Theory ted K is right about society and power

[Raider919]

83. Some people partly satisfy their need for power by identifying themselves with
a powerful organization or mass movement. An individual lacking goals or power joins
(1) References footnote 11 again.

27

a movement or an organization, adopts its goals as his own, then works toward these

goals. When some of the goals are attained, the individual, even though his personal ef-
forts have played only an insignificant part in the attainment of the goals, feels (through

his identification with the movement or organization) as if he had gone through the

power process. This phenomenon was exploited by the Fascists, Nazis and Commu-
nists. Our society uses it too, though less crudely.

dude the notion of being a good little soycialist being a surrogate activity for the power process is something I've thought of, just not as refined as teddy k here put it



each and every one of you who fails to comply with the progs/systemic faggotard christcuckold beta controllers is resistance in and of itself

 

[ElTruecel]

Everything Ted K was right JFL he was a complete revolutionary though

 

[Zogpilled]

He was ahead of his time he seen the writing on wall and knew society was fucked

 

[JuliusEvola]

i wish he was still alive so i could send him a letter, i saw he wrote back to people

 

[SoycuckGodOfReddit]

meh, it's a simplification

normies are tribalistic, and already identify with their communities. they don't have a clear sense of individuality. so of course they identify with orgs, with society, with communities, and so on.

it doesn't matter if they 'contribute' at all, sportsball fans will generally be invested in the fortune of 'their' side, and normies will try to conform and be deeply invested in social norms