Blackpill [For Normies & IncelTears] Modern Day Expressions Of Female Sexuality Are Cringe (Just Posturing, Trying To Emulate Male Sexuality - PENIS ENVY)

[BlkPillPres]

Sometimes I even wonder if women are sentient, because as soon as a cultural change happens they just fall in line, they don't think for themselves, they don't question whether something makes sense, all society has to do is hail a behavior or mindset as popular & acceptable, and they will take part in it

A good example of this is the expression of sexual desires (in relation to male bodies)

The reason why men obsess over certain body parts of a woman is because they intend to actually fuck those parts

Men who are "ass men" want to do anal (or fuck the cheeks)
Men who are "tits men" want to tit fuck and suck on them
Men who like women's faces and lips want to receive oral
Men who like feet want to get a "foot job"
Men who like hands want to get a "hand job"
Etc, etc, etc (are you noticing the trend here)

This is why men are always talking about the specific parts and thinking about and obsessing over those parts, because they want to fuck those parts, this is why it makes sense for a man to say "nice ass", he likes that her ass is "nice" because he intends to fuck it in some manner, a man says "nice tits" because he intends to fuck it in some manner, THERE IS SOMETHING HE CAN EXPLICITLY DO WITH SAID THINGS, WHICH IS WHY HE NOTICES THEM

Today you'll notice that women try to emulate male sexuality in this manner saying a guy has a "cute butt" or a "nice ass", and this idea always pops into my head when I see it expressed in media or I hear a woman say these things - "ok and what can you even do with that knowledge"

Ok ladies, that guy has a nice ass, NOW WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WITH HIS ASS WHEN YOU "GET IT"?

WHAT CAN YOU DO WITH THAT KNOWLEDGE?

...................................................exactly (ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, ITS NOTHING BUT POSTURING FOR A WOMAN TO SPEAK LIKE THAT)

There's nothing you can do to it, you don't have a penis, you are the object acted upon not the subject that acts, you are the penetrated not the penetrator, women trying to emulate male sexuality is not only cringey, its illogical

I guess women do this today because it feels "liberating" and its a "role reversal" kind of thing, and they "get to do it now", but that's because they interpret men doing it as some kind of malicious act, and this is them simply taking "their turn". They don't seem to understand that men are quite genuine when acting like this and saying these things and there is no malicious intent. We obsess over these parts and say these things, because we intended on doing something sexually explicit with said body parts that we find attractive, a woman trying to emulate this "practice" just feels so fake, it feels forced, because she knows full well there is nothing she can actually do with a "nice ass" other than see it

That "cute butt"
That "nice 6 pack"
Etc

YOU CAN'T ACTUALLY DO ANYTHING WITH IT, THE ONLY THING YOU CAN DO IS WHAT YOU ARE CURRENTLY DOING WHILST TALKING ABOUT IT, LOOK AT IT

I mean I guess they could lick it or something, but that doesn't really sound like something the average straight man would want, and it sounds like a reversal of the usual role men want in the bedroom, the role of dominance

For men, the process of "taking it all in" and talking about it, is about fantasizing about what you plan on doing to it, it just doesn't work when women try it, because there is no after, nothing else happens, that's the furthest any use of the body part gets, mental masturbation, visual stimuli, the end

Women are trying to emulate male sexuality but they don't realize it "just doesn't fit", because male sexuality is of the role of the "actor", and female sexuality is of the role of the "object" (that is acted upon), the expressions of male sexuality exhibit this, because when things are spoken about sexually, it is implied that said thing WILL BE ACTED UPON. So when women try to emulate male sexuality in this manner and speak about male body parts in the same fashion, they don't seem to get it just doesn't work, because they can't act upon anything, they lack the equipment

THIS NEW BEHAVIOR IS ONE OF THE MOST OBVIOUS EXAMPLES OF PENIS ENVY EVER, BECAUSE ITS WOMEN GOING AROUND ACTING AS IF THEY HAVE A PENIS

 

[tulasdanslos]

They have tongues, too.
A nice ass means that they can thrust harder, too. It's not just psychological like you want it to be, it's actual genetically embedded in them.

 

[Nothingness]

As for "nice ass". Freud thought that women subconsciosly enwy male penis. They actualy want to fuck man but they can not - according to Freud

 

[BlkPillPres]

As for "nice ass". Freud thought that women subconsciosly enwy male penis. They actualy want to fuck man but they can not - according to Freud

Yeah, I pointed out that this behavior is connected to penis envy

 

[lightskin2thousand0]

Obvious yea

 

[Nothingness]

Yeah, I pointed out that this behavior is connected to penis envy

And remember woman s obsession with ass gay sex. Those animes.

