subhuman
Fuck it, we ball
★★★★★
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2022
- Posts
- 11,520
I. You Will Never Be A Man (YWNBAM)
At the foundation of subjective experience is, of course, the subject. The subject is created not in conception, nor in birth, but when it first discovers it has or lacks a penis. A female child notices that she does not have a penis and assumes it has been cut off by the mother, while a male child fears that his father will cut off his penis (castration complex). The subject is first structured based on this lack.
At the heart of Being is our sexual position, with its fundamental incompleteness. Being necessarily presupposes a lack which does not have a biological cause. This is why it's low IQ when incels blame their desires on their biology. There is nothing natural about desire, we have to be taught how to desire. Desire is the result of our fantasies which structures reality to cope with traumatic structures.
II. Women Don't Exist
Sexual difference is quite binary. As was shown with the castration complex, it's either you have a penis, or you don't. The phrasing of this formula is important, because what's notably absent is the signifier for the female equivalent of the phallic function. Women can only be defined in terms of men. The binary signifier for a woman independent of man is absent even from our unconscious. If you want to read more about this, Saint BPP has a good thread about how female sexuality is just an imitation of masculine sexuality.
III. There Is No Sexual Relationship
Because women don't exist, sexual relationships are impossible. It is commonly thought that your sexual partner is your "other half" and that your sexual partner will "complete you" and you will fit together like lock and key and so on. But the reality is that men and women aren't complementary, they are just two subjects structured around a lack. When you put them together, they will not make up for the other's lack because there is no relationship between the two. Being is always incomplete. In fact, the whole idea of fusion with a sexual partner is just an illusory fantasy we employ to cope with the trauma of the impossibility of a sexual relationship. The same is true of "love".
Zizek writes "Imagine a gradual process of getting to know a thing, a process of approximation in which the thing ultimately always eludes us, and then imagine that this process of approaching a thing is immanent to this thing itself, so that this thing circulates around a void, an impossibility, in its very core. And it is here that what Lacan calls objet petit a, the object-cause of desire, enters: objet a gives body to this void."
Fantasy allows us to imagine what the Other (in this case the sexual partner) wants from you, in a vain attempt to bridge the fundamental gap of sexual difference. It structures and directs our desires onto an object, called objet petit a. However, this ultimately fails to provide a substitute to the sexual relationship, because it only exists so far as we put ourselves into it and structure it. No actual relationship is established, as it's only an interaction with your own image of the Other. For men (and a lot of women), sexual pleasure comes from this objectification of their sexual partner. Interestingly, for women the greatest pleasures of sex are not sexual in nature. Zizek suggests that the most enticing fantasy of sex for women is the fantasy of telling the tale afterwards.
IV. At The Root Of The Male Fantasy Is A Man Dressed In Drag
I have always wondered why incels and men in general talk about fags so much, when they really don't have anything to do with inceldom. They are not foids so I don't desire them, and they are not in competition with me for foids. They are basically just irrelevant to me. So what makes them so traumatic to people that they seethe endlessly about them? The image of gay people and trannies is so shocking to men because it forces them to confront the core fantasy which structures and directs their desires, that their ideal woman is a dressed-up man.
Freud once said that a dream come true is a nightmare. Zizek gives an example of this as women being raped. As we all know, all women want to be brutally raped by a chad. But when they actually do get raped, they never stop bitching about it. The reason for this isn't that rape is bad, but being forced to confront your fantasies, which structure your reality, causes a complete collapse of your subjective world and exposes you to the brutalism of reality.
The problem for many men is that our desires can't cope with female desire and agency which excludes us. We want these women's sexualities to cater to men, sustained by fantasies originating from the phallic function. When female desire is not denied and suppressed, you basically get what we have now where a bunch of chadsexual foids are forming massive chad harems, losing their virginities at young ages, and becoming total sluts and whores. In contrast, the women of our fantasies act with only you, the male viewer, in mind.
V. Conclusion
Our suffering is caused by the false hope our fantasies give us that there is something out there. Inceldom sustains this fantasy by telling us that human connection is possible, but we just aren't attractive enough for it. This is a cope. We are all helplessly alone in our own heads, and there is no possible way to reach out and establish connections with people. We only interact with images that exist in our own heads.
Once we confront our fantasies and see them for what they are, irrational and impossible, we can finally break the spell they have on us. Rather than despairing over our isolation and continuing to fall prey to the cuck/homosexual mentality of wanting a relationship, we should embrace that we are alone while maintaining emotional distance from the brutalism of reality, basically unlocking the psychopath mind.
All women and people in general are empty headed and nothing but worthless pieces of meat. Thinking that feeling "desired" "loved" or "validated" is nothing but an ego delusion that not only won't make you fulfilled, but also thinking that it will makes you a bitch. The only "love" that you need is also the purest and most fulfilling form of love, that of self-love. Self-love that is not dependent on your images of nonexistent people.
