Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Soy “stop complaining about hypergamy, it’s just female nature"

MaxZM98

MaxZM98

Socially constructed loser
★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
4,297
stop complaining about rape. it’s just male nature.

now do you see how retarded your argument sounds, PUA fucks? apparently it doesn’t matter how damaging female nature is, we should just go along with it and not call it out because it’s just their nature.
 
i wouldn't say hypergamy is womens nature but rather a culture if im gonna sound like a professor here rn imma call it "toxic feminity" And it gotten way worse with womens liberation movements and feminism
yep, I think hypergamy is natural but our society has blown it WAAAAAAAAY out of proportion. hypergamy is a toxic female trait.
 
i wouldn't say hypergamy is womens nature but rather a culture if im gonna sound like a professor here rn imma call it "toxic feminity" And it gotten way worse with womens liberation movements and feminism
based
 
yep, I think hypergamy is natural but our society has blown it WAAAAAAAAY out of proportion. hypergamy is a toxic female trait.
It was always a severe problem. In past something like 1 man reproduced for every 17 women.
 
stop complaining about rape. it’s just male nature.

now do you see how retarded your argument sounds, PUA fucks? apparently it doesn’t matter how damaging female nature is, we should just go along with it and not call it out because it’s just their nature.
Ultra based thread ngl
 
It was always a severe problem. In past something like 1 man reproduced for every 17 women.
in the past I think males fought with other males and took the women for themselves, so it was mainly males preventing other males from reproducing (look at apes)
 
If all people did whats in their nature, oh boy no one would be safe.
 
i wouldn't say hypergamy is womens nature but rather a culture if im gonna sound like a professor here rn imma call it "toxic feminity" And it gotten way worse with womens liberation movements and feminism
It is their very nature, since day one the first woman would spread her legs wide open for whatever male could hunt her down food, build her shelter, make fire, and protect her from animal or other human male predators. Females practically invented capitalism where vaginal capitalism capitalizing on men that can provide for them is as old as time itself. There was no need for the serpent to tempt or corrupt Eve concerning the Abrahamic religious tradition, that bitch was corrupt from her very biological inception already and all females that followed afterward. :feelsjuice:
 
Last edited:
It is their very nature, since day one the first woman would spread her legs wide open for whatever male could hunt her down food, build her shelter, make fire, and protect her from animal or other human male predators. Females practically invented capitalism where vaginal capitalism capitalizing on men that can provide for them is as old as time itself. :feelsjuice:
should be taught in kindergarden
 
should be taught in kindergarden
Foid teachers wouldn't allow it obviously in the new age of totalitarian wokeism, the greatest trick in history was convincing men that female human nature is that of largely selfless angelic like virtuous innocence. Women are master bullshit artists with words, but a smart man learns to ignore their words entirely and observe their actions because their words never ever synchronize with their own applied actions or behaviors. :feelsjuice:
 
Last edited:
I have no problem with hypergamy, it is just selective pressure on the species. Some animals like birds, get traits selected that are sexually appealing but end up making them easier to hunt.

The problem is that they deemed it okay (even good or "moral) and yet when men try to utilize their evolutionary strategies like dominance, we not only get vilified but even get our lives destroyed.

Fuck any system that allows this scenario to exist.
 
I have no problem with hypergamy, it is just selective pressure on the species. Some animals like birds, get traits selected that are sexually appealing but end up making them easier to hunt.

The problem is that they deemed it okay (even good or "moral) and yet when men try to utilize their evolutionary strategies like dominance, we not only get vilified but even get our lives destroyed.

Fuck any system that allows this scenario to exist.
Sexual hypergamy is an extension of vaginal capitalism, and just like our own economic capitalism completely unregulated without any oversight or limits can destroy entire nations overnight, likewise, vaginal capitalism of women in regards to reproduction tied with population demographics and even in regards to maintaining political social order can be equally disastrous unregulated without limits imposed. There needs to be a balance between the sexes, but unlimited sexual hypergamy or vaginal capitalism of females has inexplicably destroyed any semblance of balance to which we're dealing with the fallout of that currently. :feelsjuice:
 
Last edited:
Sexual hypergamy is an extension of vaginal capitalism, and just like our own economic capitalism completely unregulated without any oversight or limits can destroy entire nations overnight, likewise, vaginal capitalism of women in regards to reproduction tied with population demographics and even in regards to maintaining political social order can be equally disastrous unregulated without limits imposed. There needs to be a balance between the sexes, but unlimited sexual hypergamy or vaginal capitalism of females has inexplicably destroyed any semblance of balance to which we're dealing with the fallout of that currently. :feelsjuice:
High IQ
 
Sexual hypergamy is an extension of vaginal capitalism, and just like our own economic capitalism completely unregulated without any oversight or limits can destroy entire nations overnight, likewise, vaginal capitalism of women in regards to reproduction tied with population demographics and even in regards to maintaining political social order can be equally disastrous unregulated without limits imposed. There needs to be a balance between the sexes, but unlimited sexual hypergamy or vaginal capitalism of females has inexplicably destroyed any semblance of balance to which we're dealing with the fallout of that currently. :feelsjuice:
I disagree.