 

[ThirdWorldcel]

Post-modernist feminism hasn't achieved more better relations between men and women, it has made an entire generation of poor little kids to even interact with the oppossite sex.

 

[turbocuckcel_7000]

Very true, it's all fake copied shit.

Now, this is where I blow your mind by telling you how I had sassy female classmates, back in 2001, around 7th grade or so, saying shit out loud like "hey you've got such a fuckable ass, _____" at male classmates they liked.

In 2001, before feminism took root in the Balkans, before Tinder, before degeneracy culture spread wide, before any of that shit.

Women basically have a whole fucking circuit in their brains that makes them turn off all grace and sensibility, and start emulating male behavior in as crass and unfiltered a fashion as possible, it's built-in. Just takes a little male weakness and permisiveness to trigger it.

 

[Deleted member 1042]

Feminists and the like encourage this behaviors in name of "equality." And so young women are playing the game like men would play it - if men were playing on tutorial mode that is. They hop from Chad dick to Tyrone dick getting their fill, because is that not what sexual liberation is about? Of course now they feel bad about themselves, and take to blaming men once more for shaming their sexuality. Has it not occurred to these females that it is simply not in their nature to enjoy it the way men would enjoy it? Why would evolution have you pregnant and essentially disabled for 9 months for you to think it's in your nature to hop from dick to dick and feel good about yourself? What a twisted sense of equality.

I think this western fascination with lbgt movements is a reflection of the female collective conscious and it's accompanying neurosis. We went from a patriarch (masculine energy) to something that isn't even matriarchal or egalitarian. What are females called when they want to become males? Transexuals. This is what happens when vocal feminists (see masculine femcels) front their liberation movement.

 

[Deleted member 4159]

Women are pathetic.

 

[Deleted member 6657]

Thank your local rabbi and his friends in Hollywood.

 

[ionlycopenow]

It's why it's so weird when a girl says she "fucked" a dude. No you didn't you whore youre rhe kne who took it up the ass.

 

[FinnCel]

This is why women shouldn't talk

 

[arabce1]

Some of this is agreeable. However six pack abs? Six pack abs are a health indicator. Women are programmed to like them because it is biologically favorable.

 

[Ellsworth]

Very based op.

I think it extends to more than just sexuality. Women are sheep that just go along with the latest trends and what is considered pc. Some men do but they are more likely to think for themselves and question things. I guess this is why women seem to be more susceptible to advertising.

 

[Over4Mexicels]

As for "nice ass". Freud thought that women subconsciosly enwy male penis. They actualy want to fuck man but they can not - according to Freud

They do it by other means

 

[BlkPillPres]

It's why it's so weird when a girl says she "fucked" a dude. No you didn't you whore youre rhe kne who took it up the ass.

JFL exactly, its like you didn't fuck anyone, fuck is a verb, you got fucked

 

[Deleted member 18912]

They are very adaptive to their environment.
The environment is the leading force of how they will behave.

 

[BlkPillPres]

Six pack abs are a health indicator

Yeah but its not something you can do something sexually explicity too, that's my point, eyeing indicators of genetic health is female sexuality, because its about choosing the mate that GETS TO FUCK YOU, women don't actually do any fucking, which is why them emulating male sexuality in this manner always seems off and doesn't make sense

 

[littlemanhikicel]

Yes I notice that too , they copy the male behavior because they feel week and inferior.

 

[FlyFace]

Women basically have a whole fucking circuit in their brains that makes them turn off all grace and sensibility, and start emulating male behavior in as crass and unfiltered a fashion as possible, it's built-in. Just takes a little male weakness and permisiveness to trigger it.

Copious amounts of Alcohol tends to lower their inhibitions real sharpish too.

They are very adaptive to their environment.
The environment is the leading force of how they will behave.

Throughout History we know this to be true.. genetically they have always adapted to a new environment for survival.

 

[DoctorBlythe]

Yeah but its not something you can do something sexually explicity too, that's my point, eyeing indicators of genetic health is female sexuality, because its about choosing the mate that GETS TO FUCK YOU, women don't actually do any fucking, which is why them emulating male sexuality in this manner always seems off and doesn't make sense

What about women who have hand fetish? Hand fetish is incredibly common among foids. And you can get literally fucked by a hand.

 

[BlkPillPres]

What about women who have hand fetish? Hand fetish is incredibly common among foids. And you can get literally fucked by a hand.

Guys who like tits like big tits but they like tits period, they appreciate small tits too, men who have a foot fetish have favorites I'm sure, but they like women's feet period, how many women do you think get turned on by a "wristcel" because they just like hands so much...................... exactly, women don't really have fetishes, their fetish always revolves around one thing, indicators of genetic superiority, the end, that's not really a fetish, that's just the drive to reproduce high quality offspring

There are guys who like BBW (obese bitches), I've never seen any porn category for the female equivalent, yet I can find a "big cock" category on every porn site, and that's because women only want genetic quality, women don't "fetishize" anything but genetic superiority, how many views and downloads do you think the "small cock" category gets huh? JFL. Women aren't really "true fetishists", at the end of the day its just about fucking Chad, that's not a fetish

Even all the things they want to speak of as fetishes - "OMG I'm so weird and different, I'm into S&M, I'm into Rape, etc", its really just about them being man handled by a man they deem to be a high quality specimen, and they all delude themselves into thinking they "have fetishes" like men, at the end of the day, its just about chasing Chad

Having distinct and "quirky" personality traits, IS A MALE TRAIT, women are barely even human

 

[DoctorBlythe]

Guys who like tits like big tits but they like tits period, they appreciate small tits too, men who have a foot fetish have favorites I'm sure, but they like women's feet period, how many women do you think get turned on by a "wristcel" because they just like hands so much...................... exactly, women don't really have fetishes, their fetish always revolves around one thing, indicators of genetic superiority, the end, that's not really a fetish, that's just the drive to reproduce high quality offspring

There are guys who like BBW (obese bitches), I've never seen any porn category for the female equivalent, yet I can find a "big cock" category on every porn site, and that's because women only want genetic quality, women don't "fetishize" anything but genetic superiority, how many views and downloads do you think the "small cock" category gets huh? JFL. Women aren't really "true fetishists", at the end of the day its just about fucking Chad, that's not a fetish

Even all the things they want to speak of as fetishes - "OMG I'm so weird and different, I'm into S&M, I'm into Rape, etc", its really just about them being man handled by a man they deem to be a high quality specimen, and they all delude themselves into thinking they "have fetishes" like men, at the end of the day, its just about chasing Chad

Having distinct and "quirky" personality traits, IS A MALE TRAIT, women are barely even human

I don't know man, I love tits, but I can't say I'm turned on by small tits (even if they look feminine). And I'm sure most guys who are into feet don't get off to wrinkly and rough looking feet, most of them are only into smooth, nice feet. You also can't say male feitshes are that practical, for example, if male likes small tits, how is he gonna get a titjob? There are also some males who are into midriffs (I'm one of them), but how can you fuck a midriff? Wouldn't fucking midriff be basically the same as woman getting off on male's sixpack with her clit? Using pillow is a popular method of masturbation among women, and that would be basically the same thing. Same with riding leg or arm (and lots of women seem to have arm/leg fetishes).
And yeah, there's a male equivalent of BBW, it's called dadbod. Very popular among some women.

I'm not really interested in debating your general points, I agree with them, especially about penis envy and trying to emulate males and masculine behaviour, which is just ridiculous, since their libido is so much lower. I just wonder about those details lol.

 

[BlkPillPres]

And yeah, there's a male equivalent of BBW, it's called dadbod. Very popular among some women.

Dude come on now, I know what dadbod is and its not the male equivalent of BBW

Just google BBW and then google dadbod, its not even close, dadbod is like guys with a "pot belly", BBW is literally obese women, you can't seriously be comparing the two, and to say its "very popular among some women" is an overstatement, most of those women you speak of are older women, likely in their 30's, afraid of the wall and desperate to "settle down", if they were in their prime you think they'd be interested in that shit, like come on dude

 

[DoctorBlythe]

Dude come on now, I know what dadbod is and its not the male equivalent of BBW

Just google BBW and then google dadbod, its not even close, dadbod is like guys with a "pot belly", BBW is literally obese women, you can't seriously be comparing the two, and to say its "very popular among some women" is an overstatement, most of those women you speak of are older women, likely in their 30's, afraid of the wall and desperate to "settle down", if they were in their prime you think they'd be interested in that shit, like come on dude

To me all fat people look about the same, disgusting lards. Idk bro, that shit sells, and I've seen plenty of females being interested in specifically tall, fat dude (way more than females interested in tall lanky man). I think it's because they associate that fatness combined with big frame and hairy body with strength (and high T).

 

[BlkPillPres]

To me all fat people look about the same

So you've just admitted that we should compeltely disregard anything you have to say on this specific issue then JFL

I've seen plenty of females being interested in specifically tall, fat dude

No they are interested in his tallness DESPITE him being fat (not because of it), if he was short they wouldn't be attracted to the fatness INDEPENDENT of the tallness, your entire argument here sounds like complete BS

I think it's because they associate that fatness combined with big frame and hairy body with strength (and high T).

Fatness helps with "frame frauding" but again it only looks good IF YOU ARE TALL, women are attracted TO THE TALLNESS not the fat

Either way I've grown tired of this particular argument, believe what you want, but it doesn't make any sense

 

[ShyManlet]

So you've just admitted that we should compeltely disregard anything you have to say on this specific issue then JFL



No they are interested in his tallness DESPITE him being fat (not because of it), if he was short they wouldn't be attracted to the fatness INDEPENDENT of the tallness, your entire argument here sounds like complete BS



Fatness helps with "frame frauding" but again it only looks good IF YOU ARE TALL, women are attracted TO THE TALLNESS not the fat

Either way I've grown tired of this particular argument, believe what you want, but it doesn't make any sense

Lol why you always mad bro...

 

[Delusion]

Dude come on now, I know what dadbod is and its not the male equivalent of BBW

Just google BBW and then google dadbod, its not even close, dadbod is like guys with a "pot belly", BBW is literally obese women, you can't seriously be comparing the two, and to say its "very popular among some women" is an overstatement, most of those women you speak of are older women, likely in their 30's, afraid of the wall and desperate to "settle down", if they were in their prime you think they'd be interested in that shit, like come on dude

You are right

Though you forgot to add one more thing, while BBW is a legitimate fetish, meaning that men who are into BBWs will favour those type of women over the usual Bimbo regardless of the options he has

Women who are "into" dad bods is nothing more than a insecurity, she fears the contrast of a superior specimen illumining her flaws, bringing forth her deep shame into the light. That is why you always here women say "I don't want a guy more pretty than me"

Insecurities and nothing more

 

[DoctorBlythe]

So you've just admitted that we should compeltely disregard anything you have to say on this specific issue then JFL



No they are interested in his tallness DESPITE him being fat (not because of it), if he was short they wouldn't be attracted to the fatness INDEPENDENT of the tallness, your entire argument here sounds like complete BS



Fatness helps with "frame frauding" but again it only looks good IF YOU ARE TALL, women are attracted TO THE TALLNESS not the fat

Either way I've grown tired of this particular argument, believe what you want, but it doesn't make any sense

JFL dude, that's what I was saying - they are interested in dadbods because they appear tall, strong and dominant thanks to their extra fat. Not despite their fatness, that extra fat makes them look stronger and more capable (at least to some women).

 

[ShyManlet]

Feminists and the like encourage this behaviors in name of "equality." And so young women are playing the game like men would play it - if men were playing on tutorial mode that is. They hop from Chad dick to Tyrone dick getting their fill, because is that not what sexual liberation is about? Of course now they feel bad about themselves, and take to blaming men once more for shaming their sexuality. Has it not occurred to these females that it is simply not in their nature to enjoy it the way men would enjoy it? Why would evolution have you pregnant and essentially disabled for 9 months for you to think it's in your nature to hop from dick to dick and feel good about yourself? What a twisted sense of equality.

I think this western fascination with lbgt movements is a reflection of the female collective conscious and it's accompanying neurosis. We went from a patriarch (masculine energy) to something that isn't even matriarchal or egalitarian. What are females called when they want to become males? Transexuals. This is what happens when vocal feminists (see masculine femcels) front their liberation movement.

Jfl the penis is shaped the way it is to scoop out rival male sperm, monogamy (especially for life) isnt natural for any animal species, in fact even some species that are thought to be monogamous are only socially monogamous and theres plenty of cheating going on. Sexual monogamy is truly truly rare in animal kingdom in both gender.

Make sense tbh, after all who tf really wanna stick with the same person forever?
My father had a loyal virgin wife (more gl than him too, not just looksmatch)
But got bored of fucking her after just 4 years (and started visiting escorts).
If I had the choice id change partner every 3-7 years, cant imagine being sexually monogamous for longer than that. Cant be healthy. I believe serial monogamy is the perfect combination of variety and exclusivity.

Im not really jealous men back then have absolute control of their wife, they also have to be enlisted in war. These days life is cushy af, most of us never had to work tough jobs like men in the past nor have to be enlisted in war, so its fair were also not as privleged as they are.

 

[GowkBird]

Smart and legit.

 

[Deleted member 1042]

Jfl the penis is shaped the way it is to scoop out rival male sperm, monogamy (especially for life) isnt natural for any animal species, in fact even some species that are thought to be monogamous are only socially monogamous and theres plenty of cheating going on. Sexual monogamy is truly truly rare in animal kingdom in both gender.

Make sense tbh, after all who tf really wanna stick with the same person forever?
My father had a loyal virgin wife (more gl than him too, not just looksmatch)
But got bored of fucking her after just 4 years (and started visiting escorts).
If I had the choice id change partner every 3-7 years, cant imagine being sexually monogamous for longer than that. Cant be healthy. I believe serial monogamy is the perfect combination of variety and exclusivity.

Im not really jealous men back then have absolute control of their wife, they also have to be enlisted in war. These days life is cushy af, most of us never had to work tough jobs like men in the past nor have to be enlisted in war, so its fair were also not as privleged as they are.

