Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The benefit Islam would have to Incels: they would be reminded less of what they can't have.

Urlaubsinsel

Urlaubsinsel

Agecucks' IQ is the age of consent.
Joined
Nov 17, 2024
Posts
558
Online time
19h 59m
(Note: I am not a muslim.) From what I've read in earlier threads, whether an Islamic society would benefit involuntary celibates is inconclusive and controversial, however, there is one benefit it certainly would have: Women covering their hair and bodies would prevent incels from being constantly reminded of what they can't have.

For similar reasons, if I were to go through school again, I would prefer not having beautiful women as my teachers.

What's the point of looking at beautiful women in public if you can't have physical contact with them? All they leave behind is an empty void of unfulfilled romantic and erotic desires.

If I wanted to look at beautiful women, I am just one image search away. But this is not a substitute for the physical proximity. This is why I find the ideas of "telephone sex" and "AI girlfriends" incredibly stupid. They are nothing close to a substitute for the physical touch and intimacy with a real woman. Even sex workers do not provide the sense that you are actually being desired for who you are. You'd always have in the back of your mind that she does this because you are paying her, not voluntarily.

Women who are bothered by appearing on photographs in public should dress accordingly. Here in Germany, we have a feminist wanting to criminalize public photographing where women with little clothing appear, even in the background, because she considers it "sexualizing women against their will". In reality, she was the one sexualizing herself.

How about this moralfag takes responsibility for her life choices and covers herself in public? She is running away from accountability and shifting the blame. And such a law would effectively let a woman censor public photography by standing in the way. For example, a minimally clothed woman could stand at a public place that is normally covered by the freedom of panorama, and say "haha, now you can't take photos anymore!"

Also, she obviously wouldn't be bothered by Porsche drivers taking pictures of her. She is only bothered if men she finds unattractive do it.

FACEandLMS said:
Why do women put so much effort into their styling, make-up, and hair, and try their best to show off their cleavage, figure, and skin, yet react hostile and find it uncomfortable or an insult when some men look?

Although some of the reason is to compete with other women, a lot of that effort is for Chad [men with good genes]. It's not so much that women hate being objectified, but rather, they hate being objectified by guys that they don't find good-looking. [...]

The fact that non-good-looking guys can also see their showy display is an unwanted side effect.
(source: WAW2: Women hate when non-goodlooking guys approach - FACEandLMS, 11:27)

I hereby release this post into the public domain, CC0 1.0
 
Last edited:
Pretty much stops after that a lot of times.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →