating them (like decapitation/biting off their heads), dolphins/otters do it too

Sexual coercion: Why do you think a mallard has such a long, corkscrew-like dick? For raping females. Why do you think water striders have long legs? For raping females. Antagonistic coevolution due to sexual conflict gave males/females both traits to commit and defend against rape.

Among others that rang from genital plugs (closing off female genitalia after copulation to prevent her from having sex with other males, a kind of chastity belt), to anti-aphrosidiacs (chemicals given to a female to suppress sexual behavior) to inducing abortion/child death (via chemicals in mice).

If nature was something to just accept we wouldn't transplant hearts or fly to different plants, we would still shit in caves and die after minor injuries due to an infection with Tetanus or whatever. If the (natural) behavior of men gets suppressed by society in the long term, why should females not face restrictions?

Just fucking laugh, they always say "X is a social construct/therefore invalidated", but human rights or any rights/morals are nothing more than that either, but in their hubris they think that they are undebatable while in fact everything is debatable depending on the current social climate. They want nature where it suits them and when they deem themselves as the strongest, but as soon as shit happens that they dislike they go crying for daddy state and want lenience (like when a man leaves after impregnation which is still a valid reproduction strategy naturally speaking).

If you say one natural behavior is good/acceptable, the others are too.
Holy shit, good point here. "Nature has no moral" is in fact the harsh reality
Nah. The average IQ of humans is decreasing. Because stupid femoids are choosing only looks. Only intelligent people changed the world. Without them we were nothing. If foids still gonna continue this hypergamy by only looks, the future people will be pure retard.
Is funny to see that currently, because in the past one of the traits that evolve (was attractive to neanderthal foids) was the size of the brain. Nowadays is only a funny joke have an average-above IQ, you are mogged to point where is a mess in society
Heat of the sun's core in Celsius IQ
It's what I've been always saying, nature is actually not as pretty as soyciety thinks, and there's examples to spare. Just try to lock yourself up with a tiger and just see what happens, for instance. Very pretty amirite?

Rape is actually pretty common in various species, be it birds, bugs, or even bigger, domesticated animals such as dogs. Heck not even humans with established laws can control their sexual drive sometimes. In the end morals are just a social construct that were created as a mass control weapon alongside religion. Because otherwise, humanity as a whole would just turn into a chaotic fiesta.

If the law didn't exist for 1 day, I can assure you shit would just go wild and people would kill each other for anything, kinda like in the movie ''The Purge''.
Hell yeah, laws keeps us at bay. No discussion for that
 
Last edited:
100% this.
"Natural" doesn't mean we have to accept it.
Nature knows no moral.

In nature following things happen:

Necrophilia: look at Rhinella proboscidea which uses it even as a reproductive strategy by squeezing eggs out of dead females or at teiids/ducks that routinely do it for sexual release (male tegus even wait on streets to rape fresh roadkill)

Infanticide: In many species with harems, if the leading male dies the new male kills the offspring

Zoophilia: Male snapping turtles routinely rape other species often while mutilating them (like decapitation/biting off their heads), dolphins/otters do it too

Sexual coercion: Why do you think a mallard has such a long, corkscrew-like dick? For raping females. Why do you think water striders have long legs? For raping females. Antagonistic coevolution due to sexual conflict gave males/females both traits to commit and defend against rape.

Among others that rang from genital plugs (closing off female genitalia after copulation to prevent her from having sex with other males, a kind of chastity belt), to anti-aphrosidiacs (chemicals given to a female to suppress sexual behavior) to inducing abortion/child death (via chemicals in mice).

If nature was something to just accept we wouldn't transplant hearts or fly to different plants, we would still shit in caves and die after minor injuries due to an infection with Tetanus or whatever. If the (natural) behavior of men gets suppressed by society in the long term, why should females not face restrictions?

Just fucking laugh, they always say "X is a social construct/therefore invalidated", but human rights or any rights/morals are nothing more than that either, but in their hubris they think that they are undebatable while in fact everything is debatable depending on the current social climate. They want nature where it suits them and when they deem themselves as the strongest, but as soon as shit happens that they dislike they go crying for daddy state and want lenience (like when a man leaves after impregnation which is still a valid reproduction strategy naturally speaking).

If you say one natural behavior is good/acceptable, the others are too.
Very Insightfull , Nature Has No Morals " thats a Nixe quote , lol . Your really Something Else brain wise "

And yea Woman Just love playing victim when They are Called Out but Most man Got so cucked over the years and therefore Play along with the Bullshit.
[UWSL]. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]I Really Wonder when Shit Hits the Fan or that Whe are so conditioned to be docile little Shits that nothing will happen.[/UWSL]
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top