Monogamy is social artifice, a compromise between the sexes and their antagonistic sexual imperatives. Serial monogamy sounds like female behavior. Desiring the best, branch swinging from one to next. Sounds like hypergamy. I imagine males engage this style only because they have difficulty getting casual sex.

We are all pussys as a result of this “cushy” life. I hate it. Men died for stupid shit in the past, died like dogs for the elites, but it was glorious. High T tbh.

 

[Deleted member 17724]

Make sense tbh, after all who tf really wanna stick with the same person forever?

Me.

 

[Player]

Some of this is agreeable. However six pack abs? Six pack abs are a health indicator. Women are programmed to like them because it is biologically favorable.

Almosr every listed itt sexually attractive part of a body is a health indicator. It is pop science.

 

[ShyManlet]

Me.

Most people thats been married for 15+ yrs are miserable af, from what I saw with. Parents and extended family, dont want tbh.
I dont see why anyone who has options wants monogamy for life, thats just madness tbh
One can only flourish in serial monogamy

Monogamy is social artifice, a compromise between the sexes and their antagonistic sexual imperatives. Serial monogamy sounds like female behavior. Desiring the best, branch swinging from one to next. Sounds like hypergamy. I imagine males engage this style only because they have difficulty getting casual sex.

We are all pussys as a result of this “cushy” life. I hate it. Men died for stupid shit in the past, died like dogs for the elites, but it was glorious. High T tbh.

It was glorious? Jfl. Truth is most died like dogs and hardly anyone even remembers them.
Unless theyre some hi ranking generals. Or did an extraordinary feat.

Whereas the foid get to stay comfy af at home, making me really unsure if men truly have it better even back then..most foids didnt have to work then, keeping house clean and cooking is hardly any work, at least now they have to try harder to snug a betabuxx..(men whos paycheck are capable of suporting a whole family are rarer now).
So im really not jealous of men in the past, since their privilege comes with expensive price, overall i dont think they have it better than us.

Serial monogamy doesnt necessarily mean im always looking for better, just looking for different, just looking for variety brah. Also doesnt mean id be fucking different broad every weekend, just new gf every 2/3 yrs would be perfect tbh.
(Of course this is all just ifs, cos in reality I cant even get gf at all)

Cause its cope thinking you wouldnt be sick of being stuck with 1 person for life.

I hardly ever see happy marriages after 15+ yrs even in conservative countries.
Most men only stick in it bcs of social pressure too (theyd be considered pos if they divorced wife even if shes bitchy af youre expected to tough it out jfl) their wife are ugly, cold and naggy, argues over everything, just lawd. Sex life would be dead after 7/8 yrs max. This is the reality of marriage even in conservative cultures.

Romance is better enjoyed in short stints. So you can feel the intoxicating buzz of new love over and over again (another benefit of serial monogamy). After some years romantic relationship just turn to a sibling / friend like relationship, the buzz dies away completely. So whats the point, especially when kids already left the nest.

 

[BlkPillPres]

Jfl the penis is shaped the way it is to scoop out rival male sperm

I don't see how that works, if it functions as a "seal" when coming out of the vaginal canal allowing it to pull out "rival male sperm", then it also functions as a "seal" going in, so it would actually just push said sperm further in from the first thrust inside, I don't think you were even thinking this through while writing it, a penis going in will push the sperm inward, the only way it could pull sperm out is if it left enough gaps to all sperm to run past it towards the shaft, but if it did that, then it would also be inefficient at scooping out sperm as the sperm would just run past it again, this just sounds like some red pill bro science BS

monogamy (especially for life) isnt natural for any animal species

That's exactly why it works so well for society, nature revolves around chaos, which is not good for having a stable and efficient society, humans never really do whats natural anyways, we do what works (when were allowed to and outside forces aren't pulling strings to keep us from doing so)

Make sense tbh, after all who tf really wanna stick with the same person forever?

I do, I would prefer it that way, a contract is mutually beneficial for both parties, also you can't have a stable society without monogamy, people have to go to work, and pour their heart and effort into making society prosper, one cannot do so effectively if their mind is elsewhere, wondering if their significant other is being faithful and their investments are going to waste, marriage just isn't a good deal anymore which is why I would not take part, but if I could get a wife in a strict islamic society (like I moved to an islamic state), yes I'd get married, because I'd have the power and authority to enforce monogamy and those societies are set up to deter infidelity (I'm sure it still happens, but at an extremely low rate), when you life is at risk for cheating, it makes it a lot less alluring

 

[truthpill]

women are barely even human

Based

Make sense tbh, after all who tf really wanna stick with the same person forever?