At the foundation of subjective experience is, of course, the subject. The subject is created not in conception, nor in birth, but when it first discovers it has or lacks a penis. A female child notices that she does not have a penis and assumes it has been cut off by the mother, while a male child fears that his father will cut off his penis (castration complex). The subject is first structured based on this lack.
At the heart of Being is our sexual position, with its fundamental incompleteness. Being necessarily presupposes a lack which does not have a biological cause. This is why it's low IQ when incels blame their desires on their biology. There is nothing natural about desire, we have to be taught how to desire. Desire is the result of our fantasies which structures reality to cope with traumatic structures.
II. Women Don't Exist
Sexual difference is quite binary. As was shown with the castration complex, it's either you have a penis, or you don't. The phrasing of this formula is important, because what's notably absent is the signifier for the female equivalent of the phallic function. Women can only be defined in terms of men. The binary signifier for a woman independent of man is absent even from our unconscious. If you want to read more about this, Saint BPP has a good thread about how female sexuality is just an imitation of masculine sexuality.
III. There Is No Sexual Relationship
Because women don't exist, sexual relationships are impossible. It is commonly thought that your sexual partner is your "other half" and that your sexual partner will "complete you" and you will fit together like lock and key and so on. But the reality is that men and women aren't complementary, they are just two subjects structured around a lack. When you put them together, they will not make up for the other's lack because there is no relationship between the two. Being is always incomplete. In fact, the whole idea of fusion with a sexual partner is just an illusory fantasy we employ to cope with the trauma of the impossibility of a sexual relationship. The same is true of "love".
Zizek writes "Imagine a gradual process of getting to know a thing, a process of approximation in which the thing ultimately always eludes us, and then imagine that this process of approaching a thing is immanent to this thing itself, so that this thing circulates around a void, an impossibility, in its very core. And it is here that what Lacan calls objet petit a, the object-cause of desire, enters: objet a gives body to this void."
Fantasy allows us to imagine what the Other (in this case the sexual partner) wants from you, in a vain attempt to bridge the fundamental gap of sexual difference. It structures and directs our desires onto an object, called objet petit a. However, this ultimately fails to provide a substitute to the sexual relationship, because it only exists so far as we put ourselves into it and structure it. No actual relationship is established, as it's only an interaction with your own image of the Other. For men (and a lot of women), sexual pleasure comes from this objectification of their sexual partner. Interestingly, for women the greatest pleasures of sex are not sexual in nature. Zizek suggests that the most enticing fantasy of sex for women is the fantasy of telling the tale afterwards.
IV. At The Root Of The Male Fantasy Is A Man Dressed In Drag
I have always wondered why incels and men in general talk about fags so much, when they really don't have anything to do with inceldom. They are not foids so I don't desire them, and they are not in competition with me for foids. They are basically just irrelevant to me. So what makes them so traumatic to people that they seethe endlessly about them? The image of gay people and trannies is so shocking to men because it forces them to confront the core fantasy which structures and directs their desires, that their ideal woman is a dressed-up man.
Freud once said that a dream come true is a nightmare. Zizek gives an example of this as women being raped. As we all know, all women want to be brutally raped by a chad. But when they actually do get raped, they never stop bitching about it. The reason for this isn't that rape is bad, but being forced to confront your fantasies, which structure your reality, causes a complete collapse of your subjective world and exposes you to the brutalism of reality.
The problem for many men is that our desires can't cope with female desire and agency which excludes us. We want these women's sexualities to cater to men, sustained by fantasies originating from the phallic function. When female desire is not denied and suppressed, you basically get what we have now where a bunch of chadsexual foids are forming massive chad harems, losing their virginities at young ages, and becoming total sluts and whores. In contrast, the women of our fantasies act with only you, the male viewer, in mind.
V. Conclusion
Our suffering is caused by the false hope our fantasies give us that there is something out there. Inceldom sustains this fantasy by telling us that human connection is possible, but we just aren't attractive enough for it. This is a cope. We are all helplessly alone in our own heads, and there is no possible way to reach out and establish connections with people. We only interact with images that exist in our own heads.
Once we confront our fantasies and see them for what they are, irrational and impossible, we can finally break the spell they have on us. Rather than despairing over our isolation and continuing to fall prey to the cuck/homosexual mentality of wanting a relationship, we should embrace that we are alone while maintaining emotional distance from the brutalism of reality, basically unlocking the psychopath mind.
All women and people in general are empty headed and nothing but worthless pieces of meat. Thinking that feeling "desired" "loved" or "validated" is nothing but an ego delusion that not only won't make you fulfilled, but also thinking that it will makes you a bitch. The only "love" that you need is also the purest and most fulfilling form of love, that of self-love. Self-love that is not dependent on your images of nonexistent people.
Last edited: