I addressed it, I linked the thread debunking why that study is bullshit. If you want a TLDR: muttsmericans don't know what arabs look like, and I've constantly presented evidence for this on this very forum. So when you ask some mutts in 2006 what they think of arabs, they assume we all look like jeets, when in fact, Arabs have some of the moggest phenotypes outside of Europe.
View attachment 1278833View attachment 1278834View attachment 1278835View attachment 1278837View attachment 1278838View attachment 1278840
Doesn't change that Jeets mog Chinks. Round eyes + thin nose = god to gooks.
Arguements like this is why I know you are bluepilled. Racial reputation affects SMV, the way people preceieve a race matters. Watch Rehab Room, he explains these concepts very well, although I made a thread on this myself. Indians suffer from negative cultural failo, which is why when an indian who LOOKS racually ambigious larps as arab/latino, he gets treated better despite his physical appearance not changing. So it's not just about looks. That said, again, when I say indian, in this context, I am primarily talking about NW indians. Many NW indians can pass as arab and have vaguely mediteranean-adjacent features, ergo, they MOG CHINKS.
We weren't talking about white women, but asians, JFL. Keep track of the discssion, retard.
No, Southern Indians are VEDDOID, they are barely caucasion by any stretch of the imagination.
West Africans and African Americans also have caucasion blood, dumb fuck. Average West African is 20-30% Caucasion, and when you consider many African Americans are DESCENDED from West African PLUS having European DNA, most African Americans are probably 30-60% Caucasion.
They're not, that would be central african manlets. I see MANY pure black nigger immigrants and they're all short and ugly. Somalis are some of the tallest people
Map of shortest races
View attachment 1278850
It's within the same ball park, it's an orange-yellow skin tone, which many arabs have. Either naturally or through also tanning.
You can say it's not true at all, but I've already shown articles and proof that say otherwise. I'm not arguing this point with you beyond this.
it's not just Asian cultures that associated paleness with the middle and upper classes. europeans and americans always had the exact same...
www.girlsaskguys.com
In the realm of skincare and aesthetics, tanned skin has often been associated with a look of health and vitality. While it's crucial to approach tanning with caution to protect against harmful UV rays, moderate and protected exposure to the sun can have benefits, particularly for men. Here we...
litchisiciliani.com
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R55SZPG5Q5w&ab_channel=KamaTV
Yes, because that's if you include dravidians, again FFS, I'm talking about NW indians when I say indian.
No they're not.
Nah.
1. Big noses aren't seen as ugly on men
2. many europeans get nose jobs
3. Dinarid pheno is fully European yet they have massive noses
you can keep repeating the same shit all you want, those 3 facts don't change.
Here's some europeans getting their massive noses shrunk down.
View attachment 1278870View attachment 1278871View attachment 1278874View attachment 1278876View attachment 1278878View attachment 1278880View attachment 1278881
No
No
View attachment 1278863
source: my ass
source: my ass
Nah.
No they're not.
Many blacks have caucasion features, dumb monkey
View attachment 1278883
Here's actual congolese man JFL
View attachment 1278884View attachment 1278885View attachment 1278886View attachment 1278887
No they dont.
They still mog chinks