Me, I don't wanna die alone

 

[ShyManlet]

Me, I don't wanna die alone

Yeah. In the end only people with no option want monogamy.

That's exactly why it works so well for society, nature revolves around chaos, which is not good for having a stable and efficient society, humans never really do whats natural anyways, we do what works (when were allowed to and outside forces aren't pulling strings to keep us from doing so)

I was replying to the guy who said its not in female nature to have sex with multiple men. Lel, we all know both gender is naturally slutty with men being sluttier.

I don't see how that works, if it functions as a "seal" when coming out of the vaginal canal allowing it to pull out "rival male sperm", then it also functions as a "seal" going in, so it would actually just push said sperm further in from the first thrust inside, I don't think you were even thinking this through while writing it, a penis going in will push the sperm inward, the only way it could pull sperm out is if it left enough gaps to all sperm to run past it towards the shaft, but if it did that, then it would also be inefficient at scooping out sperm as the sperm would just run past it again, this just sounds like some red pill bro science BS

nope theres multiple research in it, google it..

 

[BlkPillPres]

we all know both gender is naturally slutty with men being sluttier.

That I agree with, anyone saying otherwise is coping, monogamy is something that was forced upon women for the "greater good"

Though I would not agree that men are "sluttier", the average man would have no problem settling for a single woman if she made him feel happy, fed him and cared for him, he would be satisfied with her alone (especially if she's "his type"), but the average woman can never truly settle or be satisfied by any man, even if he is perfection, she'll always be chasing perfection+, and then if she gets that guy she'll think about perfection++, and so on and so forth, nothing is ever enough for women and that's why their sluttiness dwarfs men's

 

[ShyManlet]

That I agree with, anyone saying otherwise is coping, monogamy is something that was forced upon women for the "greater good"

And the penis head thing, theres multiple research in it..its true

 

[needsolution]

Post-modernist feminism hasn't achieved more better relations between men and women, it has made an entire generation of poor little kids to even interact with the oppossite sex.

 

[ShyManlet]

That I agree with, anyone saying otherwise is coping, monogamy is something that was forced upon women for the "greater good"

Though I would not agree that men are "sluttier", the average man would have no problem settling for a single woman if she made him feel happy, fed him and cared for him, he would be satisfied with her alone (especially if she's "his type"), but the average woman can never truly settle or be satisfied by any man, even if he is perfection, she'll always be chasing perfection+, and then if she gets that guy she'll think about perfection++, and so on and so forth, nothing is ever enough for women and that's why their sluttiness dwarfs men's

Men is simply hornier, nothing to do with whos more likely to monkey branch, besides i disagree..the gender whos more likely to monkey branch depends on your culture..

in my country where women are expected to hold down the fort and women who initiate divorce are looked down upon..
Even if its perfectly acceptable for men to cheat..here, a lot of them would still leave their wife for prettier foid if they can afford to..because men arent shamed when we monkey branch, but if foid do this theyll be shamedd. (Aka men being dog = not surprising, non loyal foid = whore, type of mindset)

In here its the other women that will get blamed for stealing the men and ruining the family instead of the husband, with no social shaming, its no wonder plenty of men here leave their wife for younger women when they can afford it..
Id probably do the same if theres no consequences to monkey branching, im just bein honest. . . . . .

In the west, women monkey branching isnt so looked down upon + divorce laws that heavily benefit women, so its no wonder they do it as often / more than men.

To be fair, its easier for men not to monkeybranch, in many cultures, its acceptable for us to cheat, so even if the wife gets old n ugly we can stick it out for the family, while getting our dick wet by paying different stacy prostitute every week.
While for foid, cheating is an offense thatll end the whole marriage + ruin their reputation, so if they wanna fuck chad they cant do it on the side, they had to monkey branch. Just my 50 cents..

 

[DeepSea]

Im not really jealous men back then have absolute control of their wife, they also have to be enlisted in war. These days life is cushy af, most of us never had to work tough jobs like men in the past nor have to be enlisted in war, so its fair were also not as privleged as they are.

The men of the past were not privileged and neither are the men of today. For men to be allowed to exert authority over women is not any more of a privilege than for parents to be allowed to exert authority over their children.

The reason life has become easier for everyone, not just men, is because of technology, which is produced and maintained by men. Everyone benefits from technology and scientific advancement, so the fact that life has become easier is not a good argument to justify undermining male authority. If a war breaks out, men will still be the ones who will be expected to sacrifice themselves for society. Men are also still expected to protect women from crime and violence, even though they are no longer allowed to have any authority over them.

