You are too fucking retarded for this conversation. I have tried to make things as simple and clear as possible for your 60 IQ mutt brain.
1. Being Caucasian or closer to Caucasian does not matter when you are brown and look ethnic. Being brown and ethnic will put you below non caucasians.
2. Curries are phenotypically more Caucasian than both Asians and Blacks. It's not just the northern curries; curries, in general, are phenotypically more caucasian than Asians and Blacks.
3. Both Asians and Blacks mog curries. Not only African Americans but black immigrants in France, Canada, America, and Britain.
4. African Americans are still negroid despite small white admixture because black genes are dominant.
5. Asians are mongoloid and Blacks are negroid. They look less Caucasian than both Sand and Curry. They have a higher SMV than both.
I will now list all of the evidence proving above. Keep in mind you have provided no proof for anything and have too low an IQ to even understand what I am talking about.
Here are the two studies saying curries and sands are the least attractive races.
View attachment 1279837
View attachment 1279839
The first study in black and white looks at online dating preferences. It shows which races were the most excluded the two most excluded races were Middle Easterners at 95% and Indians at 96%. They both scored at the bottom, and Foids did not care one bit about them being "Caucasian". They liked Blacks and Asians more despite them being mongoloid and negroid.
The second, more recent study, which is in color, looked at females' increased and decreased physical attraction toward various races of males.
"Which of these races do you experience increased attraction towards" Indians and Arabs got the lowest votes. Middle Easterners/Arabs got 84 and Indians got 61.
Question 2: "Which of these races do you experience decreased attraction towards?" Indians and Middle Easterners/Arabs got the most votes for decreasing attraction in the foids. Indians got 270 and Middle Easterners got 167.
They scored the worst on both questions.
Video evidence
Quotes from the video: "What's one race you wouldn't date?" Everyone says Indian. The interviewer asks why and the white foid says, "It's just the way they look," and laughs.
View: https://youtu.be/dNKBrILSsE8?si=Cj6JrwcT3Jo1PRLM
"What race would you not date," everyone says, Indian. "They're built funny" They are ugly" "They're weird" "They're not really attractive" "They stink" "They're musty"
View: https://youtu.be/dNKBrILSsE8?si=Cj6JrwcT3Jo1PRLM
Sandcel tries to get blonde German Becky. She can't hold back her laughter at how crazy he is to think he has a chance with her. The rejection is posted on TikTok as "POV: Your German friend is a refugee magnet"
View: https://youtu.be/nBujzTMzIPg?si=nY746ClYWOExm1S3
White influencer makes TikTok of her just skipping past Indians on Omegle and then uploads it.
View: https://youtu.be/lzxIFJqIky0?si=iI3ic4UcUApzy19J
Another what race would you not date video. Followed by normies answering Indian non-stop.
View: https://youtu.be/C8ttZyAkz6Q?si=9PrBUeYOmmUMWHZO
White Canadian women on the ultra-liberal platform Reddit say they HATE seeing Indian men on dating apps.
View attachment 1279872
Everything from dating studies to interviews to social media like Reddit points to one conclusion: people think Curries and Sand are really ugly.
Curries are phenotypically caucasian and technically closer to whites in appearance than Black negroids and Asian mongoloids. That doesn't matter they are uglier than both. All of this also applies to sand as you can see from the two studies. They literally asked, "Which of these races do you experience increased attraction towards" and "Which of these races do you experience decreased attraction towards" Curries and sands were at the bottom of both questions. In the racial exclusion study, 96% of curries and 95% of sands were the two worst scores.
In the videos, they said curries are "ugly," "built funny," "not attractive," and many others. You are hearing it from the horse's mouth.
Curries are Caucasian and closer to whites than Black negroids and Asian mongoloids. That doesn't fucking matter because they have shit-skin and ugly ethnic features.
All of this also applies to sand. Sands have shit-skin and ugly ethnic features too. In the video with the sandcel asking out the blonde german foid she just started laughing becuase of how ridiculous it is that a sand thought he had chance with her.
Caucasian curries and sands get mogged by Black negroids and Mongoloid Asians because of their shit-colored skin and ugly ethnic faces. Being Caucasian doesn't fucking help you when you have poo skin and ethnic face.
You always cherrypick the whitest sands. The biggest sand country is Egypt at 116 million. 99% of sands are dark, short, hairy, and ugly.
This is what the average sand looks like
View attachment 1279897
Now that you see that, it makes perfect sense why sands are at the bottom, along with curries. Whites know what sands look like. Sands are all over their social media and TV feed and it has been that way for decades. They just don't like what they see.
I have posted numerous studies, street interviews with many participants, rejection videos, and even leftists on Reddit hating browns.
People think we are ugly. Foids think we are ugly. That is what all the evidence points to.
You have denied and ignored all of the evidence, studies, interviews, videos, etc. You are too fucking brain-dead to even understand what I am saying and keep up with the conversation. You have zero fucking reading comprehension and miss all of my points.
You have not posted a single piece of evidence backing up your nonsense. You're too dumb to even comprehend what I am saying. NOT ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE.
All of the evidence and observable reality says I'm right. It's not my fault you are too shitbrained to understand it.
I am tired of arguing with a deranged retard who cannot acknowledge the facts. Fuck off you're blocked faggot.