The sexual market is regulated, by women. That is why it is fucked.

Just like how our economic systems are regulated, by the government. What are TAXES, what are regulations, what are lobbyists?

Capitalism is an economic system, not a socio-political one. I'm sick of people inter-playing the two.

When the sexual market was regulated by men in whatever community they existed, the patriarchy was used to curb both men and women. John Doe had to be a good provider to get Becky's dad to approve of the marriage. They taught Becky that if she was a whore, no man would want her.

Traditional conservative cultures used to practice this exact method of quasi-arranged marriage.

The system we have now is socialism, which is a political model, not an economic one.

When women cry to the government about inequality and the large, overbearing government changes the laws to make things "equal", how is any part of that a free market economy?

Affirmative Action, Quotas, funding feminist organizations, etc. How is this a capitalist system? At what part can you say, "No, I refuse to pay for this shit"? Never, then it isn't a voluntary system. That is capitalism.

Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit. Central characteristics of capitalism include capital accumulation, competitive markets, a price system, private property and the recognition of property rights, voluntary exchange and wage labor. In a capitalist market economy, decision-making and investments are determined by owners of wealth, property, or production ability in capital and financial markets—whereas prices and the distribution of goods and services are mainly determined by competition in goods and services markets.

The key part there is voluntary exchange.

Tell me again, what part of this socialist shit hole of a western system is voluntary?

Are women pragmatic in the sense they will abuse the power given to them? ABSOLUTELY.

Did we not know that giving voting rights to the masses would end in the complete decay of society? OF COURSE, WE DID.

"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy.” ― George Orwell, 1984.

They are the foot soldiers of the PARTY. The Party is made up of people that are using women as tools, to enforce the very caste system that has killed millions of people in human history and has created more slaves than other systems.

Men gave women voting rights, the same men who sought to take advantage of their emotionality and pragmatic selfishness, the government grew and is now a gun, that can be aimed at any group that is a threat to the STATE.

How can you sit on a thread, on the backwater of the internet, and argue we live in an unregulated environment? The same site that is supposedly a honey pot for GLOWS?

Women (LIKE MOST LIFE ON EARTH) are pragmatic opportunists. They vote left as a group, to regulate every facet of the modern economy, from AA to Women in STEM. If they didn't have political power in the first place, we wouldn't have this problem.

To continue, if the argument is that they want the best option for reproduction, I give you the literal definition for survival;

To survive, all organisms must compete for resources. Competition is the struggle among organisms (plants or animals) to survive in an ecosystem with limited resources. All organisms have basic needs: they need to get energy and water, they need to reproduce, and they need enough space. But there often aren't enough resources for everyone to survive. Organisms with the best adaptations are the ones who can compete for the best. They are the ones who survive.

Capitalism is a product of limited resources and therefore depends on limited resources. Everything is a scarce good in economic terms and free markets are the best way of distributing and allocating such scarce goods.

If based on this, we are all capitalists, we will all operate in a way that improves our own position. Even women are using a strategy to improve their own position. Life is inherently capitalist because it needs to compete to survive.

The problem, as I stated before is when one side may circumvent the restrictions placed on the other by effectively "regulating" what the other may do. It is not immoral to do so, but just like how women don't want to date their looks match, men do not need to support a system that treats them like shit.

Of course, if the scenario went the other way, the women would be the ones complaining. But men are stupid and as my example before, gave women the power to be hypergamous as possible. THEY GAVE IT TO THEM.

And now women regulate the dating market by making the vast majority of men unneeded. The big daddy government replaced the vast majority of men. These women make their own money, can have abortions on demand, have unlimited access to men online, and are given special treatment in the job market. How the fuck can any man compete? You can't outwork AA or undercut HR for a job.

We live in the most regulated time in history (IF YOU ARE A MAN).
 
I disagree.

The sexual market is regulated, by women. That is why it is fucked.

Just like how our economic systems are regulated, by the government. What are TAXES, what are regulations, what are lobbyists?

Capitalism is an economic system, not a socio-political one. I'm sick of people inter-playing the two.