Women have always been completely dependent on men for resource provision and for protection. And they are still completely dependent on men. What is different today is that because of feminism, they are no longer dependent on individual men as providers and protectors, but instead, they depend on men collectively through the government which gives them money and many other advantages by actively discriminating against men. Feminist laws force companies to observe gender quotas and hire women in large numbers, even though men are better than women at every job that isn't related to child care or nursing. Women are the primary beneficiaries of the welfare state, so they no longer need individual men as providers and can choose to become single mothers.

It is perfectly reasonable for men to have authority over their wives and daughters because, like children, women are incapable of being responsible for society or even for themselves. If all men dropped out of the workforce or chose to only work the non-essential (often cozy) jobs that women disproportionately do, society would collapse. Without men to provide for them, most women would be almost as helpless as children, The problem is a lack of authority. Responsibility without authority is slavery, authority without responsibility is tyranny. If men stopped being cucks, they would realize that men are currently slaves and women tyrants.

Jfl the penis is shaped the way it is to scoop out rival male sperm, monogamy (especially for life) isnt natural for any animal species, in fact even some species that are thought to be monogamous are only socially monogamous and theres plenty of cheating going on. Sexual monogamy is truly truly rare in animal kingdom in both gender.

Monogamy may not be natural, but neither is clothing, plastic, or steel. That doesn't mean those things are not beneficial. Primitive human societies that closely resemble those of our hunter-gather ancestors, such as Australian aboriginals or African bushmen, tend to be polygamous or promiscuous, but those societies are clearly inferior in spite of being more "true to nature". If almost every man has a stake in society by being given the opportunity to have a wife and reproduce, men will be more motivated to cooperate with each other for the benefit of the greater good. Sexually frustrated men tend to be demoralized and uncooperative.

Make sense tbh, after all who tf really wanna stick with the same person forever?

According to this study, women's sexual desire declined on average after marriage, while men's desire generally stayed constant. Because of their hypergamy, women are much less inclined towards monogamy than men and much more likely to initiate breakups and divorces. Although men's attraction to their partners probably does decline after many years of marriage, it does not disappear completely. Even elderly men often retain some desire for their wives.

I believe serial monogamy is the perfect combination of variety and exclusivity.

It makes no sense for a man to spend lots of time and money on a woman, only to break off the relationship after a few years and find someone else. Serial monogamy benefits women far more than it benefits men. Attractive men are in short supply and in high demand. By practicing serial monogamy, every woman can get to enjoy the exclusive temporary commitment of attractive men. Most women would rather have a chad for one month than a normie for one year.

My father had a loyal virgin wife (more gl than him too, not just looksmatch)
But got bored of fucking her after just 4 years (and started visiting escorts).
If I had the choice id change partner every 3-7 years, cant imagine being sexually monogamous for longer than that. Cant be healthy.

I don't see how that would be an argument against monogamy. Men are much better able to compartmentalize love and sex than women, so it should not be considered cheating for a married man to visit a prostitute. In most monogamous societies throughout history, prostitution was legal, but prostitutes were stigmatized and ostracized by society. As long as women have to pay a high price for being promiscuous and violating monogamous norms, I don't think married men should be discouraged from sleeping with prostitutes as long as they don't actually have affairs with them.

 

[DoctorBlythe]

Make sense tbh, after all who tf really wanna stick with the same person forever?

Me. I know it's possible to feel incredibly attached and attracted to someone for a long time, my parents have been together for almost 40 years and they still act like newlyweds. I would love to experience something like this.

 

[BlkPillPres]

Men is simply hornier, nothing to do with whos more likely to monkey branch

Monkey branching is what defines a slut, a slut isn't merely a person who has sex a lot, a slut is a person who has sex with A LOT OF DIFFERENT PEOPLE

So I think you are misunderstanding the term "slut"

I mean would you call a woman who only had sex with her husband, at an interval of twice per day every day, a "slut"?

JFL that wouldn't make sense, its not being hornier that makes someone a slut, its being "pickier", going from person to person, that makes someone a slut

Sluttiness has everything to do with who is more likely to monkey branch, in fact that act is what defines slutty behaviour, not just being horny and wanting to fuck

A faithful horny woman/man is not a slut

 

[ShyManlet]

Monkey branching is what defines a slut, a slut isn't merely a person who has sex a lot, a slut is a person who has sex with A LOT OF DIFFERENT PEOPLE

So I think you are misunderstanding the term "slut"

I mean would you call a woman who only had sex with her husband, at an interval of twice per day every day, a "slut"?

JFL that wouldn't make sense, its not being hornier that makes someone a slut, its being "pickier", going from person to person, that makes someone a slut

Sluttiness has everything to do with who is more likely to monkey branch, in fact that act is what defines slutty behaviour, not just being horny and wanting to fuck

A faithful horny woman/man is not a slut

Who gives a fuck about all of these, doe??

