Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The "Science" proves a Creator

Sir Silentium

Sir Silentium

π•―π–Šπ–šπ–˜ π–π–šπ–‘π–™ †
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Joined
Jan 8, 2025
Posts
11,543
Online time
7d 11h


No further explanation required

@thevineyardworker @The_word_made_flesh @Krad @Ricecel Sungnodius
 
I'd agree with the video. The fact that something had to cause the universe is one of the main reasons I believe in God.
 
- the fact many people agree that something is true doesn't mean it is actually true;
- "cause-effect" is not inherent to the universe but a construction of the mind to interpret it, it can be very true that not everything has a cause, in particular, that the universe began from a void;
- indemostrable propositions are the realm of speculation and, thus, religion;
- one cannot prove the origin of the universe logically. Why? Agrippa's Trilemma.

agnosticism is the only intellectually honest position.
 
"cause-effect" is not inherent to the universe but a construction of the mind to interpret it, it can be very true that not everything has a cause, in particular, that the universe began from a void;
 
- "cause-effect" is not inherent to the universe but a construction of the mind to interpret it, it can be very true that not everything has a cause, in particular, that the universe began from a void;
so it came from nothing? :lul:
agnosticism is the only intellectually honest position.
cope
 
"Science" lol.
pls dont do that again. it just reveals how religious ppl are so low-iq. keep talking about morality, theology and the bible, these stuff doesnt require any iq.
 
Yeah its called being All-Powerful

happenstance?
What is that?

Its either He exists or He doesnt

'dont think about it bro or you'll end up at God eventually'
Missed the point award. grats.
Happenstance is an english word look for it in a dictionary.
I will ignore you and never have to read your babble again.
 
"Science" lol.
pls dont do that again. it just reveals how religious ppl are so low-iq. keep talking about morality, theology and the bible, these stuff doesnt require any iq.
 
Missed the point award. grats.
What did i miss?
You didnt make an argument - you just said 'you worship a god that created things out of nowhere' - yeah, so?
Thats not a logical rebuttal with any force behind it....

Happenstance is an english word look for it in a dictionary.
You used the term but want me to look it up instead of explaining it yourself
Nice dodge jfl
It just means coincidence - so 'coincidence' has the power,knowledge etc to make a universe?
Bro doesnt wanna believe jfl

I will ignore you and never have to read your babble again.
Running when cornered?
Yeah what i thought
 
Dumb arguments debunked a million times
Debunk a single argument made regarding creation and i'll delete my account. There are none to debunk.
 
"Science" lol.
pls dont do that again. it just reveals how religious ppl are so low-iq. keep talking about morality, theology and the bible, these stuff doesnt require any iq.
I can mention points for why Christians have an objective higher IQ than the norm, but that's not the point.

This is such an ignorant comment that I don't even know what to say...
Bible = the truth
so
True theology = taken from a biblical account
True morality = taken from a biblical account

There are very very few moral absolutes in this world - The Bible and God's word is the only objective truth. Everything else is subjective.
 
- the fact many people agree that something is true doesn't mean it is actually true;
- "cause-effect" is not inherent to the universe but a construction of the mind to interpret it, it can be very true that not everything has a cause, in particular, that the universe began from a void;
- indemostrable propositions are the realm of speculation and, thus, religion;
- one cannot prove the origin of the universe logically. Why? Agrippa's Trilemma.

agnosticism is the only intellectually honest position.
Intelectual but egocentric.

Blaise Pascal’s Wager
 
I can mention points for why Christians have an objective higher IQ than the norm, but that's not the point.

This is such an ignorant comment that I don't even know what to say...
Bible = the truth
so
True theology = taken from a biblical account
True morality = taken from a biblical account

There are very very few moral absolutes in this world - The Bible and God's word is the only objective truth. Everything else is subjective.
hit em with the prolepsis man fuck yeah.
 
I can mention points for why Christians have an objective higher IQ than the norm, but that's not the point.
i doubt your "points" come from some ytb christian apologetic channel. nice try. disbelief has been demonstrated to have a statistically significant correlation with intelligence. it's had to argue against statistics.
This is such an ignorant comment that I don't even know what to say...
still, u choose to talk about morality and the bible, like i anticipated. it's more suitable to your iq level. dont touch science or philosophy tho, it's embarrassing even to watch.
Bible = the truth
so
True theology = taken from a biblical account
True morality = taken from a biblical account
are you protestant? the bible doesnt matter, the fucking interpretation matters. why do u think the protestant is so fucking fragmented.
There are very very few moral absolutes in this world - The Bible and God's word is the only objective truth. Everything else is subjective.
god's word change all the time man. what do u think jesus or paul or martin luther did? they fucking changed god's word :feelskek:
so does "christian ethics", whatever that is.
 
i doubt your "points" come from some ytb christian apologetic channel. nice try. disbelief has been demonstrated to have a statistically significant correlation with intelligence. it's had to argue against statistics.

still, u choose to talk about morality and the bible, like i anticipated. it's more suitable to your iq level. dont touch science or philosophy tho, it's embarrassing even to watch.

are you protestant? the bible doesnt matter, the fucking interpretation matters. why do u think the protestant is so fucking fragmented.

god's word change all the time man. what do u think jesus or paul or martin luther did? they fucking changed god's word :feelskek:
so does "christian ethics", whatever that is.
pls stop wasting your time and dedicate yourself to something more productive like rotting on the rest of the forum ok? can't reason when belief and faith and these things that these people center their whole life around are on the line
 
i doubt your "points" come from some ytb christian apologetic channel. nice try. disbelief has been demonstrated to have a statistically significant correlation with intelligence. it's had to argue against statistics.
Every true statistic in the world proves Gods existence. Without God, statistics would not even exist.

still, u choose to talk about morality and the bible, like i anticipated. it's more suitable to your iq level. dont touch science or philosophy tho, it's embarrassing even to watch.
Stop acting like a jewygit and make a counter argument. You leftists "statistically" aren't incels. Take your woke garbage somewhere else.

are you protestant? the bible doesnt matter, the fucking interpretation matters. why do u think the protestant is so fucking fragmented.
I can't even understand what you are saying. I am protestant, pentecostal. The only true denomination that is based off the New Testament.

god's word change all the time man. what do u think jesus or paul or martin luther did? they fucking changed god's word :feelskek:
so does "christian ethics", whatever that is.
Is this supposed to be a joke? Gods word hasn't and will never change. The 1611 KJV is the original and only true version of the bible.
 
Debunk a single argument made regarding creation and i'll delete my account. There are none to debunk.
Debunk basic watchmakers argument πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Have you done any philosophy

Why would you assume the universe to be the product of one creatore rather than many for example you cannot rationally prove one over the other

Boom destroyed any serious christian knows god cannot be proved scientifically
 
who cares nigga. If you actually believe in God then keep believing and don't force others to do it or else you seem insecure about your own beliefs.
 
who cares nigga. If you actually believe in God then keep believing and don't force others to do it or else you seem insecure about your own beliefs.
christians need to spread the "truth" o algo because their god imposed it or something. I'm sure they're making a great job seeing the state of the contemporary world btw. especially with these kinds of arguments that are laughable cuz they reveal the little amount of time they spent actually analyzing their thoughts instead of praying for their god. circular logic at its finest in this thread. just ignore and do something better.
 
Creators might exist, but if it's the god of Christianity, I don't think anyone can be sure. I'm pretty sure that the theory of evolution can't definitively explain the transition between species; parts must have been perfectly coordinated from the beginning, or organisms would have become deformed and died, like winged mammals or dinosaurs... archaeology isn't reliable in terms of carbon dating either, still relying on unprovable assumptions, and astronomy isn't much different. I don't think ancient people invented stories with a similar structure to gods descending from the air; perhaps they were telling the truth but exaggerating it, perhaps gods are just creatures with superior genes and technology; who knows?
 
you find Jesus
Bless You Help GIF by Mike Hitt
Sarcastic Charlie And The Chocolate Factory GIF


Hebrew music


View: https://youtu.be/MsrJeYLO4o4?si=PPLjQaUwH_rYw_mz
 

Similar threads

Sir Silentium
Replies
15
Views
564
The_word_made_flesh
T
Sir Silentium
Replies
16
Views
848
182ltn
182ltn
Sir Silentium
Replies
16
Views
2K
AmadeusCelibatus
AmadeusCelibatus
Sir Silentium
Replies
18
Views
854
David1033
David1033
Sir Silentium
Replies
25
Views
462
Rule breaker
R

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top