JFL The left ethno sovereign paradox (blood and soil)

[AsiaCel]

@blackpillednigga
@DarkStarDown

I came across a hilariously ironic thread in a socialist subreddit, about the topic of ethnocultural sovereign territories.

The idea of blood (a people) is linked to a soil (a country or a place) is contradictory to the leftist idea that the planet belongs to everyone.

Ironically, that has caused some of the leftists to take on the position of right wing idea of *blood and soil*.

A good example is the israel-Palenstine war - a far right, Islamic theocracy, against a centre-left Israel, with it's LGBT rights and feminism.

Watch the leftists explode their heads trying to argue they are not right wing "blood and soilers".


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/Socialism_101/comments/vdvtou/nativeamerican_blood_and_soil/

 

[AsiaCel]

Yeah land shouldn’t be tied to any ethnic group, but to the people who live there

Even on one comment, if a land belong to the people who live there, then leftists, advocating for open borders, would be contradictory. If everyone can migrate freely to any places, then what value does "belonging" holds?

 

[blackpillednigga]

communists and fascists only difference is being internationalist vs nationalist

 

[lifesucksandyoudie]

Bunkertroons have no principles other than USA bad, they'll go against their beliefs for this. They will promote nationalism for the underdogs under the boots of ZOG imperialists and other oppressors to liberate them, which I actually agree with. But at the same time they will be against ethnonationalism and separatism for anyone else despite having the same types of goals and outcomes as the prior national liberation struggles. Most of them are too historically illiterate to realize with the how frequently humans migrate, hardly any ethnic groups were the first peoples to inhabit a land. They fail to understand their reasoning for supporting their cause is shallow and ill informed too.