All the reply I typed
And you pick over one sentence, jfl, why do you care if men are sluttier anyway, its not like the word slut its an insult to us. I was just sayin 'sluttier' why do you have to dig real deep into it, youre overthinking fr, now i honestly wonder how do you function in rl

I give up arguing with you, it fucks up my already bad mood. Real unproductive
Although you do make some pretty interesting thread here and there, Youre still annoying. Calm it down a bit..

 

[BlkPillPres]

Let me get the important part out of the way:

As for the argument that the male penis head shape is because its supposed to scoop out other mens sperm, that's complete BS, it literally doesn't make any sense if you actually think about it (or should I say "over think" lol), the vaginal canal already functions as its own spermicide, the acidity level makes it so that sperm left there only lasts around 12 hours, the only sperm that have a chance of surviving are those that make it to the cervix, uterus or the fallopian tubes, nobodies dick is making it there to scoop out anything JFL

FAST SPERM CAN REACH THE EGG IN 30 MINS, SLOWER SPERM WOULD TAKE DAYS

WHEN SPERM PENETRATES AN EGG ITS SURFACE CHANGES SO THAT NO OTHER SPERM CAN PENETRATE

So its quality of sperm that matters, not shape of the penis head, unless you are arguing guys are just lining up and immediately fucking said woman one after the other, and somehow these men are just calm and orderly waiting their turn rather than just killing the competition

So you are quite literally arguing that it was the norm for men to somehow line up in an orderly fashion, watch another guy creampie his perspective mate, and then proceed to fuck her on the hopes that he'd scoop some out and impregnate her instead, what you're saying makes no sense, its complete nonsense, if the first guy who cum in her is fertile and his sperm are healthy and afst, and his sperm makes its way into her womb, he's already won, unless another guy fucks her IMMEDIATELY after the first guy ejaculates the first guy has already won, because his sperm has a huge head start, so unless his sperm is defective (slow swimmers) then the other guy even right after has no chance, so there would be no reason for the shape to adapt for the purpose of "scooping" when scooping doesn't result in any increase in chances to reproduce

Like seriously think about what you are saying and how retarded it is, were men in the past seriously just chill about other men fucking their women, do women just always randomly get kidnapped and raped a few minutes after fucking another guy, were gangbangs the norm and humans did "breeding partys" JFL, that's the only way "scooping" would make sense

why do you care if men are sluttier anyway, its not like the word slut its an insult to us.

It creates the false narrative that men are actually worse than women and just projecting our actions onto women, if false narratives like that keep being spread then they just become tools to quickly shut down conversations and debates

Guy: (brings up study)
Woman: Yeah yeah yeah, didn't you hear, its men who are sluttier, men are way hornier than women anyways

Why would you want a falsehood to be spread

why do you have to dig real deep into it, youre overthinking fr

Although you do make some pretty interesting thread here and there

Ironically the threads are interesting because I "dig real deep into it"

 

[ShyManlet]

As long as women have to pay a high price for being promiscuous and violating monogamous norms, I don't think married men should be discouraged from sleeping with prostitutes as long as they don't actually have affairs with them.

Lol.. now that foid have to work and contribute financially to the household, ofc they dont want such a deal...

the only foid that will be ok with this is probably the one who didnt have to contribute financially / where the men is more attractive / ugly foid who have no better option than to have a man that cheats on her.

Nowadays unless youre chad, cheating means high probability of losing custody of your kids and half your assets due to divorce.

And only if youre at least hi tier normie, you can make foid agree to have kids with you without marrying her.

Nowadays as you said that they could easily land a cushy job and get into short term relationship with attractive men why would they stay with a cheating husband instead..?

Back then women cant have a job. And therefore rely 100% on the men for a living. It aint no wonder they tolerate cheating, they really didnt have a choice. Hell back then there werent no fault divorce either. So they literally cant divorce if they wanted to.

Imagine having to work, contribute financially to your family like your husband do, on top of taking care of family, pleasing your husband, but only he gets to cheat.
Honestly no one would take such a deal unless, as I said the men is higher value / relying on husband for a living / women with low self esteem (uggos)

Most women in the right mind simply wont do this.., back then when cheating was tolerated women dont have to work. And cant work even if they wanted to.

Now we cant go back to those time, so that whole paragraph you type is just a pipe dream.....the second women can have cushy jobs and sex outside of marriage are no longer looked down upon, the whole dynamic of what theyll tolerate and what we can get away with shifted. Im talking realistically here.

 

[Deleted member 1042]

Cause its cope thinking you wouldnt be sick of being stuck with 1 person for life.

Who the fuck said otherwise? This is an incel forum. Most here just want to experience it once, and then go from there. Most men do not have his pick of the litter with options, which is partly why men even go along with monogamy. Might as well just fuck escorts if you want variety. Nothing wrong with that.