When the sexual market was regulated by men in whatever community they existed, the patriarchy was used to curb both men and women. John Doe had to be a good provider to get Becky's dad to approve of the marriage. They taught Becky that if she was a whore, no man would want her.

Traditional conservative cultures used to practice this exact method of quasi-arranged marriage.

The system we have now is socialism, which is a political model, not an economic one.

When women cry to the government about inequality and the large, overbearing government changes the laws to make things "equal", how is any part of that a free market economy?

Affirmative Action, Quotas, funding feminist organizations, etc. How is this a capitalist system? At what part can you say, "No, I refuse to pay for this shit"? Never, then it isn't a voluntary system. That is capitalism.

Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit. Central characteristics of capitalism include capital accumulation, competitive markets, a price system, private property and the recognition of property rights, voluntary exchange and wage labor. In a capitalist market economy, decision-making and investments are determined by owners of wealth, property, or production ability in capital and financial markets—whereas prices and the distribution of goods and services are mainly determined by competition in goods and services markets.

The key part there is voluntary exchange.

Tell me again, what part of this socialist shit hole of a western system is voluntary?

Are women pragmatic in the sense they will abuse the power given to them? ABSOLUTELY.

Did we not know that giving voting rights to the masses would end in the complete decay of society? OF COURSE, WE DID.

"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy.” ― George Orwell, 1984.

They are the foot soldiers of the PARTY. The Party is made up of people that are using women as tools, to enforce the very caste system that has killed millions of people in human history and has created more slaves than other systems.

Men gave women voting rights, the same men who sought to take advantage of their emotionality and pragmatic selfishness, the government grew and is now a gun, that can be aimed at any group that is a threat to the STATE.

How can you sit on a thread, on the backwater of the internet, and argue we live in an unregulated environment? The same site that is supposedly a honey pot for GLOWS?

Women (LIKE MOST LIFE ON EARTH) are pragmatic opportunists. They vote left as a group, to regulate every facet of the modern economy, from AA to Women in STEM. If they didn't have political power in the first place, we wouldn't have this problem.

To continue, if the argument is that they want the best option for reproduction, I give you the literal definition for survival;

To survive, all organisms must compete for resources. Competition is the struggle among organisms (plants or animals) to survive in an ecosystem with limited resources. All organisms have basic needs: they need to get energy and water, they need to reproduce, and they need enough space. But there often aren't enough resources for everyone to survive. Organisms with the best adaptations are the ones who can compete for the best. They are the ones who survive.

Capitalism is a product of limited resources and therefore depends on limited resources. Everything is a scarce good in economic terms and free markets are the best way of distributing and allocating such scarce goods.

If based on this, we are all capitalists, we will all operate in a way that improves our own position. Even women are using a strategy to improve their own position. Life is inherently capitalist because it needs to compete to survive.

The problem, as I stated before is when one side may circumvent the restrictions placed on the other by effectively "regulating" what the other may do. It is not immoral to do so, but just like how women don't want to date their looks match, men do not need to support a system that treats them like shit.

Of course, if the scenario went the other way, the women would be the ones complaining. But men are stupid and as my example before, gave women the power to be hypergamous as possible. THEY GAVE IT TO THEM.

And now women regulate the dating market by making the vast majority of men unneeded. The big daddy government replaced the vast majority of men. These women make their own money, can have abortions on demand, have unlimited access to men online, and are given special treatment in the job market. How the fuck can any man compete? You can't outwork AA or undercut HR for a job.

We live in the most regulated time in history (IF YOU ARE A MAN).
Oh, where to start with this well thought out reply.........:feelshehe:

Before the advent of feminism historically, men regulated the sexual marketplace of women completely since women have the extra value of being able to replicate other human beings something which men do not possess because the ancient man knew that women have all the power of the human world at their complete utter disposability through sexuality alone. It makes perfect sense really since men are the biological sexual proletariat, why would you want to give or hand over any power whatsoever to the sexual vaginal capitalist that is women?

With the advent of feminism by men being the sexual proletariat giving all the power to the sexual vaginal capitalist that is women the sexual proletariat of men have been under the whip and losing side ever since. The whole privatization of female sexual utility has essentially been fucking over men for decades. Yes, the sexual market is completely regulated by women currently but historically speaking this wasn't always the case.

There is virtually no difference between socialism and crony capitalism, under socialism the government controls the populace completely through direct central control, under crony capitalism private corporations control the government which controls the populace completely through direct central control. Very few differences and I for one don't fall for the whole socialism versus capitalism, or capitalism versus socialism bullshit divide, both have the same final destination concerning ambitions it's just there are trivial differences both systems take along the way in getting to that final destination.

Free market economy is largely illusionary, it's not real. Free will and volunteerism aren't real either even if people wished that they were.

No, all human behavior or social interactions is purely based upon force, coercion, blackmail, the threat of violence, and incentive. Free will or volunteerism has very little to do with anything.

The very nature of capitalism is greed, competition, ruthless social Darwinism, and individual apathy or indifference for the greater collective cohesion of society.
 
stop complaining about rape. it’s just male nature.

now do you see how retarded your argument sounds, PUA fucks? apparently it doesn’t matter how damaging female nature is, we should just go along with it and not call it out because it’s just their nature.
the difference here is that there's nothing wrong with intraracial rape
 
Oh, where to start with this well thought out reply.........:feelshehe:

Before the advent of feminism historically, men regulated the sexual marketplace of women completely since women have the extra value of being able to replicate other human beings something which men do not possess because the ancient man knew that women have all the power of the human world at their complete utter disposability through sexuality alone. It makes perfect sense really since men are the biological sexual proletariat, why would you want to give or hand over any power whatsoever to the sexual vaginal capitalist that is women?
I agree, in terms of our post-patriarchal society. That is why we didn't allow them to engage in open hypergamy in the past via a biased system that changes the very nature of the social fabric.

With the advent of feminism by men being the sexual proletariat giving all the power to the sexual vaginal capitalist that is women the sexual proletariat of men have been under the whip and losing side ever since. The whole privatization of female sexual utility has essentially been fucking over men for decades. Yes, the sexual market is completely regulated by women currently but historically speaking this wasn't always the case.
I agreed.

There is virtually no difference between socialism and crony capitalism, under socialism the government controls the populace completely through direct central control, under crony capitalism private corporations control the government which controls the populace completely through direct central control. Very few differences and I for one don't fall for the whole socialism versus capitalism, or capitalism versus socialism bullshit divide, both have the same final destination concerning ambitions it's just there are trivial differences both systems take along the way in getting to that final destination.
I agree, the result is the same. But crony capitalism and socialism are two sides of the same coin. Both require big government and whatever group will abuse that government can buy or coerce it. In our timeline, it's multinationals that lobby and feminism who are most of the voting base. My point was that either system requires domination of those who don't accept it, that the foot soldiers, the women enforce.

Free market economy is largely illusionary, it's not real. Free will and volunteerism aren't real either even if people wished that they were.

No, all human behavior or social interactions is purely based upon force, coercion, blackmail, the threat of violence, and incentive. Free will or volunteerism has very little to do with anything.
To an extent, I agree that voluntarism is impossible as humans are completely self-interested. The whole point of society is not to descend to that point by separating power. But we both know that any human system will decay into self-destructive hedonism because it is about dominance/power over others. "That wasn't real communism" == "That wasn't real capitalism", but one is clearly superior to the other.

In conclusion, regardless of the economic system, the socio-political system is the one being weaponized.

The very nature of capitalism is greed, competition, ruthless social Darwinism, and individual apathy or indifference for the greater collective cohesion of society.
Just like nature intended, I agree.

Women could do jack shit if the government wasn't big enough to enforce feminism.

Hypergamy is a biological function, we restricted it to enable social cohesion, in the same way, we now enforce a zero-tolerance policy of male violence and male evolutionary strategies; we stopped the female restriction and now we are fucked.
 
@RebornMordred26
I agree, in terms of our post-patriarchal society. That is why we didn't allow them to engage in open hypergamy in the past via a biased system that changes the very nature of the social fabric.
Yes. :feelsjuice:

I agree, the result is the same. But crony capitalism and socialism are two sides of the same coin. Both require big government and whatever group will abuse that government can buy or coerce it. In our timeline, it's multinationals that lobby and feminism who are most of the voting base. My point was that either system requires domination of those who don't accept it, that the foot soldiers, the women enforce.
Both systems are not even coherent systems whatsoever in any sense, they're both expressions of need concerning the whims of the world's elites, when the elites need to socialize losses on the greater population they impose socialism trying to hold everything together in terms of existential crisis which is why often socialism fails because in every socialist historical era the losses become so insurmountable in terms of organized chaos leaving much of nothing in society to salvage, restore, or politically reform. In more aggressive expansionary times in terms of wealth or productivity economic capitalism is the preferred imposition on society, however, this process always devolves into crony capitalism, then late-stage capitalism, and finally collapse to which socialism is rushed out hastily hoping to stave off collapse, but in almost all cases fail devolving further into despotism. Both systems merely a negative feedback loop into each other reflecting nothing more than the current mood, tempo, and feelings of the whims of the elites to which everybody under their control concerning population prisoners held in a captive state under the banner of the citizenry. :feelsjuice:

The multinationals themselves don't actually believe in their own propagandized social utopia whether it is a capitalistic or communistic flavoring, at least the very top anyways, they are people whose ideology is pure unadulterated power, and over time they've come to understand the mental sentiments of the population of slaves they command, their strategy that of preying upon the wishes, hopes, dreams, ambitions, and aspirations of those they command but of course for a profit to further enrich themselves. Feminism was a perfect weaponized ideology, it got rid of the single-income household initially dropping wages significantly with the introduction of females into the workforce, it further divided men and women from each other to the point of devastating the population demographically as intended reducing overall reproduction of useless eating labor human livestock or cattle, and finally on a psychological level raised the female worker to surpass male ones due to the feminine disposition to mindlessly follow in social conformity in total obedience under authority thus psychologically neutering men effectively to which was unable to be implemented previously with a majority male workforce. But of course, the long-term consequence of this is a burdensome aging population in the majority with no significant number of younger people to replace them in the birth, life, and death cycle. And of course presently a majority male population of sexless involuntary celibate men on top of all that who are ungovernable with the entire framework of current society on the precipice of total collapse staring over a cliff into the abyss. For what worked in the very beginning no matter how perverse effectively is now the very thing that is guaranteed to destroy the entirety of everything presently. :feelsclown:
 
Last edited:
Yes. :feelsjuice:


Both systems are not even coherent systems whatsoever in any sense, they're both expressions of need concerning the whims of the world's elites, when the elites need to socialize losses on the greater population they impose socialism trying to hold everything together in terms of existential crisis which is why often socialism fails because in every socialist historical era the losses become so insurmountable in terms of organized chaos leaving much of nothing in society to salvage, restore, or politically reform. In more aggressive expansionary times in terms of wealth or productivity economic capitalism is the preferred imposition on society, however, this process always devolves into crony capitalism, then late-stage capitalism, and finally collapse to which socialism is rushed out hastily hoping to stave off collapse, but in almost all cases fail devolving further into despotism. Both systems merely a negative feedback loop into each other reflecting nothing more than the current mood, tempo, and feelings of the whims of the elites to which everybody under their control concerning population prisoners held in a captive state under the banner of the citizenry. :feelsjuice:

The multinationals themselves don't actually believe in their own propagandized social utopia whether it is a capitalistic or communistic flavoring, at least the very top anyways, they are people whose ideology is pure unadulterated power, and over time they've come to understand the mental sentiments of the population of slaves they command, their strategy that of preying upon the wishes, hopes, dreams, ambitions, and aspirations of those they command but of course for a profit to further enrich themselves. Feminism was a perfect weaponized ideology, it got rid of the single-income household initially dropping wages significantly with the introduction of females into the workforce, it further divided men and women from each other to the point of devastating the population demographically as intended reducing overall reproduction of useless eating labor human livestock or cattle, and finally on a psychological level raised the female worker to surpass male ones due to the feminine disposition to mindlessly follow in social conformity in total obedience under authority thus psychologically neutering men effectively to which was unable to be implemented previously with a majority male workforce. But of course, the long-term consequence of this is a burdensome aging population in the majority with no significant number of younger people to replace them in the birth, life, and death cycle. And of course presently a majority male population of sexless involuntary celibate men on top of all that who are ungovernable with the entire framework of current society on the precipice of total collapse staring over a cliff into the abyss. For what worked in the very beginning no matter how perverse effectively is now the very thing that is guaranteed to destroy the entirety of everything presently. :feelsclown:
100% agree.

It is definitely a people problem.
 
100% agree.

It is definitely a people problem.
Utopia no matter what ideology or flavoring it is given was never meant for humanity, an untenable final destination which in ancient Greek literally translates into nowhere or no such place. Human beings concerning traditional narratives literally transformed the Garden Of Eden into a desert barren wasteland shortly after inhabiting it and should human beings ever create paradise on earth which is highly doubtful it would be extremely temporary or fleeting for we human beings would be quick to destroy it instantaneously. Of course, those who are at the top of this whole sultry grand pyramid scheme known as humanity know all of this well in advance all too well, but they don't care, for their role in all of this is constant predation picking at the bones or dead carcass of humanity further empowering themselves to which their only desire is to continue on in this parasitic scavenging lifestyle of theirs indefinitely for as however long as they can. :feelsjuice::feelsclown:
 
Last edited:
stop complaining about rape. it’s just male nature.

now do you see how retarded your argument sounds, PUA fucks? apparently it doesn’t matter how damaging female nature is, we should just go along with it and not call it out because it’s just their nature.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top